Evaluation of postoperative toric intraocular lens alignment with anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Insights into the rotational stability of toric intraocular lens implantation: diagnostic approaches, influencing factors and intervention strategies

Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been developed to enhance visual acuity impaired by cataracts and correct corneal astigmatism. However, residual astigmatism caused by postoperative rotation of the toric IOL is an important factor affecting visual quality after implantation. To decrease the rotation of the toric IOL, significant advancements have been made in understanding the characteristics of toric IOL rotation, the factors influencing its postoperative rotation, as well as the development of various measurement techniques and interventions to address this issue. It has been established that factors such as the patient's preoperative refractive status, biological parameters, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and long-term management significantly impact the rotational stability of the toric IOL. Clinicians should adopt a personalized approach that considers these factors to minimize the risk of toric IOL rotation and ensure optimal outcomes for each patient. This article reviews the influence of various factors on toric IOL rotational stability. It discusses new challenges that may be encountered to reduce and intervene with rotation after toric IOL implantation in the foreseeable future.

Comparison of two objective methods for measuring postoperative toric intraocular lens orientation under the natural pupil

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the accuracy of iTrace and CASIA2 in measuring the postoperative orientation of toric intraocular lens (IOL) without mydriasis.

SETTING

Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients with SN6AT toric IOLs implanted after cataract surgery were enrolled. 1 month after surgery, the toric IOL orientation were measured by iTrace and CASIA2 in non-mydriatic, semi-dark conditions. Then, the toric axis was directly reviewed using the slit-lamp under full mydriasis. Axis measurement differences between each of the 2 devices and the slit-lamp, described as their relative differences (RDs), were calculated and compared. The percentage of RDs within 5 degrees, within 10 degrees and greater than 30 degrees were analyzed.

RESULTS

77 eyes of 70 patients were included. Generally, the mean toric axis measurement RDs of CASIA2 and iTrace were 9.24 ± 10.53 degrees and 13.89 ± 15.47 degrees respectively ( P = .04). For CASIA2 (72 eyes), 54.17% (39), 72.22% (52), and 4.17% (3) of eyes had RDs within 5 degrees, within 10 degrees and greater than 30 degrees, compared with 40.00% (28), 61.43% (43) and 12.86% (9) for iTrace (70 eyes). The 95% limits of agreements of CASIA2 with slit-lamp was narrower than that of iTrace with slit-lamp. The median RD of CASIA2 was significantly smaller in eyes with pupil ≥4 mm under dark condition compared with eyes with pupil <4 mm ( P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

CASIA2 demonstrates greater precision in measuring toric IOL orientation under non-mydriatic conditions compared with iTrace. Moreover, the accuracy of CASIA2 is enhanced in cases of pupil >4 mm.

Extensive misalignment of plate-haptic rotationally asymmetric multifocal toric intraocular lens

PURPOSE

Plate-haptic rotationally asymmetric multifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOL) (Lentis Comfort Toric) occasionally rotate extensively after surgery. We conducted the current study to investigate the incidence of extensive misalignment of this IOL and its association with clinical parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from patients who had undergone phacoemulsification and implantation of a plate-haptic multifocal toric IOL.

RESULTS

Among 332 eyes, extensive misalignment of toric IOLs ≥ 45º occurred in 3.3% (11 eyes). The amount of misalignment in eyes with extensive misalignment was 81.6 ± 22.9º, while in those without extensive misalignment, it was 3.0 ± 2.7º. The eyes with extensive misalignment showed significantly greater axial length (p < 0.001), larger corneal diameter (p = 0.034), and flatter corneas (p = 0.044) than those without extensive misalignment. Repositioning surgery to correct toric IOL misorientation was conducted in 9 eyes between 7 and 28 days after cataract surgery. In 2 eyes, repositioning surgery was carried out twice.

CONCLUSIONS

In majority of cases plate-haptic multifocal toric IOLs showed satisfactory rotational stability, but extensive misalignment ≥ 45º occurred in 3.3% of cases.

Outcomes of toric intraocular lens realignment surgery done using slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method

Purpose

To compare the slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method based on outcomes of toric realignment surgeries.

Settings

Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital.

Design

Retrospective study.

Methods

This study included all eyes undergoing toric intraocular lens (TIOL) realignment surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 for which TIOL axis assessment by slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method was available. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit-lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods on postoperative day 1 and day 14. In patients with misalignment, TIOL was realigned to the original position in group 1 (27 patients) and to an axis based on calculations provided by wavefront aberrometer in group 2 (25 patients). Post-realignment surgery, UCVA, subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit-lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods were assessed and analyzed.

Results

We analyzed 52 eyes and found that the mean preoperative misalignment with the slit-lamp method (44.9° ±20.0°) and wavefront aberrometry (47.1° ±19.5°) was similar. The corresponding degrees of misalignment post-TIOL repositioning surgeries were 5.2° ±5.2° (slit-lamp method) and 4.7° ±5.1° (wavefront aberrometry) (P = 0.615). Both groups showed significant improvement in median log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UCVA and reduction in median refractive cylinder.

Conclusions

Slit-lamp method is as good as wavefront aberrometer method to assess TIOL axis. Toric realignment surgery is found to be safe, and realigning TIOL based on either slit-lamp method or wavefront aberrometer method equally improved UCVA and decreased residual refractive cylinder.

Rotational stability of a new toric intraocular lens with an advanced optical profile

PURPOSE

To examine the rotational stability of a new toric intraocular lens (IOL), the TECNIS Eyhance Toric II, over a course of 3 months.

SETTING

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

Prospective unmasked single-center study.

METHODS

50 eyes of 50 patients with cataract and regular corneal astigmatism ≥0.75 diopters (D) were included. The TECNIS Eyhance Toric II IOL was implanted in 1 eye of each study patient. Images of the alignment axis of the IOL were taken intraoperatively, as well as at 1 hour, 1 week, and 3 months postoperatively. For the measurement of toric IOL rotation, images were superimposed on the basis of ocular landmarks. Uncorrected and corrected distance (4 m) and intermediate (66 cm) visual acuities were assessed at the 3-month visit.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rotational position between the intraoperative and 3 month timepoints, with a mean rotation of 1.34 ± 1.46 degrees, in 27 examined eyes. ( P = 0.313). No patients had to undergo repositioning of the toric IOL. A significant reduction of refractive cylinder occurred from preoperatively 1.8 ± 1.1 to 0.40 ± 0.42 D at the 3-month visit ( P = .001; n = 43). The corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly from 0.28 ± 0.16 logMAR preoperatively to -0.01 ± 0.13 logMAR at 3 months postoperatively ( P = .001; n = 43).

CONCLUSIONS

The TECNIS Eyhance Toric II showed a good visual performance with no significant rotation over a course of 3 months and, therefore, an excellent rotational stability. The intraocular lens showed a good safety profile with no adverse events.

Effects of Modified Haptics on Surgical Outcomes and Rotational Stability of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation

PURPOSE

To assess the rotational stability of a new toric intraocular lens (IOL), TECNIS toric II (toric II), which is a modified version of the TECNIS toric IOL (toric I) with frosted haptics (Johnson & Johnson).

METHODS

A total of 101 eyes of 101 patients who had been treated with phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation were included. Before and 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity were measured. Preoperative corneal astigmatism and postoperative manifest refractive astigmatism at 1 day and 1 month were analyzed. At 1 day and 1 month postoperatively, the amount of IOL axis misalignment from the intended orientation, tilt, and decentration were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Fifty-one eyes received the toric I IOL and 50 eyes received the toric II IOL. Toric I IOLs showed a significantly larger amount of axis misalignment than toric II IOLs at both 1 day (9.6 ± 7.6° vs 5.4 ± 4.8°, P = .003) and 1 month (9.1 ± 7.8° vs. 4.7 ± 4.2°, P = .003) postoperatively.The proportion of eyes with misalignment greater than 10° was significantly larger with toric I than toric II IOLs (P < .001). There were no significant differences between IOLs in the amount of residual astigmatism, UDVA, CDVA, and amount of tilt and decentration at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The TECNIS toric II IOL with frosted haptics has significantly improved rotational stability compared to its previous model. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(10):648-653.].

Outcomes of cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation after keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and predictability of cataract extraction with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or mushroom penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

SETTING

Villa Igea Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Toric IOL implantation was offered to patients with cataract, corneal astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D) and regular central corneal topography after complete suture removal. Phacoemulsification was performed through a 2.4 mm scleral tunnel and an enVista monofocal toric MX60T or Eyecryl monofocal toric IOL was inserted in the capsular bag. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, total prediction error, and IOL misalignment.

RESULTS

37 consecutive patients who had previously undergone either DALK (n = 27, 73%) or 2-piece mushroom PK (n = 10, 27%) were included. All patients completed the 6-month follow-up. The mean toric IOL power was 5.3 ± 1.1 D. Both UDVA and CDVA significantly improved (from 1.02 ± 0.27 to 0.46 ± 0.31 logMAR and from 0.65 ± 0.27 to 0.11 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively; P < .001). 20 eyes (54%) reached UDVA ≥20/40, whereas 35 eyes (95%) reached a CDVA ≥20/40. Final refractive astigmatism was 0.93 ± 0.87 D, with 35 eyes (95%) within 2 D. Prediction error was ≤1 D in 18 eyes (49%). Absolute IOL misalignment was 3.3 ± 3.5 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Toric IOL implantation in postkeratoplasty eyes allowed reduction of refractive astigmatism to predictably low levels with concomitant improved visual outcomes.

Influence of frosted haptics on rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses

We investigated the unfolding property and rotational stability of a new toric intraocular lens (IOL); TECNIS toric II (toric-II, ZCW, Johnson & Johnson) that is an improved version of TECNIS toric IOL (toric-I, ZCV). Both IOLs are based on an identical platform, except for the frosted haptics with toric-II IOL. The study consisted of two parts; experimental study and clinical, retrospective, case series. Experimental study indicated that the overall time from IOL ejection to unfolding to 11 mm was significantly shorter with toricII than toric-I IOLs (p = 0.032), due to the earlier separation of the haptics from the optic with toric-II IOL. Clinical study included 131 eyes of 99 patients who had undergone phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation. At 3 months postoperatively, toric-II IOL showed significantly better rotational stability than toric-I IOL, including smaller residual manifest astigmatism (p = 0.018), less amount of axis misalignment from the intended axis (p = 0.04), lower incidence of misalignment > 10º (p = 0.0044), and less degree of prediction errors (p = 0.043). Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity tended to be better in the toric-II than in the toric-I groups, with marginal statistical difference (p = 0.057). TECNIS toric II IOL with the frosted haptics showed significantly better rotational stability than its predecessor, probably due to quicker unfolding and greater friction with the capsular bag.

Rotational stability of modified toric intraocular lens

We evaluated the rotational stability of a new toric intraocular lens (IOL), HOYA XY-1 toric IOL that is an improved version of HOYA 355 toric IOL, with longer overall length (13.0 mm vs. 12.5 mm), shortened unfolding time, and texture processing of the surface of haptics. Data from 193 eyes of 165 patients (76.4 ± 8.3 years old) with preoperative corneal astigmatism exceeding 0.75 diopters who had undergone phacoemulsification and toric IOL implantation were collected and analyzed. Corneal astigmatism, refractive astigmatism, and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were evaluated before and 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery. The degree of IOL decentration, IOL tilt, and toric axis misalignment was assessed at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively. Fifty eyes received AcrySof toric IOL, 51 eyes TECNIS toric IOL, 46 eyes HOYA 355 toric IOL, and 46 eyes HOYA XY-1 toric IOL. The amount of axis misalignment from the intended axis was significantly different among IOLs (p = 0.004, one-way ANOVA), and HOYA XY-1 showed significantly less amount of axis misalignment than TECNIS (p = 0.020, Tukey’s multiple comparison) and HOYA 355 (p = 0.010). The proportion of eyes that showed axis misalignment <10° at 1 month postoperatively was significantly higher with HOYA XY-1 toric IOL than with other toric IOLs (χ² test, p = 0.020). HOYA XY-1 toric IOL, the modified version of HOYA 355 toric IOL, showed excellent rotational stability in comparison with other models of toric IOLs.

Predictability of different calculators in the minimization of postoperative astigmatism after implantation of a toric intraocular lens

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of five calculators for toric intraocular lenses (IOL).

Methods

Retrospective comparative case series in cataract patients undergoing implantation of trifocal toric IOLs (PhysIOL FineVision POD FT). Inclusion criteria were age-related cataract and a corneal astigmatism between 0.90D and 4.50D. Refractive astigmatism predictability of five different toric calculators or calculation methods were compared. Furthermore, two groups were differentiated according to the type of astigmatism. The mean absolute error and the centroid errors in the predicted residual astigmatism from each calculator were evaluated.

Results

Fifty-one eyes of 43 patients were included in the study. For the standard toric calculator using anterior keratometry values only, the centroid prediction error was 0.39D±0.41@166º, which was reduced by the application of the PhysIOL toric calculator that includes the Abulafia-Koch regression formula and adjustment for the effective lens position (0.05D±0.34@167º), and also by the application of the Barrett toric calculator (0.07D±0.28@160º). Regarding the techniques that directly evaluate posterior corneal surface, the Holladay toric calculator, using total corneal power provided by a color-LED topographer, generated better results (0.10D±0.44@156º) than those using Scheimpflug camera data (0.23D±0.56@158º). Similar results were found for both types of astigmatism.

Conclusion

The PhysIOL and the Barrett toric calculators taking into account the posterior corneal astigmatism by mathematical models, yielded lower astigmatic prediction errors compared to a standard toric calculator based on anterior keratometry data only. When total corneal power measurements were used, prediction errors were lower with color-LED than with Scheimpflug based topography.