Clinical significance of thrombocytopenia in patients with septic shock: An observational retrospective study

Prospective evaluation of bleeding risk among thrombocytopenic patients admitted in intensive care unit

PURPOSE

Bleeding risk evaluation of thrombocytopenic patients admitted in ICU has been poorly investigated.

METHODS

A prospective observational study conducted in an 18-bed medical ICU. Consecutive patients with thrombocytopenia (<150 Giga/L) and no bleeding at admission were included.

RESULTS

Over one year, 91 patients were included, mainly men (63%), with an age of 61 [46-68] years and a SOFA score of 6 [3-8]. Twenty-three patients (25%) had an hemorrhagic event during ICU stay, mainly digestive (n = 9; 39%) and urological (n = 6; 26%). The time between ICU admission and bleeding was 8 [2-19] days. Almost half of bleeding events required vasopressor infusion and a hemostatic procedure. At admission, two variables were significantly different between the Bleeding and No-Bleeding groups: plasma urea level was significantly higher in the Bleeding group (9 [5.1; 13] vs. 13 [8.9; 31] mmol/L; p < 0.001) and the presence of skin purpura was associated with a 3-fold higher risk for bleeding during ICU stay (HR: 3.4 [1.3-8.3]; p < 0.05). In contrast, admission platelet count was not significantly different between the 2 groups (90 [32; 128] vs 62 [36; 103] G/L; p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Plasma urea levels and the presence of skin purpura are helpful in identifying thrombocytopenic patients at high-risk of bleeding during ICU stay.

A Simple Bacteremia Score for Predicting Bacteremia in Patients with Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department: A Cohort Study

Bacteremia is a life-threatening condition that has increased in prevalence over the past two decades. Prompt recognition of bacteremia is important; however, identification of bacteremia requires 1 to 2 days. This retrospective cohort study, conducted from 10 November 2014 to November 2019, among patients with suspected infection who visited the emergency department (ED), aimed to develop and validate a simple tool for predicting bacteremia. The study population was randomly divided into derivation and development cohorts. Predictors of bacteremia based on the literature and logistic regression were assessed. A weighted value was assigned to predictors to develop a prediction model for bacteremia using the derivation cohort; discrimination was then assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among the 22,519 patients enrolled, 18,015 were assigned to the derivation group and 4504 to the validation group. Sixteen candidate variables were selected, and all sixteen were used as significant predictors of bacteremia (model 1). Among the sixteen variables, the top five with higher odds ratio, including procalcitonin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lactate level, platelet count, and body temperature, were used for the simple bacteremia score (model 2). The proportion of bacteremia increased according to the simple bacteremia score in both cohorts. The AUC for model 1 was 0.805 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.785-0.824) and model 2 was 0.791 (95% CI 0.772-0.810). The simple bacteremia prediction score using only five variables demonstrated a comparable performance with the model including sixteen variables using all laboratory results and vital signs. This simple score is useful for predicting bacteremia-assisted clinical decisions.