Association between stages of medial compartment osteoarthritis and three-dimensional knee alignment in the supine position: A cross-sectional study

Relationship Between the Sagittal and Coronary Alignment of the Tibiofemoral Joint and the Medial Meniscus Extrusion in Knee Osteoarthritis

Background/Objectives: This study aims to clarify the reproducibility, validity, and accuracy of tibial external-rotation alignment evaluation using ultrasound imaging and to investigate the relationship between medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and tibiofemoral alignment in both the sagittal and coronal planes in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Study 1 included 10 healthy participants. The tibial external-rotation angle was calculated using MRI. In the ultrasound imaging evaluation, the differences in the distance from the most posterior points of the tibial and femoral condyles to the skin were calculated as the medial and lateral condyle gaps, respectively. The mediolateral (ML) gap was calculated by subtracting the lateral condyle gap from the medial condyle gap. Study 2 included 63 patients with unilateral OA and 16 healthy controls. MME was compared according to the severity of OA, the degree of tibial rotation, and the presence or absence of a tibial posterior shift. Results: Ultrasound imaging examinations showed high intra- and inter-rater reliabilities (0.786-0.979). The ML gap significantly affected the tibial external-rotation angle, determined using MRI. The ML gap of ultrasound imaging was significantly correlated with the ML gap of MRI. MME was significantly higher in the Early OA group than in the Control group. There was no significant difference in MME based on the tibial rotation degree. The group with a tibial posterior shift exhibited significantly more MME than that without a posterior shift. Conclusions: Ultrasound imaging is useful for evaluating knee alignment. MME was found to be associated with the tibial posterior shift.

High variability exists in 3D leg alignment analysis, but underlying principles that might lead to agreement on a universal framework could be identified: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To (1) investigate the hypothesis that there is high variability in the reported methods to derive axes and joint orientations from three-dimensional (3D) bone models to (a) perform 3D knee-related leg alignment analysis and (b) define coordinate systems for the femur, tibia and leg and (2) identify underlying principles that might lead to agreement on a universal 3D leg alignment analysis framework.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature between January 2006 and June 2024 was performed. Articles explicitly reporting methods to derive axes and joint orientations from CT-based 3D bone models for alignment parameters and/or coordinate systems of the femur, tibia and leg were included. Study characteristics and reported methods were extracted and presented as a qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 93 studies were included. There was high variability in the reported methods to derive axes and joint orientations from 3D bone models. Nevertheless, the reported methods could be categorized into four groups, and several underlying principles of the four groups could be identified. Furthermore, the definitions of femoral and tibial coordinate systems were most frequently based on the mechanical axis (femoral, 13/19 [68%]; tibial, 13/26 [50%]) and a central medial-lateral axis (femoral, 16/19 [84%]; tibial, 12/26 [46%]); no leg coordinate system was reported. Interestingly, of the included studies that reported on leg alignment parameters (76/93, 82%), only a minority reported expressing these in a complete coordinate system (25/76, 33%).

CONCLUSION

There is high variability in 3D knee-related leg alignment analysis. Therefore, universal 3D reference values for alignment parameters cannot yet be defined, and comparison of alignment parameter values between different studies is impossible. However, several underlying principles to the reported methods were identified, which could serve to reach more agreement on a future universal 3D framework for leg alignment analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I (1).

Volume and mobility of the infrapatellar fat pad during quasi-static knee extension after manual therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized control trial study

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine whether the volume and mobility of the infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) change as a result of manual release or stretching during quasi-static knee extension in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). [Participants and Methods] Fourteen patients with KOA were allocated to one of two groups: the manual release (R) and stretching (S, control) groups. They all underwent 12 treatment sessions in in a space of four weeks. We created 3D models of the IPFP, tibia, patella, and patellar tendon using sagittal MRI scans with the knee at 30° or 0°. We compared the differences in (1) the distance of anterior movement of the anterior surface of the IPFP (IPFP movement) and (2) the volume of the IPFP, between the R and S groups, using the 3D models. [Results] Neither group showed any anterior movement of the IPFP during quasi-static knee extension at pre-intervention; however, both groups showed significant anterior movement of the IPFP at post-intervention. IPFP movement decreased in the S group, meanwhile it increased in the R group at post-intervention. [Conclusion] Anterior movement of the IPFP was more increased by manual release than by stretching since the latter may have shortened the distance between the patella and tibial tuberosity at 0° and 30° flexion.