Capsulorhexis contraction after cataract surgery: Comparison of sharp anterior edge and modified anterior edge acrylic intraocular lenses

Effect of intraocular lens material and haptic design on anterior capsule contraction after cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare anterior capsule contraction (ACC) after cataract surgery with implantation of intraocular lens (IOLs) of different materials and designs.

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases for relevant studies published up to January 1, 2023. Five randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and three cohort studies involving 1,221 eyes were included in quantitative synthesis. We extracted data, assessed their quality independently, and calculated standard mean difference (SMD) using a random-effects model. Six RCTs and one retrospective cohort were included in information summary.

RESULTS

The contraction of the anterior capsule opening area in the hydrophilic group was larger than that of the hydrophobic group from one month to one year postoperatively (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Specifically, the hydrophilic group showed greater contraction of the anterior capsule opening area at one month postoperatively (Standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.93 to -0.52), three months (SMD = -1.04, 95% CI = -1.32 to -0.75), six months (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI = -1.24 to -0.74) and one year (SMD = -1.33, 95% CI = -2.50 to -0.16). As of one year postoperatively, the anterior capsular opening area showed a trend of decreasing over time in both groups (P = 0.046 and P = 0.050, respectively). In information summary, three studies indicated no relationship between haptic design and ACC, while the other four studies reported that the number and shape of haptic would affect ACC.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that the postoperative ACC after the implantation of hydrophobic IOLs was less than that induced by hydrophilic IOLs. Haptic design may also affect the degree of ACC.

Effects of intraocular lens anterior edge design on anterior capsule morphology changes following femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy

PURPOSE

To compare morphological changes in the anterior capsule of two intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different anterior edge designs 6 months after femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy surgery (FLACs).

METHODS

This study included 168 eyes from168 patients undergoing FLACs. Group A included 74 eyes from 74 patients who had an Acrysof IQ Restor SN6AD3 IOL implantation with a flat anterior edge and Group B included 94 eyes of 94 patients with a TECNIS Multifocal ZMB00 IOL implantation and a "peak-like" anterior edge. All patients were followed up for 6 months. We assessed anterior capsule morphological changes including variation of anterior opening diameters and lens epithelial cell (LEC) proliferation in four directions, variation of anterior opening area, and the level of anterior capsule opacification (ACO).

RESULTS

Variation of anterior opening diameters in 4 directions were significantly lower in Group B (P < 0.05). Obvious shrinkage ratio of anterior opening diameters and contraction of anterior opening area (P < 0.05) appeared in Group A. LEC proliferation was along the "peak" in Group B, while it spread to the edge of anterior capsule in Group A. ACO grades 6 months after operation in Groups A and B were as follows: grade I in 28.38% and 82.98% of eyes, grade II in 51.35% and 17.02% of eyes, and grade III in 20.27% and 0% of eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that a "peak-like" IOL anterior edge design played an important role in maintaining the morphology of anterior capsule in the early postoperative stage.

Anterior Capsule Opening Contraction and Late Intraocular Lens Dislocation after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Weak or Partially Absent Zonular Support

Background and Objectives: To evaluate anterior capsule opening (ACO) contraction and late intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation after cataract surgery in patients with weak or partially absent zonular support and assess methods of reducing these complications. Materials and Methods: For this prospective study, we enlisted cataract surgery patients in our hospital with preoperative diagnoses of weak zonules. All patients received phacoemulsification surgery with implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic IOL and capsular tension ring (CTR). ACO reductions were measured for six months after enrolment. Data on late IOL dislocations were collected five years after enrolment of the last patient. Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled from 2011 to 2015. Over the six-month active follow-up period, ACO area reduction was 23% in patients receiving CTRs of 11 mm diameter and 8% for patients with CTRs of 12 mm, with an overall mean of 15% reduction. Five years after the last patient was enrolled, seven patients (13%) had experienced late IOL-CTR-capsular bag dislocation. For these patients, the mean ACO reduction in the first six months of follow-up was 33%, including for those who had received neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) anterior capsulotomies. Conclusion: Use of hydrophobic acrylic lenses and CTR reduces ACO contraction, with rates comparable to those after cataract surgery without ocular comorbidity. Our patients experienced a relatively high rate of late IOL-CTR-capsular bag dislocation. However, dislocated complexes were easily repositioned and few patients required IOL exchange. Frequent visits are warranted to promptly detect late complications of cataract surgery in patients with weak zonular support.

Intraindividual comparison of capsule behavior of 2 hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses during a 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the 5-year postoperative anterior (ACO) and posterior capsule opacification (PCO), the occurrence of glistenings, and the level of anterior capsule retraction after implantation of 2 designs of 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs.

SETTING

Hospital St. John, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled prospective case series.

METHODS

Patients had an Acrysof SA60AT IOL (Group A) implanted in 1 eye and a Tecnis ZCB00 IOL (Group B) implanted in the fellow eye. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the PCO level was evaluated with the Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software. The level of ACO and capsule retraction was graded subjectively. Glistenings were scored as present or not present.

RESULTS

Fifty eyes of 25 patients were evaluated after 5 years. No significant differences in PCO scores were found between the 2 groups at all follow-up visits (1 year: 0.06 ± 0.12 [SD] versus 0.07 ± 0.13, P = .35; 3 years: 0.23 ± 0.36 versus 0.22 ± 0.32, P = .66; 5 years: 0.36 ± 0.41 versus 0.36 ± 0.54, P = .98). A significant increase in PCO score was found between 3 and 5 years (P < .01). Anterior capsule opacification was present in Group A and Group B in 18.0% and 2.7% of eyes (P = .03), in 92.0% and 24.0% of eyes, and in 100% and 52% of eyes (P < .01) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Glistenings (5 years 100%) were observed in Group A.

CONCLUSION

Both IOLs had a comparable PCO rate 5 years after surgery, although more ACO and retraction as well as glistenings were observed in Group A.

Evaluation of anterior capsular contraction syndrome after cataract surgery with commonly used intraocular lenses

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of anterior capsular contraction syndrome (ACCS) in cataract patients after implantation with one of two most commonly used hydrophobic acrylic lenses.

Setting

This study included patients from Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Design

This study is a retrospective chart review.

Methods

In this study, 1,047 eyes of 811 patients with and without known ACCS risk factors who underwent successful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were included. Eyes that sustained intraoperative capsular tears and patients with a postoperative follow-up of <1 month were excluded. Each patient underwent surgery by the same surgeon receiving either the SN60WF IOL or the ZCB00 IOL. The duration of postoperative follow-up along with the presence of ACCS and the dimensions of the anterior capsule opening in these cases were recorded. The incidence of ACCS between the two lenses was compared.

Results

ACCS was significantly (P=0.045) less frequent in those patients who received the ZCB00 lens compared to those who received the SN60WF lens, despite a significantly greater (P<0.0001) number of patients with ACCS risk factors in the ZCB00 cohort.

Conclusion

In a direct comparison of the ZCB00 and SN60WF IOLs, a lower incidence of ACCS was found with ZCB00 IOL.

Intraindividual comparative analysis of capsule opacification after implantation of 2 single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses models: Three-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To compare the 3-year postoperative anterior (ACO) and posterior (PCO) capsule opacification and the level of anterior capsule retraction after implantation of 2 single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) models.

SETTING

Hospital of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Comparative randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial.

METHODS

Eyes with bilateral cataract were evaluated. Each patient had an Acrysof SA60AT (interrupted optic edge) IOL implanted in 1 eye (Group A) and a Tecnis ZCB00 (continuous optic edge) IOL implanted in the fellow eye (Group B). One and 3 years postoperatively, PCO was evaluated using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification software and the ACO level and capsule-retraction level were evaluated and graded subjectively.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 100 eyes of 50 patients ranging from 61 to 80 years. Postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in PCO between Group A and Group B at 1 year (0.06 ± 0.12 [SD] and 0.07 ± 0.13, respectively; P = 4.35) or 3 years (0.23 ± 0.36 and 0.22 ± 0.32, respectively; P = .66). In Group A and Group B, ACO was present in 18.0% of eyes and 2.7% of eyes, respectively, at 1 year (P = .03) and in 92.0% and 24.0%, respectively, at 3 years (P < .01). Capsule phimosis (18.0% at 1 year; 30.0% at 3 years) and glistenings (66.0% at 1 year; 86.0% at 3 years) were observed in Group A only.

CONCLUSION

Both IOLs had similarly low PCO rates 3 years postoperatively, although more ACO and capsule retraction were observed in eyes with the interrupted optic edge IOL.

Comparison of the keratometric corneal astigmatism and refractive astigmatism after phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation

Here we aimed to define keratometric and refractive astigmatism in a series of patients who underwent phacoemulsification, using small corneal incision and implantation of foldable intraocular lenses. Furthermore, we compared keratometric astigmatism and refractive astigmatism of the patients both before and after surgery. We performed a follow-up study of patients with newly diagnosed cataract before and after phacoemulsification surgery. Eighty eyes from 78 patients with a mean age of 62.9 ± 12.03 (32-86) years were studied. Thirty-nine (48.8 %) were male and 41(51.2 %) were female. All subjects underwent 3.5 mm corneal incision with the temporal (75 patients; 94 %) or superior (5 patients; 6 %) approach. The patients were followed for a mean of 74.21 ± 71.25 (30-400) days. Patients had higher values of keratometric measurements after surgery compared to those before surgery [45.81 ± 0.11 (45.06-45.94) vs. 45.2 ± 0.20 (44.6-45.41)] (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the keratometric astigmatism, refractive astigmatism and keratometry axis pre- and postoperatively. The mean keratometric astigmatism was 0.9 ± 0.54 (0.00-4.00) diopters (D) preoperatively and 0.93 ± 0.45 (0.00-4.00) D postoperatively (p = 0.444). The keratometric axis was 97.7 ± 9.4 preoperatively and 115 ± 15.8 postoperatively (p = 0.185). Refractive astigmatism was 1.15 ± 0.77 (5-180) with the refractive axis of 89.7 ± 5.89 (5-180) degrees in the follow-up (p = 0.752). Ninety percent of the patients had <1.00 D difference in the keratometric and refractive astigmatism, postoperatively. In conclusion while there is no significant difference in postoperative keratometric and refractive astigmatism in most of the eyes, about 10 % show >1 D difference in these measurements.

The impact of capsulorhexis diameter, localization and shape on posterior capsule opacification

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of capsulorhexis diameter, localization and shape on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) development after cataract extraction with phacoemulsification.

MATERIAL/METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed of 297 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and AcrySof SA60AT implantation. In a first group of 97 patients, 53 received small capsulorhexis (3.9 to 4.9 mm in diameter) and 44 patients received large capsulorhexis (5.0 to 5.9 mm in diameter). Another group of 99 patients was split into subgroups--66 patients whose capsulorhexis were centrally located and 33 patients whose capsulorhexis were paracentral. A third group of 101 patients was split into subgroups--a subgroup of 59 patients were classified as having a regularly rimmed capsulorhexis and a subgroup of 42 patients as having an irregularly rimmed capsulorhexis. At 6 months follow-up, PCO was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe, depending on the number of quadrants involved.

RESULTS

86.79% of the patients with a small capsulorhexis had no or mild PCO (p<0.001), whereas, 68.18% of the patients with a large capsulorhexis experienced moderate or severe PCO; 89.4% of the patients with a central capsulorhexis had no or mild PCO (p<0.001), whereas, 75.75% of the patients with a paracentral capsulorhexis had moderate or severe PCO; 86.44% of the patients with a regularly rimmed anterior capsulorhexis had no or mild PCO (p<0.001); and 69.04% of the patients with an irregular capsulorhexis rim had moderate or severe PCO.

CONCLUSIONS

A small capsulorhexis diameter, its central localization and regular shape result in less PCO following phacoemulsification.