1
|
Longo UG, Marino M, Lalli A, Bandini B, Giannarelli D, Ruiz Ibán MÁ. Arthroscopic management of isolated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2024. [PMID: 38932614 DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present study is to provide a comprehensive review on the surgical outcomes following arthroscopic treatments of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs) and to compare the postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score following in situ transtendon repair and tear completion, followed by repair. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL and CENTRAL bibliographic databases were searched. Papers including patients with PT-RCTs of any grade who underwent treatment using debridement, in situ transtendon repair, tear completion and repair or bioinductive collagen implants were reviewed. Primary PT-RCTs were the sole indication for surgery. Primary postoperative outcomes assessed included the ASES score, the Absolute Constant-Murley score, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Visual Analogue Scale, the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Score, range of motion, complications and revisions. A meta-analysis of comparative studies compared the postoperative ASES score between patients treated with in situ transtendon repair versus tear completion repair. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included. The ASES score was reported by four comparative studies with contrasting results. The heterogeneity was high (I2 = 86%), and effect sizes ranged from -0.49 in favour of the tear completion and repair technique to an effect size of +1.07 favouring in situ transtendon repair. The overall effect size of 0.02 suggests an equivalence between the two techniques in terms of the ASES score. Two studies with a total sample size of 111 patients reported on debridement, and four studies with a total sample size of 155 patients reported on bioinductive collagen implants. CONCLUSION Debridement alone is suitable for Ellman grades I-II PT-RCTs. In situ transtendon and tear completion repair techniques yield similar postoperative outcomes. Bioinductive collagen implants hold promise but lack long-term efficacy data. High-quality comparative studies are needed to determine the best treatment for PT-RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umile Giuseppe Longo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Martina Marino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Alberto Lalli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Benedetta Bandini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orozco E, Dhillon J, Keeter C, Brown TD, Kraeutler MJ. Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation Is Associated With Lower Retear Rates for Large Tears: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:1300-1308. [PMID: 37734446 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with and without patch augmentation. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that directly compared outcomes between rotator cuff repair (RCR) with versus without patch augmentation. Patients were evaluated based on retear rate, histological outcomes, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (Constant score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score; University of California-Los Angeles shoulder scale; Simple Shoulder Test; EuroQol-visual analog scale; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and PENN shoulder score questionnaire). RESULTS Six studies (1 level I, 5 level II) met inclusion criteria, including 188 patients undergoing RCR alone (Control) and 193 patients undergoing RCR with patch augmentation (Patch). Patient age ranged from 56.0 to 68.0 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 14.0 to 68.4 months. The average body mass index ranged from 24.4 to 29.4, and the overall percentage of males ranged from 32.5% to 82.3%. Three studies found significantly decreased retear rates with patch augmentation. The retear rate ranged from 34.0% to 65.4% in the Control group and 9.1% to 52.9% in the Patch group. One study found a significant difference for the Constant score favoring the Patch group. Two studies found a significant difference for the ASES score favoring the Patch group. One study found significantly better results with patch augmentation in terms of repaired tendon thickness and footprint coverage, based on magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS Patch augmentation of rotator cuff repairs may be associated with lower retear rates for large tears. There is limited evidence to suggest that patch augmentation is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, systematic review of level I and II studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Orozco
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Jaydeep Dhillon
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Carson Keeter
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Taylor D Brown
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Matthew J Kraeutler
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith JT, Pill SG, Eggert KA, Brignull CG, Adams KJ, Wyland DJ, Tolan SJ, Thigpen CA, Kissenberth MJ. Corticosteroid injection prior to surgery had no effect on 2-year outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. JSES Int 2024; 8:75-79. [PMID: 38312263 PMCID: PMC10837736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) can be an effective nonsurgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff tears. Recent large database studies have raised concern that CSI may result in a higher reoperation rate, increased infection risk, and worse outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reoperation rate, incidence of postoperative infection, and two-year outcomes of patients undergoing ARCR with and without the use of preoperative CSI. Methods An institutional database generated from fellowship-trained orthopedic sports surgeons was retrospectively queried for patients who underwent ARCR with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria consisted of 1) primary full-thickness rotator cuff tear and 2) preoperative and minimum two-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Of the 219 patients identified, 134 patients had preoperative subacromial CSI administered within one year of ARCR. Reoperation rate, number of injections, Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Physical Component Score/Mental Component Score were compared between groups at six months, one year, and two years. Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare baseline differences, postoperative infections, and reoperations. A repeated measures Analyses of Covariance was used to measure differences between PROMs at each time point. Simple Analyses of Covariance were used for the two-year sub-analyses for patients receiving CSI within 90 days of surgery and if multiple preoperative CSI had been given (α ≤ 0.05). Results There were no significant demographic differences between groups (P > .05). Preoperative use of subacromial CSI within one year prior to ARCR did not increase reoperation rate (P = .85) or impact PROMs at any timepoint. There were two reoperations during the study period in the CSI group (2 lysis of adhesions). No infections occurred in either cohort. No differences were found if injections were performed within 90 days of surgery or if more than one CSI was administered within the year prior to surgery (P > .05). Conclusion Our results show that preoperative CSI prior to primary ARCR did not increase risk of reoperation, infection, or influence PROMs with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T. Smith
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Stephan G. Pill
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | | | - Kyle J. Adams
- Department of Orthopedics, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Douglas J. Wyland
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Stefan J. Tolan
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Charles A. Thigpen
- ATI Physical Therapy, Greenville, SC, USA
- Center for Effectiveness Research in Orthopaedics, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Longo UG, Lalli A, Medina G, Maffulli N. Conservative Management of Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2023; 31:80-87. [PMID: 37976129 DOI: 10.1097/jsa.0000000000000372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative management has emerged as an attractive option for partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs). A single algorithmic treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic PT-RCT has not yet been developed. This systematic review aims to ascertain whether a conservative approach to PT-RCTs yields positive results in terms of clinical outcomes and functional recovery. METHODS This is a systematic review of the literature on patients with PT-RCTs receiving conservative treatment with physiotherapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, collagen injections, hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, or corticosteroids injections coupled with polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN). Outcomes such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley Score evaluations, as well as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Euro Quality of Life-5D questionnaires were reported following a conservative approach. RESULTS Eleven studies were included. Six articles explored the outcomes of patients with PT-RCT treated with PRP injections. Significant improvements in VAS for pain were observed. Two studies examined collagen injections and reported variations in VAS for pain and Constant-Murley Score. Sodium hyaluronate and HA injections were studied in two other articles, showing notable improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Corticosteroid and PDRN injections also displayed favorable outcomes. In addition, physical therapy protocols demonstrated improvements in VAS for pain and strength, particularly with eccentric rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS Conservative management of PT-RCTs, involving physical therapy, PRP injections, collagen injections, corticosteroid injections, HA injections, and PDRN in jections, demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, favorable results are observed in terms of decreased tear width and improved strength recovery, at least during a short-term follow-up. Unfortunately, long-term insight into the structural integrity of conservatively treated rotator cuff tendons following a partial injury has not been thoroughly evaluated yet. STUDY DESIGN LEVELS OF EVIDENCE Level IV-systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umile Giuseppe Longo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus-Biomedico
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma
| | - Alberto Lalli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus-Biomedico
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma
| | - Giovanna Medina
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knotted and knotless double row transosseous equivalent repair techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrate comparable post-operative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 31:1919-1924. [PMID: 35996032 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07121-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare failure rates and outcomes after transosseous equivalent (TOE) double row (DR) knotted suture bridge versus knotless suture tape bridge repair techniques for rotator cuff tears. METHODS A consecutive series of 272 shoulders in 256 patients who underwent arthroscopic, double row, TOE repair for full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon were reviewed. Eighty-four shoulders were repaired using knotted suture bridge (KSB) technique, and 188 shoulders were repaired using all knotless suture tape bridge (KTB) technique. Revision procedures and concomitant subscapularis tendon repairs were excluded from analysis. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Primary outcome was failure of surgical repair, defined as either confirmed retear on MRI and/or need for revision surgery. Secondary clinical outcome measures were assessed including range of motion, strength, visual analog scale (VAS), operative time, subjective shoulder value (SSV), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental and physical health, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Brophy shoulder activity scores, and need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). RESULTS A total of 127 shoulders (38 KSB and 89 KTB) met inclusion criteria for the study. No significant difference in demographic variables were present between the groups at baseline. Supraspinatus tear size and average follow-up time did not differ significantly between groups. Failure rates were similar between the KSB and KTB repairs (13.1 vs 7.9%, n.s.). There was no significant difference in functional outcomes including strength, range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation, as well as patient reported outcomes including VAS, SSV, PROMIS, ASES, and Brophy scores between the groups. There was also no difference in post-operative stiffness requiring MUA. CONCLUSION Both KSB and KTB repair techniques demonstrate low retear rates with excellent functional outcomes when compared to pre-operative examination. Both KSB and KTB techniques are viable options for achieving a successful rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|