Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry

Influence of lens position as detected by an anterior segment analysis system on postoperative refraction in cataract surgery

AIM

To predict postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) position using the Sirius anterior segment analysis system and investigate the effect of lens position and IOL type on postoperative refraction.

METHODS

A total of 97 patients (102 eyes) were enrolled in the final analysis. An anterior segment biometry measurement was performed preoperatively with Sirius and Lenstar. The results of predicted lens position (PLP) and IOL power were automatically calculated by the software used by the instruments. Effective lens position (ELP) was measured manually using Sirius 3mo postoperatively. Pearson's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were used to determine the correlation of lens position to other parameters.

RESULTS

PLP and ELP were positively correlated to axial length (AL; r=0.42, P<0.0001 and r=0.49, P<0.0001, respectively). There was a weak correlation between the peLP (ELP-PLP) and the prediction error of spherical refraction (peSR; r=0.34, P<0.0001). The peLP of Softec HD IOL differed statistically from those of both the TECNIS ZCB00 and Sensor AR40E IOLs. Multiple linear regression was used to obtain the prediction formula: ELP=0.66+0.63×[aqueous depth (AQD)+0.6LT] (r=0.61, P<0.0001), and a new variable (AQD+0.6 LT) was found to have the strongest correlation with ELP.

CONCLUSION

The Sirius anterior segment analysis system is helpful to predict ELP, which reduces postoperative refraction error.

[Long term postural myopic shift assessment after posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation]

PURPOSE

Posterior chamber iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) is often used in aphakic eyes with inadequate capsular support. Postoperatively, patients may describe better capabilities for near reading in a face-down position. The goal was to evaluate the indications, visual outcomes and complications of this IOL and to compare postoperative spherical equivalent between the prone and the face-down position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective single-center case series of 31 eyes of 28 patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2016. Visual outcomes, early and late complications were analyzed. The refractive measurements were also assessed using a portable refractometer in prone and face-down position for each patient. The spherical equivalents were then compared.

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 29 months (3-73). The final mean corrected visual acuity (0.17±0.5 SD LogMar) was significantly better than preoperatively (0.5±0.50 SD LogMar) (P<0.05). Postoperative refractive error was within±2 diopters of emmetropia in 95 % of patients. The mean spherical equivalents in prone and face down position were different (P<0.05),-0.44 diopters (-4;+2.75) and-1.38 diopters (-5.25; 1) respectively. A mean myopic shift of-0.95 diopters (-5.25; 1.00) was observed in face down position. Cystoïd macular edema (6 %) and IOL disenclavation (9.6 %) were the main complications.

DISCUSSION

A posterior iris-claw intraocular lens appears to be an effective and relatively safe IOL to treat aphakia with poor capsular support. When the patient's head is bent forward, a mean myopic shift of 1 diopter is observed. This may support the idea that this IOL could be considered as an accommodative implant. Anterior movement of the iris-IOL complex due to gravity may be responsible for this myopic shift.

Comparison of objective accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes between age groups

PURPOSE

To compare objective accommodation of phakic and pseudophakic eyes between two different age groups.

METHODS

Eighty-three eyes (83 participants aged ≥ 40 years) with a visual acuity of 20/25 or better, and refractive error < spherical - 1.0 diopters (D) and cylindrical 1.0 D, were included. Forty-four patients had undergone phacoemulsification and monofocal intraocular lens implantation and were examined 6 months post-surgery. Participants were divided into groups 1 (pseudophakic, age < 60 years), 2 (pseudophakic, ≥ 60 years), 3 (phakic, < 60 years), and 4 (phakic, ≥ 60 years). Objective accommodation and pupil diameter to 2.0- and 3.0-D stimuli were measured with a binocular open-field autorefractor.

RESULTS

The mean objective accommodation was 0.29 ± 0.47 D, 0.01 ± 0.21 D, 1.00 ± 0.88 D, and 0.01 ± 0.13 to a 2.0-D stimulus, and 0.26 ± 0.51 D, - 0.06 ± 0.21 D, 1.42 ± 1.21 D, and - 0.06 ± 0.21 to a 3.0-D stimulus in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. For both stimuli, the values in group 1 exceeded those in groups 2 and 4, and were smaller than those in group 3, while the values in group 3 exceeded those in groups 2 and 4. The mean pupillary diameter was - 0.5 ± 0.8 mm, - 0.3 ± 0.8 mm, - 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and - 0.6 ± 0.9 mm to a 2.0-D stimulus, and - 0.6 ± 0.8 mm, - 0.6 ± 0.8 mm, - 0.9 ± 0.5 mm, and - 1.0 ± 1.1 mm to a 3.0-D stimulus in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was significant correlation between objective accommodation and changes of pupil size for both stimuli.

CONCLUSION

Age seems to play a role in objective accommodation among relatively young pseudophakic patients.

Axial elongation measured by long scan depth optical coherence tomography during pilocarpine-induced accommodation in intraocular lens-implanted eyes

We used an ultra-long scan depth optical coherence tomography (UL-OCT) system to investigate changes in axial biometry of pseudophakic eyes during pilocarpine- induced accommodation. The right eyes from 25 healthy subjects (age range 49 to 84 years) with an intraocular lens (IOL) were imaged twice in the non-accommodative and the accommodative states. A custom-built UL-OCT instrument imaged the whole eye. Then accommodation was induced by two drops of 0.5% pilocarpine hydrochloride separated by a 5-minute interval. Following the same protocol, images were acquired again 30 minutes after the first drop. The central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), IOL thickness (IOLT), and vitreous length (VL) were obtained using custom automated software. The axial length (AL) was calculated by summing the CCT, ACD, IOLT, and VL. With accommodation, ACD increased by +0.08 ± 0.09 mm, while the VL decreased by −0.04 ± 0.09 mm (paired t-test each, P<0.05). CCT and IOLT remained constant during accommodation (P > 0.05). The non-accommodative AL was 23.47 ± 0.93 mm, and it increased by +0.04 ± 0.04 mm after accommodation (P<0.01). The AL increased and the IOL moved backward during pilocarpine-induced accommodation in pseudophakic eyes.

Scheimpflug image-based changes in anterior segment parameters during accommodation induced by short-term reading

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of the accommodation on the anterior segment data (corneal and anterior chamber parameters) induced by short-time reading in a healthy, nonpresbyopic adult patient group.

METHODS

Images of both eyes of nonpresbyopic volunteers were captured with a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam HR) in a nonaccommodative state. Fifteen minutes of reading followed and through fixation of the built-in target of Pentacam HR further accommodation was achieved and new images were captured by the device. Anterior segment parameters were observed and the differences were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two healthy eyes of 26 subjects (range 20.04-28.58 years) were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in the keratometric values before and after the accommodative task (p = 0.35). A statistically significant difference was measured in the 5.0-mm-diameter and the 7.0-mm-diameter corneal volume (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03) between accommodation states. Corneal aberrometric data did not change significantly during short-term accommodation. Significant differences were observed between nonaccommodative and accommodative states of the eyes for all measured anterior chamber parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the parameters of the cornea, only corneal volume changed during the short-term accommodation process, showing some fine changes with accommodation of the cornea in young, emmetropic patients. The position of the pupil and the anterior chamber parameters were observed to change with accommodation as captured by a Scheimpflug device.

Gravitational pseudoaccommodation in patients with aphakic iris-claw intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To assess whether iris-claw intraocular lenses (IOLs) undergo gravitation-dependent changes in position and refraction.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center, Bern, Switzerland.

DESIGN

Observational case study.

METHODS

Patients with a history of pars plana vitrectomy and IOL exchange with implantation of an aphakic iris-claw IOL (Artisan) were included in this study. Objective refraction was obtained with a handheld autorefractometer, and the IOL position was measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy with the patient prone, sitting, and supine.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eyes of 19 patients with retropupilary IOLs (13) or prepupillary IOLs (8) were included. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) in the sitting position was -0.81 diopter (D) ± 0.95 (SD), and the mean distance from the endothelium to the anterior edge of the IOL was 3.35 ± 0.72 mm. The mean SE in the supine position was -0.61 ± 1.28 D, whereas the mean SE in the prone position was -1.34 ± 1.17 D (P = .0030). The IOL position changed from 3.50 mm in the supine position to 3.06 mm in the prone position (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The aphakic iris-claw IOL was subject to significant movement related to gravity. The change in the refractive effect suggests that there is a degree of pseudoaccommodation caused by the forward shift of the aphakic IOL in the face-down position.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Pseudo-accommodation in non-amblyopic children after bilateral cataract surgery and implantation with a monofocal intraocular lens: prevalence and possible mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Some pseudophakic patients implanted with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) have good near visual acuity (VA) with their distance correction. The objective was to evaluate the prevalence of pseudo-accommodation in children after bilateral cataract surgery, without amblyopia, and to define its mechanisms.

METHODS

Observational study that took place in a pediatric ophthalmology department, Paris, France. A total of 68 eyes were included, 40 from 23 children and 28 from 14 adults, with a corrected distance VA above 20/25 and a normal near VA (20/25) with +3 addition. Pseudo-accommodation was defined as a near VA better than 20/50 with the distance correction and without addition. Prevalence of pseudo-accommodation was calculated in each group. In order to determine the possible mechanisms of pseudo-accommodation in children, we compared children with pseudo-accommodation and adults without pseudo-accommodation regarding several parameters: refraction, axial length, corneal topography, aberrometry, pupillary diameter and IOL shift after cyclopentolate instillation.

RESULTS

Among the children group, 36 (90 %) had pseudo-accommodation versus 2 (7 %) in the adult group. We found that spherical equivalent, implant power, corneal multifocality and corneal higher-order aberrations (mainly coma and trefoil) were significantly higher in the pseudo-accommodation group, while pupil diameter and implant shift were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudo-accommodation has a high prevalence among non-amblyopic pseudophakic children. Several possible mechanisms have been found to explain pseudo-accommodation in children: a high power of the IOL and a small axial length, maximizing the effect of the IOL shift, corneal multifocality and corneal higher-order aberrations.

The effect of Nd:YAG laser treatment of posterior capsule opacification on anterior chamber depth and refraction in pseudophakic eyes

Purpose

This was a prospective descriptive study to determine the changes in intraocular lens (IOL) position after neodymium-doped yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy by measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) and refraction, including the spherical equivalent (SE) and cylinder.

Materials and methods

Forty-seven pseudophakic eyes with posterior capsule opacification of 29 patients were included. Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy was performed. Patients’ ACD and refraction were measured before the treatment, as well as after the treatment at 1 week and 3 months. IOLMaster^® and an automated refractometer were used at the Department of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in ACD and SE before and after laser treatment at 1 week and 3 months (repeated analysis of variance, P=0.582 and P=0.269, respectively). Both backward IOL movement (number [n]=29) and forward IOL movement (n=18) were found. Some changes in cylindrical refraction were found at 1 week, but decreased at 3 months after capsulotomy (baseline cylinder: −1.16; cylinder at 1 week and 3 months: −1.00 and −1.14, respectively; P=0.012). These changes were the same with one-piece and three-piece IOLs.

Conclusion

Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy did not significantly change ACD and SE. It led to cylinder change at 1 week after laser, but the effect decreased at 3 months. This effect was small and may not be clinically significant.

Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches

PURPOSE

To discuss the various static and dynamic surgical approaches which attempt to give presbyopes good vision at far, intermediate and near viewing distances.

CONTENT

Static methods broadly adopt the same optical techniques as those used in presbyopic contact lens correction and aim to satisfy the needs of the presbyope by increasing binocular depth-of-focus, often using monovision as well as simultaneous-imagery. Dynamic methods generally attempt to make use of at least some of the still-active elements of the accommodation system. They include procedures which are supposed to modify the relative geometry of the ciliary muscle and lens, or which reduce the stiffness of the presbyopic lens either by replacing it with other natural or man-made material or by subjecting it to femtosecond laser treatment. Alternatively the natural lens may be replaced by some form of intraocular lens which changes power as a result of forces derived from the still-active ciliary muscle, zonule and capsule, or other sources.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, multifocal intraocular lenses appear to offer the most consistent and reliable surgical approach to surgical presbyopic correction. They have obvious advantages in convenience and stability over optically-similar, simultaneous-image presbyopic contact lenses but this must be balanced against their relative inflexibility in cases of patient dissatisfaction. Dynamic methods remain largely experimental. Although some approaches show promise, as yet no method has demonstrated a reliable, long-term ability to correct distance refractive error and to appropriately change ocular power in response to changes in viewing distance over the normal range of interest.

Comparisons of amplitude of pseudoaccommodation with aspheric yellow, spheric yellow, and spheric clear monofocal intraocular lenses

Purpose

To determine the amplitude of pseudoaccommodation and higher-order aberrations with three types of implanted monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): aspheric yellow (IQ); spheric yellow (NT); and spheric clear (AT).

Setting

Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

Methods

We studied 60 patients who underwent small incision phacoemulsification with the implantation of a monofocal IQ, NT, or AT IOL. The pseudoaccommodation was measured by the lens-loading method, and the postoperative ocular higher-order aberrations were measured with a Hartmann–Shack wavefront analyzer through natural and 4 mm pupils.

Results

Sixty eyes of 60 patients were studied. The average amplitude of the pseudoaccommodation was 0.45±0.24 D with the IQ IOL, which was significantly lower than that with the AT IOL at 0.81±0.37 D (Tukey’s test; P<0.01). The differences in the amplitude of the pseudoaccommodation between the IQ and the NT IOLs, and between the NT and the AT IOLs were not significant (Tukey’s test; P>0.05). The degree of spherical aberration was significantly different for the IQ, NT, and AT lenses (analysis of variance, P=0.016). The spherical aberration through the IQ IOL was significantly lower than that through the NT and the AT IOLs (Tukey’s test; P<0.01). The fourth-order RMS (root mean square) aberration of the IQ lens was also significantly lower than that of the NT and AT IOLs (Tukey’s test; P<0.01).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the spherical aberration and selective spectral transmission of IOLs may work together to increase the amplitude of the pseudoaccommodation.

Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison

AIM

To evaluate the visual function after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZMA00, aspheric monofocal ZA9003 versus spherical monofocal Akreos Adapt intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

Tecnis ZMA00, Tecnis ZA9003 or Akreos Adapt IOLs were bilaterally implanted in 180 eyes from 90 patients. The following parameters were assessed 3 months postoperatively: monocular and binocular uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) for distance, intermediate and near, spherical aberration (SA), contrast and glare sensitivity, near point refractive power, uncorrected and best-corrected near stereoscopic acuity (NSA). Patient satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, the monocular and binocular UCVA and DCVA at near of Tecnis ZMA00 were significantly better than other two groups. The mean SA for 5.0mm optical zone in Tecnis ZMA00 and Tecnis ZA9003 was significantly lower than that in Akreos Adapt. Mean contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity were better for Tecnis ZA9003 group than for other two groups. Patients with Tecnis ZMA00 had higher monocular and binocular near point refractive power and uncorrected NSA than monofocal groups. The patients in Tecnis ZMA00 had higher mean values for halo compared with other two groups.

CONCLUSION

Tecnis ZMA00 provided better near VA and uncorrected NSA and higher near point refractive power than monofocal IOLs and patients were spectacle independent. The IOLs with Tecnis aspheric design improved contrast and glare sensitivity. Patients with Tecnis ZMA00 reported more disturbances on visual phenomena of halo.

Comparison of through-focus image sharpness across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To assess through-focus polychromatic image sharpness of 5 FDA-approved presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a range of object vergences and pupil diameters using an image sharpness algorithm.

DESIGN

Laboratory investigation.

METHODS

A 1951 USAF resolution target was imaged through Crystalens AO (AO), Crystalens HD (HD), aspheric ReSTOR +4 (R4), aspheric ReSTOR +3 (R3), and Tecnis Multifocal Acrylic (TMF) IOL in a model eye and captured digitally for each combination of pupil diameter and object vergence. The sharpness of each digital image was objectively scored using a 2-dimensional gradient function.

RESULTS

AO had the best distance image sharpness for all pupil diameters and was superior to the HD. With a 5-mm pupil, the R4 distance image sharpness was similar to the HD and at 6 mm the TMF was superior to the HD, R3, and R4. The R3 moved the near focal point farther from the patient compared to the R4, but did not improve image sharpness at intermediate distances and showed worse distance and near image sharpness. Consistent with apodization, the ReSTOR IOLs displayed better distance and poorer near image sharpness as pupil diameter increased. TMF showed consistent distance and near image sharpness across pupil diameters and the best near image sharpness for all pupil diameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Differing IOL design strategies to increase depth of field are associated with quantifiable differences in image sharpness at varying vergences and pupil sizes. Objective comparison of the imaging properties of specific presbyopia-correcting IOLs in relation to patient's pupil sizes can be useful in selecting the most appropriate IOL for each patient.

Real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses

In the attempt to manage presbyopia, different intraocular lens designs have been proposed such as monofocal IOLs with monovision or multifocal IOLs. Even though the lenses mentioned offer satisfactory visual results, contemporary ophthalmology has not completely answered the presbyopic dilemma by simulating the accommodative properties of the crystalline lens itself. Accommodative IOLs were designed to fill this gap and provide satisfactory vision for all distances by restoring some degree of "pseudoaccommodation." Pseudo accommodative capability can be linked to monofocal IOL's as well but the results are not satisfactory enough to fully support unaided near vision. Pseudoaccommodation is a complex phenomenon that can be attributed to several static (i.e., pupil size, against-the-rule cylindrical refractive error, multifocality of the cornea) and dynamic (i.e., anterior movement of the implant itself) factors. Objective measurement of the accommodative capability offered by the accommodative IOLs is extremely difficult to obtain, and different methods such as autorefractometers, retinoscopy, and ultrasound imaging during accommodative effort, ray tracing, or pharmacological stimulation have been developed but the results are sometimes inconsistent. Despite the difficulties in measuring accommodation, accommodative IOLs represent the future in the attempt to successfully "cure" presbyopia.

A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes

PURPOSE

To compare the accommodative performance of the Morcher BioComFold Type 89A bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens (IOL) with a conventional in-the-bag control IOL in presbyopic eyes.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial with intraindividual comparison.

METHODS

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

STUDY POPULATION

Fifty-two eyes of 26 patients with bilateral age-related cataracts.

INTERVENTION

Phacoemulsification cataract extraction with implantation of a bag-in-the-Lens and a control IOL, the Alcon AcrySof SA60AT (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), randomized to either eye.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Axial IOL shift stimulated by physiologic (near visual effort) and pharmacologic (pilocarpine and cyclopentolate) accommodative stimulation was measured objectively with partial coherence interferometry. Other outcome measures were objective and subjective accommodation, logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution distance-corrected near visual acuity, and defocus curves.

RESULTS

Three months after surgery, axial IOL shift stimulated by near visual effort measured -5.9 ± 10.3 μm in bag-in-the-lens eyes versus -8.4 ± 12.8 μm in control eyes (P = .37), that stimulated by pilocarpine measured 20.2 ± 165.6 μm versus 50.4 ± 164.4 μm (P = .36), and that stimulated by cyclopentolate measured -65.8 ± 64.3 μm versus -54.0 ± 37.5 μm (P = .34), respectively (n = 25). Objective accommodation measured 0.03 ± 0.18 diopters (D) in bag-in-the-lens eyes versus 0.08 ± 0.21 D in control eyes (P = .40), whereas subjective accommodation measured 2.48 ± 0.72 D versus 2.45 ± 0.80 D (P = .75), respectively. Distance-corrected near visual acuity and defocus curves showed no difference between IOLs.

CONCLUSIONS

The bag-in-the-lens IOL demonstrated negligible axial shift and objective accommodation with physiologic near visual stimulation. The IOL shift demonstrated with pilocarpine also was clinically insignificant. The bag-in-the-lens IOL showed no accommodative or near visual advantage over a conventional in-the-bag IOL, despite its unique capsular fixation method. This provides further evidence that the focus-shift principle fails to produce clinically significant IOL movement.

Maximizing satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: the missing links

PURPOSE

To critically analyze recent studies of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to examine opportunities to enhance patient satisfaction further.

DESIGN

Perspective.

METHODS

Literature review and commentary.

RESULTS

Although overall patient satisfaction with the currently available presbyopia-correcting IOLs remains high, it is not uniform. Current accommodating or multifocal IOL designs are hampered by limited accommodative ability or reduced contrast sensitivity and photic phenomenon, respectively. Toric IOLs and IOLs inserted through smaller incisions minimize postoperative wound healing changes. Better assessment of total ocular characteristics, including corneal wavefront and pupil size and dynamics, will allow further IOL customization to each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative modification of IOLs may offset variations in postoperative healing that cannot be predicted before surgery. Further methods to assess and modify neural adaptive capability are needed. Newer IOL designs may enhance functional depth of field further without compromising contrast sensitivity or inducing photic phenomena.

Subjektive und objektive Ergebnisse nach Implantation der apodisiert diffraktiven AcrySof ReSTOR

BACKGROUND

Our purpose in this study was to assess the postoperative subjective and objective results after implantation of the Acrysof ReSTOR lens and to evaluate the advantages and limitations of the apodized diffractive optic design of this new multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL).

METHODS

Phakoemulsification and implantation of an Acrysof ReSTOR was performed in 55 eyes of 32 patients. All patients were examined after a mean period of 7.9+/-1.9 months. The accuracy of lens calculation was evaluated for the Haigis, Holladay I, and SRK-T formulas. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity for distance and for intermediate and near vision were assessed, as was stereoacuity. In addition, contrast sensitivity was tested under photopic and mesopic conditions, with and without glare. The patients were asked about dysphotic phenomena such as halos, glare or flare, and night vision using a standardized evaluation. The degree to which patients were able to manage without spectacles after the surgery was also documented.

RESULTS

The median monocular uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) for distance was 20/25 (LogMAR 0.05) while the binocular UCVA was 20/20 (LogMAR 0). The monocular uncorrected acuity for near vision was 20/25 (LogMAR 0.1), the binocular near visual acuitiy was 20/20 (LogMAR 0), while the intermediate monocular visual acuity was 20/50 (LogMAR 0.4) and the binocular, 20/32 (LogMAR 0.2). Contrast sensitivity was within the normal range. Dysphotic phenomena were noted by 66% of patients but were so slight as not to cause any problem at all in 59%. For close work and distance vision 84% of all patients needed no correcting glasses, while 78% did not need to use glasses for intermediate vision.

CONCLUSION

The Acrysof ReSTOR provides excellent uncorrected visual acuity for distance and near vision and the level of patient satisfaction achieved with it is good.