Sequential intrastromal corneal ring segment and monofocal intraocular lens implantation for keratoconus and cataract: Long-term follow-up

Current concepts in the management of cataract with keratoconus

This review analyzed all pertinent articles on keratoconus (KCN) and cataract surgery. It covers preoperative planning, intraoperative considerations, and postoperative management, with the aim of providing a simplified overview of treating such patients. Preoperatively, the use of corneal cross-linking, intrastromal corneal ring segments, and topo-guided corneal treatments can help stabilize the cornea and improve the accuracy of biometric measurements. It is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of traditional techniques such as penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, as well as newer stromal augmentation techniques, to choose the most appropriate surgical approach. Obtaining reliable measurements can be difficult, especially in the advanced stages of the disease. The choice between toric and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) should be carefully evaluated. Monofocal IOLs are a better choice in patients with advanced disease, and toric lenses can be used in mild and stable KCN. Intraoperatively, the use of a rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens can overcome the challenge of image distortion and loss of visual perspective. Postoperatively, patients may need updated RGP or scleral lenses to correct the corneal irregular astigmatism. A thorough preoperative planning is crucial for good surgical outcomes, and patients need to be informed regarding potential postoperative surprises. In conclusion, managing cataracts in KCN patients presents a range of challenges, and a comprehensive approach is essential to achieve favorable surgical outcomes.

Development of a Web-Based Algorithm for Understanding the Intraocular Lens-Based Surgery in Stable and Progressing Keratoconus for Non-Specialist Ophthalmologists

PURPOSE

To propose an algorithm to facilitate lens-based surgery in keratoconus.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to prepare a software algorithm based on cone location, stability, best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (BSCVA) level and whether there is a clear or cataractous lens. The software usability was assessed through a 10-question questionnaire and two hypothetical keratoconus case histories (moderately simple and moderately complex) given to 15 trainees. The usability questionnaires were graded on a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) and two case histories (1 = very difficult to 7 = very easy).

RESULTS

The algorithm can be found at https://www.sussexeyelaserclinic.co.uk/keratoconus/. Thirteen trainees completed the questionnaire. 91.9% would frequently use it; for 100%, it was easy to use independently without technical support; for 63.7%, it was strongly integrated; for 100%, it was consistent; 100% thought that most people would learn to use it quickly, 91.9% found the system not cumbersome to use, felt very confident to use it and need not learn a lot to use it. The first case was found easy by 63.7% and the second by 45%.

CONCLUSION

We present an algorithm as a guide for lens-based surgery in stable and progressing keratoconus, which is classified based on cone location. This algorithm will help trainee and "non-specialist" ophthalmic surgeons understand the pre-operative planning for the surgery and referral to the "specialist" corneal surgeon, considering factors such as progression, BSCVA, keratometry, topography and apex location of the cone in keratoconus patients.

Effectiveness of toric IOL and capsular tension ring suturing technique for rotational stability in eyes with long axial length

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the toric intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular tension ring (CTR) suturing technique in eyes with long axial length (AL) with a high risk of toric IOL rotation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational case series. The data files of patients who underwent a one-piece acrylic toric IOL (Tecnis Toric IOL and Acrysof IQ Toric IOL) implantation with the toric IOL and CTR suturing technique for cataract and astigmatism or toric IOL repositioning were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were a regular total corneal astigmatism of ≥ 1.5 D and an AL of ≥ 26.0 mm. Preoperative and postoperative astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), IOL rotation, intraoperative, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 30 eyes of 29 patients were included in this study. The mean AL was 27.82 ± 1.53 mm (range, 26.08-31.07). UDVA revealed a statistically significant improvement from 0.84 ± 0.20 logMAR preoperatively to 0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative corneal astigmatism was 3.08 ± 1.01 D reduced to the postoperative residual astigmatism of 0.59 ± 0.32 D which was found also statistically significant (p < 0.001). Only 2 eyes (6.2%) had postoperative toric IOL rotation of 5° and 10°, respectively. The mean degree of postoperative rotation was 0.50 ± 2.01.

CONCLUSION

This technique provided excellent rotational stability even in eyes with longer AL and did not require additional intervention.

Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Stable Subclinical and Forme Fruste Keratoconus: A Case Series

In this retrospective case series, we examine the outcomes of diffractive trifocal intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery, in patients with subclinical and forme fruste keratoconus. Eight eyes of four patients (aged between 47 and 64) were included in the study and underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP or AT LISA tri-toric 939MP intraocular lenses (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Post-operative evaluation included a visual acuity test at three distances (6m, 80cm, and 40cm), a visual acuity test at three low contrast levels (25%, 12.5%, and 6%), and a questionnaire about the patients' experience with photic phenomena and overall satisfaction with the achieved quality of vision. Our results show that spectacle freedom was achieved in all cases with a high satisfaction rate among participants. We hope our results would encourage surgeons to offer this technology to carefully selected candidates with stable subclinical and forme fruste keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery, giving them the possibility of achieving spectacle independence.

Cataract surgery in Keratoconus revisited - An update on preoperative and intraoperative considerations and postoperative outcomes

PURPOSE

This review aims to evaluate and simplify the recent literature on preoperative surgical planning, intraoperative considerations, postoperative surprises, and their management in patients with keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery.

METHODS

A review of the literature was done to analyze all the pertinent articles on Keratoconus and cataract surgery.

RESULTS

The surgical planning of cataracts in eyes with keratoconus needs a multifaceted approach. Preoperatively, techniques such as cross-linking or the use of intra-corneal rings help stabilize the progression. Unreliable biometric measurements are a significant problem in keratoconus patients, especially in an advanced stage of the disease. It is better to consider actual K readings if the K value is less than 55D but for a K value, more than 55D using standard K values will prevent postoperative refractive surprises. For calculation of K values, an elevation-based device like pentacam gives better repeatability in mild to moderate cases whereas for advanced keratoconus none of the keratometers is reliable. Recently, the Kane keratoconus formula performed better in all stages of disease whereas previous studies showed good results with SRK/T formula is a mild and moderate disease. Monofocal intraocular lenses are a better choice in these patients. Toric lenses can be used in mild and stable keratoconus. Intraoperatively, the use of a customized RGP lens can overcome the challenge of image distortion and loss of visual perspective. Despite taking necessary measures, postoperative refractive surprise can occur and can be managed with IOL exchange or Secondary IOLs.

CONCLUSION

There is a spectrum of challenges in managing cataracts in keratoconus which makes thorough preoperative planning important for good surgical outcomes. Despite the measures, there might be post-operative surprises and the patients need to be informed regarding the same.

Cataract surgery in patients with underlying keratoconus: focused review

An underlying diagnosis of keratoconus (KC) can complicate cataract surgery. In this study, the results of a focused review of the literature pertaining to cataract surgery in patients with KC are detailed. Topics essential for the appropriate management of this patient population are discussed. First, the individual and shared epidemiology and pathophysiology of cataract and KC are reviewed. Then, the theory and approach to intraocular lens power calculation are discussed, highlighting particularities and pitfalls of this exercise when performed in patients with KC. Finally, several special-although not uncommon-management scenarios and questions are addressed, such as surgical planning in cases where corneal stabilization or tissue replacement interventions are also necessitated.

[Intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus management]

Intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), used in the management of keratoconus since the 2000s, have enjoyed significant technological development. Various types of ICRS exist, whose arc length, thickness, and diameter can be chosen according to the desired effect on the spherical equivalent, keratometry and asphericity. Individualized implantation strategies, based on each patient's topographic and tomographic pattern, are constantly evolving. The surgical procedure is standardized, and complications remain very rare. Combined procedures (corneal collagen cross-linking and refractive photokeratectomy±topo-guided, phakic and pseudophakic intraocular lenses) are increasingly used and require a good knowledge of the effect of ICRS alone on the keratoconic cornea. The objective of this review is to summarize clinical practices used in the visual rehabilitation of keratoconic patients using the ICRS+- combined procedures.

[Excimer laser in keratoconus management]

Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is a challenge, notably because of the significant irregular astigmatism and optical aberrations that it induces. Many surgical techniques have been developed in addition to, or in the case of failure of, spectacles and rigid gas permeable contact lenses: intracorneal ring segments, intraocular lenses, excimer laser and, as a last resort, keratoplasty. Excimer laser photoablates the cornea, allowing remodeling of its surface. There are various treatment modes (wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided), allowing performance of a customized treatment if needed. Its use in keratoconus has been described since the 2000s, alone or in combination with other procedures. For example, the combination of photoablation and corneal cross linking, a technique that increases corneal rigidity and in so doing can slow or even stop the progression of keratoconus, proved its efficacy and safety in many studies, and various protocols have been described. A triple procedure, including intracorneal ring segments, excimer laser and cross linking, has also given some very promising results in progressive keratoconus, providing a significative improvement in visual acuity and topographic data. The combination of excimer laser and intraocular lenses remains a poorly explored lead that might provide some satisfactory results. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent data on excimer laser in keratoconus management.

[Phacosurgery features in keratoconus]

The review summarizes the results of surgical treatment of cataracts in patients with keratoconus. The major challenges of phacosurgery in keratoconus are associated with intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, choice of the most appropriate IOL model and additional interventions required to stabilize keratectasia and reduce corneal irregularity.

[Intraocular correction of ametropia in patients with keratoconus]

This review was conducted due to the growing number of patients with keratoconus requiring cataract surgery and the complexity of surgical planning. The article reviews preoperative planning, intraoperative options, and postoperative management, which can help obtain high functional results. Treatment of cataracts in keratoconic eyes requires a multifaceted approach. In some cases, in the preoperative period, interventions such as crosslinking and implantation of intrastromal segments or corneal ring may be required to ensure stable keratometry values for accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculations. The use of stabilizing procedures prior to optical biometrics can assist in preoperative lens selection and provide predictable surgical outcomes. To achieve targeted refraction and reduce unwanted optical effects, it is necessary to take a critical approach when choosing the type of lens (toric, monofocal). This is due to the appearance of aberrations of different order after preliminary surgical interventions on the cornea. The intraoperative decision plays important role in choosing the position of the corneal incisions, how to use sutures for wound adaptation, choosing scleral approaches to minimize possible postoperative complications. In the postoperative period, the degree of irregular astigmatism and the need for rigid gas-permeable or scleral lenses should be assessed.

Management of cataract in keratoconus: early visual outcomes of different treatment modalities

A review of 31 eyes with keratoconus who developed cataract and underwent phacoemulsification. Visual acuities were measured 1mo postoperatively. Six eyes with a history of good corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and a similar refractive and topographic astigmatic axis were implanted with toric intraocular lenses (IOLs). The mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.2 logMAR with a spherical equivalent (SE): 0.75D. Eleven eyes with a history of good CDVA and different refractive and topographic axis were implanted with monofocal IOL+/-Toric implantable collamer lenses to treat anisometropia and ametropia; mean UDVA was 0.25 logMAR with a mean SE: -0.51 D postoperatively. Six eyes with poor CDVA were first treated with intra-corneal ring segments, followed by phacoemulsification, the mean postoperative UDVA was 0.82 logMAR with an SE: 0.22 D. Eight eyes had advanced ectesia and received combined phacoemulsification and penetrating keratoplasty. Our approach is efficient in addressing ametropia after cataract surgery in keratoconic eyes.

Effectiveness of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the efficacy of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) for keratoconus and with other interventions such as contacts lens, keratoplasty, and corneal collagen cross-linking.

RECENT FINDINGS

Changes in ICRS thickness and size, combination of procedures, and the adaptation of a more sophisticated classification system have broadened our application of ICRS. Recent studies have shown the long-term efficacy of ICRS in visual acuity, keratometry, and astigmatism.

SUMMARY

Studies have demonstrated the short-term and long-term efficacy of ICRS implantation in patients with keratoconus.

Intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus; A review of literature

Purpose

To review the published literature regarding cataract surgery in keratoconus (KCN) patients with emphasis on challenges encountered during intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and their solutions.

Methods

A literature review was performed to investigate all the relevant articles on the advancements of IOL calculations in KCN patients.

Results

Cataract surgery in keratoconic eyes can improve patients' refraction, and proper patient selection and IOL calculation methods are necessary to get the best results. The main problem in KCN patients is unreliable biometric measurements. It is more difficult to make conclusions in more advanced keratoconic corneas, as the steep keratometric values in these eyes will result in the selection of a low-power IOL. Presence of a low-power IOL will yield in extreme postoperative hyperopia, and IOL exchange might be mandatory. In cases in which keratoplasty may be needed in the future, contact lens fitting can help surgeons make a better decision preoperatively. Axial length (AL) measurements may have better repeatability and reproducibility than keratometry (K) readings in keratoconic eyes. SRK II formula may provide the most accurate IOL power in mild KCN. There is still not a comprehensive consensus of which formula is the best one in moderate and severe KCN, as the literature is limited in this subject.

Conclusions

Various methods of IOL power calculation optimization and recommendations may hold the key to improve surgical outcomes in keratoconic eyes. There are multiple sources of biometric error in KCN patients, hence IOL calculation methods may not be as efficient as expected in these eyes.

Three-year follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in central keratoconus with regular astigmatism: ‘Bow-tie’ shape

Purpose:

To assess the outcomes of implanting Ferrara-type intrastromal corneal ring segments in central ‘bow-tie’-shaped keratoconus over 3 years of follow-up.

Methods:

A total of 20 eyes with central ‘bow-tie’-shaped keratoconus were evaluated before and after implanting Ferrara-type intrastromal corneal ring segments (AJL Ophthalmic, Spain). LogMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity and best corrected distance visual acuity and residual refractive errors analysed using vector analysis were recorded preoperatively, at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively.

Results:

The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (LogMAR scale) rose from a preoperative 0.75 ± 0.28 to a 6-month postoperative 0.38 ± 0.28 (p < 0.0001). The corrected distance visual acuity, in turn, improved from 0.07 ± 0.06 to 0.05 ± 0.06 (p = 0.0008). Both the uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity were stable over the postoperative period in both groups (p > 0.05). None of the eyes lost uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity lines over the postoperative follow-up period. The spherical equivalent and the refractive cylinder declined steeply after intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation (p < 0.0001). Both the spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder were stable over the postoperative period. None of the eyes had an increase in maximum or minimum keratometry greater than 0.75D over the postoperative period.

Conclusion:

The planning for intrastromal corneal ring segments insertion proposed in this study reduces the spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder in this type of keratoconus, while improving post-surgery uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity. These results remain stable over 3 years of follow-up. Therefore, this procedure could be considered as an effective therapeutic alternative in patients affected by this type of keratoconus.

Clinical Outcomes of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments and an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Keratoconus and Cataract

Purpose

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and predictability of sequential Ferrara-type intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) and an extended range of vision intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with keratoconus and cataract.

Methods

This study comprised patients with keratoconus and cataract that had ICRS implantation followed 6 months later by extended range of vision IOL implantation. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and residual refractive errors, analysed using vector analysis, were recorded preoperatively, 6 months after ICRS implantation, and 6 months after IOL implantation, respectively.

Results

The study enrolled 17 eyes (11 patients). The mean UDVA (logMAR scale) was 1.15 ± 0.67 preoperatively, 0.88 ± 0.69 six months after ICRS implantation (P = 0.005), and 0.27 ± 0.18 six months after IOL implantation (P < 0.0001). The CDVA changed from 0.26 ± 0.15 (logMAR) before surgery to 0.17 ± 0.08 six months after Ferrara-type ICRS implantation (P = 0.002) and to 0.07 ± 0.06 six months after IOL implantation (P < 0.0001). The spherical equivalent and the refractive cylinder declined steeply after IOL implantation (P < 0.001). The magnitude of depth of focus was 2.60 ± 1.02 D. There were no statistically significant differences in visual acuity for a defocus range from +0.50 D to −0.50 D (P > 0.1).

Conclusion

Sequential Ferrara-type ICRS and an extended range of vision IOL implantation provided good visual and refractive outcomes, being an effective, safe, and predictable procedure for the treatment of selected cases of patients with keratoconus and cataract. In addition, this approach provides an increase of tolerance to defocus.

Surgical Options for the Refractive Correction of Keratoconus: Myth or Reality

Keratoconus provides a decrease of quality of life to the patients who suffer from it. The treatment used as well as the method to correct the refractive error of these patients may influence on the impact of the disease on their quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe the evidence about the conservative surgical treatment for keratoconus aiming to therapeutic and refractive effect. The visual rehabilitation for keratoconic corneas requires addressing three concerns: halting the ectatic process, improving corneal shape, and minimizing the residual refractive error. Cross-linking can halt the disease progression, intrastromal corneal ring segments can improve the corneal shape and hence the visual quality and reduce the refractive error, PRK can correct mild-moderate refractive error, and intraocular lenses can correct from low to high refractive error associated with keratoconus. Any of these surgical options can be performed alone or combined with the other techniques depending on what the case requires. Although it could be considered that the surgical option for the refracto-therapeutic treatment of the keratoconus is a reality, controlled, randomized studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are needed to determine which refractive procedure and/or sequence are most suitable for each case.