Correlation of infrared pupillometers and CCD-camera imaging from aberrometry and videokeratography for determining scotopic pupil size

Pupil size measurements with a multifunctional aberrometer/coherence interferometer/tomographer and two infrared-based pupillometers

PURPOSE

To compare precision of pupil size measurements of a multifunctional device (Pentacam AXL Wave [Pentacam]) and 2 infrared-based pupillometers (PupilX, Colvard) and to compare repeatability of Pentacam and PupilX.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative trial.

METHODS

Pupil diameter of healthy eyes was measured with Colvard once and Pentacam without glare (WO) and with glare (WG), PupilX in 0, 1, and 16 lux 3 times each. In a second series, measurements with Pentacam WO and PupilX in 0.06 and 0.12 lux were assessed.

RESULTS

36 eyes of participants aged 21 to 63 years were included. Mean pupil diameter was 6.05 mm with Colvard, 5.79 mm (first series), 5.50 mm (second series) with Pentacam WO, 3.42 mm WG, 7.26 mm PupilX in 0, 4.67 mm 1, 3.66 mm 16, 6.82 mm in 0.06, and 6.39 mm in 0.12 lux. Measurements with Pentacam WO were significantly different to PupilX in 0, 0.06, 0.12, and 1 lux (all P < .001), but not to Colvard ( P = .086). Pupil size measured with Pentacam WG and PupilX in 16 lux was not significantly different ( P = .647). Consecutive measurements with Pentacam WO and WG had mean SD of 0.23 mm and 0.20 mm, respectively, and with PupilX 0.11 in 0, 0.24 mm 1, and 0.20 mm in 16 lux.

CONCLUSIONS

Pentacam provided good assessment of pupil size but was not equivalent to PupilX in low lighting conditions. Repeatability was more favorable for Pentacam.

Repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different topography devices

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intra- and inter-device repeatability of pupil diameter measurements using three different devices in patients prior to corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

We examined preoperative measurements from a total of 204 eyes (102 patients) scheduled for corneal refractive surgery at two private centers between July and December 2021. Three consecutive scans were performed with three different devices (Sirius anterior segment analyzer, Pentacam HR, IOLMaster 500) in the same session by the same examiner under standardized conditions. To assess the intra- and inter-device repeatability, we calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and demonstrated results using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

The measurement accuracy (intra-device repeatability) of Sirius and IOLMaster was comparable (ICC = 0.64 and 0.61, respectively), with almost no statistically significant differences. Sirius showed the highest measurement accuracy among the three devices. Pentacam measurements resulted in lower precision, with an ICC of 0.09. The agreement between the pairs of devices (inter-device repeatability) was low (wide LoA ranges, Table 5).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the intra-device repeatability of Sirius and IOLMaster was higher than that of the Pentacam, although it did not achieve an optimal level across all three devices. The three devices examined cannot be used interchangeably.

[Complications of corneal lamellar refractive surgery]

Techniques available for corneal lamellar refractive surgery are laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser incision followed by excimer laser corneal ablation, and femtosecond laser-assisted refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx). These treatments are nowadays considered to be safe and effective standard procedures for surgical correction of mild to moderate ametropia. Possible complications include too small or decentered optical zones, intraoperative flap cutting errors and postoperative inflammation (e.g. diffuse lamellar keratitis, DLK), epithelial or flap folds, epithelial ingrowths or iatrogenic ectasia. The occurrence of complications may be significantly reduced by compliance to corresponding standards of indication and treatment that are based on current scientific knowledge.

Pupil Diameter Changes in High Myopes after Collamer Lens Implantation

PURPOSE

To observe the changes in pupil size under photopic and scotopic conditions after Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantations in eyes with high myopia.

METHODS

The ICL was implanted in 90 eyes belonging to 45 patients with high myopia. Photopic pupil diameters, scotopic pupil diameters, anterior chamber depths, and ICL vaults were examined at the preoperative, postoperative 1-month, and postoperative 3-month stages. The preoperative and postoperative photopic pupil diameters and scotopic pupil diameters were also compared with each other to note the differences between them. The correlations between preoperative and postoperative pupil diameter changes under different light conditions and presurgical refractive error were analyzed alongside patient's age and ICL vault.

RESULTS

Pupil diameters at both postoperative 1-month and postoperative 3-month stages were smaller than those before operation in distinct light environments, as well as pupil constriction amplitude. Correlation analysis showed that there was a statistically significant correlation between pupil diameter changes under different light conditions and presurgical refractive error at 1 month and 3 months after ICL implantation; pupil diameter decreased more when presurgical refractive error powers were less myopic. Statistically significant correlations were not found, however, with patient's age and ICL vault. Postoperative 1-month and mean postoperative 3-month anterior chamber depths were decreased when compared with preoperative anterior chamber depths. Statistically significant correlations were found in change in preoperative and postoperative anterior chamber depth and ICL vault. No statistically significant difference was found between ICL vault at the postoperative 1-month and postoperative 3-month stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Pupil diameter may decrease at the 1- and 3-month stages after ICL implantation under both photopic and scotopic conditions. This indicates that reduction of pupil diameter may be caused by mechanical contact between the ICL and the posterior iris surface.

Mesopic pupil size in a refractive surgery population (13,959 eyes)

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors that may affect mesopic pupil size in refractive surgery candidates.

METHODS

Medical records of 13,959 eyes of 13,959 refractive surgery candidates were reviewed, and one eye per subject was selected randomly for statistical analysis. Detailed ophthalmological examination data were obtained from medical records. Preoperative measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, topography, slit lamp examination, and funduscopy. Mesopic pupil size measurements were performed with Colvard pupillometer. Relationship between mesopic pupil size and age, gender, refractive state, average keratometry, and pachymetry (thinnest point) were analyzed by means of ANOVA (+ANCOVA) and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall mesopic pupil size was 6.45 ± 0.82 mm, and mean age was 36.07 years. Mesopic pupil size was 5.96 ± 0.8 mm in hyperopic astigmatism, 6.36 ± 0.83 mm in high astigmatism, and 6.51 ± 0.8 mm in myopic astigmatism. The difference in mesopic pupil size between all refractive subgroups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Age revealed the strongest correlation (r = -0.405, p < 0.001) with mesopic pupil size. Spherical equivalent showed a moderate correlation (r = -0.136), whereas keratometry (r = -0.064) and pachymetry (r = -0.057) had a weak correlation with mesopic pupil size. No statistically significant difference in mesopic pupil size was noted regarding gender and ocular side. The sum of all analyzed factors (age, refractive state, keratometry, and pachymetry) can only predict the expected pupil size in <20% (R = 0.179, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis confirmed that age and refractive state are determinative factors on mesopic pupil size. Average keratometry and minimal pachymetry exhibited a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, impact on mesopic pupil size.

Comparison of Rosenbaum pupillometry card using red and blue light to Colvard and Iowa pupillometers

PURPOSE

To compare four scotopic pupil measuring techniques to determine whether a statistically significant difference exists among the techniques for each observer or between the observers for each technique.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study performed on 200 eyes of 100 healthy individuals. Two observers performed pupillometry four times per pupil using the Rosenbaum card with red light, Rosenbaum card with blue light, Iowa pupillometer, and Colvard pupillometer. All measurements were recorded in scotopic conditions with each examiner masked to the other's results.

RESULTS

Both examiners measured mean pupil diameters > 6.0 mm for all modalities except the Colvard device whose mean measurements were the smallest. The Iowa pupillometer and Rosenbaum card with red light produced the largest pupil measurements and were the most similar for both observers. The mean pupil diameter obtained by observer 1 was smaller compared with observer 2 while using the Rosenbaum card with blue light, but this was not significant (P = .2574). The mean pupil diameter obtained by observer 1 was larger compared with observer 2 while using the Colvard pupillometer and this was statistically different after adjusting for eye color (P = .0370). The mean pupil diameters of blue irides and brown irides are significantly higher than the measurements obtained for hazel irides (P = .0271 and P = .0445, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the complex interaction among observer, pupillometry technique, and iris color, one cannot compare the four techniques to each other with the same observer, nor can one compare the two observers irrespective of the technique.

Distribution of photopic pupil diameter in the Tehran eye study

PURPOSE

To determine the photopic pupil diameter and its determinants in a sample derived from a population-based survey in Tehran.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study with a stratified random cluster sampling approach, 410 people age 14 years and over were selected from those residing in the first four municipality districts of Tehran after applying exclusion criteria, and 800 eyes (399 right eyes and 401 left eyes) were examined with the Orbscan II. The main outcome measure was the mean pupil diameter under photopic conditions, and possible correlations with potential determinants were evaluated through linear regression analyses. The design effect of a cluster sampling approach was observed and adjusted for.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 40.6 +/- 16.8 years and 38.8% were male. The mean photopic pupil diameter (PPD) was 3.70 mm (range 2.30 to 5.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.62 to 3.78). The mean PPD was 3.67 mm (95% CI, 3.54 to 3.81) in men and 3.72 mm (95% CI, 3.63 to 3.81) in women (p = 0.481). There was a significant reduction of 0.021 mm in PPD per year of aging (r = -0.49, p < 0.001). There was also a significant inverse correlation between PPD and spherical equivalent (r = -0.12, p = 0.034), while there was 0.66-mm increase in PPD with every 1.0-mm increase in the anterior chamber depth (ACD) (p < 0.001). Anisocoria, defined as a pupil diameter difference more than 0.4 mm between two eyes, was observed in 12.2% of the study population.

CONCLUSION

While the mean PPD measured with the Orbscan II was 3.70 mm in a sample derived from a population-based survey in Tehran, the scarcity of similar studies and reports concerning the pupil diameter measured with the Orbscan II makes it difficult to draw eligible comparisons. The pupil diameter has reverse correlations with age and spherical equivalent, a direct correlation with ACD, but is not correlated with gender.

[The aspheric blue light filter IOL AcrySof IQ compared to the AcrySof SA60AT : influence of IOL power, pupil diameter, and corneal asphericity on postoperative spherical aberration]

BACKGROUND

The aspheric optic design of intraocular lenses (IOL) aims to minimize postoperative ocular spherical aberration (SA). The effect of a standardized IOL asphericity depends on IOL power, pupil diameter, and corneal asphericity. The impact of these factors was investigated in a comparative study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective study, 70 eyes with the aspheric blue light filter IOL AcrySof IQ (Alcon) were compared to 36 eyes with the conventional AcrySof SA60AT (Alcon). Six weeks after uneventful phacoemulsification the following parameters were assessed: visual acuity, higher order aberrations, pupil diameter, and corneal asphericity.

RESULTS

The comparison of 42 eyes in a normal dioptric range with the IQ IOL (22.4+/-2.0 D) to 20 eyes with the control lens of similar IOL power (22.0+/-2.7 D) showed no different visual outcome. For a 5-mm pupil SA was calculated at 0.04 (+/-0.05) microm for the IQ IOL and 0.20 (+/-0.06) microm for the AcrySof SA60AT. Also for a 4-mm pupil SA was significantly lower in eyes with the IQ lens. A separate evaluation of 28 eyes which needed very high or low IOL power revealed a similar postoperative SA for the IQ IOL. The greatest difference of SA between the two IOLs was found in hyperopic eyes with higher IOL power. The corneal asphericity (Q value) showed significant correlation to postoperative ocular SA.

CONCLUSIONS

The aspheric AcrySof IQ reduces postoperative SA significantly compared to a conventional IOL even with smaller pupils and independent of IOL power. The assessment of corneal asphericity enables an individual estimation of postoperative SA.

Higher-order aberrations after implantation of iris-fixated rigid or foldable phakic intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after implantation of Artiflex phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative case series comprised 27 eyes (14 patients) that had Artiflex pIOL implantation and 22 eyes (13 patients) that had Artisan pIOL implantation. Refractive data, pupil size, IOL decentration, and HOA values were recorded and compared. Laboratory analysis was performed. Follow-up was 1 year.

RESULTS

In the Artiflex group, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) changed from -9.95 diopters (D) +/- 1.43 (SD) (range -6.75 to -12.13 D) to -0.30 +/- 0.53 D (range -1.94 to 0.56 D). Postoperatively, trefoil-y increased (increase factor 1.73) and spherical aberration decreased (increase factor 0.55). The mean pIOL decentration was 0.24 +/- 0.12 mm; 96.3% were decentered 0.5 mm or less. There was a significant correlation between pIOL decentration and postoperative spherical aberration and coma-y. In the Artisan group, the mean SE changed from -9.90 +/- 2.74 D (range -4.00 to -14.50 D) to -0.20 +/- 0.42 D (range -0.75 to 0.50 D). Postoperatively, trefoil-y and spherical aberration increased (increase factors 3.32 and 6.84, respectively). Laboratory analysis confirmed the negative and positive spherical aberration profile of the Artiflex pIOL and Artisan pIOL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Artiflex pIOL implantation decreased spherical aberration, while Artisan pIOL implantation increased spherical aberration. Trefoil-y increased in both groups. These changes might be explained by incision size differences in relation to trefoil and differences in optic design in relation to spherical aberration.

Comparison of 2 multiple-measurement infrared pupillometers to determine scotopic pupil diameter

PURPOSE

To compare a monocular and a binocular multiple-measurement digital infrared pupillometers for measuring scotopic pupil diameter.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.

METHODS

Scotopic pupil size was measured after 1 minute of dark adaptation in 42 eyes of 21 volunteers. Measurements were taken twice each with 2 multiple-measurement digital infrared pupillometers, the monocular pupillometer (Neuroptics, Inc.), and the binocular pupillometer (P2000D, Procyon, Ltd.) Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA) were used to measure repeatability and agreement of measures with each instrument and between instruments. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare variability of measurements within each instrument.

RESULTS

The mean scotopic pupil size was 4.79 mm +/- 0.95 (SD) with the Procyon and 4.86 +/- 0.93 mm with the Neuroptics. Repeatability and agreement tests for the Procyon measures showed the following: ICC, 0.954; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.916-0.975; LOA, -0.60 to 0.56; range, 1.16. The Wilcoxon signed rank test of variability gave a Z score of -2.53 (P = .01, 2 tailed). The repeated measures testing with the Neuroptics pupillometer showed the following: ICC, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.972-0.992; LOA, -0.39 to 0.26; range, 0.64; Z score, -1.15 (P = .25, 2-tailed). Repeatability and agreement tests for measures between instruments showed the following: ICC, 0.954; 95% CI, 0.916-0.975; LOA, -0.60 to 0.50; range 1.11.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high repeatability and agreement in scotopic pupil diameter for repeated measures within each device and measurements between the devices. Differences in variability in scotopic pupil diameter evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed rank test were significant only with the Procyon pupillometer.

Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia

PURPOSE

To determine patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation to correct myopia.

DESIGN

Non-comparative prospective case series.

METHODS

One hundred twenty eyes of 60 patients who had undergone Artisan PIOL implantation to correct myopia were analyzed. A validated questionnaire that consisted of 66 satisfaction items were self-administered by patients 12 months after surgery. Clinical parameters (PIOL decentration, the difference between pupil size and PIOL optical zone, and optical aberrations) were measured. Main outcome measures of satisfaction scale scores (global satisfaction, quality of uncorrected and corrected vision, night vision, glare, day and night driving) were analyzed. Correlations with clinical parameters were obtained.

RESULTS

After surgery, 98.3% of patients were satisfied, and 73.3% of patients considered their night vision to be the same or better; 44.1% of patients reported more bothersome glare. The night vision score correlated with spheric aberration (r = -0.303; P = .020). The glare score correlated with the difference between scotopic pupil size and PIOL optical zone (r = -0.280; P = .030) and vertical coma (r = -0.337; P = .009). The night driving score correlated with postoperative spheric equivalent (r = 0.375; P = .009), total root mean square aberrations (r = -0.337; P = .017), higher order root mean square aberrations (r = -0.313; P = .027), and vertical coma (r = -0.297; P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Overall satisfaction after Artisan PIOL implantation for myopia is excellent. The quality of night vision and night driving were related to scotopic pupil size, individual higher order aberrations, and residual refractive error.

Intérêt de l’auto-réfractomètre et de l’orbscan pour la mesure du diamètre pupillaire

PURPOSE

We compared pupil size measurements obtained with the Orbscan and autorefractometer to the Colvard Infrared pupillometer in order to determine their respective clinical advantages.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prospectively measured the pupil diameter in 94 eyes of 47 normal patients using the Colvard device, the Nikon NKR 8000 autorefractometer, and the Orbscan device. For each device, two successive measurements were taken to determine its reproducibility. We also studied the relationship with the contralateral eye (i.e., difference and correlation). The measurements obtained with the different devices in different light intensities were compared and studied using regression analysis.

RESULTS

Pupil diameter measured using the Orbscan had the highest reproducibility (mean difference between the two successive measurements: 3.8% or 0.15mm) and showed the smallest difference between the two eyes (5.0% or 0.19mm) and the strongest correlation with the contralateral eye (r=0.93; p<0.001). Scotopic Colvard measurements and autorefractometer measurements with low light settings were not significantly different (5.86mm versus 5.86mm; p=0.48). Autorefractometer measurements with low light settings showed the strongest correlation with the scotopic Colvard measurements (r=0.84; p<0.001). The Orbscan measurements were less correlated with the scotopic or photopic Colvard measurements (r=0.73; p<0.001 and r=0.51; p=0.003, respectively). For the Colvard pupillometer, the correlation between photopic measurements and scotopic measurements was also poor (r=0.51; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pupil size measurements with the autorefractometer may be advantageous before refractive surgery. Measuring pupil size in photopic conditions, as with the Orbscan, cannot screen people with large pupils in mesopic conditions.

The effects of tramadol on static and dynamic pupillometry in healthy subjects--the relationship between pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 metaboliser status

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the present study was to provide information on whether static and dynamic pupillometry can be used for pharmacodynamic profiling, particularly when investigating opioid-like drugs, such as tramadol.

METHODS

Healthy subjects (n = 26) participated in this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover Phase 1 study. Of these, 20 extensive metabolisers (EMs) with respect to polymorphic isoenzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) received up to 150 mg of tramadol-HCl and placebo. The 6 poor metabolisers (PMs) with respect to CYP2D6 received 100 mg tramadol-HCl and placebo.

RESULTS

In EMs, serum concentrations of the enantiomers of tramadol and of O-demethylated metabolite (M1) increased with increasing doses. Comparing the 100-mg dose between EMs and PMs, the latter exhibited higher serum concentrations of both enantiomers of tramadol. Serum concentrations of (+)-M1 remained below the lower limit of quantification, and that of (-)-M1 were lower than those in EMs. In EMs, doses from 100 mg tramadol-HCl on induced a significant (P<0.05) miosis as compared with placebo. The maximum mean differences from placebo after dosing with 50, 100 and 150 mg tramadol-HCL were -0.5, -0.8 and -1.1 mm, respectively, indicating a dose-dependent character of the changes. Dynamic pupillometry revealed significant (P<0.05) effects for the amplitude, latency and duration of reaction. The amplitude and velocity of constriction were decreased only at the highest dose; whereas, the changes of the amplitude reached statistical significance (P<0.05). Both the latency and reaction duration behaved in a dose-dependent manner. For the latency, significant changes compared with placebo (P<0.05) were found at the 150-mg dose level, while the reaction duration was already significantly (P<0.05) decreased from the 100-mg dose on. The velocity of redilatation did not respond at all. In PMs, no effect on the initial pupil diameter was found. Although the statistical analysis failed to demonstrate any significant change from placebo for the dynamic pupillometry, the effect-time profiles of EMs and PMs were comparable. For both metaboliser groups, a decrease of amplitude, velocity of constriction and reaction duration as well as an increase of latency was observed. In principle, the direction and magnitude of changes were comparable between EMs and PMs. Most important was the finding that the time course of effects was completely different between both groups of metabolisers. In EMs, effects slowly reached a maximum between 4 h and 10 h after dosing and diminished until 24 h; whereas, in PMs, both maximum effects and the return to baseline occurred much earlier, at approximately 3 h and 8 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The EMs and PMs of CYP2D6 treated with tramadol behaved differently in static and dynamic pupillometry. The reason for this could largely be explained with the aid of the metaboliser status and the pharmacokinetic properties of tramadol. In EMs, the pupillometric response was mainly driven by the (+)-M1, which comprises the mu action component of tramadol; whereas, in PMs, the non-mu component appears to play an important role. Thus, pupillometry was found to be useful in pharmacodynamic profiling and provides a good correlation with the pharmacokinetics.