Fractional excretion of urea to differentiate transient from persistent acute kidney injury: should we still trust old tools in the biomarker era?

Biochemical Markers of Renal Hypoperfusion, Hemoconcentration, and Proteinuria after Extreme Physical Exercise

Background and Objectives: Physical exercise increases the blood perfusion of muscles, but decreases the renal blood flow. There are several markers of renal hypoperfusion which are used in the differential diagnosis of acute kidney failure. Albuminuria is observed after almost any exercise. The aim of this study was to assess changes in renal hypoperfusion and albuminuria after a 100-km race. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 males who finished a 100-km run were studied. The mean age of the runners was 38.04 ± 5.64 years. The exclusion criteria were a history of kidney disease, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min, and proteinuria. Blood and urine were collected before and after the race. The urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), fractional excretion of urea (FeUrea) and sodium (FeNa), plasma urea/creatinine ratio (sUrea/Cr), urine/plasma creatinine ratio (u/pCr), urinary sodium to potassium ratio (uNa/K), and urinary potassium to urinary potassium plus sodium ratio (uK/(K+Na)) were calculated. Results: After the race, significant changes in albuminuria and markers of renal hypoperfusion (FeNa, FeUrea, sUrea/Cr, u/sCr, urinary Na, uNa/K, uK/(K+Na)) were found. Fifteen runners (55.56%) had severe renal hypoperfusion (FeUrea <35, uNa/K <1, and uK/(Na+K) >0.5) after the race. The mean ACR increased from 6.28 ± 3.84 mg/g to 48.43 ± 51.64 mg/g (p < 0.001). The ACR was higher in the group with severe renal hypoperfusion (59.42 ± 59.86 vs. 34.68 ± 37.04 mg/g), but without statistical significance. Conclusions: More than 50% of the runners had severe renal hypoperfusion after extreme exercise. Changes in renal hemodynamics are probably an important, but not the only, factor of post-exercise proteinuria.

Prevention and treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: an update

Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SAKI) remains an important challenge in critical care medicine. We reviewed current available evidence on prevention and treatment of SAKI with focus on some recent advances and developments. Prevention of SAKI starts with early and ample fluid resuscitation preferentially with crystalloid solutions. Balanced crystalloids have no proven superior benefit. Renal function can be evaluated by measuring lactate clearance rate, renal Doppler, or central venous oxygenation monitoring. Assuring sufficiently high central venous oxygenation most optimally prevents SAKI, especially in the post-operative setting, whereas lactate clearance better assesses mortality risk when SAKI is present. Although the adverse effects of an excessive “kidney afterload” are increasingly recognized, there is actually no consensus regarding an optimal central venous pressure. Noradrenaline is the vasopressor of choice for preventing SAKI. Intra-abdominal hypertension, a potent trigger of AKI in post-operative and trauma patients, should not be neglected in sepsis. Early renal replacement therapy (RRT) is recommended in fluid-overloaded patients’ refractory to diuretics but compelling evidence about its usefulness is still lacking. Continuous RRT (CRRT) is advocated, though not sustained by convincing data, as the preferred modality in hemodynamically unstable SAKI. Diuretics should be avoided in the absence of hypervolemia. Antimicrobial dosing during CRRT needs to be thoroughly reconsidered to assure adequate infection control.