Dynamic optic nerve sheath diameter changes upon moderate hyperventilation in patients with traumatic brain injury

Diagnostic Value of the Combination of Ultrasonographic Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Width of Crural Cistern with Respect to the Intracranial Pressure in Patients Treated with Decompressive Craniotomy

BACKGROUND

The monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) and detection of increased ICP are crucial because such increases may cause secondary brain injury and a poor prognosis. Although numerous ultrasound parameters, including optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), width of the crural cistern (WCC), and the flow velocities of the central retinal artery and middle cerebral artery, can be measured in patients after hemicraniectomy, researchers have yet to determine which of these is better for evaluating ICP. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between ICP and ultrasound parameters and investigate the best noninvasive estimator of ICP.

METHODS

This observational study enrolled 50 patients with brain injury after hemicraniectomy from January 2021 to December 2021. All patients underwent invasive ICP monitoring with microsensor, transcranial, and ocular ultrasound postoperatively. We measured the ONSD including the dura mater (ONSDI), the ONSD excluding the dura mater, the optic nerve diameter (OND), the eyeball transverse diameter (ETD), the WCC, and the flow velocities in the central retinal artery and middle cerebral artery. Then, we calculated the ONSDI-OND (the difference between ONSDI and OND) and ONSDI/ETD (the ratio of ONSDI to ETD). Patients were divided into a normal ICP group (n = 35) and an increased ICP group (≥ 20 mm Hg, n = 15) according to the ICP measurements. Correlations were then assessed between the values of the ultrasound parameters and ICP.

RESULTS

The ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and ONSDI/ETD were positively associated with ICP (r = 0.455, 0.482, 0.423 and p = 0.001, < 0.001, 0.002, respectively), whereas the WCC was negatively associated with ICP (r = - 0.586, p < 0.001). The WCC showed the highest predictive power for increased ICP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.904), whereas the ONSDI-OND and ONSDI also presented with acceptable predictive power among the ONSD-related parameters (AUC = 0.831, 0.803, respectively). The cutoff values for increased ICP prediction for ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and WCC were 6.29, 3.03, and 3.68 mm, respectively. The AUC of the combination of ONSDI-OND and WCC was 0.952 (95% confidence interval 0.896-1.0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and WCC were correlated with ICP and had acceptable accuracy levels in estimating ICP in patients after hemicraniectomy. Furthermore, WCC showed a higher diagnostic value than ONSD-related parameters, and the combination of ONSDI-OND and WCC was a satisfactory predictor of increased ICP.

Current status of point of care ultrasonography for the perioperative care of trauma patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incorporation of point of care ultrasound into the field of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine is growing at rapid pace. The benefits of this modality align with the acuity of patient care and decision-making in anesthetic care of a trauma patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiac ultrasound can be used to diagnose cardiac tamponade or investigate the inferior vena cava to assess volume status in patients who may suffer from hemorrhagic shock. Thoracic ultrasound may be used to rapidly identify pneumothorax or hemothorax in a patient suffering chest wall trauma. In addition, investigators are exploring the utility of ultrasonography in traumatic airway management and elevated intracranial pressure. In addition, the utility of gastric ultrasound on trauma patients is briefly discussed.

SUMMARY

Incorporation of point of care ultrasound techniques into the practice of trauma anesthesiology is important for noninvasive, mobile and expeditious assessment of trauma patients. In addition, further large-scale studies are needed to investigate how point of care ultrasound impacts outcomes in trauma patients.

Optic nerve sheath diameter in intracranial hypertension: Measurement external or internal of the dura mater?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a promising metric to estimate intracranial pressure (ICP). There is no consensus whether ONSD should be measured external (ONSDext) or internal (ONSDint) of the dura mater. Expert opinion favors ONSDint, though without clear evidence to support this. Adjustments of ONSD for eye diameter (ED) and optic nerve diameter (OND) have been suggested to improve precision. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of ONSDext and ONSDint for estimating ICP, unadjusted as well as adjusted for ED and OND.

METHODS

We performed an observational cohort study, measuring ONSDext and ONSDint in patients with invasive ICP monitoring at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. We used ONSDext and ONSDint unadjusted as well as adjusted for ED and for OND. We compared the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) for these methods. Thresholds for elevated ICP were set at ≥20 and ≥22 mmHg, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 220 measurements from 100 patients. Median ONSDext and ONSDint were significantly different at 6.7 and 5.2 mm (p = .00). There was no significant difference in AUROC for predicting elevated ICP between ONSDext and ONSDint (.67 vs. .64, p = .31). Adjustment for ED yielded better diagnostic accuracy (AUROC, cutoff, sensitivity, specificity) for ONSDext/ED (.76, .29, .81, .62) and ONSDint/ED (.71, .24, .5, .89).

CONCLUSIONS

ONSDext and ONSDint differ significantly and are not interchangeable. However, there were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between ONSDext and ONSDint. Adjustment for ED may improve diagnostic accuracy of ONSD.

Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement by ultrasound: Evaluation of a standardized protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is central to neurocritical care, but not all patients are eligible for invasive ICP-monitoring. A promising noninvasive option is ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). However, meta-analyses of ONSD for elevated ICP show wide confidence intervals. This might be due to baseline variations, inter-rater variability, and varying measurement methods. No standardized protocol has been validated. Corrections for eyeball diameter (ED) and optic nerve diameter (OND) may compensate for baseline variations. We evaluated a protocol and compared two different measurement methods for ONSD ultrasound.

METHODS

Two operators, blinded to each other's measurements, measured ONSD, ED, and OND twice in 20 patients. ONSD was measured with two different methods in use: internal (ONSDint) or external (ONSDext) of the dura mater. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was calculated for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability.

RESULTS

ICCs for inter-rater reliability of ONSDext and ONSDint (95% confidence interval) were 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) and 0.88 (0.79, 0.94), respectively. ICCs for intra-rater reliability of ONSDext and ONSDint were 0.97 (0.94, 0.99) and 0.93 (0.87, 0.96), respectively. There was no significant bias or difference in intra-rater reliability between operators.

CONCLUSIONS

ONSD can be measured with an excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability and low risk of inter-rater bias, when using this protocol. ONSDext yields a higher inter- and intra-rater reliability than ONSDint. Corrections for ED and OND can be performed reliably.