The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review

Acute prophylactic antibiotic nailing of open femoral shaft fractures for prevention of fracture-related infection

Background

Open, grossly contaminated femoral shaft fractures pose a significant threat for fracture-related infection. Traditional treatment for these injuries consists of irrigation and debridement with temporizing external fixation placement and staged conversion to definitive fixation.

Methods

We describe a protocol for acute antibiotic cement nailing of open femoral shaft fractures as an infection prophylaxis modality in fractures with a high risk of infection and present three cases.

Results

Three patients presented with open femoral shaft fractures with large soft tissue defects and gross contamination and were successfully treated with acute retrograde antibiotic nailing and external fixation with later conversion to definitive metallic nailing. They did not develop infection and had acceptable postoperative function and fracture alignment.

Conclusion

This technique of early infection prophylaxis after open femoral shaft fracture is reproducible, pragmatic, and cost-effective.

[Treatment strategies for fracture-related infections with concurrent soft tissue damage]

Fracture-related infections are the predominant complication following surgical fracture treatment. The distal lower leg, e.g., in pilon tibial fractures, is at a high risk of infection due to poor soft tissue coverage, particularly in cases of open fractures in this area. Fracture-related infections with significant soft tissue damage require special attention alongside treatment of the infection itself. In general, the principle is that healing of fracture-related infection is not possible without sufficient soft tissue coverage. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate both soft tissue damage and fracture-related infection into a comprehensive treatment plan from the beginning. An interdiscpilinary treatment approach between trauma and plastic surgery is often necessary and beneficial. In cases, where fracture fixation devices or bone is exposed, mid- or long-term use of vacuum-assisted wound therapy is not advisable due to a higher risk of reinfection. Hence, an interdisciplinary treatment strategy involving trauma and plastic surgery should prioritize early soft tissue closure, referred to as the "orthoplastic approach". If this cannot be done in the own hospital, early patient transfer is indicated to ensure optimal interdisciplinary therapy with early soft tissue closure and simultaneous trauma surgical treatment to control the infection and enable bone healing. Free fasciocutaneous or muscle flap techniques in combination with adequate trauma surgical and antibiotic therapy lead to good reliable results in these situations.

Key aspects of soft tissue management in fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group

A judicious, well-planned bone and soft tissue debridement remains one of the cornerstones of state-of-the-art treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI). Meticulous surgical excision of all non-viable tissue can, however, lead to the creation of large soft tissue defects. The management of these defects is complex and numerous factors need to be considered when selecting the most appropriate approach. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence with respect to soft tissue management in patients diagnosed with FRI. Specifically we discuss the optimal timing for tissue closure following debridement in cases of FRI, the need for negative microbiological culture results from the surgical site as a prerequisite for definitive wound closure, the optimal type of flap in case of large soft tissue defects caused by FRI and the role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in FRI. Finally, recommendations are made with regard to soft tissue management in FRI that should be useful for clinicians in daily clinical practice.Level of evidence Level V.

Antibiotic coated nails: Rationale, development, indications and outcomes

The concept of antibiotic-coated implants, mainly coated intramedullary nails, has become increasingly used for the treatment of fracture related infections. After a long period of hand-made implants, commercially fabricated implants combine several benefits. Antibiotic-coated nails constitute a solid treatment option for unstable diaphyseal infections with fractures or non-unions. They release high concentrations of antibiotics locally, while retaining reduction and providing axial stability. This review aims to provide an overview about the background, the development, the indications, the treatment strategies and the outcomes of antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails.

Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy: Minimum five-year follow-up and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in a five-year patient cohort and to discuss the results in the light of literature data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2016, a total of 74 patients (35 males, 39 females; median age: 60 years; range, 20 to 95 years) who received NPWT were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included 49 orthopedic and traumatology, 12 vascular surgery, and 13 general surgery patients. The efficacy of wound healing, bacterial load, and the impact of comorbidities on wound healing were examined.

RESULTS

The distribution of wound types varied very widely. Certain comorbidities affected wound healing. In orthopedic traumatology patients, we observed mainly skin flora infection (57.14%), while in surgical and vascular patients, mixed flora (80%) and in many cases poly-resistant pathogens were present (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 24%) A total of 43.3% of wounds were completely closed, while 44.6% of patients had a wound healing. Successful skin grafting was performed in 75% of wounds.

CONCLUSION

This technique may be used as widely and as early as possible. However, further large-scale, multi-center, randomized clinical trials are needed worldwide to find a place for this technique in wound care and even in primary care.