Lefort II distraction with zygomatic repositioning versus Lefort III distraction: A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications

Long-term photogrammetric outcomes of midface advancement in Apert syndrome: are we nearing normal?

BACKGROUND

The aesthetic goals of midface surgery in Apert syndrome are to correct the multi-planar midface deficiency and normalize facial ratios. This study characterizes the long-term photogrammetric outcomes of midface advancement in Apert syndrome.

METHODS

Patients with Apert syndrome who underwent midface distraction from 2000 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Soft tissue measurements were applied to preoperative (T0), short-term postoperative (T1), and long-term postoperative (T2) photographs. Long-term changes were compared between subcranial and transcranial procedures, segmental and non-segmental osteotomies, and individual techniques. Frontal facial dimensions at time T2 were compared to age- and sex-matched normal controls from the NIMH-ChEFS face database.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had postoperative follow-up of T1 = 0.6 ± 0.4 and T2 = 4.7 ± 1.1 years and were compared to 40 normal controls. From time T0 to T2, middle facial third height increased (26.1 ± 3.0% to 27.8 ± 2.6%, p = 0.026), canthal tilt improved (- 7.6° ± 3.7° to - 3.9° ± 4.4°, p < 0.001), and facial convexity increased (182.9° ± 6.2° to 167.9° ± 8.6°, p < 0.001). From time T1 to T2, facial convexity flattened (159.4° ± 10.1° to 167.9° ± 8.6°, p < 0.001). Compared to controls, patients at time T2 had shorter middle facial third height (27.8 ± 2.6% vs. 32.0 ± 1.9%, p < 0.001) and reverse canthal tilt (- 3.9° ± 4.4° vs. 5.4° ± 2.6°, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A tailored treatment approach to the Apert midface yields varying degrees of resolution of central midfacial shortening, canthal tilt, and facial concavity at 5 years postoperatively. A slight reduction in facial convexity over time, likely reflecting pseudorelapse in the setting of sagittal overcorrection, should be anticipated. Greater utilization of segmental osteotomies may bring facial third ratios and canthal tilt closer to normal morphometric values.

Changes in mandibular position during midface distraction in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in mandibular position during midface distraction. Midface distraction was performed in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis to increase upper airway volume. Although this treatment resulted in changes in occlusion, the concomitant changes in mandibular position were poorly understood. In this retrospective study, three-dimensional (3D) cephalograms were obtained before and after midface distraction in 15 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Perioperative polysomnography scores and changes in maxillary and mandibular position, mandibular volume, and upper airway volume were analyzed. Results showed a significant improvement in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (from 20.6 ± 21.3 to 6.9 ± 5.1, p < 0.05) and upper airway volume (from 2951.65 ± 2286.38 to 5218.04 ± 3150.05 mm3, p < 0.001). When the lowest point of the sella turcica was set as the reference point, the mandible moved significantly in an anterior direction (from 47.9 ± 11.5 to 51.9 ± 9.8 mm, p < 0.05). Mandibular volume did not change significantly perioperatively (from 32530.19 ± 10726.01 to 35590.50 ± 14879.21 mm3, p = 0.10). There were positive correlations between the rates of improvement in AHI and the amount of mandibular movement in the anterior and inferior directions (both p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that the mandible moved in the anterior-inferior direction after midface distraction, and the amount of movement correlated with improvement in respiratory function. Therefore, it is important to consider the position of the mandible when determining the direction of midface distraction, as it may influence the therapeutic effect.

Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton has become an effective technique for the treatment of both nonsyndromic and syndromic conditions. The advent of craniofacial DO has allowed for earlier intervention in pediatric patients with less complication risk and morbidity compared to traditional techniques. In this review, we will discuss current application and technique for craniofacial DO by anatomical region and explore future applications in craniofacial surgery.

Apert Syndrome: Selection Rationale for Midface Advancement Technique

Apert syndrome is characterized by a wide spectrum of craniofacial clinical features that have been successfully addressed via a variety of midface advancement techniques. Although surgeons have individual preferences as to which specific procedures should be performed to best treat Apert patients, craniofacial plastic surgeons, working in tandem with pediatric neurosurgeons, can identify and evaluate functional limitations and facial morphologic disproportions, and establish appropriate criteria for effective midface advancement technique indication and selection. The purpose of this review article is to present and discuss our rationale for midface advancement technique selection based upon the most common craniofacial characteristics presented by Apert syndrome patients. The present article also provides a grading system that stratifies as major, moderate, and mild, the effect of each midface advancement technique on the different types of Apert syndrome facial features. Surgeons should take into consideration the maximum effect and benefit of each craniofacial osteotomy and how these procedures will alter the craniofacial skeleton. By understanding the long-term effect of each osteotomy on the most common craniofacial characteristics of Apert syndrome patients, craniofacial plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons will be able to customize the surgical procedures they perform in order to achieve the best possible outcomes.

A bibliometric analysis of research on craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis from 2000 to 2021

Objective

This study collected and summarized publications related to craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis(DO) from 2000 to 2021, investigated trends in related research, and compared publications from different countries, institutions and journals. The aim is showcasing hotspots and frontiers in the field and providing a reference for future research.

Background

Craniomaxillofacial DO serves to treat different types of craniomaxillofacial dysplasia and bone defects and deformities. DO can significantly reduce surgical trauma, complications, and recurrence rate compared to conventional surgery. However, there is a lack of bibliometric analyses regarding Craniomaxillofacial DO.

Methods

CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to analyze and visualize 3,141 articles and reviews searching through the Web of Science Core Collection(WOSCC) to obtain publications on craniomaxillofacial DO from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021.

Results

In the last 21 years, there has been a significant increase in the number of publications. The United States, the People's Republic of China, and Italy produce the vast majority of publications. University of Milan and University of Bologna are the most influential in this field. McCarthy JG is the most influential author. Obstructive sleep apnea, TMJ ankylosis and cleft lip and palate are potential research direction in this field.

Conclusion

Future research should focus on the precise indications and optimal timing of craniomaxillofacial DO and the evaluation of the long-term outcomes of various modified procedures. This study provides a relatively objective reference for related researchers, medical practitioners, and global health systems.

Algorithm to the treatment of Crouzon syndrome

Clinical reports regarding the entire surgical sequence in Crouzon syndrome from the neonatal period to the adult age are rare. The purpose of this study is to trace an operative algorithm with a long term follow up in a homogenous group of patients affected by Crouzon syndrome. A retrospective review was conducted for all patients affected by Crouzon syndrome who completed the entire surgical sequence. 7 Crouzon patients (4 females, 3 males) completed the entire surgical sequence at different ages: fronto-orbital advancement (0.9 years), LF III distraction osteogenesis (11.5 years) and orthognathic surgery (18 years). The mean age at the last follow up was 19.3 years; normalization of the face was obtained in all cases with improvement of the respiratory problems. After orthognathic surgery, all patients had stable occlusion. A one-year postoperative CBCT scan revealed almost complete ossification of all osteotomy sites. Frontoorbital advancement and modified Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis are reliable surgical procedures. SARME and conventional orthognathic surgery with reductive genioplasty and fat grafting are performed at the end of the surgical sequence to enhance facial aesthetics.