Effect of early hyperoxemia on the outcome in servere blunt chest trauma: A propensity score-based analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort

Hyperoxemia Induced by Oxygen Therapy in Nonsurgical Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperoxemia, often overlooked in critically ill patients, is common and may have adverse consequences.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of hyperoxemia induced by oxygen therapy in nonsurgical critically ill patients at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the association of hyperoxemia with hospital mortality.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included all consecutive admissions of nonsurgical patients aged 18 years or older who received oxygen therapy on admission to the Hospital Santa Luzia Rede D'Or São Luiz adult ICU from July 2018 through June 2021. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to Pao2 level at ICU admission: hypoxemia (Pao2<60 mm Hg), normoxemia (Pao2= 60-120 mm Hg), and hyperoxemia (Pao2 >120 mm Hg).

RESULTS

Among 3088 patients, hyperoxemia was present in 1174 (38.0%) and was independently associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.67; P=.02). Age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.02; P<.001) and chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02-2.36; P=.04) were associated with a higher rate of hyperoxemia. Factors associated with a lower rate of hyperoxemia were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P<.001); late-night admission (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96; P=.02); and renal/metabolic (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-1.39; P<.001), neurologic (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05; P<.001), digestive (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.41; P<.001), and soft tissue/skin/orthopedic (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79; P=.01) primary reasons for hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

Hyperoxemia induced by oxygen therapy was common in critically ill patients and was linked to increased risk of hospital mortality. Health care professionals should be aware of this condition because of its potential risks and unnecessary costs.

The Effect of Early Severe Hyperoxia in Adults Intubated in the Prehosptial Setting or Emergency Department: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The detrimental effects of hyperoxia exposure have been well-described in patients admitted to intensive care units. However, data evaluating the effects of short-term, early hyperoxia exposure in patients intubated in the prehospital setting or emergency department (ED) have not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to quantify and describe the existing literature examining the clinical outcomes in ED patients exposed to hyperoxia within the first 24 h of mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

This review was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. Two rounds of review using Rayyan QCRI software were performed for title and abstract screening and full-text search. Of the 2739 articles, 27 articles were retrieved after initial screening, of which 5 articles were excluded during the full-text screening, leaving 22 articles for final review and data extraction.

RESULTS

Of 22 selected publications, 9 described patients with traumatic brain injury, 6 with cardiac arrest, 3 with multisystem trauma, 1 with stroke, 2 with septic shock, and 1 was heterogeneous. Three studies were randomized controlled trials. The available data have widely heterogeneous definitions of hyperoxia exposure, outcomes, and included populations, limiting conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of data that examined the effects of severe hyperoxia exposure in the acute, post-intubation phase of the prehospital and ED settings. Further research with standardized definitions is needed to provide more detailed guidance regarding early oxygen titration in intubated patients.

An exploratory study investigating the effect of targeted hyperoxemia in a randomized controlled trial in a long-term resuscitated model of combined acute subdural hematoma and hemorrhagic shock in cardiovascular healthy pigs

Severe physical injuries and associated traumatic brain injury and/or hemorrhagic shock (HS) remain leading causes of death worldwide, aggravated by accompanying extensive inflammation. Retrospective clinical data indicated an association between mild hyperoxemia and improved survival and outcome. However, corresponding prospective clinical data, including long-term resuscutation, are scarce. Therefore, the present study explored the effect of mild hyperoxemia for 24 hours in a prospective randomized controlled trial in a long-term resuscitated model of combined acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and HS. ASDH was induced by injecting 0.1 ml × kg-1 autologous blood into the subdural space and HS was triggered by passive removal of blood. After 2 hours, the animals received full resuscitation, including retransfusion of the shed blood and vasopressor support. During the first 24 hours, the animals underwent targeted hyperoxemia (PaO2 = 200 - 250 mmHg) or normoxemia (PaO2 = 80 - 120 mmHg) with a total observation period of 55 hours after the initiation of ASDH and HS. Survival, cardiocirculatory stability, and demand for vasopressor support were comparable between both groups. Likewise, humoral markers of brain injury and systemic inflammation were similar. Multimodal brain monitoring, including microdialysis and partial pressure of O2 in brain tissue, did not show significant differences either, despite a significantly better outcome regarding the modified Glasgow Coma Scale 24 hours after shock that favors hyperoxemia. In summary, the present study reports no deleterious and few beneficial effects of mild targeted hyperoxemia in a clinically relevant model of ASDH and HS with long-term resuscitation in otherwise healthy pigs. Further beneficial effects on neurological function were probably missed due to the high mortality in both experimental groups. The present study remains exploratory due to the unavailability of an a priori power calculation resulting from the lack of necessary data.

Risk factors that predict mortality in patients with blunt chest wall trauma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years, research has highlighted emerging potential risk factors for poor outcomes following blunt chest wall trauma. The aim was to update a previous systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for mortality in blunt chest wall trauma patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to March 2022 was completed. Broad search terms and inclusion criteria were used. All observational studies were included if they investigated estimates of association between a risk factor and mortality for blunt chest wall trauma patients. Where sufficient data were available, ORs with 95% CIs were calculated using a Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

RESULTS

73 studies were identified which were of variable quality (including 29 from original review). Identified risk factors for mortality following blunt chest wall trauma were: age 65 years or more (OR: 2.11; 95% CI 1.85 to 2.41), three or more rib fractures (OR: 1.96; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.26) and presence of pre-existing disease (OR: 2.86; 95% CI 1.34 to 6.09). Other new risk factors identified were: increasing Injury Severity Score, need for mechanical ventilation, extremes of body mass index and smoking status. Meta-analysis was not possible for these variables due to insufficient studies and high levels of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this updated review suggest that despite a change in demographics of trauma patients and subsequent emerging evidence over the last 10 years, the main risk factors for mortality in patients sustaining blunt chest wall trauma remained largely unchanged. A number of new risk factors however have been reported that need consideration when updating current risk prediction models used in the ED.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021242063. Date registered: 29 March 2021. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/%23recordDetails.

The effect of targeted hyperoxemia in a randomized controlled trial employing a long-term resuscitated, model of combined acute subdural hematoma and hemorrhagic shock in swine with coronary artery disease: An exploratory, hypothesis-generating study

Controversial evidence is available regarding suitable targets for the arterial O₂ tension (P_aO₂) after traumatic brain injury and/or hemorrhagic shock (HS). We previously demonstrated that hyperoxia during resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock attenuated cardiac injury and renal dysfunction in swine with coronary artery disease. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of targeted hyperoxemia in a long-term, resuscitated model of combined acute subdural hematoma (ASDH)-induced brain injury and HS. The prospective randomized, controlled, resuscitated animal investigation consisted of 15 adult pigs. Combined ASDH plus HS was induced by injection of 0.1 ml/kg autologous blood into the subdural space followed by controlled passive removal of blood. Two hours later, resuscitation was initiated comprising re-transfusion of shed blood, fluids, continuous i.v. noradrenaline, and either hyperoxemia (target P_aO₂ 200 – 250 mmHg) or normoxemia (target P_aO₂ 80 – 120 mmHg) during the first 24 h of the total of 54 h of intensive care. Systemic hemodynamics, intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures, parameters of brain microdialysis and blood biomarkers of brain injury did not significantly differ between the two groups. According to the experimental protocol, P_aO₂ was significantly higher in the hyperoxemia group at the end of the intervention period, i.e., at 24 h of resuscitation, which coincided with a higher brain tissue PO₂. The latter persisted until the end of observation period. While neurological function as assessed using the veterinary Modified Glasgow Coma Score progressively deteriorated in the control group, it remained unaffected in the hyperoxemia animals, however, without significant intergroup difference. Survival times did not significantly differ in the hyperoxemia and control groups either. Despite being associated with higher brain tissue PO₂ levels, which were sustained beyond the intervention period, targeted hyperoxemia exerted neither significantly beneficial nor deleterious effects after combined ASDH and HS in swine with pre-existing coronary artery disease. The unavailability of a power calculation and, thus, the limited number of animals included, are the limitations of the study.

Dangers of hyperoxia

Oxygen (O2) toxicity remains a concern, particularly to the lung. This is mainly related to excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Supplemental O2, i.e. inspiratory O2 concentrations (FIO2) > 0.21 may cause hyperoxaemia (i.e. arterial (a) PO2 > 100 mmHg) and, subsequently, hyperoxia (increased tissue O2 concentration), thereby enhancing ROS formation. Here, we review the pathophysiology of O2 toxicity and the potential harms of supplemental O2 in various ICU conditions. The current evidence base suggests that PaO2 > 300 mmHg (40 kPa) should be avoided, but it remains uncertain whether there is an "optimal level" which may vary for given clinical conditions. Since even moderately supra-physiological PaO2 may be associated with deleterious side effects, it seems advisable at present to titrate O2 to maintain PaO2 within the normal range, avoiding both hypoxaemia and excess hyperoxaemia.