Quality of life assessment in the late postoperative period of patients with rectal cancer submitted to total mesorectal excision

The functional results of radical rectal cancer surgery: review of the literature

Introduction For more than the last 20 years, low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) is a gold standard for rectal cancer treatment. Oncological outcomes have improved significantly and now more and more reports of functional outcomes appear. Due to the close relationship between the rectum and pelvic nerves, bowel, bladder, and sexual function are frequently affected during TME. Methods A search for published data was performed using the MEDLINE database (from 1 January 2005 to 31 January 2015) to perform a systematic review of the studies that described anorectal, bladder, and sexual dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Results Eighty-nine studies were eligible for analysis. Up to 76% of patients undergoing sphincter preserving surgery will have changes in bowel habits, the so-called "low anterior resection syndrome" (LARS). The duration of LARS varies between a few months and several years. Pre-operative radiotherapy, damage of anal sphincter and pelvic nerves, and height of the anastomosis are the risk factors for LARS. There is no evidence-based treatment available for LARS. Sexual function is more commonly affected after rectal surgery than after urinary function. The main cause of dysfunction is damage to pelvic nerves. Sexual and bladder functional outcomes in females are less well reported. Laparoscopic and robotic surgery allows better visualization of autonomic nerves and, therefore, more precise dissection and preservation. Conclusions It is important that rectal resection is standardized as much as possible, and that new functional outcome research use the same validated outcome questionnaires. This would allow for a high-quality meta-analysis.

Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version of low anterior resection syndrome score

BACKGROUND

Up to 90 % of patients undergoing low anterior resection complain of increased daily bowel movements, urgency, and a variable degree of incontinence. A symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer has recently been developed and validated. The aim of our study was to adapt the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scale questionnaire to the Lithuanian language, and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The LARS questionnaire was translated into Lithuanian by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust using a standard procedure of double-back translation. The Lithuanian version of the LARS (LARS-LT) questionnaire was completed by 111 patients who underwent low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in the period from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2012, at the National Cancer Institute. An anchor question from the Wexner score assessing the impact of bowel function on lifestyle was included. A subgroup of 20 patients completed the LARS-LT questionnaire twice. Validity was tested using a factor analysis, and internal reliability was estimated using the Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (25 %) had no LARS, 26 (24 %) had minor LARS, and 55 (56 %) had major LARS. The response rate was 60.7 %. The LARS-LT showed significantly high reliability and internal consistency [Cronbach's α = 0.88, interclass correlation coefficient-0.86 (0.71-0.98)]. The LARS score showed significant correlations with the lifestyle question (p < 0.05). It could not detect differences between female and male patient groups (p = 0.33), patients' age (p = 0.45), patients who had/had not undergone radiation therapy (p = 0.07), and those in whom the distal edge of the tumor was close to or far from the anal verge (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

The Lithuanian version of the LARS-LT shows acceptable psychometric properties and can be considered a valuable and specific instrument to assess bowel function in rectal cancer patients, both for research purposes and in clinical practice.