Change in inappropriate critical care over time

Factors Associated With Quality-of-Dying-and-Death Classes Among Critically Ill Patients

Importance

Improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a priority, but clinically modifiable factors of quality of dying and death (QODD) are seldom identified.

Objectives

To comprehensively identify factors associated with QODD classes of dying ICU patients, emphasizing clinically modifiable factors based on the integrative framework of factors associated with for bereavement outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This observational cohort study was conducted at medical ICUs of 2 Taiwanese medical centers from January 2018 to March 2020 with follow-up through December 2022. Eligible participants included primary family surrogates responsible for decision making for critically ill ICU patients at high risk of death (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score >20) but who survived more than 3 days after ICU admission. Data analysis was conducted from July to September 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

QODD was measured by the 23-item ICU-QODD questionnaire. Factors associated with patient membership in 4 previously determined QODD classes (high, moderate, poor to uncertain, and worst) were examined using a 3-step approach for latent class modeling with the high QODD class as the reference category.

Results

A total of 309 family surrogates (mean [SD] age, 49.83 [12.55] years; 184 women [59.5%] and 125 men [40.5%]) were included in the study. Of all surrogates, 91 (29.4%) were the patients' spouse and 66 (53.7%) were the patients' adult child. Patient demographics were not associated with QODD class. Two family demographics (age and gender), relationship with the patient (spousal or adult-child), and length of ICU stay were associated with QODD classes. Patients of surrogates perceiving greater social support were less likely to be in the poor to uncertain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94) and worst (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) QODD classes. Family meetings were associated with the poor to uncertain QODD class (aOR, 8.61; 95% CI, 2.49-29.74) and worst QODD class (aOR, 7.28; 95% CI, 1.37-38.71). Death with cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with the worst QODD class (aOR, 7.51; 95% CI, 1.12-50.25). Family presence at patient death was uniformly negatively associated with the moderate QODD class (aOR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54), poor to uncertain QODD class (aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.82), and worst QODD class (aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.38). Higher family satisfaction with ICU care was negatively associated with the poor to uncertain QODD class (aOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98) and worst QODD class (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.92).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of critically ill patients and their family surrogates, modifiable end-of-life ICU-care characteristics played a more significant role in associations with patient QODD class than did immutable family demographics, preexisting family health conditions, patient demographics, and patient clinical characteristics, thereby illuminating actionable opportunities to improve end-of-life ICU care.

[ICU admission for cancer patients with respiratory failure: An ethical dilemma]

In medicine, each decision is the result of a trade-off between medical scientific data, the rights of individuals (protection of persons, information, consent), individual desires, collective values and norms, and the economic constraints that guide our society. Whether or not to admit a cancer patient to an intensive care unit is very often an ethical dilemma. It is necessary to distinguish patients who would benefit from admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) from those for whom it would be futile. In this review, we will discuss the appropriateness of ICU admission and the concept of unreasonable admission, along with the different levels of intensity of ICU care and the alternatives to intensive care. We will then consider how and when to initiate reflection leading to a reasonable decision for the patient.