Miniarthrotomy assisted percutaneous screw fixation for displaced medial malleolus fractures - A novel technique

Current management of trimalleolar ankle fractures

A trimalleolar ankle fracture is considered unstable and treatment is generally performed operatively. Computed tomography is important for the operative planning by providing an elaborated view of the posterior malleolus.

Trimalleolar ankle fractures have a rising incidence in the last decade with up to 40 per 100,000 people per year. With a growing number of elderly patients, trimalleolar ankle injuries will become more relevant in the form of fragility fractures, posing a particular challenge for trauma surgeons.

In patients with osteoporotic trimalleolar ankle fractures and relevant concomitant conditions, further evidence is awaited to specify indications for open reduction and internal fixation or primary transfixation of the ankle joint.

In younger, more demanding patients, arthroscopic-assisted surgery might improve the outcome, but future research is required to identify patients who will benefit from assisted surgical care.

This review considers current scientific findings regarding all three malleoli to understand the complexity of trimalleolar ankle injuries and provide the reader with an overview of treatment strategies and research, as well as future perspectives.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:692-703. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200138

Medial malleolar fractures: current treatment concepts

The medial malleolus, once believed to be the primary stabilizer of the ankle, has been the topic of conflicting clinical and biomechanical data for many decades. Despite the relevant surgical anatomy being understood for almost 40 years, the optimal treatment of medial malleolar fractures remains unclear, whether the injury occurs in isolation or as part of an unstable bi- or trimalleolar fracture configuration. Traditional teaching recommends open reduction and fixation of medial malleolar fractures that are part of an unstable injury. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that nonoperative management of well-reduced fractures may result in equivalent outcomes, but without the morbidity associated with surgery. This review gives an update on the relevant anatomy and classification systems for medial malleolar fractures and an overview of the current literature regarding their management, including surgical approaches and the choice of implants. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:512-521.

Comparison of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures

Introduction

Surgical treatment of medial malleolus (MM) fractures can be performed through open or percutaneous approaches, although comparisons between these two approaches have not been undertaken. In this study, we compared patients with MM fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) with patients treated with traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods

A group of 165 consecutive patients underwent surgical fixation of a closed MM fracture from 2011 to 2015 at a single institution. Thirty-one underwent CRPF and 134 underwent ORIF. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment methods, and outcome variables were recorded through review of patient charts, radiographs, and surgical reports.

Results

The rate of MM fracture comminution was higher in the ORIF group compared with the CRPF group (9.7% vs 27.6%; P = 0.04). All other patient and injury variables were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference observed between the CRPF and ORIF groups regarding outcomes, including nonunion, malunion, time to union, rate of hardware removal, and wound complications.

Discussion

Both CRPF and ORIF resulted in acceptable radiographic outcomes and low complication rates for the treatment of MM fractures.

An evaluation of the Herscovici classification for fractures of the medial malleolus

BACKGROUND

Despite its use in the literature, the application of the Herscovici classification system for medial malleolus fractures has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We aimed to determine the reliability and accuracy of the Herscovici classification. The blinded radiographs of 130 patients were independently classified by four orthopaedic trauma surgeons. We held a consensus meeting where observers agreed on a final classification and this served as our reference standard. We used weighted kappa (κ) coefficients of agreement.

RESULTS

Twenty-four fractures (18%) were deemed unclassifiable. The classification system demonstrated moderate inter-observer reliability (κ=0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.68) but substantial reproducibility (κ=0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.79). Accuracy, when compared with the reference standard, was κ=0.54 (95% CI 0.40-0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The obliquity of the fracture line, and fracture extension, created difficulty in classification in 26% of cases. 18% of our cases could not be classified by majority decision. Our results emphasise the challenges faced in classifying these fractures. Future work should focus on refining the Herscovici classification.

State-of-the-Art in Ankle Fracture Management in Chile

The ankle represents the most commonly injured weightbearing joint in the human body. They are typically the result of low-energy, rotational injury mechanisms. However, ankle fractures represent a spectrum of injury patterns from simple to very complex, with varying incidence of posttraumatic arthritis. Stable injury patterns can be treated nonoperatively; unstable injury patterns are typically treated operatively given that they could lead to severe arthritis if not properly addressed.

Anterograde Headless Cannulated Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Medial Malleolar Fractures: Evaluation of a New Technique and Its Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of anterograde headless cannulated screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study included 12 patients (8 males, 4 females; age 27-55 years) with medial malleolar type B fractures according to the Herscovici fracture classification who had undergone anterograde headless cannulated screw fixation surgery between 2012 and 2014. Seven had an isolated medial malleolar fracture and 5 a bimalleolar fracture. All of the bimalleolar fractures were classified as 44-B2 based on the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. Postoperatively, bone union was evaluated on direct radiographs at the final follow-up examination. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system was used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 17.2 ± 5.3 months (range 12-23). Full union was achieved in all fractures. The mean time to union was 3.4 ± 1.5 months (range 2-5). No instability, loss of reduction, non-union or infection was observed in any patient. The mean AOFAS score was 95.0 ± 5.4 (range 87-99). Based on the AOFAS score, 4 patients showed good results and 8 excellent results. The mean time to return to the previous level of activity was 4.0 ± 2.5 months (range 2-5).

CONCLUSION

In this study, anterograde headless cannulated screw fixation yielded good clinical outcome in the surgical treatment of Herscovici type B fractures.