1
|
Dhillon J, Tanguilig G, Kraeutler MJ. Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulators Show Intraoperative, Surgical Training, and Athletic Training Applications: A Scoping Review. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00146-4. [PMID: 38387769 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review published literature to identify and evaluate the effect of virtual reality (complete immersion) and augmented reality (overlay of digital information onto the physical world) simulators on intraoperative use for orthopaedic surgeons, orthopaedic surgical education, and athletic training. METHODS A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies, published since 2014, that evaluated the role of augmented/virtual reality on intraoperative use for orthopaedic surgeons, orthopaedic surgical education, and athletic training. RESULTS Virtual reality (VR) simulators provide 3-dimensional graphical simulation of the physical world, and augmented reality (AR) simulators overlay digital information onto the physical world. Simulators can include interactive features (i.e., replication of intraoperative bleeding), haptic feedback, and unrestricted task repetition, and they can record, compare, and analyze performance while being easily accessible and eliminating the need for the presence of a mentor or coach. Four studies reported on VR for intraoperative use, 47 studies on surgical education, and 10 studies on athletic training. Two studies revealed the advantages of using VR simulation during intraoperative procedures, specifically showcasing its benefits for elbow arthroscopy, while 2 studies demonstrated similar positive outcomes for hip arthroscopy. Seventeen studies demonstrated that a VR simulator could be a beneficial tool to assist in surgical education for the knee, while 12 studies found that VR simulation is a valuable tool for aiding in surgical education of shoulder arthroscopy. Ten studies demonstrated that VR simulation improves skills in the operating room. Three studies revealed that individuals with more experience exhibit superior performance on these simulators compared to those with less experience. In the realm of athletic training, 10 studies showcased the potential of VR simulation to play a significant role in athletic performance and injury rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS VR simulation shows benefits in the operating room, is a valuable tool for surgical education resulting in improved skills, and can be used to enhance athletic performance and injury rehabilitation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Understanding that VR simulators can improve surgical outcomes, surgical skill training, and athletic training and rehabilitation could facilitate development and adoption of this advanced technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaydeep Dhillon
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Grace Tanguilig
- Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Matthew J Kraeutler
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Andriollo L, Picchi A, Sangaletti R, Perticarini L, Rossi SMP, Logroscino G, Benazzo F. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:300. [PMID: 38338185 PMCID: PMC10855330 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The remarkable progress in data aggregation and deep learning algorithms has positioned artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to revolutionize the field of medicine. AI is becoming more and more prevalent in the healthcare sector, and its impact on orthopedic surgery is already evident in several fields. This review aims to examine the literature that explores the comprehensive clinical relevance of AI-based tools utilized before, during, and after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The review focuses on current clinical applications and future prospects in preoperative management, encompassing risk prediction and diagnostics; intraoperative tools, specifically navigation, identifying complex anatomic landmarks during surgery; and postoperative applications in terms of postoperative care and rehabilitation. Additionally, AI tools in educational and training settings are presented. Orthopedic surgeons are showing a growing interest in AI, as evidenced by the applications discussed in this review, particularly those related to ACL injury. The exponential increase in studies on AI tools applicable to the management of ACL tears promises a significant future impact in its clinical application, with growing attention from orthopedic surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Andriollo
- Robotic Prosthetic Surgery Unit—Sports Traumatology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.); (S.M.P.R.); (F.B.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Aurelio Picchi
- Unit of Orthopedics, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.P.); (G.L.)
| | - Rudy Sangaletti
- Robotic Prosthetic Surgery Unit—Sports Traumatology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.); (S.M.P.R.); (F.B.)
| | - Loris Perticarini
- Robotic Prosthetic Surgery Unit—Sports Traumatology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.); (S.M.P.R.); (F.B.)
| | - Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi
- Robotic Prosthetic Surgery Unit—Sports Traumatology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.); (S.M.P.R.); (F.B.)
| | - Giandomenico Logroscino
- Unit of Orthopedics, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (A.P.); (G.L.)
| | - Francesco Benazzo
- Robotic Prosthetic Surgery Unit—Sports Traumatology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.); (S.M.P.R.); (F.B.)
- Biomedical Sciences Area, IUSS University School for Advanced Studies, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guerra Bresson H, Baumann Q, El Koussaify J, Benayoun M, Maillot C, Rousseau MA, Boyer P. Arthroscopic approach in initial training: Study of a novice cohort using inverse direct and indirect approaches and its implication in the development of training programs. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023; 109:103552. [PMID: 36649789 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Arthroscopic training includes successive stages of observation, reproduction and then repetition. Learning through simulation in 2D virtual reality makes it possible to repeat these different stages to enhance the learner's experience in complete safety and a shorter timeframe. Some procedures require inversion of the optical and instrumental approaches in the axial plane, disrupting the existing psychomotor and technical skills. The objective of this study was to compare the degree of difficulty and the distribution of results for the same exercise carried out alternately in classical holding and inverted holding of the instruments in a cohort of novice learners. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-two medical students, novices in arthroscopic surgery, participated in the study. Each performed an exercise consisting of grasping ten targets with arthroscopic forceps and placing them in a basket on the VirtaMed ArthroS™ simulator. The exercise was performed with the scope and grasping instrument pointed away from the operator, "catch the stars front" (CTSF), then directed towards the operator, "catch the stars back" (CTSB). The simulator recorded several parameters making up an overall composite score ("overall performance score", OPS) out of 120 points. Voluntary abandonment of the exercise was also collected. RESULTS All students completed the CTSF exercise but 6 dropped out of the CTSB exercise (27%, p=0.01). In the CTSF exercise, the average OPS was higher with 45.9 points versus 22.8 points in the CTSB exercise (p<0.001). By detailing the components of the OPS score, the parameters of interest on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Training (FAST) module of the simulator included: the distance traveled by the scope and the grasping forceps was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the duration of the exercise was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the time spent with the instruments in the videoscopic field was significantly lower in the CTSB group (p=0.001) and finally the absence of a significant difference in the camera alignment compared to the horizontal plane between the two groups. CONCLUSION The exercise with the instruments directed towards the operator is more difficult with a greater distribution for all the secondary criteria except for the camera alignment, which suggests that it could be more discriminating. The dropout rate is also higher. It would therefore be interesting to introduce CTSB type training in initial training programs in arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, comparative prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héléna Guerra Bresson
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France.
| | - Quentin Baumann
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Jad El Koussaify
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Marie Benayoun
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Cédric Maillot
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Marc-Antoine Rousseau
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Boyer
- Service de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cate G, Barnes J, Cherney S, Stambough J, Bumpass D, Barnes CL, Dickinson KJ. Current status of virtual reality simulation education for orthopedic residents: the need for a change in focus. GLOBAL SURGICAL EDUCATION : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR SURGICAL EDUCATION 2023; 2:46. [PMID: 38013875 PMCID: PMC10032253 DOI: 10.1007/s44186-023-00120-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Advances in technology are changing surgical education. Simulation provides an important adjunct to operative experience. This pedagogy has arguably become more important in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, with resultant reduction in operative exposure for trainees. Virtual reality (VR) simulators may provide significant contribution to experiential learning; however, much of the investigative focus to date has, correctly, been on establishing validity evidence for these constructs. The aim of this work was to perform a scoping review to assess the current status of VR simulation education to determine curricular development efforts for orthopedic residents. Methods With a trained medical librarian, searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for all articles in the last 10 years (September 2011-September 2021). Controlled vocabulary Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and natural language developed with subject matter experts describing virtual reality or VR simulation and orthopedic training were used. Two trained reviewers evaluated all abstracts for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were all articles that did not assess VR simulation education involving orthopedic residents. Data were extracted from the included full-text articles including: study design, type of participants, type of VR simulation, simulated orthopedic skill, type of educational event, learner assessment including Kirkpatrick's level, assessment of quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), and level of effectiveness (LoE). Results Initial search identified 1,394 articles, of which 61 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The majority (54%) were published in 2019- 2021, 49% in Europe. The commonest VR simulator was ArthroS (23%) and the commonest simulated skill was knee arthroscopy (33%). The majority of studies (70%) focused on simulator validation. Twenty-three studies described an educational module or curriculum, and of the 21 (34%) educational modules, 43% were one-off events. Most modules (18/21, 86%) assessed learners at Kirkpatrick level 2. With regard to methodological quality, 44% of studies had MERSQI 11.5-15 and 89% of studies had LoE of 2. Two studies had LoE of 3. Conclusion Current literature pertaining to VR training for orthopedic residents is focused on establishing validity and rarely forms part of a curriculum. Where the focus is education, the majority are discrete educational modules and do not teach a comprehensive amalgam of orthopedic skills. This suggests focus is needed to embed VR simulation training within formal curricula efforts guided by the work of Kern, and assess the efficacy of these against patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Cate
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - Jack Barnes
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - Steven Cherney
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - Jeffrey Stambough
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - David Bumpass
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - C. Lowry Barnes
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - Karen J. Dickinson
- Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR USA
- Office of Interprofessional Education, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang H, He Y, Chen Y, Liu J, Jin Q, Xu S, Fu X, Qiao J, Yu B, Niu F. Virtual Reality and Three-Dimensional Printed Models Improve the Morphological Understanding in Learning Mandibular Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study. Front Surg 2022; 8:705532. [PMID: 35004831 PMCID: PMC8727369 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.705532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a routine operation performed to correct mandibular deformity including mandibular retrusion, protrusion, deficiency, and asymmetry. The SSRO remains a challenging procedure for junior surgeons due to a lack of adequate morphological knowledge necessary for success in clinical practice. Virtual reality (VR) and three-dimensional printed (3DP) models have been widely applied in anatomy education. The present randomized, controlled study was performed to evaluate the effect of traditional educational instruments, VR models, and 3DP models on junior surgeons learning the morphological information required to perform SSRO. Methods: Eighty-one participants were randomly assigned to three learning groups: Control, VR, and 3DP. Objective and subjective tests were used to evaluate the learning effectiveness of each learning instrument. In the objective test, participants were asked to identify 10 anatomical landmarks on normal and deformed models, draw the osteotomy line, and determine the description of SSRO. In the subjective test, participants were asked to provide feedback regarding their subjective feelings about the learning instrument used in their group. Results: The objective test results showed that the VR and 3DP groups achieved better accuracy in drawing the osteotomy line (p = 0.027) and determining the description of SSRO (p = 0.023) than the Control group. However, there was no significant difference among the three groups regarding the identification of anatomical landmarks. The VR and 3DP groups gave satisfactory subjective feedback about the usefulness in learning, good presentation, and enjoyment. The Control and 3DP groups reported positive feelings about ease of use. Conclusion: The current findings suggest that VR and 3DP models were effective instruments that assisted in the morphological understanding of SSRO-related anatomical structures. Furthermore, 3DP models may be a promising supplementary instrument to bridge the gap between conventional learning and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henglei Zhang
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu He
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianfeng Liu
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Jin
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shixing Xu
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Fu
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Qiao
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Yu
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Niu
- Department of Craniomaxillofacila Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|