Levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy

Associations of continuous anionic gap detection with the mortality in critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the associations of anion gap (AG) levels before and 1-day after hemodialysis as well as anion gap changes with the mortality in critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS

Totally, 637 patients from MIMIC-III were included in this cohort study. The associations between AG (T0), AG (T1), or ∆AG [AG (T0) - AG (T1)], and the risk of 30-day or 1-year mortality were examined by Cox restricted cubic spline regression models. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model was applied to assess the associations between AG (T0), AG (T1), ∆AG with 30-day and 1-year mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 18.60 (8.53, 38.16) days and 263 (41.3%) patients were survived. There was a linear relationship between AG (T0), AG (T1) or ∆AG and the risk of 30-day or 1-year mortality, respectively. The risk of 30-day mortality was higher in AG (T0) > 21 group (HR = 1.723, 95% CI 1.263-2.350), and AG (T1) > 22.3 group (HR = 2.011, 95% CI 1.417-2.853), while lower in AG > 0 group (HR = 0.664, 95% CI 0.486-0.907). The risk of 1-year mortality was increased in AG (T0) > 21 group (HR = 1.666, 95% CI 1.310-2.119), and AG (T1) > 22.3 group (HR = 1.546, 95% CI 1.159-2.064), while decreased in AG > 0 group (HR = 0.765, 95% CI 0.596-0.981). Patients with AG (T0) ≤ 21 had higher 30-day and 1-year survival probability than those with AG (T0) > 21.

CONCLUSION

AG before and after dialysis as well as the changes of AG were important factors associated with the risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality in critically ill patients receiving RRT.

Personalized antiseizure medication therapy in critically ill adult patients

Precision medicine has the potential to have a significant impact on both drug development and patient care. It is crucial to not only provide prompt effective antiseizure treatment for critically ill patients after seizures start but also have a proactive mindset and concentrate on epileptogenesis and the underlying cause of the seizures or seizure disorders. Critical illness presents different treatment issues compared with the ambulatory population, which makes it challenging to choose the best antiseizure medications and to administer them at the right time and at the right dose. Since there is a paucity of information available on antiseizure medication dosing in critically ill patients, therapeutic drug monitoring is a useful tool for defining each patient's personal therapeutic range and assisting clinicians in decision-making. Use of pharmacogenomic information relating to pharmacokinetics, hepatic metabolism, and seizure etiology may improve safety and efficacy by individualizing therapy. Studies evaluating the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomic information at the point-of-care and identification of biomarkers are also needed. These studies may make it possible to avoid adverse drug reactions, maximize drug efficacy, reduce drug-drug interactions, and optimize medications for each individual patient. This review will discuss the available literature and provide future insights on precision medicine use with antiseizure therapy in critically ill adult patients.

Neurologic Complications of Critical Medical Illness

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the neurologic complications encountered in patients admitted to non-neurologic intensive care units, outlines various scenarios in which a neurologic consultation can add to the diagnosis or management of a critically ill patient, and provides advice on the best diagnostic approach in the evaluation of these patients.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Increasing recognition of neurologic complications and their adverse impact on long-term outcomes has led to increased neurology involvement in non-neurologic intensive care units. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of having a structured clinical approach to neurologic complications of critical illness as well as the critical care management of patients with chronic neurologic disabilities.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Critical illness is often accompanied by neurologic complications. Neurologists need to be aware of the unique needs of critically ill patients, especially the nuances of the neurologic examination, challenges in diagnostic testing, and neuropharmacologic aspects of commonly used medications.

Pharmacokinetic considerations surrounding the use of levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in neurocritical care - an overview

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most widely used anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in clinical practice. This is due both to a different mechanism of action when compared to other ASMs and its easy handling. Indeed, because of its interesting pharmacokinetic properties, it is often used outside of the labelled indications, notably in the neurocritical setting as prophylaxis of epileptic seizures.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted and the most relevant studies on the pharmacokinetic properties of LEV were selected by two independent investigators. Current evidence on the use of ASM prophylaxis in the neurocritical setting was also reviewed, highlighting and discussing the strengths and limits of LEV as drug of choice for anti-epileptic prophylaxis in this scenario.

EXPERT OPINION

LEV has a "near-ideal" pharmacokinetic profile, which makes it an attractive drug for ASM prophylaxis in neurocritical care. However, current recommendations restrict ASMs prophylaxis to very selected circumstances and the role of LEV is marginal. Moreover, studies are generally designed to compare LEV versus phenytoin, whereas studies comparing LEV versus placebo are lacking. Further randomized trials will be needed to better elucidate LEV utility and its neuroprotective role in the neurocritical setting.

Development and Use of an Ex-Vivo In-Vivo Correlation to Predict Antiepileptic Drug Clearance in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Results from previous ex-vivo continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) models have successfully demonstrated similar extraction coefficients (EC) identified from in-vivo clinical trials. The objectives of this study are to develop an ex-vivo in-vivo correlation (EVIVC) model to predict drug clearance for commonly used antiepileptics and to evaluate similarity in drug extraction across different CRRT modalities to extrapolate dosing recommendations.

METHODS

Levetiracetam, lacosamide, and phenytoin CRRT clearance was evaluated using the Prismaflex CRRT system and M150 hemodiafilters using an albumin containing normal saline (ALB-NS) vehicle with 3 different albumin concentrations (2 g/dL, 3 g/dL, and 4 g/dL) and a human plasma vehicle at 3 different effluent flow rates (1 L/hr, 2 L/hr, and 3 L/hr). Blood and effluent/dialysate concentrations were collected after circuit priming. ECs were calculated for each drug, modality, vehicle, and experimental arm combination.

RESULTS

The calculated average EC for levetiracetam and lacosamide was approximated to the fraction unbound from plasma protein. Human plasma and ALB-NS vehicles demonstrated adequate prediction of in-vivo CRRT clearance. Geometric mean ratios indicated similarity in extraction coefficients when comparing between hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration modalities and between filtration and dialysis modalities at effluent flow rates ≤ 2L/hr. Evaluation of phenytoin provided inconsistent findings with regards to extraction coefficient similarity across different CRRT modalities.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that an ex-vivo study can be used as a surrogate to predict in-vivo levetiracetam and lacosamide clearance in patients receiving CRRT.

A Clinician's Guide to Dosing Analgesics, Anticonvulsants, and Psychotropic Medications in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a common complication in critical illness and has a significant impact on pharmacokinetic factors determining drug exposure, including absorption, distribution, transport, metabolism, and clearance. In this review, we provide a practical guide to drug dosing considerations in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT, focusing on the most commonly used analgesic, anticonvulsant, and psychotropic medications in the clinical care of critically ill patients. A literature search was conducted to identify articles in which drug dosing was evaluated in adult patients receiving CRRT between the years 1980 and 2020. We included articles with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses and those that described medication clearance via CRRT. A summary of the data focused on practical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles is presented, with recommendations for drug dosing of analgesics, anticonvulsants, and psychotropic medications. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to guide drug dosing of analgesics, anticonvulsants, and psychotropic medications in critically ill patients receiving CRRT are sparse. Considering the widespread use of these medications, narrow therapeutic index of these drug classes, and risks of over- and underdosing, additional studies in patients receiving CRRT are needed to inform drug dosing.