Preoperative LASIK screening: an evolving standard of care

Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments

Many algorithms exist for the topographic/tomographic detection of corneas at risk for post-refractive surgery ectasia. It is proposed that the reason for the difficulty in finding a universal screening tool based on corneal morphologic features is that curvature, elevation, and pachymetric changes are all secondary signs of keratoconus and post-refractive surgery ectasia and that the primary abnormality is in the biomechanical properties. It is further proposed that the biomechanical modification is focal in nature, rather than a uniform generalized weakening, and that the focal reduction in elastic modulus precipitates a cycle of biomechanical decompensation that is driven by asymmetry in the biomechanical properties. This initiates a repeating cycle of increased strain, stress redistribution, and subsequent focal steepening and thinning. Various interventions are described in terms of how this cycle of biomechanical decompensation is interrupted, such as intrastromal corneal ring segments, which redistribute the corneal stress, and collagen crosslinking, which modifies the basic structural properties.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references.

Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low preoperative risk: tomographic and biomechanical findings in the unoperated, stable, fellow eye

PURPOSE

To report a case of progressive corneal ectasia after LASIK with no detectable preoperative risk factors and to present three-dimensional corneal tomographic and biomechanical findings on the contralateral unoperated eye that would be considered low risk for ectasia and thereby a good LASIK candidate based on the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS).

METHODS

A case report, literature review, and description of novel screening criteria based on Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) corneal tomography are presented as well as Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Instruments) corneal biomechanical analysis.

RESULTS

Progressive corneal ectasia after LASIK of the operated left eye was confirmed by corneal topography. Scheimpflug imaging identified a meniscus-shaped LASIK flap with a central thickness of 165 μm and residual stromal bed thickness of 280 μm. Randleman ERSS score was 2 for the ectatic eye before LASIK and 1 for the current status of the unoperated eye, which remained stable with normal topography and no change in refraction for >5 years. Low corneal hysteresis (8.6 mmHg) and corneal resistance factor (7.5 mmHg) were found in the unoperated, nonectatic eye, along with a suspicious waveform sign of a second rebounded peak after second applanation. Pentacam average pachymetric progression was 1.09 (normal is <1.15); the Belin-Ambrósio overall deviation index was 1.99 (normal is <1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional corneal tomographic and ORA biomechanical measurements provide additional information that may help identify individuals at high risk for naturally occurring or iatrogenic corneal ectasia.