Balancing care and teaching during clinical activities: 2 contexts, 2 strategies

Education During Ward Rounds: Systematic Review

Background

Enhancing the educational experience provided by ward rounds requires an understanding of current perceptions of the educational value of rounds.

Objective

This systematic review examines perceptions of education in ward rounds, educational activities in ward rounds, barriers to learning, and perceptions of simulation-based ward rounds.

Methods

The 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. MEDLINE (EBSCO), Cochrane, and Scopus were searched on May 29, 2022, for studies assessing learning during ward rounds. The search terms included “ward rounds,” “education,” and “trainees.” Then, the selected articles were reference searched. In total, 354 articles were retrieved. The articles were assessed for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers who screened titles, abstracts, and full-length texts. Articles addressing trainees’ education in all ward rounds were included. Articles were excluded if they were specific to certain disciplines, were reviews, were not published in scholarly journals, were published before 2015, were published in languages other than English, or did not concern human participants. Following the removal of 63 duplicates, a total of 268 articles were excluded. The risk of bias within the selected articles was also assessed via the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research. Qualitative data were used to describe results in a narrative synthesis and in tables.

Results

A total of 23 articles were included. Perceptions of teaching in rounds were addressed by 6 studies, of which 3 showed negative perceptions among participants, 2 reported ambivalent perceptions, and 1 showed positive perceptions. Perceived barriers to teaching during rounds were assessed by 7 studies. The reported barriers included time constraints, workloads, schedules, interruptions, the service-oriented nature of rounds, the lack of feedback, hierarchies, the lack of opportunities to ask questions and be engaged in patient management, and divergent learner needs. Further, 8 studies identified types of educational activities, including observation, patient-specific teaching, and discussion. Perceptions of learning through simulated ward rounds were assessed by 8 studies, and a consensus of satisfaction was noted among learners. The interventions that were explored to improve education included using teaching frameworks, involving clinical librarians, and changing the setting of ward rounds.

Conclusions

The main limitations of this review are the predominant use of qualitative data in the included articles and the lack of standardization for the educational compositions of ward rounds among articles, which made the articles hard to compare. In conclusion, learning opportunities in ward rounds are often missed, and trainees perceive rounds to have low educational value. It is important to recognize the barriers to education during ward rounds and address them to maximize the benefits of ward rounds. Finally, there is a need to develop plans that incorporate teaching regularly during ward rounds in the inpatient setting.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO CRD42022337736; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=337736

Barriers to workplace-based learning in the intensive care unit: A qualitative description of internal medicine residents' and intensivists' perspectives

BACKGROUND

Residency programs leverage the acquisition of critical care competencies through off-service rotations in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, recent literature questions the effectiveness of increasing the exposition of residents to critical care units to improve their critical care competencies. We aimed to describe the barriers to learning in the ICU from the perspective of internal medicine (IM) residents and intensivists.

METHODS

A qualitative description methodology was applied to data gathered during an ICU quality improvement initiative in a large tertiary academic hospital. Verbatim transcriptions of 12 focus groups including 22 IM residents and 17 intensivists were assessed through thematic data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified three key themes and 13 subthemes related to barriers to learning. Aspects of the environment such as the slow socialization process of residents to the ICU environment and stakeholders' perceptions influenced the quality of learning interactions. Dedicated teaching was further influenced by factors related to the IM residency curricula (e.g. competing co-curricular demands) and contributed to tensions in delivering a standardized ICU curriculum.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a description of educational barriers that may be present during ICU rotations. Recognizing these barriers may help clinical teachers improve their trainees' educational experience.

Resident competencies before and after short intensive care unit rotations: a multicentre pilot observational study

PURPOSE

Residency programs need to understand the competencies developed by residents during an intensive care unit (ICU) rotation, so that curricula and assessments maximize residents' learning. The primary study objective was to evaluate the feasibility for training programs and acceptability by residents of conducting a multi-competency assessment during a four-week ICU rotation.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicentre observational pilot study in three ICUs. During weeks 1 and 4 of an ICU rotation, we conducted repeated standardized assessments of non-critical care specialty residents' competencies in cognitive reasoning (script concordance test [SCT]), procedural skills (objective structured assessment of technical skills [OSATS]-global rating scale], and communication skills through a written test, two procedural simulations, and a simulated encounter with a "family member". The feasibility outcomes included program costs, the proportion of enrolled residents able to complete at least one three-station assessment during their four-week ICU rotation, and acceptability of the assessment for the trainees.

RESULTS

We enrolled 63 (69%) of 91 eligible residents, with 58 (92%) completing at least one assessment. The total cost to conduct 90 assessments was CAD 33,800. The majority of participants agreed that the assessment was fair and that it measured important clinical abilities. For the 32 residents who completed two assessments, the mean (standard deviation) cognitive reasoning and procedural skill scores increased between weeks 1 and 4 [SCT difference, 3.1 (6.5), P = 0.01; OSATS difference for bag-mask ventilation and central line insertion, 0.4 (0.5) and 0.6 (0.8), respectively; both P ≤ 0.001]. Nevertheless, the communication scores did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

A monthly multi-competency assessment for specialty residents rotating in the ICU is likely feasible for most programs with appropriate resources, and generally acceptable for residents. Specialty residents' cognitive reasoning and procedural skills may improve during a four-week ICU rotation, whereas communication skills may not.

Learning in Pediatric Emergency Situations: A Qualitative Study of Residents' Perspectives

OBJECTIVES

To explore resident learning in the context of emergency situations. The guiding research questions were: How do residents learn in emergency situations? What factors facilitate or hinder their learning?

DESIGN

A qualitative approach was used in order to understand the different perspectives of participants and explore the context of emergency situations. Aware of the complex sociocultural interactions in emergency situations, we used the methodology of constructivist grounded theory.

SETTING

A medium-sized pediatric academic hospital in San Antonio, TX.

SUBJECTS

Twenty pediatric residents participated in semi-structured interviews.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We used an iterative process of data collection and analysis. The process continued until thematic saturation was reached. The data were coded and analyzed using constant comparison. Codes were clustered into themes informed by the theory of situated learning. Several methods were used to ensure trustworthiness of results. Three main themes were identified. First, resident participation in emergency situations takes different forms. Residents participate mostly in helping roles. Watching is an under-recognized form of participation yet offered unique experiences. Managing roles are rarely afforded to residents. Second, resident participation is informed by the context of the emergency situation. Based on contextual clues (e.g., safety, needs), residents infer potential risks and values from their participation, which guides their participatory role. Residents may shift their form of participation, based on changes in the context. Supervisors play a significant role in guiding resident participation. Third, engagement, a state of cognitive and emotional focus, is critical in learning. The context of the emergency situation plays a role in the level of resident engagement. Supervisors may also foster resident engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident participation in emergency situations is complex and informed by the context. Learning in emergency situations is influenced by residents' level of mental engagement. Supervisors may positively guide resident participation, foster engagement, and enable them to reach their learning goals in emergency situations.