Corneal biomechanics after laser refractive surgery: Unmasking differences between techniques

Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To compare early changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their correlations with corneal shape parameters.

METHODS

One hundred twenty four eyes received myopic PRK and SMILE for similar amounts of myopia. Corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, biomechanical parameters using Corvis ST, and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were evaluated before and 2 weeks after surgery. The change in each parameter was compared between groups, while the difference in central corneal thickness and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure measured before and after surgery were considered as covariates.

RESULTS

A significant reduction was seen in the corneal stiffness parameter at first applanation, and an increase in deformation amplitude ratio (DAR), and integrated inverse radius (IIR) in both groups after surgery (p < 0.001) Changes in DAR, and IIR were significantly greater in the SMILE than in the PRK group (p < 0.001) Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) decreased in both SMILE and PRK groups after surgery, (p < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) Among new Corvis ST parameters, DAR showed a significant correlation with changes in Ambrosio relational thickness in both groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques caused significant changes in corneal biomechanics in the early postoperative period, with greater elastic changes in the SMILE group compared to the PRK group, likely due to lower tension in the SMILE cap and thinner residual stromal bed in SMILE. There were no differences in viscoelastic changes between them, so the lower CH may reflect the volume of tissue removed.

Myopic Regression after FS-LASIK and SMILE

PURPOSE

To compare the degree of myopic regression after myopia correction with either femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) or small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) over 18 months.

METHODS

Patients undergoing FS-LASIK or SMILE surgery for myopia correction were retrospectively recruited. The propensity scores were used to match patients by age and preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (SEQ) from these 2 groups. Myopic regression was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 416 eyes of 416 patients undergoing FS-LASIK and 416 eyes of 416 patients undergoing SMILE were matched. Using 1-month SEQ as baseline, the SEQ regression values after FS-LASIK were 0D, -0.17 ± 0.69D, -0.24 ± 0.65D, -0.31 ± 0.65D, -0.32 ± 0.63D, and -0.33 ± 0.62D and the SEQ regression values after SMILE were 0D, -0.07 ± 0.75D, -0.18 ± 0.77D, -0.23 ± 0.82 D, -0.21 ± 0.77D, and -0.24 ± 0.68D at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that preoperative manifest SEQ (P = 0.021) and designed optical zone (P = 0.048) are significant predictors. The selected surgical procedure had no significant effect on predicting myopic regression (P = 0.470). The cumulative survival rates of myopic regression were 54.74% and 42.10% in the FS-LASIK group and 58.66% and 43.83% in the SMILE group, at 12 and 18 months, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

After matching based on age and preoperative manifest SEQ, we found that higher myopia and a smaller optical zone contribute significantly to the development of myopic regression after undergoing FS-LASIK or SMILE surgery at 18 months. The selected surgical procedure, however, does not affect the likelihood of myopic regression.

Comparison of refractive surgeries (SMILE, LASIK, and PRK) with and without corneal crosslinking: systematic review and meta-analysis

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used for treating keratoconus and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia. However, refractive surgery is not usually performed with prophylactic CXL. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of refractive surgeries with vs without prophylactic CXL. We systematically searched databases for studies comparing refractive surgeries for myopic correction with vs without prophylactic corneal crosslinking. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to perform statistical analysis. We included 2820 eyes from 28 studies. Compared with refractive surgery alone, surgery with prophylactic CXL resulted in decreased central corneal thickness, corrected distance visual acuity logMAR, and safety and efficacy indices. There were no significant differences in postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at ≥12 months and other visual outcomes among both groups. More randomized controlled trials with standard crosslinking protocols are needed to analyze the prophylactic use of crosslinking with refractive surgeries.

Relationship between postoperative residual refractive error and preoperative corneal stiffness in small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between postoperative residual refractive error and preoperative corneal stiffness after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

SETTING

Hospital clinic.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Corneal stiffness was evaluated using the stress-strain index (SSI). Associations between postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and corneal stiffness were determined using longitudinal regression analysis after adjustment for sex, age, preoperative SE, and other variables. The cohort was divided into halves to compare risk ratios for residual refraction in corneas with different SSI values. Low SSI values were defined as having less-stiff corneas and others as having stiffer corneas.

RESULTS

287 patients (287 eyes) were included. Greater undercorrection was found in less-stiff corneas across all follow-up timepoints (less-stiff corneas: 1 day: -0.36 ± 0.45 diopters [D], 1 month: -0.22 ± 0.36 D, and 3 months: -0.13 ± 0.15 D; stiffer corneas: -0.22 ± 0.37 D, -0.14 ± 0.35 D, and -0.05 ± 0.11 D, respectively). Postoperative refraction exhibited a mean 0.05 D undercorrection for every 0.1-unit decrease in the SSI after adjustment for variables. The SSI accounted for nearly 10% of the variance in refractive outcomes. Less-stiff corneas increased the risk ratio of postoperative absolute SE >0 D and ≥0.25 D by 2.242 (95% CI, 1.334-3.768) and 3.023 (95% CI, 1.466-6.233), respectively, compared with stiffer corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative residual refractive error was associated with preoperative corneal stiffness. Patients with less-stiff corneas had a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of residual refractive error after SMILE. Preoperative analysis of corneal stiffness can help modify nomogram algorithms of surgery and improve the predictability of refractive outcomes.

Short- and mid-term changes in CORVIS ST parameters in successful, adult orthokeratology patients

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The changes in various biomechanical and tomographic characteristics of the cornea associated with orthokeratology may allow us to identify potential mid- and long-term structural alterations, resulting in a better understanding of the governing mechanisms of this procedure and in its optimisation.

BACKGROUND

The study aimed at describing short and mid-term changes in CORVIS ST® parameters and indices in orthokeratology (ortho-k), and their diurnal variations.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was designed in which several CORVIS ST® parameters of 75 new adult participants successfully fitted with overnight ortho-k Seefree® (Conóptica - Hecht Contactlinsen) contact lenses were explored. Measurements were conducted in baseline (BL) conditions and in the morning and evening at the one-night (1 NM/1NT), one-week (1WM/1 WT) and 3-month (3 MM/3MT) follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found in DARatio_2 mm, IntRad, ARTh, CBI and TBI following overnight ortho-k, when compared with BL values, with most values reaching stability at 1WM or reverting to BL values at 3 MM. The ARTh and CBI parameters showed some of the most significant temporal variations (both p < 0.001), probably reflecting the encountered differences in central corneal thickness between BL and 1WM (p = 0.010) and between BL and 3 MM (p = 0.016). In general, corneal rigidity was higher in the morning at all follow-up visits, and decreased during the day. No statistically significant changes in adjusted intraocular pressure values were found.

CONCLUSION

Ortho-k in adults may be considered a safe procedure in terms of short and mid-term changes in CORVIS ST® parameters. The observed alterations in most of the parameters provided by the Corvis ST® probably responded to the well-described changes in corneal pachymetry and tomography, rather than to actual alterations in corneal rigidity.

Efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate versus fluorometholone in the treatment of patients after corneal refractive surgery: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate (LE) 0.5% versus fluorometholone (FML) 0.1% for treating patients after corneal refractive surgery with the aim of providing an evidence-based rationale for clinical drug selection.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, and CNKI) were searched (from inception to December 2021) for comparative clinical studies that evaluated LE versus FML treatment for post-corneal refractive surgery patients. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Nine studies with a total sample size of 2677 eyes were included in this analysis. FML 0.1% and LE 0.5% produced a similar incidence of corneal haze within 6 months after surgery (P = 0.13 at 1 month, P = 0.66 at 3 months, and P = 0.12 at 6 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean logMAR postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (WMD: - 0.00; 95% CI: - 0.01 to 0.00; P = 0.29) and spherical equivalent (WMD: 0.01; 95% CI: - 0.01 to 0.03; P = 0.35). LE 0.5% appears to have a higher tendency to reduce the incidence of ocular hypertension compared FML 0.1%, but there was no statistical significance (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.50; P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that LE 0.5% and FML 0.1% had comparable efficacy in preventing corneal haze and corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension, with no difference in visual acuity in patients after corneal refractive surgery.

In Vivo Evaluation of the Effects of SMILE with Different Amounts of Stromal Ablation on Corneal Biomechanics by Optical Coherence Elastography

This work aims to depth-resolved quantitatively analyze the effect of different stromal ablation amounts on the corneal biomechanical properties during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using optical coherence elastography (OCE). A 4.5-MHz ultrasonic transducer was used to excite elastic waves in the corneal tissue. The OCE system combined with the antisymmetric Lamb wave model was employed to achieve a high-resolution, high-sensitivity, and depth-resolved quantitative detection of the corneal Young's modulus. Eighteen rabbits were randomly divided into three groups; each group had six rabbits. The first and second groups underwent -3D and -6D SMILE surgeries, and the third group was the control group, respectively. Young's modulus of the corneal cap and residual stromal bed (RSB) were both increased after SMILE, which shared the stress under intraocular pressure (IOP). Furthermore, the Young's modulus of both the corneal cap and RSB after 3D SMILE group were significantly lower than that in the -6D group, which indicated that the increases in the post-operative corneal Young's modulus were positively correlated with the amount of stromal ablation. The OCE system for quantitative spatial characterization of corneal biomechanical properties can provide useful information on the extent of safe ablation for SMILE procedures.

Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Photorefractive Keratectomy, Using a Noncontact Tonometer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare early corneal biomechanical changes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

The study comprised 74 patients eligible for refractive surgery, equally allocated to PRK (37 patients) and SMILE (37 patients). Corneal biomechanical properties were recorded and compared between the 2 groups at preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using a dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera equipped with a noncontact tonometer.

RESULTS

Both procedures significantly affected corneal biomechanical properties at 3 months after surgery. Patients in the PRK group showed significantly better results for deformation amplitude ratio (DA ratio) ( P = 0.03), maximum inverse radius (InvRadMax) ( P = 0.02), and A2 time ( P = 0.03). The mean changes in DA ratio, HC radius, InvRadMax, and Ambrosio relational thickness were significantly higher in the SMILE group in comparison with those of the PRK group (all, P < 0.05). In both groups, change in CCT was significantly correlated with changes in DA ratio and InvRadMax ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSS

Both SMILE and PRK refractive surgeries significantly altered corneal biomechanical properties but the changes were more prominent after SMILE.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Decellularized and Crosslinked Corneal Implants Manufactured From Porcine Corneas as a Treatment Option for Advanced Keratoconus

Currently corneal transplantation is the main treatment for late-stage keratoconus; however, transplantation procedures are accompanied by significant risk of post-surgical complications; this in addition to supply limitations imposed by a worldwide shortage of human donor corneas, has driven the development of alternative therapies. One such therapy is the use of corneal implants derived from porcine corneas (Xenia^®, Gebauer Medizintechnik GmbH, Neuhausen, DE). In contrast to human donor tissue, these implants can be produced on demand and due to the processes used pose no risks for host-immune rejection. Their use has already been demonstrated clinically in patients for preventing the progression of topographic changes in keratoconus whilst improving visual acuity. The implants are derived from natural tissue and not standardised synthetic material, whilst this likely reduces the risk of issues with bio-incompatibility, there is inevitably variability in their intrinsic mechanical properties which requires investigation. Here, speckle interferometry is employed to examine the biomechanical properties, in response to physiologically representative forces, of native porcine corneal tissue prior to processing and after a proprietary 4-stage process involving decellularization, washing, compression and crosslinking. The control lenticules had an average Young’s modulus (E) of 11.11 MPa (range 8.39–13.41 MPa), following processing average E of the lenticules increased by 127% over that of the unprocessed tissue to 25.23 MPa (range 18.32–32.9 MPa). The variability in E of the lenticules increased significantly after processing suggesting variability in the propensity of the native tissue to processing. In summary, it is possible to produce thin (<90 µm) lenticules from porcine corneas with enhanced stiffness that are effective for treating late-stage keratoconus. Due to the observed variability in the responses of lenticules to processing, interferometry could be a useful technique for ensuring quality control in commercial production via biomechanical screening.

Intraocular pressure after myopic laser refractive surgery measured with a new Goldmann convex prism: correlations with GAT and ORA

Background

The purpose of this study is to describe measurements using a newly developed modified Goldmann convex tonometer (CT) 1 year after myopic laser refractive surgery. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were compared with IOP values obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA).

Methods

Prospective double-masked study performed on thirty eyes of thirty patients that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK; n = 19) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; n = 11). IOP was measured before and 3 and 12 months after surgery. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot were calculated to assess the agreement between GAT, CT, IOPg (Goldmann-correlated IOP) and IOPcc (corneal-compensated IOP) from ORA.

Results

Twelve months after LASIK, IOP measured with CT showed the best correlation with IOP measured with GAT before surgery (GATpre) (ICC = 0.886, 95% CI: 0.703–0.956) (15.60 ± 3.27 vs 15.80 ± 3.22; p < 0.000). However, a moderate correlation was found for IOP measured with IOPcc and CT 12 months after LASIK (ICC = 0.568, 95% CI: − 0.185 – 0.843) (15.80 ± 3.22 vs 12.87 ± 2.77; p < 0.004). Twelve months after PRK, CT showed a weak correlation (ICC = − 0.266, 95% CI: − 3.896 – 0.663), compared to GATpre (17.30 ± 3.47 vs 16.01 ± 1.45; p < 0.642), as well as poor correlation (ICC = 0.256, 95% CI: − 0.332 – 0.719) with IOPcc (17.30 ± 3.47 vs 13.38 ± 1.65; p < 0.182).

Conclusions

Twelve months after LASIK, IOP measured with CT strongly correlated with GAT before surgery and could therefore provide an alternative method for measuring IOP after this surgery. More studies regarding this new convex prism are needed to assess its accuracy.

Influence of tomographic and biomechanical corneal indexes on myopic refractive surgery indications: A multicenter study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of corneal tomographic and biomechanical indexes on the refractive technique indication.

METHODS

A total of 251 eyes from 251 patients interested in refractive surgery were enrolled in this cross-sectional and multicenter study. Previous to the surgeon decision, a preoperative protocol was performed by refractive optometrists, containing four sections: refraction, biometry, corneal tomography and biomechanics. The refractive surgeons made a first decision based only on refraction, biometric and tomographic information. Biomechanical indexes were revealed, and refractive surgeons made a second indication. Additionally, for Laser-Assisted in-situ Keratomileusis cases, the percent tissue altered were calculated. Possible indications were no refractive surgery, photorefractive keratectomy, Laser-Assisted in-situ Keratomileusis or intraocular Collamer lens.

RESULTS

After the first surgery indication, the distribution was photorefractive keratectomy (47.4%), Laser-Assisted in-situ Keratomileusis (48.2%) while intraocular Collamer lens achieved 2.8%. This proportion changed significantly after the second indication regarding corneal biomechanics and photorefractive keratectomy and Laser-Assisted in-situ Keratomileusis decreased by 24% while intraocular Collamer lens increased 19%. A total of 69 eyes changed the indication (27.5%) and 182 eyes (72.5%) remained unchanged. All indications changes were from photorefractive keratectomy or Laser-Assisted in-situ Keratomileusis to intraocular Collamer lens or no surgery. Indication changes to intraocular Collamer lens were observed in 49 eyes (71%). Tomographic, biomechanical indexes, ablation depth and percent tissue altered achieved statistically significant differences between eyes without and with indication changes (all, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

New corneal biomechanical indexes could change the indication decision regarding biometric and tomographic data alone. Intraocular Collamer len was the preferred indication for eyes at risk of ectasia or with subclinical keratoconus due to corneal biomechanical parameters.

Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and corneal biomechanical changes between 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

This prospective study included 150 eyes (150 patients: 91 eyes in the 120-µm group, and 59 eyes in the 140-µm group) who underwent SMILE. Enhanced correction nomograms were applied for patients according to cap thickness. Clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refraction, and corneal wavefront aberrations, were compared between the two groups. Corneal biomechanics were evaluated using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany).

Results

The mean uncorrected-distance visual acuity, safety and efficacy indices, and refractive predictability were comparable in the 120-µm and 140-µm groups after SMILE. The postoperative total corneal root mean square higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations was 0.48 ± 0.31 and 0.26 ± 0.10 in the 120-µm group, and 0.53 ± 0.16 and 0.34 ± 0.13 in the 140-µm group, which showed significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.027, and <0.001, respectively). Although corneal stiffness decreased after SMILE in both groups, the changes in the deformation amplitude ratio were significantly higher in the 140-µm group than in the 120-µm group (P = 0.022).

Conclusions

SMILE with 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness provided excellent predictable outcomes according to our enhanced correction nomogram. The amount of tissue removal required to achieve the same amount of refractive correction was greater in the thicker cap group. The induction of corneal HOAs and weakening of corneal biomechanics were less pronounced in the thin-cap group, which may be associated with the thinner cap, lesser lenticule thickness, or thicker residual stromal bed.

Translational Relevance

Although SMILE with different cap thickness was effective, thicker lenticule thickness in the thick-cap group may be associated with induction of HOAs, and corneal stiffness changes.

Is it Possible to Derive the Dresdner Correction Formula Using a Finite Element Program?

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to construct a model cornea by CAD and finite element software to find out how the intraocular pressure compares to the forces for applanation at the outside of the model cornea. These data were to be compared to the Dresdner correction formula. Thereby, it was possible to find out whether the model was plausible and to find hints as to why a correction for how the intraocular pressure depends on the corneal thickness is necessary at all.

METHODS

Using the open-source software FreeCad and geometrical data for the cornea of the literature, an average cornea was constructed. On this average cornea, a finite element analysis was performed using the free software z88aurora. The intraocular pressure was measured by applanation of the outer cornea. The necessary forces were analysed.

RESULTS

In this model, the intraocular pressure had to be corrected depending on the corneal thickness. The correction factor was k_{mean; finite elements} = 19.17 - 0.0334*corneal thickness. The necessary correction did not exclusively depend on the relation between the endothelial area and the area of the outer cornea: for this relation alone the correction would have been k_{area-relation} = 1.0361 - 0.0006*corneal thickness.

DISCUSSION

The model correction formula was close to the Dresdner formula. The relation between endothelial area and the area of the outer cornea could only explain about half of the necessary correction.

Effective elastic modulus of an intact cornea related to indentation behavior: A comparison between the Hertz model and Johnson-Kendall-Roberts model

In this study, a macro-indentation test on the submillimeter scale was performed to analyze the indentation behavior of an intact cornea under physiological pressures. The Hertz and Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) models were employed to solve the elastic modulus (E) of the intact cornea. The relevant detailed analysis showed that the JKR model, which accounted for the contribution from the adhesion energy, could be used to obtain the E values that were more than two-folds of those obtained from the Hertz model, which only considered the external force. Compared with the uniaxial tension test in vitro, unlike the elastic Hertz-model, the E values under physiological pressures that were obtained with the JKR model were between the lower and upper limits of corneal material. This phenomenon indicated that the JKR model could be used to obtain reasonably effective E values of an intact cornea under physiological pressures.

Analysis of Corneal Distortion after Myopic PRK

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties (CBP) and their behaviors after myopic refractive surgery both with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST (CST). This retrospective study included 145 eyes of 145 patients with a mean age of 33.13 ± 9.24 years, who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for a refractive defect, measured as spherical equivalent, of mean −4.69 ± 2.04 D and have been evaluated before surgery and at 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) values significantly decreased after 1 month and remained statistically stable during further follow-ups. CST parameters had a different evolution: only second applanation time (AT2) differences showed a significant variation after 1 month that did not statistically change over time. Highest concavity deformation amplitude (HCDA), highest concavity peak distance (HCPD), first applanation time (AT1) and velocity (AV1) showed continuous significant differences both after 3 and after 6 months. This study suggests that after central surface ablation surgery, such as myopic PRK, corneal shape is remodeling, and its deformation parameters are going to change even at 6 months follow-up. This indicates that it should be important to evaluate refractive surgery patients during a longer follow-up because this could allow earlier diagnosis and better management of late-onset complications.

Decade - long journey with small incision lenticule extraction: The learnings

Over the past decade, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) has revolutionized the field of keratorefractive surgery. With the promise of superior corneal biomechanics and reduced postoperative dry eye, SMILE afforded a distinct advantage over flap-based procedures. Our evolving understanding of the surgical technique and management of its unique complications has further enhanced the outcomes. This review will highlight specific pearls on various preoperative and intraoperative principles allowing optimization of outcomes with SMILE.

New applanation tonometer for myopic patients after laser refractive surgery

This study assesses the agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and a new experimental applanation tonometer with a convexly shaped apex (CT) after laser myopic refractive surgery. Two different CT radii (CT1 and CT2) were designed with a finite element analyser, and a prospective double masked study on 102 eyes from 102 patients was carried out. A Bland-Altman plot and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the agreement between GAT measurements and the measurements of both CT1 and CT2 before and after myopic laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK; n = 73) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; n = 29). We evaluated a subset of two subgroups (n = 36 each) for intra and inter-observer (IA/IE) error. From the whole cohort, the best IOP agreement was observed between GATpre and CT1post surgery: 16.09 ± 2.92 vs 16.42 ± 2.87 (p < 0.001); ICC = 0.675 (95% CI: 0.554-0.768). In the analysis of LASIK vs PRK, GATpre and CT1post showed the highest agreement, although LASIK measurements were more accurate than PRK, as the ICC = 0.718 (95% CI: 0.594-0.812) and ICC = 0.578 (95% CI: 0.182-0.795) respectively. Excellent agreement was observed for IA/IE, and there was an ICC > 0.8 (95% CI) in all cases. CT1 proved more accurate in the LASIK subgroup. In conclusion, our new version of GAT could be used with post-surgery LASIK patients as a more accurate measurement device compared to the current reference tonometer.

[Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea after keratorefractive surgery]

Biomechanical properties of the cornea are important for the functioning of the ocular optical system. They affect such qualities of the system as correct diffraction and resistance to different external action. Keratorefractive surgery widely used in clinical practice nowadays significantly upsets corneal biomechanics, which introduces a margin of error for IOP measurements done by different methods. The article reviews literature devoted to the problem of changes of corneal biomechanical properties after refractive surgeries.