Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes

Association of refractive outcome with postoperative anterior chamber depth measured with 3 optical biometers

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the relationship between refractive outcomes and postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from corneal epithelium to lens) measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Scheimpflug devices under the undilated pupil.

METHODS

Patients undergoing cataract phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a hospital setting were enrolled. Postoperative ACD (postACD) was performed with an SS-OCT device, an OLCR device, and a Scheimpflug device at least 1 month after cataract surgery. After adjusting the mean predicted error to 0, differences in refractive outcomes were calculated with the Olsen formula using actual postACD measured from 3 devices and predicted value.

RESULTS

Overall, this comparative case study included 69 eyes of 69 patients, and postACD measurements were successfully taken using all 3 devices. The postACD measured with the SS-OCT, OLCR, and Scheimpflug devices was 4.59 ± 0.30, 4.50 ± 0.30, and 4.54 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences in postACD were found among 3 devices (P < 0.001), with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman showing good agreement. No significant difference in median absolute error was found with the Olsen formula using actual postACD obtained with 3 devices. Percentage prediction errors were within ± 0.50 D in 65% (OLCR), 70% (Scheimpflug), and 67% (SS-OCT) calculated by actual postACD versus 64% by predicted value.

CONCLUSION

Substantial agreement was found in postACD measurements obtained from the SS-OCT, OLCR, and Scheimpflug devices, with a trend toward comparable refractive outcomes in the Olsen formula. Meanwhile, postACD measurements may be potentially superior for the additional enhancement of refractive outcomes.

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula

Purpose

To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements.

Setting

University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California.

Design

Retrospective comparative study.

Methods

This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results.

Results

The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) ± 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 ± 0.35 D (P=0.50).

Conclusions

The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula.

Intrasession Repeatability of Biometric Measurements Obtained with a Low-Coherence Interferometry System in Pseudophakic Eyes

Purpose: To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of the biometric measurements obtained with a low-coherence reflectometry optical biometer in pseudophakic eyes implanted with two different types of intraocular lens (IOL).Methods: Prospective, single-center, comparative study including 69 eyes of 69 patients with ages ranging from 51 to 92 years. Previous uncomplicated cataract surgery had been performed in all patients 1 to 2 months before measurements, with implantation of the Acrysof SN60WF IOL in 35 eyes (35 patients, group 1) and the IOL Akreos MI60 in 34 eyes (34 patients, group 2). A complete postoperative ophthalmological examination was performed including three consecutive measurements with the "Aladdin" system from (Topcon, Japan). Intrasession repeatability of axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and IOL thickness (IOLT) were assessed with the within-subject standard deviation (S_w), intraobserver precision (1.96 × S_w), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The S_w for AXL measurements was 0.03 and 0.05 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with ICC of 1.000 and 0.999 (CV: 0.14% and 0.22%) (p ≤ 0.031). Concerning pseudophakic ACD, the S_w was 0.03 and 0.09 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with ICC of 0.992 and 0.956 (CV: 0.55% and 1.75%) (p ≤ 0.021). The variability of IOLT measurements was high in both groups, with S_w of 0.12 and 0.29 mm for groups 1 and 2 (p = .008), respectively, and ICC of 0.065 and 0.770 (CV: 20.84% and 62.39%).Conclusions: The optical biometer "Aladdin" (Topcon, Japan) provides consistent measurements of AXL and ACD in pseudophakic eyes. However, there is a limitation in the consistency of IOLT measurements that should be investigated further.

Intraoperative optical coherence tomography measurements of aphakic eyes to predict postoperative position of 2 intraocular lens designs

PURPOSE

To evaluate intraoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements of the aphakic eye to predict the postoperative ACD and compare 2 intraocular lens (IOL) designs.

SETTING

Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients scheduled for cataract surgery received a plate-haptic IOL (Asphina, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) or an open-loop haptic IOL (ZCB00, Johnson & Johnson). Preoperatively, optical biometry (IOLMaster 700, CZM, or Lenstar, Haag-Streit) was performed. Intraoperatively, a prototype setup was used to perform time-domain OCT scans of the anterior eye segment (Visante connected to OPMI Lumera 200, both CZM). The intraoperative ACD was measured and used to predict the postoperative IOL position. Optical biometry and subjective refraction and autorefraction (RM 8800, Topcon) were performed 2 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study comprised 203 eyes of 203 patients. A partial least-square regression model for ACD generated 2 months postoperatively showed that the predictive power of the intraoperative ACD (0.48) was highest followed by the axial eye length (0.45) and then the preoperatively measured ACD (0.30). These findings were confirmed in a bootstrapping model. Regression models combining the preoperative ACD and intraoperative ACD resulted in further significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ACD measurements predicted the postoperative position of open-loop IOLs and plate-haptic IOLs better than preoperative ACD measurements. Combining preoperative and intraoperative ACD measurements further improved the prediction.

Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the repeatability of a new swept-source optical biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with healthy and phakic eyes were included in this study, and only one eye per participant was analysed. Each eye was measured five times with the IOLMaster 700 swept-source optical biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW), and K1 and K2 keratometric readings were evaluated. The repeatability of swept-source biometry was evaluated on the basis of five measurements captured for each patient.

RESULTS

The repeatability limits for the axial measurements AL, ACD, CCT, and LT were 0.03, 0.07, 0.004, and 0.11 mm, respectively. For the WTW distance and both keratometry readings, the repeatability limits were 0.20, 0.06, and 0.05 mm, respectively. The AL resulted in the lowest coefficient of variation, and the LT had the highest one. The spherical equivalent showed statistically significant negative correlations with the AL and ACD.

CONCLUSION

Swept-source optical biometry showed high repeatability performance for all biometric parameters in healthy eyes, where the correlation between the spherical equivalent and AL showed the strongest value.