Perioperative assessment for refractive cataract surgery

Biometric description of 34 589 eyes undergoing cataract surgery: sex differences

PURPOSE

To describe gender differences in the biometric parameters of a large sample of patients with cataract. Cataract surgery has evolved from a vision restoration to a refractive procedure, and population-based studies are vital to optimize normative databases and postsurgical outcomes.

SETTING

Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center observational study.

METHODS

The study included 34 589 eyes (20 004 patients with cataract). Biometric data were obtained from IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR. Linear mixed models were used to account for intereye correlation. HofferQST formula was used to calculate the hypothetical distribution of intraocular lens (IOL) power (arbitrary lens; A = 119.2).

RESULTS

Most biometric variables showed significant differences between sexes ( P < .0001), such as 0.53 mm shorter eyes found in females, of which 0.16 mm are explained by shorter aqueous depth. Steeper anterior keratometries (∼0.75 diopter [D]) were found in women, to end up in no difference on anterior astigmatism magnitude, but different orientation ( P < .0001). The distribution of IOL power differed between sexes ( P < .001), with the interquartile range shifting 1 D toward more powerful lenses in women and odds ratio (power >26 D) = 2.26, P < .0001 (Fisher).

CONCLUSIONS

Large sample size studies provide smaller margin of error, higher power, and controlled risk of reporting false (negative or positive) findings. Highly significant differences between sexes in ocular biometry were found; this supports the idea that including sex as a parameter in IOL calculation should be explored and may improve results. In addition, the distribution of IOL powers was provided, which may be useful for manufacturers and hospital stock planning.

Prevalence data for total corneal astigmatism in cataract patients

PURPOSE

To report the prevalence data for total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in cataract patients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively collected and analyzed the preoperative biometric data of the patients who underwent cataract surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, from January 2019 to May 2023.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 10817 patients was 71 ± 10 years; the male/female ratio was 4653/6164. The mean TCA obtained by the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), the Abulafia-Koch (AK) formula, and the Barrett toric calculator was 1.11 ± 0.81 diopter (D), 1.13 ± 0.75 D, and 1.12 ± 0.74 D respectively, which was significantly greater than the mean standard keratometric (K) astigmatism (0.99 ± 0.75 D) obtained by IOLMaster 700. Against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism was dominant in all the TCA measurements, and its proportion increased with age. TCA measurements by different methods exhibit high variability, with a total of 1574 (8.9%) data sets from 1016 (9.4%) patients showing a difference larger than 0.5 D in at least one pair of TCA measurements.

CONCLUSION

The use of TCA rather than K astigmatism significantly influenced the choice of intraocular lenses (IOLs) as more patients would be candidates for toric IOLs. It was essential to carefully compare and select TCA obtained with multiple methods for optimal postoperative visual quality.

Does the Difference in Axial Length Affect the Refractive Outcome?

Background

The purpose of this study is to compare axial length (AL) and the refractive outcome after phacoemulsification surgery from 2014 to 2019 at Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Terengganu, Malaysia.

Method

This was a retrospective record review of all cataract patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent uneventful superior wound phacoemulsification with nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2019. Using optical biometry or immersion technique, the preoperative AL determined solely via the Sanders, Retzlaff and Kraff 2 (SRK2) formula was selected. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at 6 weeks-12 weeks was retrieved. Using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0, the mean differences between targeted and actual postoperative SE were analysed based on the AL.

Result

In this study, 490 eyes of 472 patients aged 25 years old-88 years old (mean age 65.72 years old [SD 8.83]) were involved. There were 162 eyes (33%) in Group A (< 23 mm), 189 eyes (39%) in Group B (23.01 mm-24.0 mm) and 139 eyes (28%) in Group C (> 24.0 mm). The mean AL was 23.63 mm (SD 1.19). The mean differences between the targeted and actual postoperative SE were: -0.09 D (SD 0.60) in Group A, -0.07 D (SD 0.53) in Group B and -0.16 D (SD 0.52) in Group C. No significant difference was found between these groups (P = 0.327).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the refractive outcome using the SRK2 formula in different ALs after phacoemulsification surgery. Hence, there is no reason to modify or adjust the targeted SE based on AL.

Refractive cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study to provide an overview of recent publications and opinions in refractive cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the advent of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on different platforms, the surgeon has a wide arena of types of IOL to choose, depending on the patient's visual requirement. Optimization of the tear film, integrating tomography and topography devices for appropriate keratometry values, biometry, use of advanced formulas for IOL power calculation and application of newer IOLs can help achieve target refraction in cases scheduled for cataract surgery. Intraoperative aberrometry can be a useful aid for cataract surgery in postrefractive cases and can help minimize residual postoperative astigmatism.

SUMMARY

Evolvement and rapid advancement of technology allows to impart desired refractive outcomes in most of the cases postcataract surgery. Appropriate preoperative and intraoperative factors should be considered to achieve the desired postoperative outcome.

Recommendation for Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Delphi Consensus Statement by the ESASO Study Group

PURPOSE

To establish consensus among experts in lens and refractive surgery to guide general ophthalmologists on issues related to presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs).

DESIGN

A modified Delphi method to reach a consensus among experts.

METHODS

A steering committee formulated 105 relevant items grouped into four sections (preoperative considerations, IOL selection, intraoperative considerations, and postoperative considerations). The consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of experts agreeing with the evaluation of a statement.

RESULTS

Ten experts participated and completed all rounds of questionnaires (100% response rate). Of 68 items considered in the preoperative considerations, consensus was achieved in 48 (70.6%). There was a lack of consensus over IOL selection, the experts only agreed on the importance of the patient's habits for the optical IOL design selection. Of the 14 considerations related to intraoperative issues, the experts reached a consensus on 10 (71.4%). The postoperative considerations section reached the highest consensus in 10 items of 13 (76.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations for a diffractive multifocal IOL were a potential postoperative visual acuity > 0.5, a keratometry between 40-45 diopters, a pupil >2.8 mm under photopic conditions and <6.0 mm under scotopic conditions, a root mean square of higher order corneal aberrations <0.5 µm for 6-mm pupil size, while monofocal or non-diffractive IOLs should be considered for patients with coexisting eye disorders. A lack of agreement was found in the issues related to the IOL selection.

Prediction accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry compared with preoperative biometry formulae for intraocular lens power selection

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry to preoperative biometry formulae for predicting intraocular lens power.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes undergoing cataract extraction with at least 1 month of follow-up after surgery at an ambulatory surgical centre in Toronto.

METHODS

Consecutive sample of 228 cataract extractions with monofocal, trifocal, or toric intraocular lens implantation from November 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. The spherical equivalent was predicted preoperatively with Barrett Universal II, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF), SRK/T, Holladay I, Holladay II, Haigis, and HofferQ using biometry measurements and intraoperatively with wavefront aberrometry. The primary outcomes were mean prediction error and proportion of eyes with a spherical equivalent within 0.5 D of the refractive target at postoperative month 1.

RESULTS

The analysis included 159 eyes with 52% females and a mean age of 69.4 years. Formulae with the lowest mean prediction error were Hill-RBF (0.32 D ± 0.02 D), Barrett Universal II (0.32 D ± 0.02 D), intraoperative aberrometry (0.32 D ± 0.02 D), SRK/T (0.33 D ± 0.02 D), Holladay II (0.34 D ± 0.03 D), Holladay I (0.35 D ± 0.02 D), Haigis (0.37 D ± 0.02 D), and HofferQ (0.42 D ± 0.02 D). There were no statistically significant differences between intraoperative aberrometry and the preoperative formulae. Formulae with the highest proportion of eyes within 0.5 D of the refractive target were intraoperative aberrometry (82%), Barrett Universal II (81%), Hill-RBF (80%), SRK/T (77%), Holladay II (76%), Holladay I (75%), Haigis (71%), and HofferQ (70%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative aberrometry and modern preoperative biometry formulae are equally effective at reaching the refractive target. In normal eyes, intraoperative aberrometry does not appear to provide any additional benefit to modern prediction formulae.

Comparison of Javal-Schiøtz keratometer, Orbscan IIz and Pentacam topographers in evaluating anterior corneal topography

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Inter-instrument variation in anterior corneal shape (ACS) measurement has a consequence for ocular clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

To consider inter-instrument variability in keratometry measurements across the ACS and to explore instrument protocols for determining ACS keratometric analogues (KAs).

METHODS

  Mean keratometry/KAs of the right eye were recorded using Javal-Schiøtz keratometer (J-S), Orbscan IIz and Pentacam from 124 subjects (78 females; mean ± SD age: 24.71 ± 6.61 years). Mean radii of curvature were obtained for 1-mm wide annular zones extending up to 6 mm (horizontally) and 4 mm (vertically) from the apex for Orbscan and Pentacam. Zonal mean radius of curvature was calculated by averaging keratometry values for all measured points within the zone.

RESULTS

KA (mean ± SD): Horizontal: Orbscan (7.80 ± 0.31 mm) and J-S (7.82 ± 0.29 mm) were not significantly different (p = 0.072). Pentacam (7.86 ± 0.29 mm) was significantly flatter than J-S (p < 0.001) and Orbscan (p < 0.001). Vertical: Orbscan (7.64 ± 0.31 mm) was significantly steeper than J-S (7.67 ± 0.29 mm, p < 0.005) and Pentacam (7.70 ± 0.29 mm, p < 0.001). Pentacam was significantly flatter than J-S (p < 0.001) and significant flatter than Orbscan across the entire profile (1-4 mm zones horizontal and vertical, p < 0.001).                        LoAs (CI): J-S/Orbscan: ±0.75 mm (0.05-0.18); J-S/Pentacam: ±0.72 mm (0.01-0.12); Pentacam/Orbscan: ±0.16 mm (0.04-0.08). There was a +0.03 mm positive bias for Orbscan compared to J-S, +0.06 mm positive bias for Orbscan compared to Pentacam and -0.03 mm negative bias for Pentacam compared to J-S.

CONCLUSIONS

Algorithms used by Orbscan and Pentacam to solve the peripheral paraxial ray problem produce significantly different KAs. Instrument-specific KAs cannot be used inter-changeably between instruments. Differences in KA between instruments are not significant for ocular surgery, but may influence rigid contact lens fitting. Pentacam measures flatter than Orbscan and J-S.

TRIM3 Inhibits H2O2-Induced Apoptosis in Human Lens Epithelial Cells by Decreasing p53 via Ubiquitination

PURPOSE

Cataract is a leading visual disease characterized by enhanced oxidative stress and increased apoptosis of human lens epithelial cells (HLECs). TRIM3 is a tumor suppressor in many cancers. However, its role in cataract remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of TRIM3 in H₂O₂-injured HLECs and the underlying mechanisms involved.

METHODS

HLECs were treated with different H₂O₂ concentrations to induce apoptosis. A lentivirus was designed to overexpress TRIM3 and p53, and TRIM3 knockdown was prepared. A P53 inhibitor, PFTα, was used to knockdown p53. Cell viability and apoptosis were detected by CCK-8 and flow cytometric analyses, respectively. TRIM3, p53, Bcl2, and Bax expression levels were determined by qRT-qPCR and western blotting.

RESULTS

It was found that H₂O₂-treated HLECs had markedly decreased cell viability and TRIM3 expression. TRIM3 overexpression attenuated the H₂O₂-induced HLEC apoptosis, while TRIM3 knockdown promoted it. P53, a downstream target of TRIM3, was found to be negatively regulated by TRIM3 via ubiquitination in HLECs. Furthermore, p53 overexpression abolished the effect of TRIM3 overexpression on H₂O₂-induced HLEC apoptosis, while PFTα alleviated the TRIM3 knockdown-mediated HLEC apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that TRIM3 inhibited the H₂O₂-induced apoptosis of HLECs by decreasing p53 via ubiquitination.

Ratio of torus and equivalent power to refractive cylinder and spherical equivalent in phakic lenses - a Monte-Carlo simulation study

BACKGROUND

Spherical and astigmatic powers for phakic intraocular lenses are frequently calculated using fixed ratios of phakic lens refractive power to refractive spherical equivalent, and of phakic lens astigmatism to refractive cylinder. In this study, a Monte-Carlo simulation based on biometric data was used to investigate how variations in biometrics affect these ratios, in order to improve the calculation of implantable lens parameters.

METHODS

A data set of over sixteen thousand biometric measurements including axial length, phakic anterior chamber depth, and corneal equivalent and astigmatic power was used to construct a multidimensional probability density distribution. From this, we determined the axial position of the implanted lens and estimated the refractive spherical equivalent and refractive cylinder. A generic data model resampled the density distributions and interactions between variables, and the implantable lens power was determined using vergence propagation.

RESULTS

50 000 artificial data sets were used to calculate the phakic lens spherical equivalent and astigmatism required for emmetropization, and to determine the corresponding ratios for these two values. The spherical ratio ranged from 1.0640 to 1.3723 and the astigmatic ratio from 1.0501 to 1.4340. Both ratios are unaffected by the corneal spherical / astigmatic powers, or the refractive cylinder, but show strong correlation with the refractive spherical equivalent, mild correlation with the lens axial position, and moderate negative correlation with axial length. As a simplification, these ratios could be modelled using a bi-variable linear regression based on the first two of these factors.

CONCLUSION

Fixed spherical and astigmatic ratios should not be used when selecting high refractive power phakic IOLs as their variation can result in refractive errors of up to ±0.3 D for a 8 D lens. Both ratios can be estimated with clinically acceptable precision using a linear regression based on the refractive spherical equivalent and the axial position.

Comparing pentacam HR screening indices in different normal corneal thicknesses among refractive surgery candidates

Purpose:

To compare Pentacam indices in normal eyes with different corneal thicknesses.

Methods:

It is a retrospective observational study. Ninety-six normal eyes of 96 patients who were referred for refractive surgery in a tertiary university-based hospital from October 2015 to April 2019 were recruited consecutively. Corneal keratometry as well as Pentacam's software Belin-Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (BAD) parameters including pachymetry progression indices (PPIs), maximum Ambrosio's relational thickness (ART-max), corneal elevations, normalized deviations, BAD total deviation value (BAD-D), and anterior surface indices were measured by Pentacam HR (Type 70900). The included were classified as thin (26 eyes), average (45 eyes), and thick (25 eyes) corneas with the thinnest point thickness of ≤496 μm, 497–595 μm, and ≥596 μm, respectively. The specificities of all parameters were calculated based on routine cut-off values.

Results:

The refraction, keratometry, and elevations were not different (P > 0.05). All PPIs (minimum, average, and maximum) of thick corneas were significantly lower than average and thin corneas (P < 0.001). ART-max increased by thickening of the cornea (P < 0.001). BAD-D score and normalized indices of pachymetric parameters decreased with the increase of thickness (P < 0.001), while specificities of all indices increased with corneal thickening. More than 96% of thick corneas were classified as normal PPI-max (24/25), ART-max (25/25), and BAD-D (25/25), while nearly <54% of thin corneas (14/26 for PPI-max, 9/26 for ART-max, and 12/26 for BAD-D) were normal.

Conclusions:

The pachymetry-related indices and BAD-D were different among normal corneas with various thicknesses. The specificities of PPIs, ART-max, and BAD-D of thin corneas were lower than in thick corneas.

Do Gender, Age, Body Mass and Height Influence Eye Biometrical Properties in Young Adults? A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Do gender, age, body mass and height influence eye biometrical properties in young adults?

METHODS

A total of 155 eyes (92 female, 63 male) of healthy subjects between the ages of 18 and 39 years were included in the study. The subjects' gender and age were recorded, and their body mass, height and biometrical properties of the eyes were measured.

RESULTS

The male subjects had significantly thicker and flatter corneas and lower minimal rim-to-disk ratios than the female subjects did. In both genders, age showed strong, negative correlations with anterior chamber depth and pupil diameter and a positive correlation with lens thickness. We also found significant, negative correlations between body height and mass with keratometry measurements, negative correlations between body height and optic disk rim area and rim volume, and positive correlations between body mass and axial length in both genders.

CONCLUSIONS

Biometric eye parameters differ among people. In addition to age and gender, which are usually taken into consideration when interpreting ocular biometry findings, we strongly suggest that body height and mass should be also routinely considered when interpreting eye biometry data, as these factors have an impact on ocular biometry.

Refractive Outcomes in Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Conventional and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To investigate the refractive outcomes of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) following phacoemulsification.

Methods

This is a retrospective chart review of patients with FECD who underwent phacoemulsification. Manifest refraction at the early postoperative period (1–6 weeks) and late postoperative period (3–12 months) was collected. The spherical equivalent (SE) and variance of SE from target in diopters (D) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 219 eyes from 175 FECD patients (73 FLACS, 146 conventional phacoemulsification) were included. In the early postoperative period, when comparing variance from intended target, 62% (n=126) had a SE variance of ≤0.5 D, 22% (n=44) >0.5 D and ≤1 D, and 17% (n=34) >1 D. In the late postoperative period, 62% (n=85) had a SE variance of ≤0.5 D, 19% (n=26) >0.5 D and ≤1 D, and 20% (n=27) >1 D. There was no difference in the variance of SE comparing FLACS versus conventional phacoemulsification in either the early postoperative period (p=0.78) or the late postoperative period (p=0.29).

Conclusion

Patients with mild-to-moderate FECD had favorable refractive outcomes with phacoemulsification. There was no difference in refractive outcomes in eyes with FECD between the group that underwent FLACS versus the group that underwent conventional phacoemulsification.

Corneal aberrations measured with a high-resolution Scheimpflug tomographer: repeatability and reproducibility

PURPOSE

To evaluate the precision of elevation and wavefront aberration measurements with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).

SETTING

Flinders University, Australia.

DESIGN

Instrument evaluation study.

METHODS

A randomly selected eye of 100 participants was scanned twice with the Pentacam HR by 1 observer on the 3 measurement modes: 25-picture, 50-picture, and cornea fine. A second observer performed 2 scans on the same random eye with the 25-picture mode. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw) statistic from a 1-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

From the 100 scanned eyes, the higher-order aberration root mean square (RMS) repeatability limit for both elevation and wavefront, and anterior and posterior measurements was 0.03 μm for all 3 measurement modes. Anterior, posterior, and total corneal wavefront Zernike terms were highly precise, with most Zernike terms displaying a repeatability limit of 0.03 μm. The least repeatable measurement was the posterior elevation Zernike term with the 25-picture scan (repeatability limit 1.50 μm). The cornea fine measurement mode provided the most precise measurements. Reproducibility limits (second observer) were similar to repeatability limits with the 25-picture scan mode.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pentacam HR provided highly precise aberration outputs. The most precise measurements are achievable with the cornea fine measurement mode and wavefront aberrations. One should be cognizant of posterior elevation aberration precision, particularly for lower radial order and higher azimuthal frequency terms. Accounting for tilt and misalignment of aberrations, all RMS and Zernike aberrations were extremely precise (repeatability and reproducibility limit less than 0.000001 μm).

Evaluation of the Cataract Surgery 2018 Survey in Terms of Achieving Refractive Cataract Surgery Targets

Objectives

The aim of this study was to show at what rate the technological equipment used in cataract surgery by Turkish ophthalmologists and their knowledge are reflected in practice and how up to date they are.

Materials and Methods

A questionnaire conducted using SurveyMonkey was used to evaluate the answers to 17 questions from 823 members of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association. Results were evaluated in subgroups according to the participants' age, occupational status, institutions, and whether they conducted relevant academic activities, and the data were compared as inadequate, standard, and contemporary approaches according to the determined criteria.

Results

Optical biometry devices were used at rates of 77.7% and 67.3% for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations and keratometric measurements in preparation for cataract surgery, respectively. For IOL power calculation, third-generation formulas, especially the SRK-T, were used most commonly (46.2%), followed by second-generation formulas (21.9%), and fourth/fifth-generation formulas and multiple evaluations for different axial lengths (31.9%). The most common incision size was 2.8 mm (51.6%), while the percentage of 2.2 mm and shorter incisions considered to be neutral in terms of surgically induced astigmatism was 18.8%. When selecting incision location, approaches to reduce corneal astigmatism were reported by 28.9%, neutral approaches by 26.2%, and insensitive approaches by 44.9%. Additionally, 55.6% of participants never implanted toric IOLs and 50.7% did not use presbyopia-correcting IOLs. The proportion of surgeons who have experience with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was 10.3% and the rate of intracameral antibiotic injection at the end of the operation was 89.4%.

Conclusion

It was seen that Turkish cataract surgeons were able to use high technology for surgical preparation and surgery at high rates, but this was not reflected in practice at same rate in terms of achieving contemporary standards of refractive cataract surgery.

Intraocular Lens Power Formulas, Biometry, and Intraoperative Aberrometry: A Review

The refractive outcome of cataract surgery is influenced by the choice of intraocular lens (IOL) power formula and the accuracy of the various devices used to measure the eye (including intraoperative aberrometry [IA]). This review aimed to cover the breadth of literature over the previous 10 years, focusing on 3 main questions: (1) What IOL power formulas currently are available and which is the most accurate? (2) What biometry devices are available, do the measurements they obtain differ from one another, and will this cause a clinically significant change in IOL power selection? and (3) Does IA improve refractive outcomes? A literature review was performed by searching the PubMed database for articles on each of these topics that identified 1313 articles, of which 166 were included in the review. For IOL power formulas, the Kane formula was the most accurate formula over the entire axial length (AL) spectrum and in both the short eye (AL, ≤22.0 mm) and long eye (AL, ≥26.0 mm) subgroups. Other formulas that performed well in the short-eye subgroup were the Olsen (4-factor), Haigis, and Hill-radial basis function (RBF) 1.0. In the long-eye group, the other formulas that performed well included the Barrett Universal II (BUII), Olsen (4-factor), or Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment. All biometry devices delivered highly reproducible measurements, and most comparative studies showed little difference in the average measures for all the biometric variables between devices. The differences seen resulted in minimal clinically significant effects on IOL power selection. The main difference found between devices was the ability to measure successfully through dense cataracts, with swept-source OCT-based machines performing better than partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry devices. Intraoperative aberrometry generally improved outcomes for spherical and toric IOLs in eyes both with and without prior refractive surgery when the BUII and Hill-RBF, Barrett toric calculator, or Barrett True-K formulas were not used. When they were used, IA did not result in better outcomes.

Ocular biometry characteristics and corneal astigmatisms in cataract surgery candidates at a tertiary care center in North-East India

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine the ocular biometry characteristics and corneal astigmatisms using partial coherence laser interferometry in patients aged 40 years or above undergoing cataract surgery in a medical college in North-East India.

Methods

In a hospital-based cross-sectional study, ocular biometry characteristics such as axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW) diameter, corneal power (K), and corneal astigmatisms (D) of consecutive eligible cataract patients in a medical college in North-East India between January 2015 and December 2017 were determined using the intraocular lens (IOL) master. Height and weight were also measured.

Results

A cross-sectional study evaluated ocular biometry characteristics of 641 eyes in 641 eligible patients. The mean age was 64.04 ± 10.81 years. The mean AL, ACD, WTW, corneal power, IOL power, and body mass index (BMI) were 23.34 ± 1.12 mm, 3.12 ± 0.39 mm, 11.92 ± 0.54 mm, 44.41 ± 1.50 diopter (D), 20.53 ± 2.79 D, and 26.12 ± 4.32, respectively. Against-the-rule, with-the-rule, and oblique astigmatisms were 48.4%, 33.2%, and 18.4%, respectively. Corneal astigmatism of ≥1 D was found in 292 eyes (45.55%) and >1.5 D in 182 eyes (28.39%). AL had statistically significant correlation with ACD, WTW, K, IOL power, height and weight but not with age. By multivariate analysis, AL was found to be associated with ACD, WTW, K and IOL power (P ≤ 0.05). The mean AL was negatively correlated with the mean K (R-square 0.138).

Conclusion

This study is likely to provide the initial normative data for ocular biometry values in Indian adults 40 years or above, because such data is lacking in Indians using the IOL master. This will also help ophthalmologists in planning and improving the quality of surgical outcomes in phacoemulsification and phacorefractive surgeries by choosing the appropriate IOL and incision location.