Normal CRP and WBC values in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with signs of loosening. Do we need a joint aspiration?

Are Synovial Inflammatory Markers Increased in Patients Who Have Aseptic Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Indicated for Revision?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have speculated on elevated synovial inflammatory markers in patients undergoing surgical revision for total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation. However, this assumption is based on small patient series and a full investigation according to International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria has not yet been performed.

METHODS

Patients who had aseptic THA dislocation indicated for revision surgery were identified retrospectively. Only patients who had available diagnostic workup according to ICM 2018 criteria, including preoperative and intraoperative parameters, were included. For comparison, we analyzed a matched cohort of patients indicated for aseptic THA revision for other conditions. The 2 cohorts each consisted of 55 patients and were not different regarding age, sex, BMI, or implant fixation.

RESULTS

There was no difference in synovial white blood cell count (2,238 ± 2,544 versus 2,533 ± 3,448 c/μL; P = .601), alpha-defensin quotient (0.14 ± 0.11 versus 0.19 ± 0.28; P = .207), or polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (% PMN) (36.7 ± 22.6 versus 31.3 ± 24.5%; P = .312) between the groups. In the dislocation cohort, 20% of patients had a synovial white blood cell count of 3,000 c/μL or higher, compared with 18% in the control cohort. However, all patients in the dislocation cohort were below the cutoff for alpha-defensin or % PMN.

CONCLUSION

In patients who have aseptic THA dislocation, synovial inflammatory markers are not elevated compared with patients undergoing aseptic revision for other complications. A detailed preoperative analysis of synovial inflammatory markers using ICM criteria appears critical in patients who have a THA dislocation to exclude periprosthetic joint infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective, comparative study.

Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

The current diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are diverse and controversial, leading to delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate and unify their diagnostic accuracy and the threshold selection of serum and synovial routine tests for PJI at an early stage.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for retrospective or prospective studies which reported preoperative‐available assays (serum, synovial, or culture tests) for the diagnosis of chronic PJI among inflammatory arthritis (IA) or non‐IA populations from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022. Threshold effective analysis was performed on synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%), synovial white blood cell (WBC), serum C‐reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to find the relevant cut‐offs.

Results

Two hundred and sixteen studies and information from 45,316 individuals were included in the final analysis. Synovial laboratory‐based α‐defensin and calprotectin had the best comprehensive sensitivity (0.91 [0.86–0.94], 0.95 [0.88–0.98]) and specificity (0.96 [0.94‐0.97], 0.95 [0.89–0.98]) values. According to the threshold effect analysis, the recommended cut‐offs are 70% (sensitivity 0.89 [0.85–0.92], specificity 0.90 [0.87–0.93]), 4100/μL (sensitivity 0.90 [0.87–0.93], specificity 0.97 [0.93–0.98]), 13.5 mg/L (sensitivity 0.84 [0.78–0.89], specificity 0.83 [0.73–0.89]), and 30 mm/h (sensitivity 0.79 [0.74–0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.72–0.83]) for synovial PMN%, synovial WBC, serum CRP, and ESR, respectively, and tests seem to be more reliable among non‐IA patients.

Conclusions

The laboratory‐based synovial α‐defensin and synovial calprotectin are the two best independent preoperative diagnostic tests for PJI. A cut off of 70% for synovial PMN% and tighter cut‐offs for synovial WBC and serum CRP could have a better diagnostic accuracy for non‐IA patients with chronic PJI.

Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection. A retrospective single-center experience

Background: A low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may present without specific symptoms, and its diagnosis remains a challenge. Three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) and white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy are incorporated into recently introduced diagnostic criteria for PJI, but their exact value in diagnosing low-grade PJI in patients with nonspecific symptoms remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated patients with a prosthetic joint of the hip or knee who underwent TPBS and/or WBC scintigraphy between 2009 and 2016 because of nonspecific symptoms. We reviewed and calculated diagnostic accuracy of the TPBS and/or WBC scintigraphy to diagnose or exclude PJI. PJI was defined based on multiple cultures obtained during revision surgery. In patients who did not undergo revision surgery, PJI was ruled out by clinical follow-up of at least 2 years absent of clinical signs of infection based on MSIS 2011 criteria. Results: A total of 373 patients were evaluated, including 340 TPBSs and 142 WBC scintigraphies. Thirteen patients (3.5 %) were diagnosed with a PJI. TPBS sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were 71 %, 65 %, 8 % and 98 %, respectively. Thirty-five percent of TPBS showed increased uptake. Stratification for time intervals between the index arthroplasty and the onset of symptoms did not alter its diagnostic accuracy. WBC scintigraphy sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 30 %, 90 %, 25 % and 94 %, respectively. Conclusion: Nuclear imaging does not have clear added value in patients with low a priori chance of periprosthetic joint infection.

Ability of plasma-based or serum-based assays of D-dimer and FDP for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: protocol for a prospective single-centre, parallel comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have evaluated the diagnostic values of D-dimer and fibrin degradation product (FDP) for detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but their conclusions have been inconsistent. More importantly, whether the diagnostic value of these two biomarkers differs depending on whether they are assayed in plasma or serum is unclear.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective single-centre, parallel comparative study will involve patients planning to undergo revision hip or knee arthroplasty due to an aseptic mechanical failure or PJI. After the patients provide written informed consent, their serum and plasma will be sampled and assayed for D-dimer and FDP. The diagnostic value of these two biomarkers in plasma and serum will be compared with one another and with the value of two traditional inflammatory markers (C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) used to diagnose PJI according to the 2013 International Consensus Meeting criteria. Diagnostic value will be assessed in terms of area under receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values, all calculated based on the optimal cut-off determined from the Youden index.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital (approval no. 2020-859). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before enrollment. Study findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000038547), and it is ongoing.

The role of fibrinogen in predicting reinfection after DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections

Background

Fibrinogen (FIB) has been found to be a promising marker in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), however, the value of FIB in predicting reinfection of PJI is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of FIB in predicting reinfection after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for PJI.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who were diagnosed with PJI and underwent DAIR from 2013 to 2019. The levels of the FIB, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before DAIR. After DAIR, patients were followed and reinfections were identified. For both acute and chronic PJI, the predictive value of FIB was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and was compared with traditional inflammatory markers including ESR and CRP.

Results

The expression of FIB differed between patients reinfected and those not reinfected in both acute and chronic PJI (p < 0.05). In patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI, the sensitivity and specificity of FIB were 81.82 and 83.33%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of CRP (sensitivity, 72.73%; specificity, 50%; p < 0.05), while the specificity was higher than that of ESR (specificity, 41.67%; p < 0.05). In patients who underwent DAIR for chronic PJI, the sensitivity and specificity of FIB were 80.00 and 66.66%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of CRP (sensitivity, 53.33%; specificity, 66.66%; p < 0.05) and ESR (sensitivity was 66.00%; specificity, 16.66%; p < 0.05). The ROC curves showed that FIB demonstrated the highest AUC among the biomarkers in both acute and chronic PJI.

Conclusion

FIB is a promising indicator in predicting reinfection after DAIR for both acute and chronic PJI, and it seems to perform better than ESR and CRP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04357-8.

Are Cement Spacers and Beads Loaded with the Correct Antibiotic(s) at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

The optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection is unknown. It is also unclear, whether a suboptimal impregnation might be associated with a higher persistence of infection. A total of 93 patients (44 knee, 49 hip) were retrospectively evaluated, and the most common organism was a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, followed by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Of all the organisms, 37.1% were resistant against gentamicin and 54.2% against clindamycin. All organisms were susceptible against vancomycin. In 41 cases, gentamicin-loaded beads were inserted and in 52 cases, spacers: (2 loaded only with gentamicin, 18 with gentamicin + vancomycin, 19 with gentamicin + clindamycin, and 13 with gentamicin + vancomycin + clindamycin). The analysis of each antibiotic impregnation showed that complete susceptibility was present in 38.7% of the cases and partial susceptibility in 28%. In the remaining 33.3%, no precise statement can be made because either there was a culture-negative infection or the antibiotic(s) were not tested against the specific organism. At a mean follow-up of 27.9 months, treatment failure was observed in 6.7% of the cases. Independent of which antibiotic impregnation was used, when the organism was susceptible against the locally inserted antibiotics or not tested, reinfection or persistence of infection was observed in the great majority of cases. Future studies about the investigation of the optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement are welcome.

Percutaneous cementoplasty of periprosthetic loosening: can interventional radiologists offer an alternative to revision surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate feasibility and validate both safety and efficiency of radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty (RPPBC) performed under local anesthesia as an alternative minimally invasive treatment of aseptic implant loosening.

METHODS

In this case series, seven patients (mean age 81 years, range 73 to 89 years, 2 men and 5 women) were enrolled between February 2011 and January 2020 with confirmed aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants. One patient presented with tibial component loosening of an unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, one with glenoid component loosening from a reverse shoulder arthroplasty, one femoral gamma nail, and four presented with pedicle screw loosening after staged posterior lumbar interbody fusion. All patients underwent clinical, biochemical, and imaging assessments to confirm the diagnosis of aseptic loosening. All benefited from RPPBC under dual CT and fluoroscopic guidance. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia by an experienced radiologist. Preprocedural, immediate and 6-month post-cementoplasty pain levels on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional outcomes were evaluated. Immediate and 6-month postprocedural CTs were performed to evaluate the treated region.

RESULTS

All RPPBC were well tolerated by patients throughout the procedure. None of the patients suffered from local or systemic infection post-RPPBC, or periprosthetic fractures. No recurrent implant loosening was observed. Six patients were pain free at 6 months. All patients expressed functional improvements during validated outcome score evaluations.

CONCLUSION

RPPBC appears to be an efficient and reliable treatment strategy for aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants in elderly patients deemed unfit for revision surgery.

KEY POINTS

• Radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty offers immediate and long-lasting pain relief in elderly frail patients, or those deemed unfit for revision surgery despite presenting with symptomatic aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants. • Radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty brings quick and long-lasting improvements in clinical functional outcomes and offer effective pain reduction, thereby improving the overall quality of life. • Radiological percutaneous periprosthetic bone cementoplasty is a safe, quick, reliable, and well-tolerated minimally invasive procedure which can be easily performed under simple locoregional anesthesia and requires short-term hospital stay.

Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Background: Currently, one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery is peri-prosthetic joint infection [PJI]. While there are numerous ways to detect PJI, current clinical detection methods differ across institutions and have varying criteria and protocols. Some of these methods include the Modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society system, culturing, polymerase chain reaction, the determination of the presence of certain biomarkers, testing for the presence of alpha defensin peptides, and leukocyte level testing. Methods: This review summarizes the most recent publications in the field of PJI detection to highlight current strengths as well as provide future directions to find the system for the quickest, cost-effective, and most accurate way to diagnose these types of infections. Results: The results of this literature review suggest that, while each method of diagnosis has its advantages, each has various drawbacks as well. Current methods can be expensive, take days to weeks to complete, be prone to contamination, and can produce ambiguous results. Conclusions: The findings in this review emphasize the need for a more comprehensive and accurate system for diagnosing PJI. In addition, the specific comparison of advantages and drawbacks can be useful for researchers and clinicians with goals of creating new diagnostic tests for PJIs, as well as in clinical scenarios to determine the correct treatment for patients.

Positive Microbiological Findings at the Site of Presumed Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty Surgery of the Hip and Knee Joint: Is a Surgical Revision Always Necessary?

Little is known about patients that undergo presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty surgery of the hip and knee joint and having positive microbiological findings of the intraoperatively taken tissue samples. 228 “aseptic” operations were retrospectively analyzed from prospectively collected data with regard to the following parameters: demographic data; reasons for primary and revision surgery, respectively; time between primary and revision surgery; preoperative laboratory findings; microbiological and histopathological findings; type and length of systemic antibiotic therapy; clinical outcome; and follow-up. Identification of microorganisms was present in 8.8% of the cases (9.3% of the hip and 7.8% of the knee cases). Preoperatively, the median CRP value was 8.4 mg/l (normal values 0-5.0 mg/l) and the median WBC count 8,100 × 10⁶/l (normal values 3, 700‐10,100 × 10⁶/l). The most common identified organism was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in 30%, followed by viridans streptococci in 15% of the cases. In 7 cases, the microbiological findings were interpreted as a contamination, and no antibiotic therapy was administered. In the other cases, a systemic antibiotic therapy was applied for a time period between 2 weeks and 3 months. 68.4% of the patients did not have any infectious complications at a median follow-up of 20 (3-42) months. The present study indicates that more than 2/3 of the cases with positive microbiological findings at the site of presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty surgery of the hip and knee joint can be successfully treated conservatively and they do not require any further surgical therapy.

Loosening of total knee arthroplasty - always aseptic?

PURPOSE

When revision surgery is needed in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the most frequent reasons are aseptic loosening (AL) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However preoperative distinction between AL and PJI remains challenging. Aim of this study is to determine the incidence of PJI in patients with suspected AL after TKA and to evaluate a diagnostic algorithm for reliable differential diagnosis.

METHODS

In this study a total of 149 symptomatic patients with radiographic signs of prosthetic loosening and suspected AL were included. Preoperatively all patients underwent a standardized diagnostic algorithm. For each patient demographics, as well as the results of laboratory and microbiological testing were collected from the medical records.

RESULTS

Of the included patients 117 (78.5%) were diagnosed with AL and 32 (21.5%) with PJI. The latency period from primary arthroplasty to the presentation with symptomatic implant loosening was significantly shorter for PJI compared to AL (p < 0.05). The initial CRP values were significantly higher in patients with PJI compared to patients with AL (p < 0.05). Elevated count of white blood cells or percentage of neutrophils within the synovial fluid support the diagnosis of PJI. The sensitivity of synovial cell count (CC) count for PJI in patients with radiographic signs of loosening was 0.84 (CI 0.81-0.87) with a specificity of 0.96 (CI 0.92-0.98). The single best measure for the diagnosis of PJI was synovial fluid cultures with a specificity of 1, however this measure provides poor sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Patients with radiographic signs of loosening in TKA need thorough diagnostics. Information about primary TKA, serological testing, and results of joint aspiration can rule out a PJI in most cases.

Possible risk factors for acute and chronic deep periprosthetic joint infections in primary total knee arthroplasty. Do BMI, smoking, urinary tract infections, gender, and ASA classification have an impact?

Purpose

Aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of the patient related factors body mass index (BMI), urinary tract infection, current smoking, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification on the incidence of acute and chronic deep periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

All patients undergoing revision surgery for a deep PJI of primary TKA between July 2012 and December 2016 were included in this study. All relevant data was collected from the medical records. Acute deep PJI was defined when PJI was diagnosed within the first 6 weeks after primary TKA, chronic PJI was defined when patients demonstrated PJI later than 6 weeks after primary TKA.

Results

A total of 57 patients was included in this study with 13 cases of acute PJI and 44 of chronic PJI. Overweight patients (BMI > 25 kg/m²) represent a significantly larger proportion in both PJI groups (p < 0.05). Current smokers had an significantly increased risk for acute and chronic PJI (p < 0.05). In the acute PJI group 46.2% patients had an postoperative urinary tract infection.

Conclusion

An elevated BMI (>25 kg/m²), current smoking and urinary tract infection are possible risk factors for acute and chronic deep PJI. After primary TKA screening for urinary tract infection is recommendable to prevent predominantly acute deep PJI.

Aseptic Loosening after THA and TKA - Do gender, tobacco use and BMI have an impact on implant survival time?

Purpose

Aseptic loosening (AL) has been reported to be one of the most frequent complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to identify the effects of gender, current tobacco use and BMI on the incidence of AL and implant survival time in THA and TKA.

Methods

Between July 2012 and December 2016 all patients that were diagnosed with an AL of a primary THA or primary TKA and underwent revision surgery at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for this study. For each patient gender, current tobacco use, BMI, and implant survival time were obtained from the medical records.

Results

202 patients with 85 THA and 117 TKA were included in this study. There was no impact of the gender on implant survival times (p > 0.05) in THA and TKA. In the TKA group current tobacco use was associated with a significant shorter implant survival time (p < 0.05). For THA and TKA with cemented stem fixation a significant increase of AL was seen in overweight compared to normal weight patients (p < 0.05) and in obese compared to normal weight patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The results demonstrate that current tobacco use and elevated BMI are associated with increased rates of AL in TKA. Also, in THA with cemented stem fixation an elevated BMI is associated with an increased incidence of AL.