Optical biometry of the anterior eye segment: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of ACMaster

Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes

PURPOSE

To assess whether anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in pseudophakic eyes obtained with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) devices can be used interchangeably.

SETTING

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

The ACD measurements in 1 eye of each pseudophakic patient were performed with the PCI-based ACMaster device and the OLCR-based Lenstar LS900 device at least 1 day postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study comprised 65 eyes of 65 patients with a mean age of 71.7 years ± 9.0 (SD) (range 39 to 91 years). In 15 eyes, no valid ACD readings could be obtained with the OLCR device. No obvious reason for these measurement failures was identified; however, tear-film alterations shortly after surgery were suspected. No significant difference in the mean ACD in the remaining 50 eyes was found between PCI measurements (5019 ± 660 μm; range 4008 to 6181 μm) and OLCR measurements (5015 ± 663 μm; range 4017 to 6163 μm) (P = .06). Three (6%) of 50 measurements were not within the 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudophakic ACD measurements with the PCI and OLCR devices can be used interchangeably. The OLCR device proved to be more user-friendly and faster; however, in a substantial number of eyes, no usable values were obtainable.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner

PURPOSE

To assess the three-dimensional repeatability of thickness measurements for epithelium, stroma, cornea, flap, and residual stromal bed using the Artemis very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound arc-scanner (ArcScan Inc).

METHODS

Five consecutive measurements were obtained for 10 eyes of 10 patients 1 year after LASIK using the Artemis VHF digital ultrasound arc-scanner across the central 10-mm diameter of the cornea. Repeatability analysis was performed for thickness measurements for each corneal layer-epithelium, stroma, cornea, flap, and residual stromal bed. The standard deviation of repeated measurements (point-repeatability) was calculated for each measurement location in 0.1-mm steps for the 10×10-mm matrix. The pooled standard deviation of the point-repeatability for each measurement location within the central 1-, 2-, and 3-mm radius was calculated (region-repeatability). The corneal thickness of the baseline scan set was compared to that of subsequent scan sets within the same session and plotted over time to assess any possible hydration effects of the immersion technique.

RESULTS

The repeatability at the corneal vertex was 0.58 μm for epithelium, 1.78 μm for stroma, 1.68 μm for cornea, 1.68 μm for flap, and 2.27 μm for residual stromal bed. The region-repeatability within the central 1-mm radius was 1.01 μm for epithelium, 3.44 μm for stroma, 3.35 μm for cornea, 2.81 μm for flap, and 3.97 μm for residual stromal bed. The mean difference in corneal thickness from the baseline value was within 1.25 μm for each of the subsequent four scan sets over a 5-minute immersion period.

CONCLUSIONS

Layered pachymetry of the epithelium, stroma, cornea, flap, and residual stromal bed showed high repeatability with the Artemis VHF digital ultrasound arc-scanner. The high repeatability validates the use of the Artemis for in vivo layered pachymetry.

Anterior chamber depth measurements in eyes with an accommodating intraocular lens: agreement between partial coherence interferometry and optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To determine agreement between partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) measurements of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial intraocular lens (IOL) movement in eyes with an accommodating IOL.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

METHODS

In this prospective pilot study of cataract patients, the central ACD was measured by PCI (ACMaster) and AS-OCT (Visante) 6 months after unilateral OPAL-A accommodating IOL implantation. Measurements were performed with a distance target and 1.00 diopter (D) and 2.00 D accommodative targets and after administration of topical pilocarpine 4%. Agreement between PCI and AS-OCT ACD measurements and IOL movement was calculated.

RESULTS

Measurements were obtained in 18 patients. There was a consistent and statistically significant bias toward shallower ACD measurements with AS-OCT than with PCI, with the bias most pronounced after pilocarpine (mean 4.117 mm +/- 0.291 [SD] versus 4.054 +/- 0.287 mm; bias 0.063 mm; P<.0001). Limited IOL movement to 1.00 D and 2.00 D accommodative stimuli was detected with both instruments. After pilocarpine, forward IOL movement measurements were statistically significantly greater by AS-OCT than by PCI (mean 0.306 +/- 0.161 mm versus 0.270 +/- 0.155 mm) (P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

The AS-OCT device showed a bias toward underestimation of ACD compared with the PCI device. The bias increased as ACD shallowed with pilocarpine, resulting in overestimation of forward IOL movement by AS-OCT. This may lead to overestimation of the accommodative performance of IOLs. The ACD measurements obtained by the 2 devices are not interchangeable.

Comparison of two partial coherence interferometers for corneal pachymetry in high myopia and after LASIK

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the Haag-Streit optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) pachymeter and the Zeiss Anterior Chamber Master (ACMaster) for measuring central corneal thickness (CCT) in high myopes and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

METHODS

Central corneal thickness was measured in 55 eyes of 30 myopic subjects (spherical equivalent refraction of - 5.25 D to - 10.75 D, maximal astigmatism of - 2 D), and in 37 eyes of 21 patients 3 months after LASIK for myopia (preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of - 6.0 D to - 10.75 D, maximal astigmatism of - 2 D). All measurements were performed with the Haag-Streit OLCR pachymeter and the Zeiss ACMaster, using group refractive indices of 1.376 and 1.3851, respectively. Thickness measurements were compared using paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, linear regression and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

In myopic subjects, CCT measured 531 +/- 28 microm and 533 +/- 27 microm with the OLCR pachymeter and the ACMaster, respectively (p < 0.01); all measurements correlated closely (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). In LASIK-treated eyes, CCT measured 472 +/- 24 microm using the OLCR pachymeter and 475 +/- 23 microm using the ACMaster (p < 0.01), again with close correlation between the two instruments (r = 0.99, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of CCT in high myopes and after myopic LASIK were very similar with the Haag-Streit OLCR pachymeter and the Zeiss ACMaster. Using the current group refractive indices, the observed difference between the two instruments of < 3 microm is of little clinical importance. Thus, it would seem safe to use the OLCR pachymeter and the ACMaster interchangeably for CCT measurements in myopia as well as after myopic LASIK.

Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heightened patient expectations for precise postoperative refractive results have spurred the continued improvements in biometry and intraocular lens calculations. In order to meet these expectations, attention to proper patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry, and appropriate intraocular lens power formula selection with optimized lens constants are required. The article reviews recent studies and advances in the field of biometry and intraocular lens power calculations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several noncontact optical-based devices compare favorably, if not superiorly, to older ultrasonic biometric and keratometric techniques. With additional improvements in the internal acquisition algorithm, the new IOL Master software version 5 upgrade should lessen operator variability and further enhance signal acquisition. The modern Haigis-L and Holladay 2 formulas more accurately determine the position and the shape of the intraocular lens power prediction curve.

SUMMARY

Postoperative refractive results depend on the precision of multiple factors and measurements. The element with the highest variability and inaccuracy is, ultimately, going to determine the outcome. By understanding the advantages and limitations of the current technology, it is possible to consistently achieve highly accurate results.

Comparison of Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry and Ultrasound Pachymetry in the Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness Before and After Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To compare an ultrasound pachymeter with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) pachymeter for measuring pre- and postoperative central corneal thickness of patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

In a prospective, noncomparative, interventional study, 48 myopic eyes (mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent: -4.93 +/- 2.93 diopters [D]) of 30 healthy patients underwent PRK. Pre- and postoperative central corneal thickness was measured by two examiners (E1, E2) with an ultrasound pachymeter and an OLCR pachymeter. Agreement and inter-rater repeatability were determined using the comparison method described by Bland and Altman.

RESULTS

The limits of agreement between the two devices ranged from 17.8 microm (E1) to 20.5 microm (E2) preoperatively and from 22.4 microm (E1) to 16.9 microm (E2) postoperatively. The coefficient of inter-rater repeatability ranged from 9.1 microm (ultrasound pachymeter) to 5.4 microm (OLCR pachymeter) preoperatively and from 7.1 microm (ultrasound pachymeter) to 4.7 microm (OLCR pachymeter) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The OLCR pachymeter seems to show better pre- and postoperative repeatability compared to the ultrasound pachymeter. The agreement between the two devices should be considered acceptable for clinical practice. Photorefractive keratectomy did not affect the postoperative agreement and repeatability of the pachymeters.

Advances in anterior segment imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Imaging of the crystalline lens and intraocular lens is becoming increasingly more important to optimize the refractive outcome of cataract surgery, to detect and manage complications and to ascertain advanced intraocular lens performance. This review examines recent advances in anterior segment imaging.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main techniques used for imaging the anterior segment are slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy, scheimpflug imaging, phakometry, optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. They have principally been applied to the assessment of intraocular lens centration, tilt, position relative to the iris and movement with ciliary body contraction.

SUMMARY

Despite the advances in anterior chamber imaging technology, there is still the need for a clinical, high-resolution, true anatomical, noninvasive technique to image behind the peripheral iris.

Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth

PURPOSE

To compare three different methods of measuring corneal thickness (CT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD).

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial (Medical University of Vienna, Austria).

METHODS

Central CT (CCT), CT at four peripheral points, and central ACD were measured in 88 eyes of 44 healthy subjects with the Pentacam (rotating Scheimpflug camera; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), Orbscan I (scanning-slit topography system; Orbtek Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA), and AC-Master (partial coherence interferometry; Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and the results were compared.

RESULTS

The upper (lower) limits of agreement for CCT measurements were 7.9 (-22.2) microm between AC-Master and Pentacam, 17.6 (-32.5) microm between AC-Master and Orbscan, and 25.2 (-25.9) microm between Pentacam and Orbscan. Correlation was high between all three methods (r = 0.94 to 0.97). The upper and lower limits of agreement for ACD were 0.174 (-0.251) mm between AC-Master and Pentacam, 0.406 (-0.004) mm between AC-Master and Orbscan, and 0.384 (0.095) mm between Pentacam and Orbscan. Correlation was high between the three methods (r = 0.96 between Orbscan and Pentacam; others 0.92). Correlation was lower for the CT measurements at the four peripheral points.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCT and ACD values obtained by Pentacam, Orbscan, and AC-Master measurements correlated well and showed few outliers. The two new systems (Pentacam, AC-Master) provide a reliable, easy-to-use, noncontact method of measuring CCT and ACD. Larger differences occurred only when measuring peripheral CT values, especially between AC-Master and the other two methods.