A comparison of postoperative, three-dimensional soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusions treated via orthodontics-first and surgery-first approaches

Comparison of three-dimensional soft tissue changes according to the split pattern after sagittal split osteotomy in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyse the changes in soft tissue and hard tissue stability associated with the split pattern, i.e. long split (LS) or short split (SS), after sagittal split osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy were classified into LS or SS groups according to postoperative computed tomography images. They were examined via lateral cephalography and three-dimensional (3D) optical scanning before surgery (T0) and 1 (T1), 3 (T2), and 12 (T3) months after surgery. Six standard angles (SNA, SNB, ANB, FMA, FMIA, and IMPA) were used as measures of hard tissue change. The two sets of 3D data were superimposed, and the volumetric differences were calculated as the soft tissue change. The areas evaluated were delimited by 10 × 20-mm rectangles in the frontal aspect and a 25 × 25-mm square in the lateral aspect.

RESULTS

A total of 42 sides (26 patients) were analysed, including 20 (16 patients) in the SS group and 22 (16 patients) in the LS group. We found no significant differences in cephalographic angle or soft tissue changes in the frontal aspect between the SS and LS groups. We found significant differences in the subauricular region from T0-T1 (p = 0.02), T0-T2 (p = 0.03), and T0-T3 (p = 0.037) in terms of soft tissue changes in the lateral aspect. The volume increase associated with posterior mandibular movement was greater in the LS group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that LS patients with mandibular prognathism exhibited increased subauricular volumes following mandibular setback.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is essential to predict the postoperative facial profile before surgery. The split pattern after sagittal split osteotomy affects the postoperative profile of patients with mandibular prognathism.

Improvement in facial aesthetics of orthognathic patients after surgery-first approach

Facial appearance significantly affects psychosocial wellbeing, and an improvement in facial aesthetics is considered an essential outcome of orthognathic treatment. The surgery-first approach (SFA) has emerged as a promising alternative to the conventional orthodontics-first approach (OFA) due to its potential advantages in reducing treatment duration and cost, delivering early aesthetic improvement, and increasing patient satisfaction. However, its impact on final facial aesthetics and how it compares with the OFA has, to our knowledge, not yet been investigated. This retrospective study aimed to compare the improvement in facial aesthetics after orthognathic surgery in an SFA and an OFA group. Preoperative and postoperative 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry facial images of 40 patients were evaluated by five professional assessors using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Similar aesthetic improvement outcomes were found in both the SFA and OFA groups. The GAIS score significantly correlated with the following facial variables: upper lip projection, chin prominence, facial proportions, paranasal hollowing, lip competence, mandibular projection, and facial profile. No significant correlation was found between a change in aesthetic score and the surgical variables. There was a positive association between overall GAIS score and the gender and experience level of the individual assessors. This study suggests that aesthetic facial improvement achieved with the SFA is satisfactory and comparable to that of the OFA.