Partial coherence interferometry versus immersion ultrasonography for axial length measurement in children

External Validation of a Model to Predict Postoperative Globe Axial Length in Children After Bilateral Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To perform the external validation of a model to predict postoperative axial length (AL) in children over 2 years of age who were undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

DESIGN

Validation study using a retrospective case series.

METHODS

Using a population different from the one that created the model, but with the same characteristics regarding age, bilateral cataract, primary IOL implantation, and follow-up assessment, AL was estimated. The AL values estimated by the model were compared with the AL measured in the follow-ups.

RESULTS

In all, 55 eyes of 30 children were selected for this study; in 5 children with bilateral cataracts, only 1 eye was included. The median age at the time of surgery was 5.01 years. Follow-up AL measurements were obtained for 179 visits. The median age at the final follow-up visit was 10.15 years. The median AL measured and estimated by the model in all visits were 22.37 mm and 22.16 mm, respectively (Pearson coefficient: 0.9534; Lin correlation: 0.9258). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the 95% limit of agreement between the 2 methods (measured and estimated AL) was 0.71 to -1.19. In 3 eyes (1.68%) with AL shorter than 21.2 mm, the difference was >0.71, and in 9 eyes with AL longer than 22.5 (5.03%), it was less than -1.19. The median AL measured and estimated at the final visit were 22.69 mm and 22.43 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our previously developed prediction model for globe AL growth demonstrated good external validity by accurately predicting measured AL changes with growth in the validation cohort.

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation With Optic Capture in Berger Space for Pediatric Cataract

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in pediatric patients with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 68 children (101 eyes), aged 3 to 14 years, who received multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00; Abbott Medical Optics) implantation with optic capture in Berger space from June 2019 to June 2020 in Qingdao Eye Hospital. Ocular biometry was performed using the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The IOL power and intended postoperative refraction were calculated using the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, SRK/T, Haigis, and SRKII formulas. The refractive state of patients, prediction error, and absolute prediction error were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error of the formulas was significantly different (0.49 diopters [D], Hoffer Q; 0.52 D, Barrett Universal II; 0.47 D, Holladay; 0.54 D, Holladay2; 0.52 D, SRK/T; 0.67 D, Haigis; 0.99 D, SRKII; P < .001). However, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas had a similar accuracy in predicting refractive error within ±0.50 D (62.4%, 59.4%, 62.4%, 62.4%, and 58.4%). There was a trend toward a greater prediction error in eyes with a shorter axial length (≤ 22 mm) or a steeper cornea (> 43.50 D), for which the Hoffer Q and Holladay2 formulas were more accurate. When the axial length was greater than 22 mm or the corneal curvature was 43.50 D or less, the Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II formulas were more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pediatric cataract treated with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas performed better than the other formulas. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XX-XX.].

Evaluation of intra-operative aphakic axial eye length measurements using swept source optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

Evaluation of intra-operative aphakic axial eye length (AL) measurements using swept source optical coherence tomography.

SETTING

Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Prospective single-center study.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were measured using swept-source optical coherence tomography (ss-OCT, IOLMaster 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) to assess the axial eye length. Intra-operatively, swept source optical coherence tomography (ss-OCT) measurements were performed with a prototype device (IOLMaster 700 connected to an OPMI Lumera 700 microscope, CZM) at the beginning of cataract surgery furthermore of the aphakic eye and 2 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 59 eyes of 59 patients, the phakic median AL pre-operatively (pre-OP) and intra operatively (intra-OP) were 23.61 mm ± 0.96 (SD) and 23.51 mm ± 0.96 (SD). Absolute median difference was 0.028 ± 0.02 (SD) (p=0.049). Median phakic AL intra-OP versus 2 months post operatively (post-OP) was 23.51 mm ± 0.97 (SD) vs 23.49 mm ± 0.95 (SD). Absolute median difference was 0.049 ± 0.04 (SD) (p=0.000).Median AL intra-OP aphakic versus vs 2 months post-Op pseudophakic were 23.42 mm ± 0.97 (SD) versus 23.42 mm ± 0.97 (SD). Absolute median difference was 0.038 ± 0.04 (SD) (p=0.379).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-OP swept source OCT technology of the phakic and aphakic eye shows excellent comparability to pre- and post-operative measurements. This technique allows axial eye length measurements with high precision in cases where pre-op biometric measurements are not possible.

Predicting future axial length in patients with paediatric cataract and primary intraocular lens implantation

OBJECTIVE

Creating a model to predict Axial Length (AL) growth in paediatric cataract and evaluating influence factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eyes with AL measured at surgery and at least one measurement after a 6-month period, from children with unilateral or bilateral cataract and primary IOL implantation, were evaluated. A "rate of axial length growth" (RALG) was calculated for every single eye using these AL measurements and log₁₀ age. One average RALG was calculated for All Eyes and for the groups of Bilateral and Unilateral, Gender, Age at the Surgery, different Visual Acuity, Bilateral Excluded and Not-excluded eye, and Affected and Not-affected eye in unilateral, for comparisons.

RESULTS

Average age at surgery from 76 children was 2.83 ± 2.74 (0.11-12.21) years with follow up of 2.84 ± 1.84 (0.52-8.17) years, 29 (37.66%) had unilateral cataract. A total of 357 AL measurements were used, average of 4.70 ± 2.13 (2-10) measurements per eye. The average RALG for all eyes was 4.51 ± 3.06. There were no RALG significant differences comparing Unilateral and Bilateral eyes (p = 0.51), Male and Female (p = 0.26), Age at Surgery <0.5 and >0.5 years old (p = 0.21), both eyes in Bilateral cases (p = 0.70) and Unilateral Affected and Not-affected eyes (p = 0.18). The equation Al = initial AL + slope ×  Log₁₀ ((age + 0.6)⁄(initial age + 0.6)) estimates ALs in different ages.

CONCLUSIONS

A model to predict AL growth in paediatric cataract was developed. Different studied factors did not significantly influence AL growth.

Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer

Background

To evaluate the effect of orthokeratology on precision of measurements in children using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) optical biometer (OA-2000), and agreement between its measurements and those provided by the commonly used IOLMaster based on partial coherence interferometry (PCI).

Methods

This study recruited fifty-one eyes of 51 normal children (8–16 years). An operator took measurements with the two biometers. Then, a second operator took measurements with the SS-OCT biometer. After orthokeratology was performed for one month, the same operators repeated the same procedures. Axial length (AL), mean keratometry (Km) at 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm diameters (Km_2.5 and Km_3.0), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and corneal diameter (CD) were analyzed.

Results

With the SS-OCT optical biometer, the test-retest repeatability of AL measurements was < 0.06 mm. For all parameters, the coefficients of variation were < 1.23% and the intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.95. The 95% limits of agreement of difference between the two devices for CD parameter were up to 1.53 mm. After orthokeratology, the fluctuation ranges of difference for Km3.0 measurement was 1.11 times higher than before orthokeratology, while the absolute values of difference for AL, Km2.5, ACD and CD measurements were comparable.

Conclusions

Before and after orthokeratology, the SS-OCT biometer showed high repeatability and reproducibility for all measurements. Wearing orthokeratology contact lenses affected the agreement between SS-OCT and PCI biometers for Km3.0 measurements. The CD measurement showed poor agreement between the two devices.

A Model to Predict Postoperative Axial Length in Children Undergoing Bilateral Cataract Surgery With Primary Intraocular Lens Implantation

PURPOSE

To develop a model for predicting postoperative globe axial length (AL) in children undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children older than 2 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Children were included only if AL data were available for both eyes before surgery and at least 1 year after surgery. We analyzed variables that could influence globe axial growth and developed a multivariable generalized estimating equation regression model to predict postoperative AL.

RESULTS

Sixty-four children were included. The median age at surgery and at follow-up was 5.1 and 12.5 years, respectively. AL measurements were obtained in both eyes during 242 visits. The median AL before and at last follow-up was 22.2 and 23.1 mm, respectively. Beta value for the final model to predict postoperative AL is as below: intercept (1.93), preoperative AL (0.91), age at cataract surgery (-0.07), age at follow-up (0.14), and interaction between age at surgery and age at follow-up (-0.005). Using this model, for a hypothetical patient operated at 2.5 years of age with a 20.5 mm AL would be estimated to have a 22.8 mm AL at 18 years of age.

CONCLUSION

IOL power selection is a major challenge of pediatric cataract surgery attributable to unpredictable future eye growth. This model theoretically could be used to predict individual future adult size AL for each child undergoing cataract surgery, helping the surgeon to customize the selection of an IOL power at implantation and also to help the parents understand what to expect.

Updates on managements of pediatric cataract

Purpose

A comprehensive review in congenital cataract management can guide general ophthalmologists in managing such a difficult situation which remains a significant cause of preventable childhood blindness. This review will focus on surgical management, postoperative complications, and intraocular lens (IOL)-related controversies.

Methods

Electrical records of PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from January 1980 to August 2017 were explored using a combination of keywords: "Congenital", "Pediatric", "Childhood", "Cataract", "Lens opacity", "Management", "Surgery", "Complication", "Visual rehabilitation”, and "Lensectomy". A total number of 109 articles were selected for the review process.

Results

This review article suggests that lens opacity obscuring the red reflex in preverbal children and visual acuity of less than 20/40 is an absolute indication for lens aspiration. For significant lens opacity that leads to a considerable risk of amblyopia, cataract surgery is recommended at 6 weeks of age for unilateral cataract and between 6 and 8 weeks of age for bilateral cases. The recommended approach in operation is lens aspiration via vitrector and posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy in children younger than six years, and IOL implantation could be considered in patients older than one year. Most articles suggested hydrophobic foldable acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) for pediatrics because of lower postoperative inflammation. Regarding the continuous ocular growth and biometric changes in pediatric patients, under correction of IOL power based on the child's age is an acceptable approach. Considering the effects of early and late postoperative complications on the visual outcome, timely detection, and management are of a pivotal importance. In the end, the main parts of post-operation visual rehabilitation are a refractive correction, treatment of concomitant amblyopia, and bifocal correction for children in school age.

Conclusions

The management of congenital cataracts stands to challenge for most surgeons because of visual development and ocular growth. Children undergoing cataract surgery must be followed lifelong for proper management of early and late postoperative complications. IOL implantation for infants less than 1 year is not recommended, and IOL insertion for children older than 2 years with sufficient capsular support is advised.

Multi-component adjustable intraocular lenses: a new concept in pediatric cataract surgery

PURPOSE

The multi-component intraocular lens (IOL) (IVO; SAS, Strasbourg, France) is a novel approach to the treatment of pediatric cataract. Because the refractive requirements for pediatric eyes often change over time, current IOL technology does not easily allow refractive adjustments after the primary surgical intervention. The multi-component IOL concept allows easy, surgical refractive adjustments to the initial surgical implantation at any postoperative time period. Thus, both surgical implantation and enhancement surgery have been successfully accomplished in adult patients.

METHODS

A novel surgical approach to pediatric cataract surgery is described. At the time of the primary surgery, a two component IOL was implanted. At any postoperative time period, the front lens component, located in front of the capsular bag, could be easily surgically exchanged because the dioptric power requirements of the pediatric eye changed over time.

RESULTS

Both primary and enhancement surgeries have been done in adult patients with good results. Implantations have occurred uneventfully in all cases with no intraoperative or postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in the endothelial cell density, anterior chamber depth, and pachymetry readings preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. There was no interlenticular fibrosis present.

CONCLUSION

The multi-component IOL should provide a unique and greatly needed surgically adjustable approach to the treatment of pediatric cataract.

Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract

Globe axial length (AL) in children is commonly measured using either contact or immersion technique. Office measurement of AL can be difficult in young children and infants and must often be done under anesthesia in an eye that is unable to cooperate with precise fixation and centration. Contact A-scan measurements yield shorter AL, on average, than immersion A-scan measurements in pediatric eyes. This difference is mainly the result of the anterior chamber depth rather than the lens thickness value. During intraocular lens power calculation, if globe axial length is measured by the contact technique, it will result in the use of an average 1-D stronger IOL power than is actually required. This can lead to induced myopia in the postoperative refraction. In our studied patients, there was a significant difference in prediction error between contact A-scan biometry and immersion A-scan biometry. The immersion A-scan technique is recommended for pediatric IOL power calculation. We also provide a review of biometry in pediatric eyes. The overall mean AL of pediatric cataractous eyes is significantly different than the mean AL of non cataractous eyes. More importantly, the standard deviation is higher in eyes with cataract than in those without. Three phases of eye growth in children have been documented: A rapid, postnatal phase from birth to 6 months of age, followed by a slower, infantile phase from 6 to 18 months of age, and finally a slow, juvenile phase from 18 months forward. In our study, girls had shorter ALs than boys and African-American subjects had longer ALs than Caucasians. Eyes with unilateral cataract had shorter ALs than eyes with bilateral cataract during the earlier years, but had longer ALs during later childhood.

Pediatric intraocular lens power calculations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To implant an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) in a child, we must measure the eye well, calculate the IOL power accurately and predict the refractive change of the pseudophakic eye to maturity. The present review will concentrate on recent studies dealing with these issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immersion A-scan biometry is superior in measuring the axial length of children. Current IOL power calculation formulas are very accurate in adults, but significantly less accurate in children. Several studies point to the high prediction errors encountered particularly in shorter eyes with all available IOL formulas. Postoperative refraction target remains controversial, but low degrees of overcorrection (i.e. hyperopia) may not adversely affect eventual best-corrected visual acuity.

SUMMARY

Although pediatric IOL power calculations suffer from significant prediction error, these errors can be decreased by careful preoperative measurements. IOL power calculation formulas are most accurate in the older, more 'adult'-sized eye. The smallest eyes have the most prediction error with all available formulas. Individual circumstances and parental concerns must be factored into the choice of a postoperative refractive target.

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization

PURPOSE

Comparison of postoperative refraction results using ultrasound biometry with closed immersion shell and optical biometry.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Three hundred and sixty-four eyes of 306 patients (age: 70.6 ± 12.8 years) underwent cataract surgery where intraocular lenses calculated by SRK/T formula were implanted. In 159 cases immersion ultrasonic biometry, in 205 eyes optical biometry was used. Differences between predicted and actual postoperative refractions were calculated both prior to and after optimization with the SRK/T formula, after which we analysed the similar data in the case of Holladay, Haigis, and Hoffer-Q formulas. Mean absolute error (MAE) and the percentage rate of patients within ±0.5 and ±1.0 D difference in the predicted error were calculated with these four formulas.

RESULTS

MAE was 0.5-0.7 D in cases of both methods with SRK/T, Holladay, and Hoffer-Q formula, but higher with Haigis formula. With no optimization, 60-65 % of the patients were under 0.5 D error in the immersion group (except for Haigis formula). Using the optical method, this value was slightly higher (62-67 %), however, in this case, Haigis formula also did not perform so well (45 %). Refraction results significantly improved with Holladay, Hoffer-Q, and Haigis formulas in both groups. The rate of patients under 0.5 D error increased to 65 % by the immersion technique, and up to 80 % by the optical one.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, optical biometry offers only slightly better outcomes compared to those of immersion shell with no optimized formulas. However, in case of new generation formulas with both methods, the optimization of IOL-constants give significantly better results.