Visual and refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction in mild, moderate, and high myopia: Six-month results

The effects of programmed optical zones on achieved corneal refractive power with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a vector analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of different programmed optical zones (POZs) on achieved corneal refractive power (CRP) with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

In total, 113 patients (113 eyes) were included in this retrospective study. The eyes were divided into two groups according to POZ: group A (6.5, 6.6, and 6.7 mm, n = 59) and group B (6.8, 6.9, and 7.0 mm, n = 54). Fourier vector analysis was applied to evaluate the error values between the attempted and achieved corneal refractive power (CRP). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME), and astigmatism correction index (ACI). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess potential factors associated with the error values.

RESULTS

The error values in the group with large POZ were closer to zero, and significantly associated with the POZ at 2 and 4 mm of the cornea (β =  - 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 0.80, - 0.20]; β =  - 0.37, 95% CI [- 0.63, - 0.10], P < 0.05, respectively). For the correction of astigmatism, the values of SIA, ME, and ACI were lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). The fitting curves between TIA and SIA were y = 0.83x + 0.19 (R² = 0.84) and y = 1.05x + 0.04 (R² = 0.90), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller POZs resulted in higher error values between the achieved- and attempted-CRP in the SMILE procedure, which should be considered when performing surgery.

Corneal morphological changes after small incision lenticule extraction for myopic anisometropia

Purpose

This research aims to study the corneal morphological changes in adult patients with myopic anisometropia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the safety, efficacy, and predictability of clinical outcomes.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients with myopic anisometropia [refractive difference &gt;2.0 diopters (D)] were included in this study who underwent SMILE at our hospital from September 2019 to March 2021. For the two eyes of each patient, the one with higher myopia was defined as group A, and the fellow eye was group B. The follow-up time points were set as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery. The data collected were uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), efficacy and safety indexes, posterior corneal elevation (PCE), anterior and posterior corneal radius of curvature in the 3 mm area at the center of the thinnest point of the cornea (ARC and PRC), and higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

Results

The study included 36 patients (72 eyes), and the mean age was 25.2 ± 6.4 years. The preoperative SEs were −6.45 ± 1.25 D in group A and −3.76 ± 1.29 D in group B. Six months after surgery, the SEs in groups A and B were −0.09 ± 0.50 D and 0.07 ± 0.47 (P = 0.059), respectively. The efficacy indexes were 1.06 ± 0.16 in group A and 1.07 ± 0.14 in group B (P = 0.750). The safety indexes were 1.08 ± 0.14 in group A and 1.12 ± 0.15 in group B (P = 0.173). The PCE was significantly reduced at 6 months after surgery in pagebreak both groups (P &lt; 0.05). The ARC was significantly higher than before the surgery (P &lt; 0.05) in the two groups. The two groups showed significant increases in total HOAs, coma 90°, and spherical aberrations (P &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion

SMILE is predictable, effective, and safe in correcting myopic anisometropia. The postoperative changes in HOAs are characteristic.

Objective and Subjective Quality of Vision After SMILE for High Myopia and Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To report subjective and objective quality of vision (QoV) results for high myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) between -9.00 and -13.00 diopters (D).

METHODS

This was a prospective study recruiting 114 patients undergoing SMILE with attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) correction from -9.00 to -13.00 D, and cylinder up to 5.00 D. Patients were informed before surgery of the increased risk of QoV symptoms. Patients completed the Rasch validated QoV questionnaire. Objective QoV was assessed by corneal and whole eye aberrations, HD Analyzer Objective Scatter Index (OSI) (Keeler), and contrast sensitivity. Patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Individual item and total Rasch-scaled scores for the three subscales (frequency, severity, and bothersomeness) of the QoV questionnaire were calculated before and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.27 ± 1.18 (range: 2 to 10), 8 or higher in 93%, and 7 or higher in 98% of patients. One patient with a satisfaction score of 2 had a simple refractive error re-treatment and then reported a satisfaction score of 10. The total mean ± standard deviation Rasch-scaled QoV score for the frequency, severity, and bothersomeness subscales before surgery was 24 ± 19, 20 ± 16, and 19 ± 18, respectively. Scores increased after surgery to 41 ± 18, 32 ± 16, and 30 ± 21, respectively (P < .001). Corneal aberrations (6 mm, OSI) increased on average by 0.39 µm for spherical aberration, 0.41 µm for coma, and 0.56 µm for higher order aberrations root mean square. OSI increased on average by 0.58. There was a small but statistically significant improvement in contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree. There were no statistically significant correlations found between subjective scores for starbursts and objective measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction was high following SMILE for high myopia. As expected, there was an increase in QoV symptoms, mainly glare and starbursts. The acceptance of QoV symptoms for high myopic SMILE was high, indicating that residual refractive error and visual acuity are the major drivers for patient satisfaction with appropriate preoperative informed consent. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):404-413.].

Seven-year observation of posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in patients with moderate and high myopia

Purpose

To investigate the long-term changes in posterior corneal elevation in moderate and high myopia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Setting

Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University.

Design

Prospective case series.

Methods

Thirty-three eyes of 20 patients (30.1+/-9.5 years, 7 male and 13 female, spherical equivalent [SE] range -4.00 to -8.75 D, average SE -6.25+/-1.29 D) who underwent SMILE were included. Changes in the posterior corneal elevation at central points (PCE), the thinnest point (PTE), the maximal point (PME), and an additional 20 points within the 4-mm area of the best-fit sphere were evaluated with a Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) during a 7-year follow-up period. Mixed linear models were used to evaluate changes with P-values <0.05. Correlations of elevation changes and residual bed thickness (RBT) were also evaluated.

Results

No ectasia was observed among the 33 eyes. The safety index was 1.08, and the efficacy index was 1.03. The mean change in PCE at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was -1.42+/-0.95, -2.67+/-0.98, -2.44+/-1.06, and -1.91+/-0.92 [micro]m, respectively. Significant differences were found at 3, 5, and 7 years (P=0.007, 0.023, and 0.040, respectively). PTE was significantly reduced at each time point compared to baseline. The mean change was -2.82+/-1.19, -3.55+/-1.22, -3.47+/-1.32, and -2.39+/-1.15 [micro]m, respectively (P=0.019, 0.004, 0.010, and 0.039, respectively). PME changed 2.45+/-1.02 [micro]m at 7 years compared to baseline (P=0.017). The changes in PCE and PME negatively correlated with the RBT.

Conclusions

Long-term posterior corneal elevation was stable in moderate and high myopia after SMILE.

Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results

PURPOSE

To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between - 3.00 and - 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed.

RESULTS

No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were - 0.13 ± 0.07 and - 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and - 0.10 ± 0.07 and - 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (P = 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (P = 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE.

Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery on Thin Cornea

PURPOSE

To explore the biomechanical changes in thin corneas after the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery.

METHODS

This prospective survey screened patients scheduled for the SMILE surgery from November 2017 to March 2018. Patients with thin corneas (central corneal thickness [CCT] ≤500 μm) and those with normal corneal thickness (CCT > 500 μm) were enrolled. Corneal biomechanics were examined by the ocular response analyser and Corvis ST, preoperatively and at 1 day, 3 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (46 eyes) with mean spherical equivalent of -5.1 ± 1.7 D were assigned to the thin cornea group, and 28 (45 eyes) cases with mean spherical equation of -5.3 ± 1.8 D were assigned to the control group. Safety and efficacy did not differ between the two age- and refraction-matched groups (safety index, 1.15 ± 0.14 vs 1.14 ± 0.17 [P = .7]; efficacy index, 1.11 ± 0.13 vs 1.16 ± 0.22 [P = .2]). All biomechanical parameters changed significantly after SMILE. The thin cornea group showed less decrease in the second applanation time (A2 Time), stiffness parameters at first applanation (SP-A1). Pooling data from two groups, lower CCT was correlated with less A2 Time change (r = 0.37, P < .01) and less SP-A1 change (r = -0.33, P < .01). Less bIOP change was correlated with higher residual stromal thickness index and thicker CCT (P = .003, R² = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Over a short-term observation period, less corneal biomechanic deterioration may have contributed to the safety of SMILE on thin cornea.

Refractive, visual, and subjective quality of vision outcomes for very high myopia LASIK from - 10.00 to - 13.50 diopters

Background

To evaluate laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes, subjective quality of vision (QoV) and patient satisfaction in eyes with very high myopia (VHM) above − 10.00 diopters (D).

Methods

Consecutive myopic and myopic-astigmatism eyes with spherical equivalent (SEQ) ranging between − 10.00 to − 13.50 D underwent LASIK with the WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser. Treatment accuracy, efficacy, safety, stability, cylinder vectors, and higher-order aberrations were evaluated, together with subjective QoV and night vision disturbances (NVDs).

Results

114 eyes had a preoperative SEQ of − 11.02 ± 0.81 D, with a median follow-up of 24 months. A total of 72, 84, and 94% of eyes were within ± 0.50, ± 0.75 and ± 1.00 D of intended SEQ (R² = 0.71). The efficacy index was 0.93 ± 0.20, with 51 and 81% of eyes achieving 20/20 and 20/25. The astigmatism correction index was 0.95 ± 0.33. The safety index was 1.05 ± 0.12. The average myopic regression was − 0.51 ± 0.38 D. Preoperative QoV scores improved significantly postoperatively (7.5 ± 0.8 vs. 9.1 ± 0.7; P <  0.001), with less NVDs (P <  0.001). Total, spherical and coma root mean square (RMS) postoperative ocular higher-order aberrations were 1.07 ± 0.34, 0.67 ± 0.25, and 0.70 ± 0.40 μm.

Conclusions

Very high myopia LASIK between − 10.00 to − 13.50 D is safe and results in good visual outcomes, with high patient satisfaction and a significant improvement in patient-reported QoV after surgery. Appropriately selected patients within this very high myopia group can be included as LASIK candidates.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia: Seven-Year Outcomes of Refraction, Corneal Tomography, and Wavefront Aberrations

Purpose

To investigate the long-term outcomes of refraction, corneal tomography, and wavefront aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia.

Methods

Prospective, nonconsecutive case series. A total of 26 patients (26 eyes) who underwent SMILE from May 2010 to March 2013 at the Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital (Shanghai, China) were enrolled. The periods of follow-up were 1 month, 1 year, 5 years, and 7 years after surgery. The routine eye examinations included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, and corneal tomography.

Results

All surgeries were executed without any complications. At the final visit, an UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 26 eyes (100%) and 11 eyes (42%) exhibited no change in CDVA. 9 eyes (35%) gained one line, 6 eyes (23%) gained two lines, and no eyes lost CDVA. 24 eyes (92%) and 26 eyes (100%) were within ±0.5 D and ±1.00 D of the target refraction, respectively. A mean refractive regression of −0.17 D was observed between 1 month and 7 years postoperatively. Mean corneal front curvature (MCFC) was significantly decreased between pre- and post-SMILE surgery (P < 0.0001). Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and vertical coma were significantly increased after SMILE compared to those measured before surgery (all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in trefoil and spherical aberration between pre- and post-SMILE surgery (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

SMILE is an effective, safe, and stable procedure for moderate and high myopia, with relatively constant corneal stability and wavefront aberrations. This trial is registered with ChiCTR-ONRC-13003114.

Visual outcomes after SMILE from the first-year experience at a U.S. military refractive surgery center and comparison with PRK and LASIK outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess the visual outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) after the first year of treatments at a military refractive surgery center and compare with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes during the same period.

SETTING

Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Records of service members who underwent SMILE, PRK, or LASIK for myopia from March 2017 to February 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative and up to 6-month postoperative data were collected. Visual outcomes were compared between treatments.

RESULTS

Of 563 treated eyes, 173 (30.7%) underwent SMILE, 304 (54.0%) PRK, and 86 (15.3%) LASIK. In comparing SMILE with PRK 1 month postoperatively, SMILE (145 eyes [87.9%]) attained uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 more vs PRK (214 eyes [73.8%]; P < .01). Similarly, SMILE (152 eyes [94.4%]) achieved more eyes with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) within ±0.50 diopters (D) from intended target vs PRK (250 eyes [85.9%]; P = .01). None lost ≥1 line of corrected distance visual acuity in SMILE vs PRK (16 eyes [5.5%]; P < .01). Thereafter, there were no other significant differences except SMILE had 117 eyes (95.1%) vs PRK with 224 eyes (99.6%) achieving UDVA ≥20/20 at 3 months postoperatively (P = .01). In assessing SMILE vs LASIK, all parameters were comparable; however, 77 SMILE eyes (96.3%) had MSE within ±0.50 D from target vs 31 LASIK eyes (83.8%) at 6 months postoperatively (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The first year after SMILE treatments in a U.S. military center demonstrated early postoperative outcomes superior to PRK. SMILE seemed more predictable compared with LASIK.

Evaluation of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation for hypermyopia: An observational study

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the visual quality, objective scattering index, aberration, etc after Implantable Collamer Lens with center hole (EVO-ICL) implantation to treat patients with hypermyopia (diopter > -10 D).A total of 30 eyes underwent EVO-ICL implantation. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), equivalent spherical degree, aberration, visual quality parameters, and corneal endothelial cell density were compared preoperative and postoperative. Fill in the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument-42 before and after surgery.The modulation transfer function (MTF), Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) II values (OV 100%, 20%, 9%), and Stahl ratio 1 and 3 months after surgery were higher than the respective preoperative values. The objective scatter index value increased 1 week after surgery, but decreased 1 and 3 months after surgery compared with the preoperative values. Total aberration (TA), total low-order aberration (tLOAs), and defocus decreased at 1 week and 3 months after EVO-ICL implantation. Total high-order aberration (tHOAs) and spherical aberration were significantly increased 1 week after surgery and decreased 3 months after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant. Astigmatism, coma, and clover were not significantly different in each time period. TA, tLOAs, tHOAs, defocus, and spherical aberration were higher at 1 week than 3 months after surgery. At 3 months after surgery, the scores of the patients' NEI-RQL-42 scale were all improved except that the glare was lower than that before surgery. There was no significant difference in the density of corneal endothelial cells before and 3 months after surgery.For patients with hypermyopia, the postoperative subjective and objective visual quality of EVO-ICL implantation was better than preoperative.

Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a novel 1-step refractive procedure with femtosecond laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Although it has shown good clinical results in efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability, there are still some concerns. In this study, we review the published clinical outcomes of high myopia correction and exploration in hyperopia correction. Results have suggested that SMILE has acceptable outcomes in correction for high myopia <10.0 diopters (D), and it is a feasible and effective procedure for the treatment of hyperopia. However, it is unsuitable for the treatment of extremely high myopia because there is undercorrection and regression as existed in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and compound hyperopic astigmatism currently could not be corrected either. More technical and clinical improvements are required to make SMILE competitive.

Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus advanced surface ablation in low myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction and advanced surface ablation for low myopia or myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational case series of our first 50 consecutive small incision lenticule extraction patients compared to refraction-matched 50 advanced surface ablation treatments with attempted spherical equivalent correction ⩽-3.5 D, astigmatism ⩽-1.5 D, and corrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 (decimal scale) or better. Only one eye per patient was included.

RESULTS

Small incision lenticule extraction: mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was -2.80 ± 0.63 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.85 and 1.0 at days 1 and 5, respectively. At 3 months, mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.02 ± 0.32 D (range: -0.5 to +0.75 D), mean cylinder was -0.24 ± 0.21 D (range: 0 to -0.75 D), mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.27, mean efficacy index was 0.96, and mean safety index was 1.05. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was same or better than corrected distance visual acuity in 96%, astigmatism ⩽0.5 D in 98% and ⩽1 D in 100% of eyes, respectively. Advanced surface ablation: mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was -2.75 ± 0.5 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.72 and 0.61 at days 1 and 5, respectively. At 3 months, mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.22 ± 0.32 D, mean cylinder was -0.27 ± 0.27 D, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.21, mean efficacy index was 1.03, and mean safety index was 1.08.

CONCLUSION

Small incision lenticule extraction for low myopia was found to be safe and effective with outcomes at 3 months similar to those obtained with advanced surface ablation while offering a quicker visual recovery.

Visual and refractive outcomes of 100 small incision lenticule extractions (SMILE) in moderate and high myopia: a 24-month follow-up study

PURPOSE

We aimed to present the visual results obtained in 100 small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive surgeries, demonstrate whether the technique is effective in the treatment of moderate and high myopia, and observe the follow-up of these patients over 24-month period.

METHODS

One hundred eyes of 50 consecutive patients were treated with SMILE. The preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was - 5.64 ± 1.23 D. During the postoperative period, patients were examined at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. We analysed the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of the technique.

RESULTS

The Snellen visual acuity of 99% of the patients was 20/20 or better after 24 months of follow-up. Two eyes had a loss of two lines of visual acuity; 1% of the patients had a loss of one line of visual acuity. The postoperative spherical refraction was - 0.04 ± 0.35 D (- 1.00 to 0.50 D). The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was - 0.19 ± 0.38 D (- 1.25 to 0.50 D). Eighty-three percent of the eyes were within ± 0.50 D, and 87% obtained a residual astigmatism of 0.50 D or less.

CONCLUSION

The SMILE technique was demonstrated to be an effective, predictable, safe, and stable technique in the treatment of moderate-to-severe myopia during the 24-month follow-up. Long-term follow-up should be undertaken to observe possible refractive regressions.

Changes in Retinal Vasculature and Thickness after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in retinal vessel density and thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in myopic patients.

Methods

In this prospective study, SMILE surgeries were done in 46 eyes of 24 patients with spherical equivalent (SE) more than −6.0 diopters (D). Retinal vessel density and thickness at the macula and optic nerve were recorded with OCTA before and 1 day, 2 weeks, and 1 month after surgery. Intraocular pressure (IOP), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and refraction were taken at the same time.

Results

The superficial retinal vessel density and deep foveal retinal vessel density 1 day after surgery were less than those before surgery; however, the changes at any timepoints were not statistically significant (p=0.2736 and p=0.1590, respectively). Both the superficial vessel density and deep vessel density at the parafoveal and perifoveal regions decreased significantly 1 day postoperatively (all p < 0.05) and then returned to the preoperative level at 2 weeks and stabilized thereafter. There were no significant changes in any of the 4 vessel densities in the area of peripapillary before and 1 day, 2 weeks, and 1 month after surgery (p=0.3345). No statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative retinal thickness were detected for the area of macula and optic nerve (all p > 0.5).

Conclusions

The vessel density at the parafoveal and perifoveal regions decreased at 1 day after SMILE with no effect on the visual acuity and relieved within 2 weeks. Decreased ocular blood flow in response to the spike in IOP may account for such changes.

A Multicenter Study on Early Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia

This study was aimed to investigate the early clinical outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) to correct both myopia and myopic astigmatism at major clinical centers in Japan. This case series consisted of two hundred fifty-two eyes of 130 consecutive patients who underwent SMILE surgery (29.5 ± 6.3 years, mean age ± standard deviation), with spherical equivalents of -4.33 ± 1.61 D. We determined the safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events of this procedure. Corrected distance visual acuity significantly improved, from -0.18 ± 0.04 preoperatively to -0.19 ± 0.07 logMAR postoperatively (paired t-test, p < 0.001). Uncorrected distance visual acuity also significantly improved, from 1.05 ± 0.26 preoperatively to -0.15 ± 0.11 logMAR postoperatively (p < 0.001). 88% and 98% of eyes were within ± 0.5 and 1.0 D of the targeted correction, respectively. Changes in manifest spherical equivalent from 1 week postoperatively were 0.02 ± 0.35 D (p = 0.127). No vision-threatening complications were observed in any of the cases. SMILE performed well in the correction of myopic refractive errors, and we experienced no severe complications in this series, indicating its feasibility as a surgical option for the treatment of these eyes.

Flushing versus not flushing the interface during small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To assess the differences in outcomes between interface flushing with a balanced salt solution after refractive lenticule removal in simultaneous uneventful bilateral small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

SETTING

Six study centers in Germany.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism of similar magnitude in both eyes with a spherical equivalent less than or equal to 10.0 diopters (D), preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.80 decimal or better, and anisometropia less than or equal to 2.0 D were enrolled and followed for 3 months. One eye of each patient was treated with interface flushing after dry extraction of the lenticule. Flushing was performed with 1.0 cc balanced salt solution using a single-use 27-gauge cannula. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 1 day, 1 week, and 3 months; the CDVA at 3 months; and postoperative differences at the slitlamp examination were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution values using paired t tests. The P value for significance was less than 0.05.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 470 eyes. One day postoperatively, the mean UDVA was 0.81 in the non-flush group and 0.83 in the flush group (P = .110). At the last visit 3 months postoperatively, the mean UDVA was 1.04 and 1.05, respectively (P = .172). No significant differences in the rate of postoperative complications were found.

CONCLUSION

Interface irrigation with 1.0 cc of balanced salt solution after the removal of the refractive lenticule has neither advantages nor disadvantages in terms of visual recovery, postoperative complications, or final visual acuity.

Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia

Background

This study sought to compare the visual quality between intraocular collamer lens (EVO-ICL) implantation and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and determine the appropriate surgical method to treat patients with high myopia (− 6.25 to − 10 D).

Methods

A total of 48 eyes underwent EVO-ICL implantation and another 48 eyes underwent SMILE. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and equivalent spherical degree were compared across the SMILE (− 6.25 to − 10 D) and EVO-ICL (− 6.25 to − 10 D) implantation groups. Preoperative and postoperative visual quality parameters were compared between and within groups.

Results

The OQAS II values (OV 100%) one week and one month after surgery and the modulation transfer function (MTF), OV 20% and OV 9% values one week after surgery in the SMILE group were lower than the respective preoperative values. The objective scatter index (OSI) value increased one week as well as one month after surgery compared with the preoperative values. The MTF cut-off value of the SMILE group was lower than that of the EVO-ICL implantation group three months after surgery.

Conclusions

For patients with high myopia, the postoperative visual quality of EVO- ICL implantation was slightly better than that of SMILE.

Single-step Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of mild, moderate, and high myopia: six month results

Background

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and the refractive outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) for the correction of mild, moderate, and high myopia.

Methods

This study consecutively recruited 32 high myopic eyes, 32 mild myopic and 32 moderate myopic eyes. Eyes with myopia that had undergone TransPRK treatment. Pre- and post-operative visual and refractive data, corneal Higher Order Aberration (HOA) as well as safety and efficacy indices were analyzed at 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Six months after TransPRK, the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SE) was not significantly between high myopia group and moderate myopia group (p = 0.636). No eyes lost ≥2 lines of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA) in high myopic eyes. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was significantly higher in low and moderate myopia groups than the high myopia group (P < 0.001; P = 0.002). The CDVA was not significantly different between moderate and high myopia groups (P = 0.057). There was no significant difference in mean safety index between high myopia group (1.01 ± 0.14) and mild myopia group (1.08 ± 0.15) (P > 0.05). The mean safety index was significantly higher in the moderate myopia group (1.16 ± 0.23) than in the high myopia group (1.01 ± 0.14) (P = 0.002). The efficacy index was significantly higher in the moderate myopia group (1.05 ± 0.20) than in the high myopia group (0.89 ± 0.17) (P = 0.02), and there was no significant difference between the high myopia group (0.89 ± 0.17) and the low myopia group (0.96 ± 0.16) (P = 0.14).

Conclusions

The mean safety index was over 1.0 in the three groups. TransPRK showed acceptable safety and efficacy in the moderate myopic eyes, as well as mild and high myopic eyes. High myopic eyes got very similar refractive results with moderate myopic eyes six months postoperatively. The safety and efficacy indexes were not significantly different between the high myopia group and the low myopia group.