Liu P, Shi J. Assessment of unilateral condylar hyperplasia with quantitative SPECT/CT.
Heliyon 2024;
10:e23777. [PMID:
38192797 PMCID:
PMC10772615 DOI:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23777]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose
The current study aimedto assess condylar activityin patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) with quantitative SPECT/CT.
Patients and methods
This retrospective study included patients with UCH who underwent quantitative SPECT/CT. SPECT analysis and quantification of SPECT/CT were performed, and the maximum count per pixel and SUVmax of either side of the condyles were calculated.
Results
39 patients were included in the analysisand classified into three subgroups according to the percentile differential right-left ratio: inactive group, left active (LA) group, and right active (RA) group. Totally, the SUVmax of the affected side is significantly higher than the unaffected side (active:5.93 ± 2.43 vs inactive:3.62 ± 1.76, P < 0.001), SUVmax-based ratios correlated well with the ratios based on maximum count (R = 0.944, P < 0.001). ROC analysis showed poorSUVmaxperformance in differentiation between theactive condyles and the inactive condyles due to the lower area under the curve (AUC) (0.588). In subgroup analysis, the affected side is significantly higher than the unaffected side in active groups with SUVmax, no significant difference was found between the active sides or the inactive sides of active groups. Interestingly, the SUVmax of the left side was statistically higher than that of the right sidein the inactive group (P = 0.01),while the left side of the right active group has significantlylower activitythan that in the inactive group, meanwhile,the right side showed no significant difference. Furthermore, each side showed no significant difference between the left active group and the inactive group.
Conclusions
SUVmax is not an optimal measurement effectively used to evaluate active condyles. However, SUV ratios correlated well with the count ratios, and the left side of condyles showed a peculiar feature in condyle growth status reflected in radioactivity quantified with SPECT/CT, which needs further study to determine the role in the development of the UCH.
Collapse