1
|
Savage DE, Pantanelli SM. An update on intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2024; 35:34-43. [PMID: 37820078 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000001004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There is an ever-growing body of research regarding intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This review intends to summarize recent data and offer updated recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS Postmyopic LASIK/PRK eyes have the best refractive outcomes when multiple methods are averaged, or when Barrett True-K is used. Posthyperopic LASIK/PRK eyes also seem to do best when Barrett True-K is used, but with more variable results. With both aforementioned methods, using measured total corneal power incrementally improves results. For post-SMILE eyes, the first nontheoretical data favors raytracing. SUMMARY Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with prior laser refractive surgery are less accurate and more variable compared to virgin eyes. Surgeons may simplify their approach to IOL power calculations in postmyopic and posthyperopic LASIK/PRK by using Barrett True-K, and employing measured total corneal power when available. For post-SMILE eyes, ray tracing seems to work well, but lack of accessibility may hamper its adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E Savage
- Department of Ophthalmology, David and Ilene Flaum Eye Institute
- Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Seth M Pantanelli
- Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferguson TJ, Randleman JB. Cataract surgery following refractive surgery: Principles to achieve optical success and patient satisfaction. Surv Ophthalmol 2024; 69:140-159. [PMID: 37640272 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
A growing number of patients with prior refractive surgery are now presenting for cataract surgery. Surgeons face a number of unique challenges in this patient population that tends to be highly motivated to retain or regain functional uncorrected acuity postoperatively. Primary challenges include recognition of the specific type of prior surgery, use of appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas, matching IOL style with spherical aberration profile, the recognition of corneal imaging patterns that are and are not compatible with toric and/or presbyopia-correcting lens implantation, and surgical technique modifications, which are particularly relevant in eyes with prior radial keratotomy or phakic IOL implantation. Despite advancements in IOL power formulae, corneal imaging, and IOL options that have improved our ability to achieve targeted postoperative refractive outcomes, accuracy and predictability remain inferior to eyes that undergo cataract surgery without a history of corneal refractive surgery. Thus, preoperative evaluation of patients who will and will not be candidates for postoperative refractive surgical enhancements is also paramount. We provide an overview of the specific challenges in this population and offer evidence-based strategies and considerations for optimizing surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Bradley Randleman
- Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kermani O, Dick HB, Lubatschowski H. Femto-masking: laser-generated apertures to extend depth of focus and reduce optical aberrations in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022; 48:1095-1096. [PMID: 36026474 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Kermani
- From the Augenklinik am Neumarkt, Cologne, Germany (Kermani); University Eye Clinic, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany (Dick); ROWIAK GmbH, Hanover, Germany (Lubatschowski)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Small Aperture IC-8 Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164654. [PMID: 36012888 PMCID: PMC9409955 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction of small aperture IC-8 IOLs in cataract patients with or without prior ocular events. A systematic review of full-length original English studies reporting the visual results of small aperture IC-8 IOL implantation after cataract surgery in three databases, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The Quality Assessment Tool for case series studies from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute was used to analyze the quality of the studies selected. The search provided 543 articles, of which 22 were included in this systematic review. Significant improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA); uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA); uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA); perception of photic phenomena; and patient satisfaction have been reported. Unilateral and bilateral small aperture IC-8 IOL implantation reduces photic phenomena and provides good vision for all distances with high patient satisfaction and minimal postoperative complications. Therefore, the implantation of this IOL may be recommended for patients with cataracts, corneal irregularities and ocular trauma with partial aniridia.
Collapse
|
5
|
Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Łabuz G, Mayer CS, Khoramnia R. Presbyopia correction after previous Intracor treatment: Combined implantation of a small-aperture and a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus lens. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022; 25:101398. [PMID: 35198820 PMCID: PMC8844772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We present the case of implantation of two different Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses (EDoF IOLs) in a patient with a history of unilateral intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment for presbyopia correction (Intracor). OBSERVATIONS The patient reported decreasing visual acuity at near distance and increasing spectacle dependence. Ten years earlier, he had Intracor treatment for presbyopia correction in his left eye. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.08 logMAR for the right eye and 0.16 logMAR for the left eye. Apart from dysfunctional lens syndrome, the examination results were unremarkable. Phacoemulsification and subsequent IOL implantation was performed in both eyes. The left eye was implanted with an IC-8 (AcuFocus, Irvine, CA, USA), whereas the fellow eye was implanted with an AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA). Postoperatively, CDVA improved to 0.02 and 0.04 logMAR for the right and left eye. Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) was 0.24 logMAR for the right eye and -0.04 logMAR for the left eye, binocular UIVA was -0.04 logMAR. The patient reported a low level of photic phenomena and spectacle independence for far and intermediate distance. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE Combined implantation of a non-diffractive and a small-aperture EDoF lens after previous unilateral Intracor treatment could successfully improve visual acuity at far and intermediate distance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ramin Khoramnia
- Corresponding author. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kohnen T, Suryakumar R. Measures of visual disturbance in patients receiving extended depth-of-focus or trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47:245-255. [PMID: 32818348 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The degree of visual disturbance associated with a particular model of intraocular lens (IOL) depends on several factors, including IOL optic, material, and mechanics. Characterization of visual disturbance profiles is paramount for informing clinical IOL selection. Although many studies evaluating presbyopia-correcting IOLs include subjective assessment of visual symptoms, the types of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to capture these outcomes are inconsistent across studies, complicating data contextualization. Furthermore, some tools produce more meaningful results than others. This review presents a discussion on the scientific literature published on the subjective and semiobjective (halo and glare simulator, light-distortion analyzer, vision monitor, and halometers) methods used to assess visual disturbances in patients implanted with trifocal or extended depth-of-focus IOLs, highlighting their advantages and limitations. It underscores the importance of between-study comparisons and the need for standardized PROMs in clinical IOL research to provide more accurate information for IOL selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kohnen
- From the Department of Ophthalmology (Kohnen), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and Alcon Vision LLC (Suryakumar), Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There are several different approaches to handling regular and irregular astigmatism during cataract surgery, but still much debate on which solutions are most effective given unique patient circumstances. In this review, we examine recent literature and studies to highlight some of the most effective ways to plan preoperatively, manage regular and irregular astigmatism during cataract surgery, as well as managing postoperative complications. RECENT FINDINGS Recent developments in technology have provided increased courses of action for astigmatism management during cataract surgery. Additional options of toric IOLs with presbyopic platforms, light adjustable lenses, intraocular pinhole lenses, online technological tools and platforms, wavefront or topographic laser technology, and phototherapeutic keratectomy are all effective solutions to managing regular and irregular astigmatism. In this review, we will explore optimal approaches for unique situations. SUMMARY With increased technology, research, and methods, correcting regular and irregular astigmatism during cataract surgery is achievable in most patients. With in-depth preoperative planning, analysis of patient-specific factors, and a tailored approach, surgeons can obtain excellent uncorrected vision for patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hartmann M, Hamon L, Flockerzi E, Ardjomand N, Seitz B, Daas L. [Implantation of a small-aperture intraocular lens (IOL) in two patients with irregular astigmatism after keratorefractive surgery]. Ophthalmologe 2020; 118:1264-1266. [PMID: 33275175 PMCID: PMC8648680 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-020-01274-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Hartmann
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (UKS), Kirrbergerstr.100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
| | - L Hamon
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (UKS), Kirrbergerstr.100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| | - E Flockerzi
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (UKS), Kirrbergerstr.100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| | - N Ardjomand
- Sehzentrum für Augenlaser und Augenchirurgie, Graz, Österreich
| | - B Seitz
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (UKS), Kirrbergerstr.100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| | - L Daas
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (UKS), Kirrbergerstr.100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
September consultation #5. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46:1446-1447. [PMID: 33060481 DOI: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000721416.75901.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
10
|
Bilbao-Calabuig R, Gónzalez-López F, Llovet-Rausell A, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Tejerina Fernández V, Llovet-Osuna F. Lens-based surgical correction of presbyopia. Where are we in 2020? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 96:74-88. [PMID: 32868085 DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2020.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Presbyopia is the progressive and irreversible loss of accommodation due to aging. It is one of the main causes of loss of quality of life in people from 45 years of age, due to the, often novel, dependence on spectacles. The eagerness to correct it by ophthalmologists impulsed by the desire of millions of people who suffer from it, has become one of the main drivers for the development of intraocular lens (IOL) technology over the last twenty years. MATERIAL AND METHODS This review briefly presents the different alternatives that have allowed us to improve the crystalline lens surgical approach of presbyopia; from monofocal lenses and monovision technique, accommodative, refractive, and diffractive multifocal lenses, and finally the most recent extended depth of focus/field lenses known as EDOFs. RESULTS Each IOL has its advantages, limitations and disadvantages. Furthermore, there is no single lens that suits the needs of all patients. CONCLUSIONS It is necessary to know the variety of lenses available, and to have an in-depth understanding of their optical properties, as well as the impact that these will have later on their clinical performance and on the visual quality of the patients. This should help us to select the best alternative for each of them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bilbao-Calabuig
- Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Madrid, España.
| | - F Gónzalez-López
- Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Madrid, España
| | - A Llovet-Rausell
- Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Valencia, España; Servicio Oftalmología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - J Ortega-Usobiaga
- Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Bilbao, España
| | - V Tejerina Fernández
- Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Madrid, España
| | - F Llovet-Osuna
- Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Madrid, España; Unidad de Cirugía Refractiva y Cataratas, Clínica Baviera-Aier Hospital Eye Group, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Agarwal S, Thornell E. Spectacle Independence in Patients with Prior Radial Keratotomy Following Cataract Surgery: A Case Series. Int Med Case Rep J 2020; 13:53-60. [PMID: 32110119 PMCID: PMC7041612 DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s230863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess if post-keratorefractive patients can achieve spectacle independence following cataract surgery with currently available presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Patients and Methods Retrospective case series of unilateral implantation of the IC-8 IOL in two patients with history of bilateral myopic radial keratotomy (RK) and one patient with history of bilateral myopic RK and astigmatic keratotomy (AK), and bilateral implantation of AT Lisa 939M multifocal IOLs in one patient with previous history of RK and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Results Good uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity (VA) was achieved for most patients. Stereopsis and contrast sensitivity (CS) were maintained in patients that received the IC-8 IOLs, and two patients achieved full spectacle independence. The patient that received the trifocal lenses expressed satisfaction with their vision, but required long distance correction and experienced reduced CS. Conclusion The IC-8 and AT Lisa 939M IOLs both offer satisfactory results and reduced spectacle dependence in post-keratorefractive patients. However, it is recommended to properly counsel visual outcomes and patient expectations before commencing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Agarwal
- University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Wollongong Eye Specialist, Wollongong, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Charman WN, Liu Y, Atchison DA. Small-aperture optics for the presbyope: do comparable designs of corneal inlays and intraocular lenses provide similar transmittances to the retina? JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. A, OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION 2019; 36:B7-B14. [PMID: 31044949 DOI: 10.1364/josaa.36.0000b7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The near-vision performance of emmetropic presbyopes can be improved by the monocular surgical implantation of small-aperture corneal inlays or intraocular lenses that contain either an annular or circular stop to increase ocular depth of focus. Ray tracing is used to show that, although different stop designs and positions may produce similar axial imagery and increases in depth of focus, off-axis, the vignetting effects associated with the distance between the stop and the iris aperture result in different field dependences for the pupil transmittance. The implications of these effects, and of implanting a stop in only one eye, are discussed.
Collapse
|