Corneal ectasia after LASIK in one eye and uneventful PRK in the fellow eye

Biomechanical Properties in Different Types of Thin Corneas in Menoufia Population

Background

To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal thin (NT) healthy corneas with central corneal thickness (CCT) of 470–500 μm with matched thickness in keratoconus suspect (KCS) and keratoconus (KC) eyes.

Methods

A total of 103 eyes in three groups were included prospectively: NT, KCS, and KC groups based on clinical examination and Pentacam findings. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured using the ocular response analyzer (ORA). CCT, CH, and CRF were compared between the three groups and statistically analyzed by variance tests.

Results

The three groups consisted of 44 NT, 26 KCS, and 33 KC. The mean CH measured was 8.689 ± 1.775, 9.051 ± 1.1190, and 8.129 ± 0.8539 mmHg in NT, KCS, and KC eyes, respectively. The mean CRF was 8.441 ± 1.663, 8.337 ± 1.114, and 7.2422 ± 1.3110 mmHg in NT, KCS, and KC eyes, respectively. Within the range of central corneal thickness (470–500 μm), only mean CRF was statistically significantly different between the NT and KC (P < 0.05); there was no statistically significant difference between NT and KCS, nor was the mean CH between each group (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

CRF only can be helpful in differentiating KC from NT eyes; KCS could not be predicted with either corneal biomechanical metrics. There was no benefit from CH in differentiating between the three study groups.

Post-LASIK keratectasia in the context of a thicker than intended flap detected by anterior segment optical coherence tomography

The corneal flap created in LASIK is responsible for most of its advantages in comparison with surface ablation. However, lamellar dissection of the corneal layers in LASIK can also result in serious complications such as corneal ectasia. A 23-year-old man underwent LASIK for correction of −4.75 −2.00@15 in the right eye and −4.50 −2.00@160 in the left eye with a preoperative thinnest corneal thickness of 518 µm/right eye and 513 µm/left eye in 2009. An intended flap thickness and ablation depth in both eyes were 160 µm and 94 µm, respectively, and subsequently, residual stromal bed thickness was 264 µm/right eye and 259 µm/left eye. Several years after surgery, he was referred for the decreased vision. His corrected-distance visual acuity was 0.50 in both eyes. A scissoring reflex was found in retinoscopy. Orbscan imaging was compatible with keratoconus. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed to measure the LASIK flap. It was much thicker (200 µm) than intended (160 µm), and therefore, the residual stromal bed thickness was much thinner. In summary, keratectasia may develop in cases where thicker than expected flaps result in excessive thinning of the residual stromal bed. The obtained results from this case emphasize and remind the importance of intraoperative measurement of flap thickness and using femtosecond and new criteria for patient selection to avoid post-LASIK keratectasia.

Keratorefractive Surgery Outcomes in Keratoconus Suspect Patients

Purpose. To examine the outcomes of keratorefractive surgeries in keratoconus suspect patients. Methods. This study included 192 keratoconus suspects (351 eyes), treated with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (211 eyes), Lasik (96 eyes), and Femto-Lasik (44 eyes) surgeries in an eye clinic. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and subjective refraction were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (three months and five years after the procedure). The Orbscan II topography system was also used preoperatively and five years after the procedure. Results. The patients’ mean age was 31.6 ± 5.49 years (range: 21–47 years) in the last follow-up. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative mean values of BSCVA in any of the surgical methods ( $P$  = 0.49). The mean spherical equivalent, cylindrical power, corneal curvature, the thinnest corneal thickness, and the central corneal thickness decreased significantly in the last follow-up ( $P$  < 0.001). Four patients (3.50%) in the PRK group and one patient (1.85%) in the Lasik group needed glasses in the last follow-up. Eleven cases of corneal ectasia were detected in the last follow-up (six eyes of four patients [2.84%] and five eyes of four patients [5.20%] in the PRK and Lasik groups, respectively). Conclusion. In the present study, the high risk of postoperative ectasia was detected in keratoconus suspects following PRK and Lasik surgeries. According to the results, it can be concluded that Femto-Lasik surgery provides better outcomes than Lasik and PRK. Overall, the surgical criteria are suggested to be evaluated case by case, and the patients must be followed up over time to assess the corneal topography and refraction stability.

Ocular response analyzer parameters in healthy, keratoconus suspect and manifest keratoconus eyes

Background:

To evaluate and compare corneal biomechanical indices and their specificity among keratoconus (KC), keratoconus suspect (KCS), and normal eyes (NL) before and after controlling potential confounders.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 160 eyes in three groups were included prospectively: NL, KC, and KCS groups based on clinical examination and topography. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured by the ocular response analyzer. CH and CRF were compared between the three groups by analysis of variances test.

Results:

The three groups consisted of 80 NL, 48 KC, and 32 KCS eyes. The mean CH measured was 10.4 ± 1.25, 7.83 ± 1.28 and 10.17 ± 1.80 mm Hg in NL, KC and KCS eyes, respectively. The mean CRF was 10.23 ± 1.75, 6.5 ± 1.63 and 9.98 ± 2.00 mm Hg in NL, KC and KCS eyes, respectively. Mean CH and CRF were significantly different between the NL and KC (P < 0.05); however after controlling for central corneal thickness and sex; there was no significant difference between NL and KCS (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

CH and CRF can be helpful in differentiating KC from NL eyes; however, they are not valuable for detecting KCS that is the main concern for refractive surgery. Future studies focusing on more accurate tests for identifying KCS, using a consistent grading scale for defining KC and KCS are still warranted.