Pupil-size alterations induced by photodisruption during femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery

Surgical time and efficacy of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of the illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery in terms of shortening the surgical time in eyes with miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment.

METHODS

As retrospective study, three hundred thirty-six eyes of 336 consecutive patients who underwent the femtosecond laser and illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery were included. Cases with pupil less than 6 mm after femtosecond laser pretreatment were included in the miosis group. Pupil diameter, surgical time, and improved efficacy (100/surgical time×pupil size) were compared between eyes with and without miosis.

RESULTS

Of 336 eyes, 20 were included in the miosis group (6.0%). Pupil diameter was smaller in eyes with miosis than in those without miosis (5.23 ± 0.38 mm vs 7.35 ± 0.64 mm, p < 0.001); however, surgical time was not different (6.86 ± 0.73 min vs 6.60 ± 1.27 min, p = 0.071) between the two groups. Mechanical pupil dilations were not needed in any cases. As a result, improved efficacy was calculated to be higher in patients with miosis (2.83 vs 2.14, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In terms of surgical time and improved efficacy, using the illuminated chopper simplified cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment. The use of an illuminated chopper is expected to be a good solution for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeries.

Update on Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Review

The advent of femtosecond lasers has resulted in a new standard in cataract surgery, intended to overmatch the paradigm of conventional phacoemulsification. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) enables a higher level of reproducibility, precision, accuracy, and customization when performing several steps of cataract (or lens) surgery. Capsulotomy, corneal incisions, lens fragmentation, and arcuate incisions are the main procedures performed using FLACS. As the demand for better refractive outcomes and spectacle independence increases, the features of FLACS are highly relevant, especially when considering the implantation of premium intraocular lenses, such as toric, enhanced depth-of-focus, or multifocal lenses. The present article reviews the state of the art of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract (lens) surgery, contemplating the advantages and limitations of the two types of femtosecond laser pulses available (high and low energy) by evaluating their reported outcomes and complications.

The necessity of pretreatment with 0.1% pranoprofen for femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery: A single-center, randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To explore the effect of the variation of pupil diameter (PD) and intraocular pressure (IOP) induced by femtosecond laser treatment on the subsequent phacoemulsfication and intraocular lens implantation. And whether the application of 0.1% pranoprofen could significantly reduce the miosis and increased IOP caused by femtosecond laser treatment in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

Methods

In this study, patients were pretreated with (trial group) or without (control group) topical 0.1% pranoprofen. The PD and IOP were measured at different time points within 30 ​min after the completion of the femtosecond laser treatment.

Results

The comparisons of the two groups showed the PD of patients pretreated with 0.1% pranoprofen was significantly larger than that of the control only at 15 ​min after FLACS (P ​= ​0.046), and there was no significant difference in IOP at any time point (P ​> ​0.05). Neither the ratio of significant miosis (PD ​≤ ​5 ​mm) nor intraocular hypertension (IOP ≥30 ​mmHg) was significantly different between the control group (1.72%, 6.67%) and the trial group (1%, 4.17%) (P ​> ​0.05).

Conclusions

The PD and IOP of patients undergoing FLACS showed fluctuations within a small range. The rates of significant miosis and intraocular hypertension are very low, it is safe for surgeons to complete the follow-up procedures within 30 ​min after femtosecond laser treatment. Pretreatment with 0.1% pranoprofen exerted a slight, albeit significant prophylactic effect preventing pupil miosis. However, it provided only a limited benefit in patients undergoing FLACS without other complications.

Pupil Status with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification: An Intraindividual Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare the pupil changes in low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with conventional phacoemulsification (CP) intraindividually.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective review of registered surgical data from patients that undergone uncomplicated cataract surgery in a single centre, with randomly assigned femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) to one eye and conventional phacoemulsification (CP) to the other, was performed. The recorded pupil images were evaluated at pre and post laser treatment (after suction release) and at several surgical timepoints for both techniques (FLACS and CP). Pupil areas were calculated and compared in the same eye undergone FLACS (pre vs post laser treatment), between eyes (CP vs FLACS) in the same patient and between groups. Subgroups were built regarding age and ocular comorbidity.

Results

This study involved a total of 164 eyes of 82 patients (55 female, 27 male). No statistical differences regarding the total duration of surgery (p=0.805) between FLACS and CP. Pupil measurements between pre and post laser treatment in the FLACS group showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.107). The mean change in pupil area from the beginning until the end of surgery (total variation) was 6.59±2.08 mm² in the FLACS group and 6.67±2.13 mm² in the CP group, associated to less narrowing of pupil area with FLACS, although not statistically significant (p=0.080). Comorbidity group analysis revealed less, but not significant, pupil narrowing with the FLACS technique (p=0.071). No statistically significant differences between FLACS and CP concerning age subgroups were registered.

Conclusion

This study shows no significant pupil changes, namely myosis, after low-energy FLACS pre-treatment. Comparison between techniques showed less pupil variation in FLACS as compared to CP, more markedly in eyes with comorbidities (particularly with shallow anterior chamber), although non-statistically significant.

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Update and perspectives

Cataract surgery is among the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide and has a tremendous impact on patients' quality of life. Phacoemulsification (PCS) is accepted as a standard of care; its technique has continuously evolved and already achieved good anatomical, visual, and refractive outcomes. Lasers in ophthalmology are widely used in clinical practice, femtosecond lasers (FSLs) for corneal surgery in particular. It was natural to assess the usefulness of FSL in cataract surgery as this technology was within reach. Indeed, precise and reproducible cuttings provided by FSL platforms could improve standardization of care and limit the risk associated with the human element in surgery and provide a step toward robot-assisted surgery. After docking and planning the procedure, femtosecond lasers are used to perform corneal incisions, capsulorhexis, lens fragmentation, and arcuate incisions in an automated manner. A well-constructed corneal incision is primordial as it offers safety during the procedure, self-seals afterward, and influences the refractive outcome. Capsulorhexis size, centration, and resistance to shearing influence the surgery, intraocular lens (IOL) centration and stability, and posterior capsular opacification formation. Lens fragmentation is where most of the energy is delivered into the eye, and its amount influences endothelial cell damage and potential damage to other ocular structures. The arcuate incisions offer an additional opportunity to influence postoperative astigmatism. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has been a topic of research in many studies and clinical trials that attempted to assess its potential benefits and cost-effectiveness over PCS and is the subject of this mini-review.

Prostaglandin Release After Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Without Anti-Inflammatory Drug Premedication

PURPOSE

To compare prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) levels in the aqueous and pupil diameter in patients undergoing low-pulse energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (LCS) without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) pretreatment with either fragmentation or capsulotomy performed first.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, fellow-eye controlled comparison.

METHODS

This study was undertaken at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna. The population consisted of 140 eyes of 70 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. Bilateral same-day LCS with either anterior capsulotomy before lens fragmentation (Caps-First) in one eye or vice versa (Frag-First) in a random sequence were performed. Aqueous was tapped 5 minutes after LCS and PGE-2 concentration was analyzed. Pupil diameters were recorded immediately before and after femtosecond laser pretreatment. The main outcome measure was PGE-2 concentrations in picograms/milliliter and pupil diameter in millimeters.

RESULTS

Mean PGE-2 concentrations were 42.0 ± 63.7 pg/mL in the Caps-First group versus 71.8 ± 160.7 pg/mL with the Frag-First group (P = .186). Mean pupil diameters before and after pretreatment were 7.6 ± 0.8 mm and 7.6 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P = .871). Mean PGE-2 concentrations and pupil diameters did not show any significant difference between time points or groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy femtosecond laser pretreatment did not increase PGE-2 levels in the absence of NSAID pretreatment. This was independent of whether capsulotomy or fragmentation was performed first. Moreover, no pupillary miosis was observed.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 1-Year Outcomes of Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification

Purpose: To compare 1-year clinical outcomes, phacoemulsification energy, aqueous profiles, and patient-reported outcomes of low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) vs. conventional phacoemulsification.

Methods: The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with paired-eye design. Eighty-five patients were randomized to receive FLACS (Ziemer LDV Z8) in one eye and conventional phacoemulsification in the fellow eye. Clinical data including phacoemulsification energy parameters (cumulative dissipated energy, phacoemulsification power, and phacoemulsification time), uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (UCDVA and BCDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell count (ECC), anterior chamber flare, and post-operative complications were obtained for 1 year. Aqueous humor was collected for the analysis of prostaglandin (PGE)₂, cytokines and chemokines concentrations. Patients' reported-outcomes on surgical experiences were evaluated using an in-house questionnaire.

Results: Compared to conventional phacoemulsification, the low-energy assisted FLACS group had significantly less ECC reduction at 3 months (1.5 ± 0.3% vs. 7.0 ± 2.4%; P < 0.01) and 1 year (8.2 ± 2.8% vs. 11.2 ± 3.6%; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the phacoemulsification energy parameters, UCDVA, BCDVA, MRSE, CCT, occurrence of post-operative complications between the 2 groups throughout post-operative 1 year. Patients' subjective surgical experiences, including the surgical duration and perceived inconvenience, were comparable between the 2 groups. FLACS resulted in significantly higher aqueous PGE₂ (P < 0.01), interleukin (IL)-6 (P = 0.03), IL-8 (P = 0.03), and interferon (IFN)-γ (P = 0.04) concentrations and greater anterior chamber flare at 1 day (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Our RCT presented 1-year longitudinal clinical and laboratory data. The long-term ECC result was more favorable in low-energy FLACS. The rest of the intraoperative and post-operative outcomes, as well as patient-reported outcomes, were comparable between these two procedures.

[Historical development of energetic cataract surgery]

This article reviews scientific literature analyzing the history of ultrasound and laser phaco surgery of combined or isolated designs: erbium YAG laser, 1.064 μm Nd:YAG laser for dissection of the lens capsule and nucleus, exclusively-laser technique of lens destruction with 1.44 µm Nd:YAG laser without manual, vacuum or ultrasonic action, femtosecond laser assistance with automated transcorneal delivery of radiation into the eye cavity.

[Surgical treatment of hypermature cataract in patients with lens subluxation and small pupil]

Studying the possibilities of hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification in complicated situations is a relevant problem in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE

To develop a technique for hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification in patients with a combination of hypermature cataract, small pupil and lens subluxation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification of hypermature cataracts was performed in 36 patients (36 eyes) aged 63 to 78 years with grade I-II lens subluxation in combination with small pupil. The initial circular femtolaser capsulotomy was performed within the small pupil using the VICTUS system (Technolas Perfect Vision, Germany). After dilating the pupil with retractor hooks, the capsulorhexis was manually expanded to the required diameter.

RESULTS

In all cases, the resulting capsulorhexis had a regular round shape with a smooth edge, without radial ruptures. This made it possible to apply modern methods of fixation and centration of the capsular bag in case of lens subluxation and to perform intracapsular implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). Complete intracapsular fixation of the IOL with optics edge fully covered by the edge of the capsulorhexis in the postoperative period was achieved in 34 (94.4%) cases. In 2 (5.6%) cases in the postoperative period, the edge of the capsulorhexis exceeded the edge of the IOL optics. The loss of corneal endothelial cells 3 months after surgery was 8.8±1.9%.

CONCLUSION

The use of the proposed combined technique of capsulorhexis made it possible to perform the most physiologically appropriate intracapsular IOL implantation in all patients with hypermature cataract, small pupil and lens subluxation.

Automatic detection of pupil reactions in cataract surgery videos

In the light of an increased use of premium intraocular lenses (IOL), such as EDOF IOLs, multifocal IOLs or toric IOLs even minor intraoperative complications such as decentrations or an IOL tilt, will hamper the visual performance of these IOLs. Thus, the post-operative analysis of cataract surgeries to detect even minor intraoperative deviations that might explain a lack of a post-operative success becomes more and more important. Up-to-now surgical videos are evaluated by just looking at a very limited number of intraoperative data sets, or as done in studies evaluating the pupil changes that occur during surgeries, in a small number intraoperative picture only. A continuous measurement of pupil changes over the whole surgery, that would achieve clinically more relevant data, has not yet been described. Therefore, the automatic retrieval of such events may be a great support for a post-operative analysis. This would be especially true if large data files could be evaluated automatically. In this work, we automatically detect pupil reactions in cataract surgery videos. We employ a Mask R-CNN architecture as a segmentation algorithm to segment the pupil and iris with pixel-based accuracy and then track their sizes across the entire video. We can detect pupil reactions with a harmonic mean (H) of Recall, Precision, and Ground Truth Coverage Rate (GTCR) of 60.9% and average prediction length (PL) of 18.93 seconds. However, we consider the best configuration for practical use the one with the H value of 59.4% and PL of 10.2 seconds, which is much shorter. We further investigate the generalization ability of this method on a slightly different dataset without retraining the model. In this evaluation, we achieve the H value of 49.3% with the PL of 18.15 seconds.

Perioperative pupil size in low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To assess potential changes in pupil size during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using a low-energy laser system.

METHODS

The pupil sizes of eyes undergoing FLACS were measured using the Ziemer LDV Z8 by extracting images from the laser software after each of the following steps: application of suction, lens fragmentation, and capsulotomy. Furthermore, the pupil diameters were measured based on preoperative surgical microscope images and after releasing the suction. Paired t-test and the two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure were used for statistical analyses. The horizontal and vertical pupil diameters were compared in each of the steps with preoperative values.

RESULTS

Data were available for 52 eyes (52 patients, mean age 73.4 years, range 51-87 years). The equivalence between mean preoperative pupil size and status immediately after femtosecond laser treatment was confirmed (p<0.001; 95% confidence interval [-0.0637, 0.0287] for horizontal and p<0.001; 95% CI [-0.0158, 0.0859] for vertical diameter). There was statistically significant horizontal and vertical enlargement of pupil diameters between 0.15 and 0.24 mm during the laser treatment steps as compared with preoperative values (all p values <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

No progressive pupil narrowing was observed using low-energy FLACS. Although a suction-induced, slight increase in pupil area became apparent, this effect was completely reversible after removing the laser interface.

Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification

Purpose

To compare postoperative changes in central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) and prevalence of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients undergoing cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus standard phacoemulsification.

Design

This was a retrospective comparative real-world study.

Methods

Postoperative data of 252 eyes of 165 patients were collected: 138 eyes received low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and 114 eyes underwent conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). Postoperative changes in CSMT and prevalence of CME were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was a significant increase in mean CSMT from preoperative to postoperative values at 2.5 months in both the FLACS and CPCS group (p<0.001). Mean change (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) in CSMT was 6.2±11.5 µm in the FLACS group and 7.3±26.6 µm in the CPCS group, which was statistically significant but clinically not relevant. Comparison of mean changes in CSMT (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) between the FLACS and CPCS groups revealed no significant differences. The rate of pseudophakic CME (PCME) development was lower in the FLACS group (1.4%) than the CPCS group (4.4%; p=0.247). When using PREMED criteria to define clinically significant PCME, only 0.7% patients in the FLACS group and 1.8% in the CPCS group showed development of clinically significant PCME (p=0.586).

Conclusion

The mean change in CSMT and occurrence of postoperative CME was lower in the low-energy FLACS group than the standard-phacoemulsification group; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

[Current value of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery]

After more than 10 years of experience with the femtosecond laser in cataract surgery, it can be concluded that the safety profile of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is comparable to that of conventional cataract surgery. This technique offers the possibility to perform incisions with a precision superior to that of any surgeon in the world, based on the connection of preoperative and intraoperative diagnostics. This results in new possibilities to revolutionize the surgical procedure of cataract surgery and to generate new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of cataracts. The combination of keratotomy for correcting astigmatism, intraocular lenses supported by capsulotomy and individually adapted fragmentation patterns is already a component of a personalized cataract surgery.

Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery after 10 years of clinical application

INTRODUCTION

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has been considered a technological advance in modern cataract surgery. After years of experience, it has been observed that clinical outcomes had more complications than expected at the beginning. The aim of this study is to compare the benefits and disadvantages of the FLACS technique with conventional cataract surgery.

METHOD

The PubMed and Web of Science platforms were used to search for scientific literature.

RESULTS

The FLACS has currently improved the surgical technique in terms of the shorter ultrasound time used and the lower loss of endothelial cells. Likewise, the centration of capsulotomy and the correction of astigmatism with arcuate incisions have also been improved. As disadvantages, are the high cost of the laser, the intraoperative capsular complications, the induction of intraoperative myosis, and the learning curve of the technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLACS technique is considered beneficial for specific cases, such as patients with scheduled premium surgery, or with low endothelial cell count. However, it is believed that given the technological cost it is not a cost effective technique for most standard cases in our daily clinical practice.

The benefits and drawbacks of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was believed to revolutionize cataract surgery. However, the judgment of clinical benefit was found to be far more complex than initially might have been thought. The aim of this review was to analyze the benefits and drawbacks of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with traditional phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

METHODS

PubMed and the Web of Science were used to search the medical literature. The following keywords were searched in various combinations: femtosecond laser, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, phacoemulsification cataract surgery, FLACS.

RESULTS

The benefits of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery include lower cumulated phacoemulsification time and endothelial cell loss, perfect centration of the capsulotomy, and opportunity to perform precise femtosecond-assisted arcuate keratotomy incisions. The major disadvantages of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery are high cost of the laser and the disposables for surgery, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery-specific intraoperative capsular complications, as well as the risk of intraoperative miosis and the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery seems to be beneficial in some groups of patients, that is, with low baseline endothelial cell count, or those planning to receive multifocal intraocular lens. Nevertheless, having considered that the advantages of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery might not be clear in every routine case, it cannot be considered as cost-effective.

[Energy load and state of corneal endothelium in hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) and torsional phacoemulsification]

Postoperative state of the corneal endothelium is the most important criterion for evaluating the safety of cataract phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE

To compare the intraoperative energy load and postoperative state of corneal endothelium in hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) and torsional phacoemulsification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study analyzed surgical outcomes of 603 patients (714 eyes) divided into 3 groups: 225 patients (267 eyes) underwent modified femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification (1st group), 237 patients (278 eyes) underwent standard femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification (2nd group), and 141 patients (169 eyes) who underwent torsional phacoemulsification (3rd group). The follow-up period lasted up to 2 years.

RESULTS

In patients with grade II lens density (here and further - L. Buratto classification is used), effective ultrasound time was 0.56±0.11 s in the 1st group, 0.83±0.17 s in the 2nd group, and 2.78 ± 0.51 s in the 3rd group (p(1-2)<0.05; p(1-3)<0.05; p(2-3)<0.05). In patients with grade III lens density effective ultrasound time was 2.04±0.37 s in the 1st group, 2.97±0.53 s in the 2nd group, and 4.59±0.91 s in the 3rd group (p(1-2)<0.05; p(1-3)<0.05; p(2-3)<0.05). In patients with grade IV lens density, effective ultrasound time was 3.95±0.81 s in the 1st group, 5.11±1.03 s in the 2nd group, and 8.37±1.73 s in the 3rd group (p(1-2)<0.05; p(1-3)<0.05; p(2-3)<0.05). In patients with grade II lens density, loss of endothelial cells was 3.3±1.1% in the 1st group, 3.7±1.2% in the 2nd group, and 4.3±1.2% in the 3rd group (p(1-2)>0.05; p(1- 3)<0.05; p(2-3)<0.05). In patients with grade III lens density, loss of endothelial cells was 5.1±1.4% in the 1st group, 5.7±1.5% in the 2nd group, 7.2±1.7% in the 3rd group (p(1-2)>0.05; p(1-3)<0.05; p(2-3)<0.05). In patients with grade IV lens density, loss of endothelial cells was 8.9±2.1% in the 1st group, 10.1±2.3% in the 2nd group, and 13.3±2.5% in the 3rd group (p(1-2)>0.05; p(1-3)<0.05; p(2- -3)<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both techniques of femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification significantly reduce the effective ultrasound time (p<0.05) and the degree of corneal endothelial cells loss (p<0.05) compared with torsional phacoemulsification.

Methods for achieving adequate pupil size in cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure performed worldwide. Small pupils have been an eternal challenge for cataract surgeons; insufficient pupil dilation is associated with increased complication rates, including capsule rupture, vitreous loss, iris trauma or postoperative inflammation. The aim of the current review is to present the methods for pupil dilation and the risk factors for a small pupil in a cataract patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk factors for intraoperative small pupil include diabetes, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, receiving glaucoma medications, having undergone previous ocular surgery and iris sphincter sclerosis from aging. There is a wide range of options to manage the small pupil, including pharmacological treatment, mechanical stretching, dilation with iris hooks or pupil expanders. We recommend a stepwise approach for intraoperative pupil dilation, from pharmacological mydriasis to pupil expanders.

SUMMARY

The current article discusses risk factors for a small pupil and the methods for pupil dilation in a cataract patient. Every cataract surgeon needs to be ready to cope with a small pupil, both manifesting preoperatively and intraoperatively.

Topical Bromfenac Sodium in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative 0.09% bromfenac ophthalmic solution for the reduction of intraoperative miosis and pain in patients who have undergone femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical study included 65 patients with senile cataracts in the absence of significant ocular comorbidity. The patients received 0.09% bromfenac ophthalmic solution or control placebo twice a day for 3 days before surgery. Pupil diameter was measured at the initiation and finalization of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, and pain quantification was assessed by an analogous pain scale after one day of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were randomly divided into two groups. Five patients were excluded due to defective coupling with the laser interface. Each of the 60 patients was randomized to receive preoperative topical treatment with either 0.09% bromfenac or 0.1% sodium hyaluronate. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups for age and gender. The mean change in horizontal and vertical pupil diameter from the preoperative to post-femtosecond laser measurements were significantly less in the bromfenac group than in the placebo group (0.43 ± 0.6 vs. 1.71 ± 0.9, P < 0.001 and 0.40 ± 0.6 vs. 1.78 ± 0.9, P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with untreated patients, the quantification of pain one day after the procedure was significantly lower in the 0.09% bromfenac group (46.7% with a score of 3 vs. 50% with a score of 1, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The maintenance of pupil dilation and the prevention of miosis were more effective in the 0.09% bromfenac group than in the control group. Likewise, the greater control of postoperative pain represented an additional significant benefit.

[Prevention of intraoperative miosis in femtosecond laser-assisted phaco surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Prevention of intraoperative miosis in hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification is a relevant problem of cataract surgery.

PURPOSE

Development and clinical study of an effective method for preventing intraoperative miosis in hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phacoemulsification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Hybrid phacoemulsification was performed in 300 patients (300 eyes). The first group (100 eyes) 3 days prior to the surgery was prescribed instillations of 0.1% indomethacin 3 times a day and 3 times in 2 hours before surgery at 30 minute intervals. The second group (100 eyes) 3 days prior to the surgery was prescribed instillations of 0.1% indomethacin 3 times a day, 3 times in 2 hours before the surgery at 30 minute intervals, and 1 hour before the surgery an additional intramuscular injection of diclofenac. The third group (control, 100 eyes) 2 hours before the operation was prescribed instillations of 0.1% indomethacin, 3 times at 30 minute intervals. The diameter of the pupil was evaluated before the beginning of femtosecond laser stage and before the opening of anterior chamber during the second stage of the operation.

RESULTS

When the interval between the femtosecond laser stage and emulsification of the nucleus fragments was maintained at less than 15 minutes, pronounced decrease of the pupil (more than 2 mm) was noted in 8.2% of cases in the first group, 6.7% in the second group and 14.1% in third (control) group; mean values of pupil narrowing were 0.68±0.27 mm in the 1st group, 0.63±0.25 mm in the 2nd group, and 0.93±0.39 mm (p<0.05) in the third group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical study showed high efficiency of the proposed methods for prevention of intraoperative miosis in hybrid (femtosecond laser-assisted) phaco surgery. An important factor affecting intraoperative narrowing of the pupil is the time interval between the femtolaser stage of the operation and emulsification of the nucleus fragments, which should not exceed 15 minutes.

Changes in Pupil Area during Low-energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To study the potential changes in pupil area within low-energy femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

Methods

A retrospective assessment of the pupil size was performed in the eyes undergoing FLACS using the Ziemer LDV Z8. We measured the pupil diameters as part of the images taken preoperatively and at the completion of laser pretreatment (after releasing the suction). We calculated the pupil area in 40 eyes of 40 patients (14 right and 26 left eyes). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age of the patients was 74 ± 7.4 years (range: 51-87). Paired t-test was used for statistical analyses. Subgroups were built with reference to age and preoperative pupil area (smaller than or equal to the median versus larger than the median).

Results

The mean ± SD axial length, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance and lens thickness were 24.01 ± 1.47, 3.23 ± 0.4, 11.97 ± 0.49, and 4.59 ± 0.41 mm, respectively. The mean ± SD pupil area was 39.33 ± 7.1 mm 2 preoperatively and 39.3 ± 6.75 mm 2 after laser pretreatment. The mean ± SD change in pupil area was -0.03 ± 2.12 mm 2 . There were no statistically significant changes between preoperative and post-laser pupil areas (P = 0.93, 95% CI: -0.71 to 0.65). Comparisons within subgroups also did not detect pupil area reduction.

Conclusion

This study did not detect statistically significant changes in pupil area after laser pretreatment using low-energy FLACS. This observation is in contrast to previous studies using other laser platforms.

Cataract surgery and lens implantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to introduce recent updates in cataract surgery and lens implantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Compared to phacoemulsification, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) may offer benefit for cataract patients with other complicated ocular diseases, such as corneal disease and vitreous abnormalities. Meanwhile, several types of novel intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been introduced to the market, and each of them has particular features in improving patients' visual acuity. In addition, based on a series of studies, multifocal IOL is superior to monofocal IOL when it comes to providing a better visual correction at different distances. Furthermore, a research group has introduced a new approach for cataract surgery - all laser surgery (FLACS band with nanolaser emulsification), which can effectively reduce iatrogenic trauma to the cornea. Also, a novel technique designed for children can lessen damage from cataract surgery.

SUMMARY

Based on previous studies, we summarize the new proceedings in FLACS and the indications for applying multifocal or toric IOL. In addition, we briefly introduce a new approach to cataract surgery - all laser surgery (FLACS band with nanolaser emulsification), and a less invasive surgical procedure used in pediatric cataract patients.

Efficacy of 0.015% intracameral epinephrine for significant miosis induced by photodisruption during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

Despite the various advantages of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), pupillary constriction during laser photodisruption is considered one of the most unfavorable events. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intracameral 0.015% epinephrine injection for miosis after laser pretreatment during FLACS.A total of 82 patients who underwent FLACS for age-related cataracts were investigated in this retrospective study. The epinephrine group included patients who received intracameral epinephrine injection for miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment, while the no-epinephrine group included the patients who underwent FLACS without intracameral epinephrine due to minimal miosis. Quantitative pupil area measurements were performed through the analysis of captured images extracted from surgical videos of both femtosecond laser pretreatment and phacoemulsification.Laser photodisruption induced miosis in both groups, although the degree of miosis was greater in the epinephrine group (4.65 ± 0.87 mm) than in the no-epinephrine group (6.30 ± 0.65 mm; P < .001). The intracameral epinephrine injection significantly increased the pupil diameter from 4.65 ± 0.87 to 5.49 ± 0.76 mm (21.61 ± 22.68%; P < .001) and the pupil area from 70.28 ± 24.46 to 96.49 ± 25.24 mm (52.89 ± 63.54%; P < .001). After additional viscomydriasis, there was no difference between groups in pupil diameter (epinephrine vs no-epinephrine group; 6.10 ± 0.77 vs 6.39 ± 0.65 mm; P = .073).A single intracameral injection of 0.015% epinephrine provided immediate and appropriate redilation of pupil in patients with significant miosis after femtosecond laser photodisruption. Intracameral epinephrine is a simple and practical option for pupil redilation in case of miosis during FLACS.

The Effect of NSAID Pretreatment on Aqueous Humor Prostaglandin E2 Concentration in Eyes Undergoing Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy

PURPOSE

To assess aqueous humor concentration of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) after capsulotomy creation using a femtosecond laser (FLAC) in patients pretreated with short-term topical ketorolac versus patients without pretreatment.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised consecutive patients scheduled to undergo cataract surgery using a femtosecond laser platform to perform only capsulotomies. An identical protocol for preoperative mydriasis was used for all the eyes included in the study, while aqueous humor was extracted from the anterior chamber of all patients immediately after the initial side port incision. ELISA was performed to quantify aqueous humor PGE2. The patients were divided into 2 groups; in group 1, the patients received short-term topical ketorolac preoperatively, while the patients in group 2 did not receive NSAID pretreatment.

RESULTS

Twenty eyes of 20 patients were included in the study (10 eyes in each group). Mean concentration of aqueous humor PGE2 after FLAC was 392.16 ± 162.00 pg/ml and 622.63 ± 331.84 pg/ml for groups 1 and 2, respectively. A statistically significant difference in aqueous humor PGE2 concentration between the two groups (p < 0.05) was demonstrated, with the eyes that received ketorolac pretreatment demonstrating a lower concentration of PGE2.

CONCLUSION

Short-term topical use of ketorolac prior to FLAC seems to prevent excessive release of PGE2 in the anterior chamber of the eyes that received NSAID pretreatment when compared to the eyes that did not receive NSAIDs preoperatively.

Phacoemulsification of the rock-hard dense nuclear cataract: Options and recommendations

We describe the essential steps in the successful phacoemulsification of the rock-hard, dense cataract. Appropriate and directed preoperative history, physical examination, and diagnostics allow the surgeon to select the best incision, anesthesia, and intended surgical technique for a given dense nuclear challenge. Hard nucleus-specific approaches for hydrodissection, pupil management, and zonular protection then allow the surgeon to approach the rock-hard nucleus with maximum safety. Dense nuclear dismantling options are then discussed in detail along with fluidic and power modulation considerations. Various specific phacoemusification machine settings for rock-hard cataracts from the authors representing several different phaco systems are then presented. The combination of these steps and considerations allow a more successful dense cataract removal and potential restoration of vision for patients. This paper represents the collective experience and advice of the Challenging and Complex Cataract Surgery Subcommittee.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification

Background

To compare femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification in terms of visual and refractive outcomes, cumulative dissipated energy, anterior chamber inflammation and endothelial cell loss.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, records of eyes that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification (CP) were reviewed. The Victus femtosecond laser (Bausch and Lomb, Germany) was used to carry out corneal incisions, anterior capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation in FLACS procedures. Manifest refraction spherical equivalence (MRSE), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), postoperative cells and flare and endothelial cell count data were collected. Subgroup analysis of the visual acuity tests was performed based on the type of intraocular lens implanted (monofocal, monofocal toric, multifocal, multifocal toric, accommodating).

Results

A total of 735 eyes were included in the study (296 eyes for the FLACS group and 439 eyes for the CP group). At one year follow-up, 120 eyes comprised the FLACS group and 265 eyes for the CP group. MRSE in the FLACS group was - 0.16 ± 0.58 D and - 0.20 ± 0.52 D in the CP group (P = 0.50). UDVA in the FLACS group was 20/25 (mean logMAR 0.12 ± 0.13) and 20/25 (mean logMAR 0.11 ± 0.13) in the CP group (P = 0.48). CDVA was 20/20 (mean logMAR 0.03 ± 0.07) in the FLACS group and 20/20 (mean logMAR 0.02 ± 0.06) in the CP group (P = 0.15). No statistically significant trend was seen for FLACS versus CP by intraocular type for visual acuity. CDE for the different cataract grades ranged from 6.97 ± 5.74 to 29.02 ± 16.07 in the FLACS group and 7.59 ± 6.42 to 35.69 ± 18.30 in the CP group. The FLACS group was significantly lower for post-operative central corneal edema (P = 0.05), cells and flare (P = 0.01), and endothelial cell loss (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification had similar refractive and visual outcomes. Phacoemulsification energy, anterior chamber inflammation and corneal endothelial cell loss were less in the femtosecond laser group.

[Morphological and clinical aspects of anterior capsulotomy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery]

The review covers morphological and clinical aspects of femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery. Literature data suggests that femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy is more accurate in size, shape, and centration than manual. Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy improves the accuracy of IOL positioning within the capsular bag.

Effect of phenylephrine/ketorolac on iris fixation ring use and surgical times in patients at risk of intraoperative miosis

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of intracameral phenylephrine/ketorolac (1%/0.3%) during cataract surgery on the use of iris fixation ring and surgical time in patients with poor pupil dilation (≤5.0 mm) or intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS).

Setting

Private practice outpatient surgical center.

Design

This retrospective analysis was conducted from January 1, 2014 to October 7, 2015.

Materials and methods

The use of iris fixation rings was evaluated in a retrospective analysis of 46 patients who underwent cataract surgery from January 1, 2014, to October 7, 2015, and who were identified before surgery to be at risk for intraoperative miosis. The qualifying factors were presurgical examination of pupil dilation ≤5.0 mm after being administered topical tropicamide 1% and phenylephrine 2.5% or history of IFIS during surgery in the fellow eye. All patients received a 2-day preoperative course of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and day-of-surgery preoperative dilation using topical cyclopentolate 1%, tropicamide 1%, and phenylephrine 10%. Phenylephrine/ketorolac 1%/0.3% (Omidria^®) or epinephrine 1:1,000 with sulfites was added to the ophthalmic irrigation solution and delivered intracamerally at the start of the procedure and throughout surgery. The use of iris fixation rings and surgical time for each patient were captured for each group.

Results

Eighteen (50%) of the patients in the epinephrine group and no patients in the phenylephrine/ketorolac group required iris fixation ring insertion to maintain pupil dilation or to control IFIS (p=0.0034). Mean surgical time was significantly shorter in the group of patients who received phenylephrine/ketorolac (p=0.0068).

Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort analysis of patients with poorly dilated pupils and/or IFIS, the use of intracameral phenylephrine/ketorolac in patients at risk for intraoperative miosis resulted in significantly less iris fixation ring use and significantly shorter surgical time when compared with intracameral epinephrine use.

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm clear corneal phacoemulsification

Purpose:

Phacoemulsification is the surgical procedure of choice for cataract, providing excellent visual and safety outcomes. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is an addition to the surgical armamentarium. The study aims to compare the outcomes of FLACS using LenSx™ (Alcon Inc., USA) to standard 2.2 mm clear corneal phacoemulsification. Prospective case–control, comparative, interventional study was conducted in a tertiary care center.

Methods:

In each group, 55 eyes of 55 patients underwent cataract surgery using either FLACS or conventional phacoemulsification (control group). The primary outcome variables, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), specular microscopy, pachymetry, mean absolute error (MAE), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were compared between two groups at 4 weeks postoperatively. Intraoperative effective phaco time (EPT), postoperative circularity of the rhexis, capsular overlap over the edge of the intraocular lens (IOL), and decentration of the IOL were the secondary variables which were compared.

Results:

No significant difference was found between the groups for UCVA, pachymetry, MAE, and ACD at 4 weeks postoperatively. The FLACS group had better BCVA (P = 0.0294). Circularity of capsulorrhexis (P = 0), circular overlap over the edge of IOL (P = 0), and centration of IOL (P = 0.002) at 4 weeks postoperatively were better in the FLACS group. EPT was lower in FLACS for similar grade of cataract (P = 0). Endothelial cell loss in FLACS group was 4.2% more (P = 0.032).

Conclusions:

FLACS is superior to conventional phaco in the circularity of rhexis, capsular overlap, and centration of the IOL and uses less EPT. However, conventional phacoemulsification is equivalent to FLACS in most other parameters.

Effects of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Pretreatment on Pupil Diameter: A Comparison Between Three Laser Platforms

PURPOSE

To assess pupil diameter before and after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) pretreatment and compare the outcomes of three laser platforms.

METHODS

This prospective observational case series included consecutive patients scheduled to undergo cataract extraction using FLACS between August 2013 and February 2015. All eyes received FLACS pretreatment using three laser platforms: LenSx (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), Catalys (Abbott Medical Optics Inc., Santa Ana, CA), and Victus (Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Rochester, NY). The same protocol for preoperative medical mydriasis was used for all patients, and pupil diameter was assessed immediately before and 3 minutes after FLACS using a surgical ruler.

RESULTS

A total of 198 eyes of 161 patients were included in the study. Mean pupillary miosis was 1.42 ± 1.26 mm for the LenSx, 0.66 ± 0.89 mm for the Catalys, and 0.14 ± 0.34 mm for the Victus groups. Furthermore, 8 of the 198 eyes (4.0%) demonstrated a pupil diameter of less than 5 mm after FLACS and 48 eyes (24.24%) demonstrated a pupil diameter of 6 mm or less. There was a statistically significant decrease in pupil diameter for all groups individually (P < .05). There was also a statistically significant difference among the three groups (P < .05), with LenSx inducing the highest degree of miosis, followed by Catalys, and finally Victus. A correlation between the pupil diameter before FLACS and degree of FLACS-induced miosis was demonstrated (P < .05), with larger pupil diameter before FLACS associated with greater miosis.

CONCLUSIONS

FLACS pretreatment seems to induce significant pupillary miosis with all laser platforms assessed in this study. The decrease in pupil diameter after FLACS reached clinical significance for cataract extraction (< 5 mm) in 4.0% of cases, whereas 20.2% of eyes demonstrated small pupil diameter (≤ 6 mm) after FLACS pretreatment.

Comparative outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and manual phacoemusification: a six-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

To explore efficacy and safety outcomes in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) versus manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS).

DESIGN

Prospective consecutive nonrandomized comparative cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 124 eyes from 106 patients (70 in FLACS and 54 in PCS).

METHODS

Comparison of FLACS with PCS over 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Macular central subfield thickness (CST), cube volume (CV), cube average thickness (CAT), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT) and photon count value (PCV).

RESULTS

CST, CV and CAT increased postoperatively, which did not return to preoperative levels by 6 months. The values were similar between groups throughout the follow-up, and comparison of changes from baseline also showed no significant difference. Preoperative ECD showed significant difference, which decreased postoperatively and remained stable during follow-up, being lowest at 1 month. FLACS had greater endothelial cell loss than PCS, which was not significant. CCT in both groups increased, reaching maximum on day one and tended to decrease thereafter. No significant differences were found regarding postoperative values and the mean increase. In both groups, mean PCV increased from preoperatively to day one, week one and month one. Flare values in FLACS were lower than PCS, reaching statistical significance at 6 months (P = 0.001). However, the differences in changes of PCV were not significantly different at any visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Both FLACS and PCS achieved similar safety and efficacy outcomes for performing cataract surgery. Flare values in eyes with FLACS were lower than those with PCS at 6 months postoperatively.

Cataract

Cataract is the leading cause of reversible blindness and visual impairment globally. Blindness from cataract is more common in populations with low socioeconomic status and in developing countries than in developed countries. The only treatment for cataract is surgery. Phacoemulsification is the gold standard for cataract surgery in the developed world, whereas manual small incision cataract surgery is used frequently in developing countries. In general, the outcomes of surgery are good and complications, such as endophthalmitis, often can be prevented or have good ouctomes if properly managed. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, an advanced technology, can automate several steps; initial data show no superiority of this approach over current techniques, but the results of many large clinical trials are pending. The greatest challenge remains the growing 'backlog' of patients with cataract blindness in the developing world because of lack of access to affordable surgery. Efforts aimed at training additional cataract surgeons in these countries do not keep pace with the increasing demand associated with ageing population demographics. In the absence of strategie that can prevent or delay cataract formation, it is important to focus efforts and resources on developing models for efficient delivery of cataract surgical services in underserved regions. For an illustrated summary of this Primer, visit: http://go.nature.com/eQkKll.