Gender association with postoperative hemorrhage patient safety indicator in the United States from 2000 to 2012

The role of extended coagulation screening in adult cranial neurosurgery

Introduction

Postoperative hemorrhage after adult cranial neurosurgery is a serious complication with substantial morbidity and mortality.

Research question

We investigated if an extended preoperative screening and an early treatment of previously undetected coagulopathies may decrease the risk of postoperative hemorrhage.

Methods

A prospective study cohort of patients undergoing elective cranial surgery and receiving the extended coagulatory work-up were compared to a propensity matched historical control cohort. The extended work-up included a standardized questionnaire on the patient's bleeding history as well as coagulatory tests of Factor XIII, von-Willebrand-Factor and PFA-100®. Deficiencies were substituted perioperatively. The primary outcome was determined as the surgical revision rate due to postoperative hemorrhage.

Results

The study cohort and the control cohort included 197 cases each, without any significant difference in the preoperative intake of anticoagulant medication (p ​= ​.546). Most common interventions were resections of malignant tumors (41%), benign tumors (27%) and neurovascular surgeries (9%) in both cohorts. Imaging revealed postoperative hemorrhage in 7 cases (3.6%) in the study cohort and 18 cases (9.1%) in the control cohort (p ​= ​.023). Of these, revision surgeries were significantly more common in the control cohort with 14 cases (9.1%) compared to 5 cases (2.5%) in the study cohort (p ​= ​.034). Differences in mean intraoperative blood loss were not significant with 528 ​ml in the study cohort and 486 ​ml in the control cohort (p ​= ​.376).

Conclusion

Preoperative extended coagulatory screening may allow for revealing previously undiagnosed coagulopathies with subsequent preoperative substitution and thereby reduction of risk for postoperative hemorrhage in adult cranial neurosurgery.

Evaluation of delayed bleeding risks associated with partial hepatectomy: A nationwide population-based propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

There is an increased bleeding risk following hepatectomy either due to surgical complications or the nature of liver dysfunction among these patients. For better prevention of delayed bleeding in patients undergoing hepatectomy with different kinds of comorbidities and medications, we examined the risk of major bleeding up to 10 years following hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study used data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2000 and 2012 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The non-hepatectomy cohort was defined as patients without any record of hepatectomy. Variables including gender, age, comorbidities, and prescribed medications were matched between the hepatectomy and non-hepatectomy cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1155 patients with hepatectomy and 1155 matched non-hepatectomy subjects were included in this study. The risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in the hepatectomy cohort than that of the non-hepatectomy cohort (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.60). The gastrointestinal tract was the most common site of bleeding among patients with bleeding tendencies (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.93). Compared with the non-hepatectomy cohort, patients who underwent hepatectomy were at greater risk of delayed major bleeding in the first decade following surgery (adjusted hazard ratios ranged from 1.56 to 1.70).

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy poses a significant risk of delayed major bleeding, especially in the first decade following surgery. Proper prevention methods and close monitoring for bleeding complications are indicated for patients undergoing hepatic surgeries.