Acetabular fractures labelled poor surgical choices: Analysis of operative outcome

Sciatic nerve injury after acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis of incidence and outcomes

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and the outcome of post-traumatic and iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy (SNP) associated with fractures of the acetabulum. The results of sciatic nerve grafting for treatment were also investigated.

METHODS

PUBMED, SCOPUS and COCHRANE databases were searched for longitudinal observational studies reporting sciatic nerve palsy related to acetabular fractures in adult patients over the last 20 years. Data regarding patients demographics, type of acetabular fracture, rate of post traumatic and iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsies as well as recovery rate are reported. Studies were assessed for their quality. Random effects meta-analyses were carried out to pool overall proportions of SNP incidence and complete recovery. Variations in SNP incidence by main study characteristics were assessed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. A narrative review of sciatic nerve grafting was also conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty studies reporting 44 post-operative and 18 iatrogenic SNPs in 651 patients were reviewed. The pooled incidence of posttraumatic SNP was 5.1% (95% CI 2.7-8.2%). The pooled incidence of iatrogenic SNP was 1.4% (95% CI 0.3-2.9%). Complete recovery of post-traumatic and iatrogenic SNP occurred in 64.7% (95% CI 41.7-85.4%) and 74.1% (95% CI 31.5-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A favorable outcome of both post-traumatic and iatrogenic SNP related to acetabular fractures has been found. Due to the poor results of sciatic nerve grafting, a "wait and see" approach may be the best option, in cases of a contused but anatomically intact sciatic nerve.

Surgical treatment of acetabulum posterior wall fractures: Comparison between undercountering and marginal impaction reconstruction method with odd methods

BACKGROUND

Modern treatment principles for posterior wall fractures have become widespread in the last decade in many countries by means of international or local courses. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of acetabulum posterior wall fractures using unconventional methods of fixation, including plates placed in unusual directions, or, in the case of reoperation, only interfragmentary screws. In addition, we examined acetabulum posterior wall fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with standard undercountered plates from ischion to iliac bone in latter cases.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients who had open reduction and internal fixation of an unstable unilateral fracture of the posterior wall of the acetabulum between 2009 and 2013 were included. Group 1 was composed of 10 former patients who were treated with unconventional methods that included a compression technique with a direct plate or solely screw fixation. Group 2 was composed of latter 11 patients who were treated with standard surgery that included undercountered plates oriented from the ischial tuberosity to the iliac bone proximally and reconstruction of marginal impaction if necessary. The functional outcome was evaluated with the use of the clinical grading system adopted by Merle d'Aubigné and Postel. The Kellgren-Lawrence radiologic criteria were used for the radiologic assessments. The reduction of the fracture, posterior dislocation, marginal impaction, mean fracture particle amount, trochanteric osteotomy and avascular necrosis were compared between the two groups and examined with the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In Groups 1 and 2, the median score of the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel clinical scoring system was 16 (8-18) and 18 (14-18), respectively. The clinical scores between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.01). When two groups were compared using the Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic criteria for the development of osteoarthritis, the median value in Groups 1 and 2 was 3 (0-4) and 1 (0-3), respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study displays the evolution of the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures of the posterior wall in our clinic. The older methods failed in terms of exposure, diagnosis of fracture anatomy and fixation techniques. Patients treated after the surgeons took courses in this field showed evidence of superior clinical and radiological scores. We attribute these benefits to exposure, definition and treatment of marginal impaction and fixation principles.

Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis following acetabular fracture: A systematic review of characteristics, outcomes, and complications

PURPOSE

Posttraumatic arthritis (PTA) may develop years after acetabular fracture, hindering joint function and causing significant chronic musculoskeletal pain. Given the delayed onset of PTA, few studies have assessed outcomes of delayed total hip arthroplasty (THA) in acetabular fracture patients. This study systematically reviewed the literature for outcomes of THA in patients with PTA and prior acetabular fracture.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library were searched for articles containing the keywords "acetabular", "fracture", "arthroplasty", and "post traumatic arthritis" published between 1995 and August 2017. Studies with less than 10 patients, less than 2 years of follow-up, conference abstracts, and non-English language articles were excluded. Data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and outcomes of delayed THA, including implant survival, complications, need for revision, and functional scores, was collected from eligible studies.

RESULTS

With 1830 studies were screened and data from 10 studies with 448 patients were included in this review. The median patient age on date of THA was 51.5 years, ranging from 19 to 90 years. The median time from fracture to THA was 37 months, with a range of 27-74 months. Mean follow-up times ranged from 4 to 20 years. The mean Harris hip scores (HHS) improved from 41.5 pre-operatively, to 87.6 post-operatively. The most prevalent postoperative complications were heterotopic ossification (28%-63%), implant loosening (1%-24%), and infection (0%-16%). The minimum 5-year survival of implants ranged from 70% to 100%. Revision rates ranged from 2% to 32%.

CONCLUSION

Despite the difficulties associated with performing THA in patients with PTA from previous acetabular fracture (including soft tissue scarring, existing hardware, and acetabular bone loss) and the relatively high complication rates, THA in patients with PTA following prior acetabular fracture leads to significant improvement in pain and function at 10-year follow-up. Further high quality randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the outcomes after delayed THA in these patients.

Use of tricortical iliac crest strut autograft in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures: A case series

PURPOSE

The results for fixation of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures are not very promising with reported complications in terms of osteoarthritis, nonunion and malunion which subsequently require conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The conversion to total hip arthroplasty is possible in patients over 50 years of age but not in younger patients. So this requires new methods for salvage of the native hip in young patients.

METHODS

There were six patients in our series with highly comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures where the fragments were excised and the gap filled with tricortical anterior iliac-crest strut autograft, fixed with screws and plate.

RESULTS

Good results were achieved in four out of six patients analyzed clinically using the Merle d'Aubinge score modified by Matta and radiologically by Matta scoring. These patients have returned to original work and are walking independently. The good result in one patient deteriorated from good to poor between one and two years. One patient developed infection and excision arthroplasty was done. The graft incorporated well in five out of six patients.

CONCLUSION

The use of iliac crest autograft is a better, advanced and promising technique as it provides a new wall to the weight bearing dome of the acetabulum for articulation with the femoral head. The rates of nonunion, malunion, post traumatic osteoarthritis are less as compared to the fixation of the comminuted fragments. The need for conversion to total hip arthroplasty is also less.

Temporary Balloon Occlusion of the Abdominal Aorta in Treatment of Complex Acetabular Fracture

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of temporary balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta assisting open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of complex acetabular fracture.

Material/Methods

From August 2000 to October 2011, a total of 48 patients with complex acetabular fracture were enrolled in this study. Average operative time, intraoperative blood loss volume, blood transfusion volume, satisfactory reduction, and postoperative functional recovery rate were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

A significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in operative time (P=0.003). For intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion, ORIF combined with temporary balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta techniques appeared to be superior to normal ORIF (blood loss: P=0.007; and blood transfusion: P=0.019, respectively). However, no differences were observed in postoperative blood loss or transfusion (P>0.05). Patients in group A showed better hip function than those in group B (group A: a good-to-excellent rate of 77.8%; group B: a good-to-excellent rate of 78.3%; P>0.05). With regard to the incidence of postoperative complications, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups (group A: 9/18; group B: 11/23; P=0.890).

Conclusions

In the treatment of complex acetabular fracture, temporary balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta is a reliable technique to assist ORIF surgery to staunch the flow of blood.