Participants' perception of the AIIMS Trauma Assessment and Management (ATAM) course for management of polytrauma: A multi-institutional experience from India

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the application of the injury severity score in emergency departments: A cross-sectional multicentre study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the application of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) among emergency department nurses in China and the factors influencing these variables.

BACKGROUND

ISS is the first trauma scoring method to be developed and the most widely used in clinical practice. The correct application of the ISS by emergency department nurses plays an important role in assisting in the diagnosis and treatment of trauma patients, and it is crucial to understand nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional multicentre study.

METHODS

Nurses from the emergency departments of 25 grade II and grade III hospitals in Gansu Province, China participated in this study. Data was collected online using a self-administered questionnaire. Student's t-test or analysis of variance was performed to compare the differences between the groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors influencing nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding applying ISS. A STROBE checklist was used to report findings.

RESULTS

Among 459 nurses, a good level of attitude and passing levels of knowledge and practice regarding applying the ISS were revealed. Nurses in higher hospital grades, who had been exposed to ISS and received training had higher levels of knowledge and practices. Previous exposure to the ISS and training related to it were factors that influenced nurses' attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese emergency department nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices of applying the ISS still need to be improved. Hospitals and nursing managers should provide training opportunities for nurses about ISS knowledge and practices, while grade II hospitals should pay more attention to training and continuing education in this area.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

In hospitals, nursing managers may benefit from enhancing related education and training to promote the emergency department nurses' knowledge and practice of the ISS, by developing specific curricula and providing continuing education and training opportunities, while grade II hospitals should pay more attention to training and continuing education in this area.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS

This study focused on emergency department nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the application of the ISS. The research questions and design were derived from clinical nursing practice, literature review, and expert panel review, and patients or the public are temporarily not involved.

Trauma training in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of ATLS alternatives

INTRODUCTION

Trauma training for front-line providers is a critical component of injury mitigation and trauma systems strengthening. Although the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course is standard in much of the world, cost and administrative barriers are prohibitive to deploying the course in many low and middle income countries (LMICs). The purpose of this study was to identify alternative trauma training courses used in LMICs by scoping review and compare their effectiveness.

METHODS

Several peer-reviewed and grey literature databases were searched for relevant articles describing trauma training courses for front-line medical providers in LMICs. Studies were included if: performed in a LMIC; utilized a general trauma training course other than ATLS; trainees were hospital-based medical providers; study included some type of outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 34 manuscripts met inclusion criteria. The majority of courses were novel, hospital-initiated courses and ranged in length from 1 day to 1 week. Physicians were the most common target audience, followed by medical students and nurses. Courses were taught in 24 different countries throughout the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and Africa. Comparison of pre- and post-test knowledge was the most common metric used and nearly all courses demonstrated a statistically significant knowledge gain. One study demonstrated a reduction in mortality for injured patients after course implementation. The majority of courses were a collaboration between universities in a high income country and local faculty/practitioners in the LMIC where the course was taught. Reported cost per participant ranged from $10 to $232 USD.

CONCLUSIONS

Several trauma courses are currently being utilized in LMICs effectively with increases in knowledge gained and at a lower reported cost than ATLS. More research is needed to link trauma training courses to patient outcomes.