Irregularities on the surface of single-piece AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses

Comparative evaluation of an automated preloaded delivery system with a non-preloaded system

Purpose

To evaluate a single surgeon's experience with an automated preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) delivery system and a nonpreloaded system.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational case series. Phacoemulsification was performed under topical anesthesia by creating a temporal clear corneal incision. Patients were consecutively assigned to either the Clareon group (n = 50; the IOL was injected into the capsular bag by using an automated injector system) or the AcrySof group (n = 50; the IOL was injected into the capsular bag by using a conventional injector system). The main outcome measures were ease of implantation, intraoperative complications, postoperative centration, and visual acuity.

Results

Additional manipulation in the anterior chamber was not required in 38 (74%) eyes in the Clareon group and 41 (82%) eyes in the AcrySof group. However, seven eyes in the Clareon group and one eye in the AcrySof group required trailing haptic dislodgement from the optic. Furthermore, two eyes in the Clareon group and five eyes in the AcrySof group required injector rotation (varying from 10° to 90°) in the wound. Moreover, in two eyes of the Clareon group, the silicon plunger of the injector system crossed over the optic. None of the patients developed iris trauma and PCR during IOL manipulation. All the IOLs were centered in the capsular bag.

Conclusion

The automated IOL delivery system enables the controlled delivery of an IOL in the capsular bag. The effect of carbon footprints created by plastic generated from the delivery system and the implications of the CO₂ cylinder on the environment should be addressed.

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System During Routine Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical handleability and acceptability of a novel preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) delivery system for implantation of the TECNIS ZCB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc., Santa Ana, CA, USA) during routine small-incision cataract surgery.

Subjects and Methods

In this prospective, open-label, noncomparative, unilateral or bilateral, multicenter study, adult subjects with unilateral or bilateral cataracts scheduled for IOL implantation were enrolled. Surgeons and surgical technicians completed per-eye day-of-surgery and end-of-surgical-day questionnaires. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of acceptable overall clinical performance of the preloaded IOL delivery system. Other endpoints included additional responses from the questionnaires, preimplantation incision size, and safety.

Results

The study included 91 eyes that underwent cataract surgery and IOL implantation using the preloaded delivery system and were available for the 1-day postoperative visit. Five surgeons and 14 surgical technicians from four investigational sites participated in the study. The rate of acceptable overall clinical performance was 100% (91/91) of eyes, with most responses (78/91; 85.7%) being the highest possible rating of 5 (very satisfied). Favorable responses by most surgeons and surgical technicians regarding additional endpoints further highlighted the handleability and acceptability of the preloaded delivery system. No ocular adverse events or lens findings (ie, no cases of IOL instability, haptic breakage, IOL marking, or crimping) were reported.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrated that this preloaded IOL delivery system was safe and effective during routine small-incision cataract surgery.

Trial Registration

German Clinical Trials Register identifier, DRKS00014757.

Preloaded and non-preloaded intraocular lens delivery system and characteristics: human and porcine eyes trial

AIM

To compare characteristics of preloaded and non-preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) delivery systems during IOL delivery procedures.

METHODS

Total 101 human eyes were included in this prospective observational case series. Delivery characteristics of 5 types of IOLs including iSert250 NC60 (NC60), EnVista MX60 (MX60), AcrySof IQ SN60WF (SN60WF), TECNIS ZCB00 (ZCB00), and TECNIS PCB00 (PCB00) were investigated. NC60 and PCB00 were injected via preloaded delivery systems and other IOLs were injected via non-preloaded systems. In the human trial, time taken from IOL loading to completion of implantation was measured in all eyes undergoing conventional cataract surgery. Using 4 excised porcine eyes, dynamics of ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) between an IOL injector and a porcine eye was analyzed using fluorescein sodium-stained OVD.

RESULTS

The average time for IOL implantation was 22.0s for NC60, 43.2s for MX60, 32.3s for SN60WF, 41.4s for ZCB00, and 14.6s for PCB00 respectively. The number of cases with IOL manipulation with a second instrument was 6 for MX60, 2 for ZCB00, 0 for SN60WF, NC60, and PCB00. Amount of OVD pushed into a porcine eye was smaller with a preloaded system than with non-preloaded systems.

CONCLUSION

IOL delivery with preloaded systems is faster and more predictable. Moreover, a preloaded delivery system shows relatively less OVD pushed into a porcine eye than non-preloaded systems.

Optic surface changes in Intraocular lens scaffold: An ex vivo study

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the micro injuries on the intraocular lens (IOL) optic in the IOL scaffold technique by ex vivo study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the Tahira Research Laboratory, Dr Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai.

DESIGN

This was an experimental study.

METHODS

IOL scaffold technique was simulated in 12 caprine eyes with moderate lens changes using 12 IOLs (six acrylic hydrophilic and six polymethyl methacrylate IOL) in experimental set up. IOLs (6 mm optic diameter) were explanted from the caprine eyes immediately after the surgery and examined under light microscopy and phase contrast microscopy for anterior and posterior optic changes, and again after 24 hours. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed in IOLs with abnormalities. Two IOLs placed in caprine eyes that did not undergo scaffold procedure acted as controls. A trocar anterior chamber maintainer was used in four eyes.

RESULTS

Four out of 12 IOLs showed mark defects on the surface in mid periphery. Linear mark defects measured IOL 1 (190 μm), IOL 6 (18 μm), IOL 2 (2.33 μm, 2.3 μm, 14 μm, 14 μm) and IOL 5 (12 μm). The marks do not change after 24 hours. There were no mark defects (micro abrasions or scratches) seen on any of the IOL's in the central 4 mm of the optic anterior surface. The control IOLs showed no surface changes. The pre-experiment mark defects (n = 0) in study IOLs changed to post-experiment (n = 7), with no statistical significance obtained (p = 0.059).

CONCLUSION

IOL scaffold technique can cause microscopic optic surface changes seen as linear marks defects in the mid periphery and intraoperative fluid maintenance can reduce its incidence.

Intraocular lens delivery characteristics of the preloaded AcrySof IQ SN60WS/AcrySert injectable lens system

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the delivery characteristics of the AcrySof IQ SN60WS intraocular lens (IOL) injected via a preloaded AcrySert delivery system.

DESIGN

Prospective observational case series.

METHODS

setting: This study was carried out in the cataract service of an ophthalmic hospital that serves a large sector of inner-city London. patient population: The study included all patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification procedures with implantation of the SN60WS IOL via the preloaded system over 5 consecutive months. A total of 85 patients (85 eyes) were included in this study. intervention: Phacoemulsification procedures conducted by 7 surgeons were digitally captured. outcome measures: Video recordings of the IOL delivery stage were analyzed by a single observer. Of particular interests were the orientation of the leading haptic and optic on insertion, the degree of intrawound manipulation of the injector, and the time required to satisfactorily deliver the IOL into the capsular bag in a correct orientation. Problems of IOL delivery were also noted.

RESULTS

In 38 out of 85 eyes (45%), correct IOL delivery behavior was achieved with the leading haptic orientating to the left of the surgeon and thus did not require any intrawound rotational manipulation of the injector. Forty-seven of the 85 eyes (55%) required additional rotational manipulation of IOL orientation. Other problems recorded were trapped trailing haptic, haptic-optic adhesion, overriding of the plunger over the optic, and trauma to optic edge. The average time to achieve satisfactory IOL position was 47 seconds. IOL power and the grade of the operating surgeon did not appear to influence the event of a misdirected leading haptic.

CONCLUSIONS

The AcrySof SN60WS/AcrySert system does not appear to meet the expectations of pro-viding a predictable means of IOL delivery.