Repeat irrigation & debridement for patients with acute septic knee arthritis: Incidence and risk factors

Arthroscopy Is at Least as Effective as Arthrotomy for Treatment of Septic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review of Large and Intermediate Joints

BACKGROUND

Surgical options for septic arthritis include open arthrotomy or an arthroscopic procedure. The optimal surgical technique remains a matter of debate as acceptable results have been reported for both.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy versus arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis in large and intermediate-sized joints.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A literature search was performed of the PubMed and Cochrane online databases through September 2023 identifying articles comparing arthroscopy with arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis. Eligible articles included retrospective or prospective comparative studies investigating reoperation, perioperative complications, or clinical outcomes after arthroscopic or open treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, or ankle in adults.

RESULTS

In total, 23 articles with 34,248 patients met the inclusion criteria comparing arthroscopy with arthrotomy. In 14 of the 20 (70%) studies that reported on reoperation rates, there was no significant difference in arthroscopic versus open surgical management for septic arthritis. Four (20%) studies reported lower reoperation rates when arthroscopy was utilized compared with open arthrotomy. One single-institution study found arthrotomy to be more effective for shoulder septic arthritis, and another favored open surgery only in the presence of erosions. In 11 of 23 (47.8%) studies, no difference in complications or clinical outcomes was found. However, 11 of 23 (47.8%) studies comprising the shoulder, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle reported a significant benefit to arthroscopy for improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of septic arthritis involving the shoulder, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle appears to be safe and effective. Reoperation rates, short-term complications, and functional outcomes tend to be similar or in favor of arthroscopy when compared with arthrotomy.

Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to Anti-Inflammatory Drugs with a Focus on the Combinatory Effect of Celecoxib with Oxacillin In Vitro

Musculoskeletal infections (MIs) are among the most difficult-to-treat staphylococcal diseases due to antibiotic resistance. This has encouraged the development of innovative strategies, such as combination therapy, to combat MI. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro antistaphylococcal activity of anti-inflammatory drugs and the combined antimicrobial effect of celecoxib and oxacillin. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 17 anti-inflammatory drugs against standard strains and clinical isolates of S. aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains (MRSAs), were determined using the broth microdilution method. The fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) were evaluated using checkerboard assays. Celecoxib produced the most potent antistaphylococcal effect against all tested strains (MICs ranging from 32 to 64 mg/L), followed by that of diacerein against MRSA3 and MRSA ATCC 33592 (MIC 64 mg/L). Several synergistic effects were observed against the tested S. aureus strains, including MRSA (FICI ranging from 0.087 to 0.471). The strongest synergistic interaction (FICI 0.087) was against MRSA ATCC 33592 at a celecoxib concentration of 2 mg/L, with a 19-fold oxacillin MIC reduction (from 512 to 26.888 mg/L). This is the first report on the combined antistaphylococcal effect of celecoxib and oxacillin. These findings suggest celecoxib and its combination with oxacillin as perspective agents for research focused on the development of novel therapies for MI caused by S. aureus. This study further indicates that celecoxib could resensitize certain MRSA strains, in some cases, to be susceptible to β-lactams (e.g., oxacillin) that were not previously tested. It is essential to mention that the in vitro concentrations of anti-inflammatory drugs are higher than those typically obtained in patients. Therefore, an alternative option for its administration could be the use of a drug delivery system for the controlled slow release from an implant at the infection site.

Arthroscopy or arthrotomy for native knee septic arthritis: A systematic review

Purpose

Septic arthritis of any joint is an orthopaedic emergency which requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The knee is the commonest joint afflicted, and the primary objective of any treatment is complete source control. This commonly takes the form of antibiotic therapy and a washout of the infected joint by means of arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The primary aim of this review is to investigate if arthroscopic washout for native knee septic arthritis confers a lower risk of repeat procedure than arthrotomy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of the MEDLINE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library data bases. The primary outcome of interest was requirement for repeat washout with all-cause complications, length of inpatient stay and mortality secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 17,140 subjects were included for analysis of the primary outcome, and the overall rate of repeat procedure was 14.6%. No statistical difference was found between arthroscopy and arthrotomy for repeat washout (risk ratio 0.86 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.72-1.02], I 2 = 36%). Eligible studies found in favour of arthroscopy for all-cause complication rate (risk ratio 0.75 [95% CI: 0.6-0.93], I 2 = 84%) and length of stay in hospital (mean difference -1.98 days [95% CI: -3.43 to -0.53], I 2 = 84%). No statistical difference was found for the mortality rate (risk ratio 1.17 [95% CI: 0.52-2.63], I 2 = 57%).

Conclusion

Our analysis found arthroscopy and open arthrotomy to be equivocal for repeat surgical washout in native knee septic arthritis. All-cause complication rate and length of inpatient stay were favourable for arthroscopy with no difference noted between mortality rates.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement of native septic arthritis

PURPOSE

To identify associations with unplanned repeat irrigation and debridement (I&D) after arthrotomy for native septic arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients with native septic arthritis treated with open arthrotomies. The primary outcome was unplanned repeat I&D within 90 days. Associations evaluated for included comorbidities, ability to bear weight, fever, immunosuppressed status, purulence, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count (synovial fluid and serum levels), and synovial fluid polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%).

RESULTS

There were 59 arthrotomies in 53 patients involving the knee (n = 32), shoulder (n = 10), elbow (n = 8), ankle (n = 6), and hip (n = 3). The median patient age was 52, and a 71.2% were male. An unplanned repeat I&D was required in 40.7% (n = 24). The median time to the second I&D was 4 days (interquartile range 3 to 9). On univariate analysis, unplanned repeat I&Ds were associated with fever (p = 0.03), purulence (p = 0.01), bacteria growth on cultures (p = 0.02), and the use of deep drains (p = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the only variables that remained associated with unplanned repeat I&Ds were fever (odds ratio (OR) 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3, 23.6, p = 0.02) and purulence (OR 5.3, CI 1.1, 24.4, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

An unplanned repeat I&D was required in 40.7% of patients and was associated with fever and purulence. These findings highlight the difficulty of controlling these infections and support the need for future research into better methods of management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, Level III.

Failure rates in surgical treatment in adults with bacterial arthritis of a native joint: a systematic review of 8,586 native joints

INTRODUCTION

Most adult cases of bacterial-septic-arthritis of a native joint are effectively managed with a single surgical debridement, but some cases may require more than one debridement to control the infection. Consequently, this study assessed the failure rate of a single surgical debridement in adults with bacterial arthritis of a native joint. Additionally, risk factors for failure were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021243460) before data collection and conducted in line with the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' (PRISMA) guidelines. Multiple libraries were systematically searched to identify articles including patients reporting on the incidence of failure (i.e. persistence of infection requiring reoperation) of the treatment of bacterial arthritis. The quality of individual evidence were assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Failure rates were extracted from included studies and pooled. Risk factors for failure were extracted and grouped. Moreover, we evaluated which risk factors were significantly associated with failure.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (8,586 native joints) were included in the final analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 26% (95% CI 20 to 32%). The failure rate of arthroscopy and arthrotomy was 26% (95% CI 19 to 34%) and 24% (95% CI 17 to 33%), respectively. Seventy-nine potential risk factors were extracted and grouped. Moderate evidence was found for one risk factor (synovial white blood cell count), and limited evidence was found for five risk factors (i.e. sepsis, large joint infection, the volume of irrigation, blood urea nitrogen-test, and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio).

CONCLUSION

A single surgical debridement fails to control bacterial arthritis of a native joint in approximately a quarter of all adult cases. Limited to moderate evidence exists that risk factors associated with failure are: synovial white blood cell count, sepsis, large joint infection, and the volume of irrigation. These factors should urge physicians to be especially receptive to signs of an adverse clinical course.

Early postoperative laboratory parameters are predictive of initial treatment failure in acute septic arthritis of the knee and shoulder joint

Septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency potentially causing irreversible joint damage. However, the predictive value of potential risk factors such as early postoperative laboratory parameters remains uncertain. We investigated risk factors for initial surgical treatment failure using data from 249 patients (194 knees, 55 shoulders) treated for acute septic arthritis between 2003 and 2018. Necessity for further surgical intervention was defined as primary outcome. Demographic data, medical history, initial and postoperative laboratory parameters, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Kellgren and Lawrence classification were collected. Two scoring systems were developed as tools for failure risk estimation after initial surgical irrigation and debridement. More than one intervention was necessary in 26.1% of cases. Treatment failure occurred significantly more often for those with longer symptom duration (p = 0.003), higher CCI grades (p = 0.027), Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV (p = 0.013), shoulder arthroscopy (p = 0.010), positive bacterial culture results (p < 0.001), slow postoperative CRP decline until day three (p = 0.032) and five (p = 0.015), reduced WBC-decline (p = 0.008), and lower hemoglobin (p < 0.001). Scores for third and fifth postoperative day achieved AUCs of 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. This study identified risk factors for treatment failure in patients with septic arthritis, suggesting that early postoperative laboratory parameters can guide further treatment.

Factors associated with subsequent surgery after septic arthritis of the knee in children

BACKGROUND

Septic arthritis of the knee in children is a challenging problem. Surgical debridement is an established treatment, but there is a paucity of literature on long-term prognosis.

AIM

To determine the rates and factors associated with return to surgery (RTS) and readmission after index surgical debridement for septic arthritis of the knee in children.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study that utilizes data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). We included patients between ages 0 to 18 years that underwent surgical debridement for septic arthritis of the knee between 2005 and 2017. Demographic data included age, gender, race, hospital type and insurance type. Clinical data including index admission length of stay (LOS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were available from the HCUP database. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Nine-hundred thirty-two cases of pediatric septic knee were included. This cohort was 62.3% male, with mean age of 9.0 (± 6.1) years. Approximately 46% of patients were white and approximately half had Medicaid insurance. Thirty-six patients (3.6%) required RTS at a minimum of 2 year after index surgery, and 172 patients (18.5%) were readmitted at any point. The mean readmission LOS was 11.6(± 11.3) d. Higher CCI was associated with RTS (P = 0.041). There were no significant associations in age, gender, race, insurance type, or type of hospital to which patients presented. Multivariate analysis showed that both increased CCI (P = 0.008) and shorter LOS (P = 0.019) were predictive of RTS.

CONCLUSION

Septic arthritis of the knee is an important condition in children. The CCI was associated with RTS at a minimum of 2 years after index procedure. No association was found with age, gender, race, insurance type, or hospital type. Shorter LOS and CCI were associated with RTS in multivariate analysis. Overall, risk of subsequent surgery and readmission after pediatric septic knee arthritis is low, and CCI and shorter LOS are predictive of RTS.

S. AUREUS IS ASSOCIATED WITH A GREATER NEED FOR REOPERATION IN SEPTIC ARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE

Objective

To determine the frequency of reoperations in the treatment of adult patients diagnosed with septic arthritis of the knee, the average number of debridements needed to control the infection, the mortality rate, and to assess factors associated with a greater need for reoperation and mortality.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study evaluating 38 adult patients diagnosed with septic arthritis who underwent arthrotomy via a medial parapatellar approach for joint cleaning and debridement. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and microbiological variables of the cases were analyzed by review of medical records. Tests for equality of two proportions, chi-square, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed, defining a significance level at 0.05, with 95% confidence interval.

Results

A total of 50% of the cases underwent reoperation, with an average number of required debridement of 2.02 and a mortality rate of 10.5%. Patients with infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus were more likely to need a reoperation compared to patients with positive cultures for other agents (OR 6.0).

Conclusion

In 50% of cases, an average of 2.02 debridements were necessary and the mortality rate was 10.5%. Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with a 6 times greater chance of additional surgeries. / Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Raised initial total white cell count and lower post-operative decline of C reactive protein increases the risk of secondary surgery in septic arthritis of the native knee

PURPOSE

Septic arthritis is an orthopaedic emergency with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors associated with secondary surgery for septic arthritis of the native knee joint.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study reviewing all patients who underwent surgery for septic arthritis of the knee from 2012 to 2019 in a single institution. A total of 117 patients were recruited. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I (79/117, 67.5%) underwent one surgery and Group II (38/117, 32.5%) underwent more than one surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with a raised initial total white (TW) cell count of > 20 × 10⁹/L had a significantly higher risk of secondary surgery. (Adjusted hazard ratio 2.42, p < 0.05) A decline of CRP level of less than 20% within 24 h from initial operation was also a risk for secondary surgery. (Adjusted hazard ratio 0.34, p < 0.01) Patients in group II also had significantly higher post-operative median TW cell count and neutrophil count. There was no significant difference in the offending microbe, surgical approach, and duration of operation from initial presentation between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with septic arthritis of the native knee joint who present with raised initial total white cell count of > 20 × 10⁹/L and decline of CRP level of less than 20% within 24 h from initial operation are at higher risk of secondary operation. In these patients, more aggressive treatment strategies and appropriate counselling on the risks of repeated surgery are recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Management of a Hot Swollen Joint in the Acute Setting

BACKGROUND

The presentation of a hot swollen joint is common in the emergency department, general practice, rheumatology and orthopedic clinics. There is a wide set of differential diagnoses for a hot swollen joint, thus making it difficult to diagnose and manage, especially for junior doctors. Initially, it is pertinent to exclude/diagnose medical and surgical emergencies.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to summarize the key indications within the history, examination and investigations in order to quickly and effectively diagnose a hot swollen joint based on the original 2006 management guidelines and the papers discussing other possible indications and management strategies published since.

RESULTS

Currently, the management of crystal and non-infectious arthropathies are well recognized with little disparity. However, the treatment of infectious arthritis is not concrete and there are discrepancies in management between doctors.

CONCLUSION

We have summarized the key indications and provided a diagnostic flow chart to aid with the management.

A two-stage approach to primary TKA using articulating antibiotic-loaded spacers improve function and eradicate infection in septic arthritic knees

PURPOSE

The treatment of an infected arthritic knee might be challenging. The failure rate has been reported to be high for open or arthroscopic debridement. A subsequently high rate of infection has been noted in these patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the present study, a two-stage approach using an articulating spacer was used. The hypothesis was that the procedure would eradicate the infection and improve pain and function in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 16 consecutive patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The mean follow-up time was 6.1 years (range 2.0-9.9 years). Patients with advanced osteoarthritis and infection of the knee were included. All patients had previously undergone one or more failed arthroscopic or open procedures for the eradication of infection. All patients received the same homemade metal-on-plastic articulating antibiotic spacer. Double antibiotic therapy was given for 2 weeks intravenously and orally for 4 weeks. TKA implantation was performed 6 weeks after the first stage.

RESULTS

The infection was eradicated without recurrence in all patients. The functional results were significantly improved, and pain was significantly reduced after spacer and TKA implantation. The mean amount of knee flexion was 95 ± 30° preoperatively, and it increased to 109 ± 14° (p = 0.012) after spacer implantation and to 119 ± 10° (p = 0.002) after TKA implantation. The mean KSS objective was 58 ± 12 preoperatively, and it increased to 75 ± 14 (p < 0.0001) after spacer implantation and to 96 ± 3 (p < 0.0001) after TKA implantation. The mean KSS function was 17 ± 11 preoperatively, and it increased to 46 ± 10 (p < 0.0001) after spacer implantation and to 86 ± 6 (p < 0.0001) after TKA implantation. The mean VAS score was 65 ± 11 preoperatively, and it decreased to 2 ± 4 (p < 0.0001) after spacer implantation and to 1 ± 2 (p < 0.0001) after TKA implantation.

CONCLUSION

The two-stage procedure for the treatment of infected arthritic knees after failed eradication surgery was effective in all patients. Using an antibiotic articulating metal-on-plastic cement spacer showed improved functional results between the stages and at the final follow-up. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred.