Postoperative aphakia in modern cataract surgery

Outcomes of sutureless secondary intraocular lens fixation with haptic flanging in a cohort of surgically complex eyes

PURPOSE

To describe clinical outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using sutureless trans-scleral techniques in surgically complex eyes.

METHODS

Retrospective surgical case series of 45 eyes that underwent secondary IOL implantation using a sutureless haptic flange technique. Demographic data of age, sex, primary diagnosis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, intraocular pressure, full ophthalmic exam findings, surgical approach, and any intraoperative complications were noted.

RESULTS

The most common indication for secondary IOL implantation was aphakia, most commonly after ocular trauma. The primary outcome measures were pre-operative and post-operative BCVA, which revealed recovery of pre-operative vision levels by post-operative week 1 and improved vision by post-operative month 1 (p = 0.03). Secondary outcome measures of target refraction pre-operatively and post-operatively revealed significant reduction in post-operative spherical equivalent to achieve BCVA (p < 0.001). Targeting of the secondary IOLs using Barrett Universal II, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T all exhibited a hyperopic shift post-operatively in post-traumatic aphakic eyes and a myopic shift in the post complicated cataract extraction eyes. No intraoperative adverse events were noted. The most common post-operative complication was transient IOP elevation, with most patients completing 6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There is rapid visual rehabilitation and reduction of spherical equivalent correction to attain BCVA in eyes with a history of ocular trauma that undergo secondary IOL implantation using a trans-scleral flange technique. Moreover, this study highlights that a specific IOL power formula can be more predictive of the desired refractive outcome depending on the indication for secondary IOL implantation.

Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery in Korea: A Nationwide Study Evaluating Incidence and Risk Factors in a Korean Population

PURPOSE

To assess the nationwide rate of acute postoperative endophthalmitis (APE) after cataract extraction in Korea and to evaluate potential risk factors thereof.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nationwide insurance claims data from July 2014 to June 2017 were reviewed. All patients with phacoemulsification or extracapsular/intracapsular cataract extraction were included. Exclusion criteria were combined glaucoma surgery or total vitrectomy or when the patient had a history of intraocular foreign body.

RESULTS

In total, 1505103 cases (982203 patients) were included. APE developed in 953 cases (938 patients) with an overall incidence of 0.063%. After adjusting for possible confounding factors, male sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.61; p<0.001], primary clinical setting, operations performed in non-major cities, usage of sutures (OR 2.82; 95% CI 2.13-3.74; p<0.001), anterior vitrectomy (OR 8.71; 95% CI 6.71-11.32; p<0.001), aphakic cataract surgery (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.03-2.22; p=0.033), hypertension (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.18-1.66; p<0.001), diabetes (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.31-1.93; p<0.001), and chronic renal failure (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.01-1.62; p=0.039) were found to be related to APE development.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of APE after cataract extraction was consistent with reports from other studies. Additional research is needed to determine the relationship of newly found risk factors, such as hypertension, primary clinical setting, chronic renal failure, and usage of suturing, with APE development.

Sutureless glueless intrascleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens: Boon for aphakic

Purpose:

To report results of intrascleral fixation of 3-piece IOL without the help of suture and glue.

Methods:

Study included intrascleral fixation of haptic in 50 eyes by T-fixation technique. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, slit lamp and fundus examination, applanation tonometry, keratometry, biometry, optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging were done for extensive evaluation. Qualitative and quantitative data were summarized in the form of proportion and mean and standard deviation, respectively. The significance of difference was measured by Chi-square test or unpaired t-test or ANOVA whichever is appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results:

There was one case in which haptic broke during handshake maneuver and another IOL was required. Postoperative complications included corneal edema (4%), increased intraocular pressure (6%), cystoid macular edema (2%), decentration (4%), and dislocation (2%), which were all managed to the level of good visual recovery. There was no significant change in corneal astigmatism. There was significant change found in best-corrected visual acuity and uncorrected visual acuity after surgery.

Conclusion:

This modified technique seems to be a good alternative in IOL implantation in eyes with deficient capsules in view of the decrease in the learning time and surgical time and risk for complications.

Comparison of automated and partial coherence keratometry and resulting choice of toric IOL

PURPOSE

Consistent astigmatism correction with implantation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) requires accurate preoperative keratometry. This article compares corneal astigmatism determined by an autokeratometer (Topcon KR-7100) and a partial coherence interferometry keratometer (IOLMaster 500) and considers if any discrepancy ultimately alters in final cylindrical power of the toric IOL for implantation.

METHODS

Keratometry of 235 eyes was performed using both instruments. Corneal astigmatism was transformed into vector components J0 and J45 and cylindrical power at the IOL plane calculated. Comparisons were made using paired t test and correlation and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

Although interinstrument differences for J0 (p = 0.013), J45 (p = 0.012), and toric IOL cylindrical power (p < 0.001) were statistically significant, a high correlation for these (R = 0.96, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively) was observed. IOLMaster tended to overestimate corneal astigmatism by 0.13 (±0.31) diopters and toric IOL cylinder by 0.11 (±0.18) diopters. Difference in calculated toric IOL cylindrical power correlated poorly with corneal curvature (R = 0.007) and astigmatism (R = -0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The two keratometers were generally concordant in measuring corneal astigmatism. However, the resultant choice of toric IOL cylinder power differed appreciably in 40% of eyes examined. Therefore, postoperative visual outcome with toric IOL implantation may be optimized by a thorough analysis of biometry data before IOL selection, paying special attention to any difference in corneal astigmatism as measured by more than one instrument.