ICU acquired hypernatremia treated by enteral free water - A retrospective cohort study

Fluid dynamics of life: exploring the physiology and importance of water in the critical illness

Water acknowledged as a vital component for life and the universal solvent, is crucial for diverse physiological processes in the human body. While essential for survival, the human body lacks the capacity to produce water, emphasizing the need for regular ingestion to maintain a homeostatic environment. The human body, predominantly composed of water, exhibits remarkable biochemical properties, playing a pivotal role in processes such as protein transport, thermoregulation, the cell cycle, and acid–base balance. This review delves into comprehending the molecular characteristics of water and its interactions within the human body. The article offers valuable insights into the intricate relationship between water and critical illness. Through a comprehensive exploration, it seeks to enhance our understanding of water’s pivotal role in sustaining overall human health.

Enteral free water vs. parenteral dextrose 5% in water for the treatment of hypernatremia in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study from a mixed ICU

PURPOSE

Effective treatment options for patients with hypernatremia are limited. Free water administration (parenterally or enterally) is the mainstay of treatment but the impact of each strategy on lowering serum sodium (Na) is not known. The purpose of the study was thus to assess the effectiveness of enteral free water vs. parenteral dextrose 5% in water (D5W) in treating ICU-acquired hypernatremia.

METHODS

An electronic medical record-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted in a 30-bed mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan. All adult patients admitted to the ICU from August 2017 to July 2021 were reviewed. After a 2-step exclusion, patients who stayed in the ICU ≥ 24 h and received either or both treatments for ICU-acquired hypernatremia (Na ≥ 145 mEq/L) constituted the study cohort. The primary outcome was a change in serum Na during the 24 h before treatment each day (ΔNa); the secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal complications, serum glucose levels, ICU/hospital mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay, and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Repeated measurements on each patient were addressed using a generalized estimated equation (GEE) for multiple linear regression analysis. Analysis was conducted with R version 4.0.3.

RESULTS

In total, 256/6596 (131: D5W, 125: enteral free water) patients were analyzed. Median treatment lasted 6 days [3-17] for the D5W group vs 7 days [3-14] for the enteral free water group with a total median daily treatment volume of 799 [IQR 299-1221] mL vs. 400 [IQR 262-573] mL. GEE multiple linear regression analysis showed an estimated mean ΔNa per liter of treatment fluid of - 2.25 [95% CI - 2.76 to - 1.74] mEq/L per liter of parenteral D5W vs. - 1.91 mEq decrease [95% CI - 2.75 to - 1.07] per liter of enteral free water. Hydrochlorothiazide was the only medication associated with a statistically significant negative ΔNa by- 0.89 [- 1.57 to - 0.21] mEq/L. There were no significant inter-group differences for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that both enteral free water and parenteral D5W are effective for treating ICU-acquired hypernatremia. Parenteral D5W was slightly more effective than enteral free water to lower serum Na levels in patients with ICU-acquired hypernatremia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Severe hypernatremia in hyperglycemic conditions; managing it effectively: A case report

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS) are common acute complications of diabetes mellitus with a high risk of mortality. When combined with hypernatremia, the complications can be even worse. Hypernatremia is a rarely associated with DKA and HHS as both are usually accompanied by normal sodium or hyponatremia. As a result, a structured and systematic treatment approach is critical. We discuss the therapeutic approach and implications of this uncommon presentation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old man with no known past medical history presented to emergency department with altered mental status. Initial work up in emergency room showed severe hyperglycemia with a glucose level of 1093 mg/dL and severe hypernatremia with a serum sodium level of 169 mEq/L. He was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and was started on insulin drip as per DKA protocol. Within 12 h of ICU admission, blood sugar was 300 mg/dL. But his mental status didn’t show much improvement. He was dehydrated and had a corrected serum sodium level of > 190 mEq/L. As a result, dextrose 5% in water and ringer's lactate were started. He was also given free water via an nasogastric (NG) tube and IV Desmopressin to improve his free water deficit, which improved his serum sodium to 140 mEq/L.

CONCLUSION

The combination of DKA, HHS and hypernatremia is rare and extremely challenging to manage, but the most challenging part of this condition is selecting the correct type of fluids to treat these conditions. Our case illustrates that desmopressin and free water administration via the NG route can be helpful in this situation.

[Hypo- and hypernatremia in the intensive care unit : Pitfalls in volume management]

Hypo- and hypernatremias are very frequent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and are closely related to volume disturbances and volume management in the ICU. They are associated with longer ICU stays and significant increases in mortality. Treating them is more complex than it may initially appear. Hyponatremias are differentiated based on tonicity and volume status. With hypertonic and isotonic hyponatremias, the primary focus of treatment is the underlying hyperglycemia. In case of hypotonic hypovolemic hyponatremia, the condition is treated with balanced crystalloid solutions. In eu-/hypervolemic hypotonic hyponatremias acute treatment with hypertonic saline is necessary. Hypervolemic hypernatremia occurs almost exclusively in ICU patients, often due to infusion of hypertonic solutions. There is little evidence to guide treatment, although hypotonic infusions in conjunction with diuretics may represent a legitimate approach. Great emphasis should be placed on prevention and the infusion of hypertonic solutions should be avoided. Disturbances in plasma sodium concentrations are common, requiring close attention. Exact diagnostic classification needs to be made and volume managed accordingly.

Early ICU-acquired hypernatraemia is associated with injury severity and preceded by reduced renal sodium and chloride excretion in polytrauma patients

PURPOSE

To further elucidate the origin of early ICU-acquired hypernatraemia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre study, polytrauma patients requiring ICU treatment were analysed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight (47.5%) of 101 included polytrauma patients developed hypernatraemia within the first 7 days on ICU. They were more severely ill as described by higher SAPS III, ISS, daily SOFA scores and initial norepinephrine requirements as well as longer requirements of mechanical ventilation and ICU treatment in general. The development of hypernatraemia was neither attributable to fluid- or sodium-balances nor renal impairment. Although lower in the hypernatraemic group from day 4 onwards, median creatinine clearances were sufficiently high throughout the observation period. However, in the hypernatraemic group, urine sodium and chloride concentrations prior to the evolvement of hypernatraemia (56 (27-87) mmol/l and 39 (23-77) mmol/l) were significantly decreased when compared to i) the time after developing hypernatraemia (94 (58-134) mmol/l and 78 (36-115) mmol/l; p < 0.001) and ii) the non-hypernatraemic group in general (101 (66-143) mmol/l and 75 (47-109) mmol/l; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early ICU-acquired hypernatraemia is associated with injury severity and preceded by reduced renal sodium and chloride excretion in polytrauma patients.