Laser in situ keratomileusis for primary hyperopia

Hyperopic LASIK and postoperative corneal steepness: revisiting the 49-diopter limit

PURPOSE

To compare corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a postoperative corneal steepness above vs below 49 diopters (D).

SETTING

Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

This study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2013 and December 2019. Hyperopic patients were divided into 2 groups based on postoperative corneal steepness with steep corneas defined >49.0 D and the control group ≤49.0 D. Adjustments were performed to account for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters.

RESULTS

Overall, 1703 eyes of 1703 patients were included. Mean age was 48.3 ± 10.0 years, and 45.3% were male. Preoperatively, the steep group (2.4%, n = 41/1703) had steeper mean (44.6 D vs 43.1 D, P < .001) and steep (45.1 D vs 43.5 D, P < .001) keratometry, worse logMAR CDVA (0.07 vs 0.04, P = .02), and higher sphere (4.9 D vs 2.9 D, P < .001). Intraoperatively, they had a higher spherical treatment (4.6 D vs 2.8 D, P < .001). After hyperopic LASIK, the steep group had worse logMAR CDVA (0.10 vs 0.06, P = .01). However, after accounting for differences in baseline and spherical treatment, no significant differences were found in postoperative logMAR CDVA (0.06 vs 0.06, P = .99). The factors that remained associated with worse postoperative CDVA were higher spherical treatment (0.01 logMAR per 1 D, P < .001) and preoperative CDVA (0.60 logMAR per 1.00 logMAR, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative corneal steepness greater than 49 D is not associated with worse visual outcomes after hyperopic LASIK. However, lower preoperative visual potential and higher spherical treatment applied are associated with worse outcomes. The 49 D cutoff should be revisited.

The relationship between patient age and residual refractive error after uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate-to-high hyperopia

PURPOSE

To determine if the manifest sphero-cylindrical residual refractive error, at various time points over a 12-month postop period after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was associated with patient age at time of surgery.

METHODS

Patients with moderate to high hyperopia (3.00-7.00 DS) and astigmatism ⩽2 DC underwent LASIK using Wavelight Allegretto Eye Q (400 Hz). Treatments were centered on corneal vertex, flaps were made with Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome. Pre-and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity, best corrected spherical equivalent (SEQ) were measured. Measurements were taken at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. Target refraction was emmetropia. Total of 161 patients were treated. In binocular cases, data from the right eyes were included for analysis. In this article, we report on refraction data only. Raw data were subjected to several permutations to elicit any links between refractive outcomes and patient age.

RESULTS

The key findings were as follows y = postop SEQ (diopters), x = patient age (years), ln(x) = natural logarithm of patient age: At 1 month, y = x[0.049 -0.011.ln(x)] (R = -0.205, p = 0.001, n = 161). At 3 months, y = x[0.077 -0.017.ln(x)] (R = -0.355, p < 0.001, n = 161). At 6 months, y = x[0.088 -0.020.ln(x)] (R = -0.382, p < 0.001, n = 161). At 12 months, y = x[0.093 -0.021.ln(x)] (R = -0.409, p < 0.001, n = 161). There was no significant association between x and y at 1 week (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Residual postop refractive error after LASIK for hyperopia has a logarithmic association with patient age at time of surgery. In younger patients there is tendency toward undercorrection, the opposite occurs in older patients and this persists 1 year after treatment.

Hyperopic laser keratorefractive surgery: Do steep corneas have worse outcomes?

PURPOSE

To report the visual and refractive outcomes of hyperopic patients undergoing laser keratorefractive surgery in preoperatively steep corneas versus a matched control group.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. All patients underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel, between 1/2000 and 11/2016. Patients were divided into two groups: steep corneas (mean keratometry ≥ 44.00 D) and control group (mean keratometry < 44.00 D). The two study groups were matched by age, gender, sphere and cylinder. Only the right eye of each patient was included. Outcomes included postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), safety and efficacy indexes, refractive outcomes and retreatment rates.

RESULTS

Five hundred and two patients were included. Both groups were similar in demographic data, visual acuity and refraction. Postoperatively, the steep corneas group had a significantly higher mean keratometry as compared to the control group (46.52 ± 1.43 D vs 44.58 ± 1.68 D, p < 0.001), K_min (46.04 ± 1.50 D vs 44.12 ± 1.76 D, p < 0.001) and K_max (46.99 ± 1.51 D vs 45.03 ± 1.77 D, p < 0.001). Both groups had similar postoperative UDVA and CDVA and achieved a similar final sphere (0.64 ± 0.19 vs 0.54 ± 1.19, p = 0.44) and cylinder (- 0.89 ± 0.59 vs - 0.86 ± 0.72, p = 0.67). Both groups had a similar efficacy index (0.92 ± 0.22 vs 0.90 ± 0.25, p = 0.33) and similar retreatment rates (4.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.74). None of the patients in either group underwent more than one retreatment throughout the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopic patients with steep corneas undergoing laser keratorefractive surgery can achieve adequate visual and refractive outcomes, similar to control group.

Changes of Functional Optical Zone After LASIK for Hyperopia and Hyperopic Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate which factors may influence the size of the postoperative functional optical zone after hyperopic LASIK.

METHODS

Thirty-three eyes with a mean spherical equivalent of +3.55 ± 1.28 diopters (D) underwent LASIK with a Technolas 217 C-LASIK laser (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Munich, Germany). After 1 week and 1, 4, and 12 months, the authors examined refraction, corneal refractive power by means of computerized videokeratography (Technomed C-Scan; Baesweiler, Germany), and uncorrected/corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA/CDVA). According to the degree of hyperopia, they were divided into low hyperopia (spherical equivalent ≤ 3.00 D) and high hyperopia (spherical equivalent > 3.00 D) groups.

RESULTS

One year postoperatively, 82% of all eyes had a UDVA of 0.5 or better; in 88%, the spherical equivalent did not deviate more than 1.00 D from the attempted value. Three eyes were slightly undercorrected. After an initial overcorrection (-0.27 D) with subsequent regression, the refraction remained stable at +0.17 D from the fourth postoperative month (low hyperopia group: +0.14 D; high hyperopia group: +0.19 D after 1 year). After 1 year, the functional optical zone diminished by 32%; the reduction was more pronounced in eyes with higher hyperopia: -1.85 ± 1.09 mm (range: +0.5 to -3.4 mm) in the low hyperopia group (P < .0001) and -2.25 ± 1.24 mm (range: +1 to -3.9 mm) in the high hyperopia group (P < .0001). Preoperative spherical equivalent and preoperative corneal refractive power affected the postoperative size of the functional optical zone additively.

CONCLUSIONS

An expected small functional optical zone in high hyperopia may not be regarded as a compelling exclusion criterion, but can induce possible side effects such as glare and halos. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(7):476-481.].

Effect of Flat Cornea on Visual Outcome after LASIK

Purpose. To evaluate the effect of preoperative and postoperative keratometry on the refractive outcome after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate and high myopia. Methods. Records of 812 eyes (420 patients) with myopia ≥−6 D who had LASIK at Sohag Laser Center, Egypt, from January 2010 to November 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. Main outcome measures were postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), postoperative spherical equivalence, and postoperative Q factor. Results. LASIK was performed in 812 eyes (mean age 21.8 ± 5.2 years). Patients were grouped according to the degree of preoperative myopia into three groups: Group 1, −6 D to −7.9 D; Group 2, −8 to −9.9 D; and Group 3, −10 to −12 D. The refractive outcome among the different myopia groups was stratified by pre- and postoperative keratometry. A trend toward greater undercorrection was noted in eyes with preoperative keratometry <43.5 D compared with those with steeper keratometry >46 D in all myopia groups. The undercorrection was also noted in postoperative keratometry groups <35 D. Conclusions. Preoperative and postoperative keratometry appeared to influence the refractive outcome especially in high myopic eyes.

Femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with a femtosecond laser vs a mechanical microkeratome for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional, comparative case series.

METHODS

settings: Vissum Santa Hortensia, Madrid, Spain.study population and procedures: Patients who had undergone LASIK to correct their hyperopia using the 60-kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser were compared to age- and refraction-matched patients in whom the Moria M2 microkeratome was used. Visual and refractive results 3 months postoperatively were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 144 eyes were analyzed (72 in each group). Mean preoperative sphere was +3.45 ± 1.0 diopters (D) in the IntraLase group vs +3.18 ± 1.3 D in the M2 group (P = .1). Results 3 months postoperatively were: mean residual sphere, +0.44 ± 0.6D vs +0.72 ± 0.8 D (P = .02), respectively; uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), 0.89 ± 0.2 vs 0.80 ± 0.2 (P = .04); best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 0.96 ± 0.2 vs 0.92 ± 0.2 (P = .2); safety index, 0.97 ± 0.1 vs 0.98 ± 0.1 (P = .5); efficacy index, 0.89 ± 0.2 vs 0.84 ± 0.2 (P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopic LASIK performed with the IntraLase femtosecond laser seems to achieve better refractive results 3 months after the surgery compared to the M2 microkeratome, without significant differences in safety between both procedures.

Advances in technologies for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery

Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become the most widely used form of refractive surgery today. The objective of this surgical technique is to modify the anterior corneal shape by ablating tissue from the stroma by means of the excimer laser after creating a hinged corneal flap. This way, we are able to change the refractive status of the patient, providing better unaided vision. Continuous improvements in the original technique have made the surgical procedure safer, more accurate and repeatable. These progressions are due to the development of novel technologies that are the responsible for new surgical instrumentation, which makes the surgical procedure easier for the surgeon, and better excimer laser ablation algorithms, which increase the optical quality of the ablation and thus the safety of the vision correction procedure. This article aims to describe the more relevant advances in LASIK that have played an important role in the spread and popularity of this technique.

Corneal aberrations and objective visual quality after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis using the Esiris excimer laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes in visual performance and ocular optical quality after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Esiris excimer laser (Schwind eye-tech-solutions).

SETTING

Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

METHODS

Excimer laser surgery was performed with the Esiris laser in 51 eyes of 29 patients with hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism. The follow-up was 6 months. Changes in visual acuity, refraction, and corneal and ocular wavefront aberrations (6.0 mm pupil) were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative sphere was +4.45 diopters (D)+/-1.08 (SD) (range +2.50 to +7.25 D) and the mean preoperative cylinder, -0.55+/-0.36 D (range 0.00 to 1.00 D). Ten eyes (19.61%) had a LASIK enhancement during the follow-up for the correction of the residual refractive error and were excluded from the refractive analysis. Of the 41 remaining eyes, 95.12% had the same or improved distance best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) 6 months after surgery; 90.25% had no change or a gain of lines of near BSCVA. Moreover, 80.50% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Regarding corneal aberrations, statistically significant changes were observed in higher-order aberrations (HOAs), coma-like aberrations, and the primary spherical aberration coefficient Z(4,0), which changed from positive to negative values (all P<.01). Regarding total ocular aberrations, statistically significant changes were observed in total and higher-order root-mean-square values (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopic LASIK using the Esiris excimer laser for the correction of 2nd-order aberrations was safe and effective. Ocular and corneal HOAs increased significantly postoperatively.

Late traumatic LASIK flap loss during contact sport

Three years and 5 months after uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis, the left eye of a 39-year-old man was struck by the finger of a friend while the two were practicing karate, resulting in loss of the flap. The patient had performed this contact sport regularly for years. When last seen 16 weeks after injury, the best corrected visual acuity in the left eye was 20/40 with -1.75 -0.50x30. Mild central corneal haze was observed under slitlamp examination, the flap was missing, and the patient complained of dysphotopsia. Pachymetry in the left eye was 394 mum, with an irregular corneal contour. Flap loss is a serious complication because severe irregular astigmatism and unpredictable refractive change can occur. This case highlights the vulnerability of flaps to trauma even late postoperatively.

Matched Population Comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens and Standard LASIK for Myopia of -3.00 to -7.88 Diopters

PURPOSE

To compare matched populations of LASIK and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) cases in the correction of myopia between -3.00 and -7.88 diopters (D).

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four LASIK eyes with prospective data collected from a single center and 164 ICL eyes from the multicenter US ICL Clinical Trial were compared in this observational non-randomized study. The LASIK and ICL groups were well matched for age, gender, and mean level of preoperative spherical equivalent refraction.

RESULTS

At 6 months, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) > or = 20/20 was 85% with LASIK and 95% with ICL (P = .003) compared to preoperative values of 93% and 88%, respectively (P = .292). Loss of > or = 2 lines of BSCVA was significantly lower with the ICL at 1 week (0.6% vs 10%, P < .001) and 1 month (7% vs 0%, P = .001) with comparable outcomes at 6 months (0% vs 1%). At 6 months postoperatively, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) > or = 20/15 (11% vs 25%, P = .001) and > or = 20/20 (49% vs 63%, P = .001) was better in the ICL cases. Predictability within 0.50 D at 6 months for ICL cases was 85% (67% LASIK, P < .001); 97% of ICL cases were within 1.00 D (88% LASIK, P = .002). Refractive stability (+/- 0.50 D) between 1 and 6 months was 93% with ICL compared to only 82% with LASIK (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICL performed better than LASIK in almost all measures of safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability in this matched population comparison, supporting the ICL as an effective alternative to existing refractive laser surgical treatments for the range of myopia studied.

Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia

PURPOSE

To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D).

METHODS

Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula.

RESULTS

In practice, 55% of patients were within +/-1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 +/- 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (-0.70 +/- 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (-1.11 +/- 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (-1.45 +/- 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia.

Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The potential for litigation has resulted in increased interest in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. This article summarizes papers written during this past year on this subject.

RECENT FINDINGS

A panel of refractive surgery experts have summarized the current state of knowledge on this subject and provided guidelines to minimize risk. Because ectasia may occur in the absence of risk factors, there may be corneas with biomechanical factors not detectable with present technology which are at risk. Several articles point out the limitations of the Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA), in particular its accuracy and reproducibility with regard to data generated from the posterior surface of the cornea. A biomechanical model of the cornea is proposed which suggests that each cornea's response to laser in situ keratomileusis is unique. Several case reports are also reviewed which provide insight into pathogenesis and potential new treatment options; these include reports on histopathology, topographic pseudokeratectasia, ectasia from transient raised intraocular pressure, poor response to laser in situ keratomileusis after incisional surgery, intracorneal rings, collagen cross-linking and conductive keratoplasty to stabilize and sphericize the cornea with ectasia.

SUMMARY

Our knowledge about ectasia is still in evolution. Insights into the biomechanics and genetics of the cornea may allow us to further reduce its occurrence.

Centration Analysis of Ablation Over the Coaxial Corneal Light Reflex for Hyperopic LASIK

PURPOSE

To analyze postoperative topographic centration when the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex was used for laser centration in hyperopic LASIK.

METHODS

Centration photographs of 21 eyes (12 patients) that underwent hyperopic LASIK with centration over the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex were reviewed to determine the distance from the entrance pupil center to the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex. Postoperative ablation centration was determined topographically at day 1 and 3 months by four different methods. The difference between the actual decentration and the decentration that would have occurred had the ablation been centered over the entrance pupil center was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean deviation of the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex from the entrance pupil center preoperatively was 0.34 +/- 0.24 mm nasal or 4.5 +/- 3.0 degrees. At 1 day, the average decentration was 0.10 mm or 1.3 degrees temporal. The mean decentration that would have occurred if the ablation had been centered over the entrance pupil center was 0.44 mm or 5.5 degrees temporal. At 3 months, the average decentration was 0.07 mm or 0.25 degrees temporal. The mean decentration that would have occurred if the ablation had been centered over the entrance pupil center was 0.45 mm or 5.6 degrees temporal. Mean uncorrected visual acuity (logMAR) improved 3 lines from 0.54 +/- 0.14 (20/70) to 0.22 +/- 0.17 (20/32). No eye lost >2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA); 2 (10%) eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent centration in hyperopic ablation is possible even in eyes with positive angle kappa when the ablation is centered over the corneal light reflex.