Continuous intracameral phenylephrine–ketorolac irrigation for miosis prevention in femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery: Reduction in surgical time and iris manipulation

Surgical time and efficacy of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of the illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery in terms of shortening the surgical time in eyes with miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment.

METHODS

As retrospective study, three hundred thirty-six eyes of 336 consecutive patients who underwent the femtosecond laser and illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery were included. Cases with pupil less than 6 mm after femtosecond laser pretreatment were included in the miosis group. Pupil diameter, surgical time, and improved efficacy (100/surgical time×pupil size) were compared between eyes with and without miosis.

RESULTS

Of 336 eyes, 20 were included in the miosis group (6.0%). Pupil diameter was smaller in eyes with miosis than in those without miosis (5.23 ± 0.38 mm vs 7.35 ± 0.64 mm, p < 0.001); however, surgical time was not different (6.86 ± 0.73 min vs 6.60 ± 1.27 min, p = 0.071) between the two groups. Mechanical pupil dilations were not needed in any cases. As a result, improved efficacy was calculated to be higher in patients with miosis (2.83 vs 2.14, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In terms of surgical time and improved efficacy, using the illuminated chopper simplified cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment. The use of an illuminated chopper is expected to be a good solution for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeries.

Pharmacological management of intra-operative miosis during cataract surgery

Cataract surgery requires a well-dilated and stable pupil for a good outcome. Unexpected pupillary constriction during surgery increases the risk of complication. This problem is more pronounced in children. There are now pharmacological interventions that help tackle this unforeseen happening. Our review discusses the simple and quick options available to a cataract surgeon when faced with this dilemma. As cataract surgical techniques continue to improvise and get faster, an adequate pupil size is of paramount importance. Various topical and intra-cameral drugs are used in combination to achieve mydriasis. Despite good pre-operative dilation, the pupil can be quite unpredictable during surgery. Intra-operative miosis limits the field of surgery and increases the risk of complications. For example, if the pupil size decreases from 7 mm to 6 mm, this 1 mm change in pupil diameter will lead to a decrease of 10.2 mm2 in the area of surgical field. Making a good capsulorhexis with a small pupil can be a challenge, even for an experienced surgeon. Repeated touching of the iris increases the risk of fibrinous complications. Removal of cataract and the cortical matter becomes increasingly difficult. Intra-ocular lens implantation in the bag also requires adequate dilation. When dealing with challenging cases like lens subluxation, pseudo-exfoliation, and zonular dehiscence, a small pupil further increases the risk and adversely affects the surgical outcome. Hence, achieving and maintaining adequate mydriasis throughout surgery is essential. This review highlights the risk factors for small pupils during surgery and current management strategies.

Ocular Drug Delivery: a Comprehensive Review

The human eye is a sophisticated organ with distinctive anatomy and physiology that hinders the passage of drugs into targeted ophthalmic sites. Effective topical administration is an interest of scientists for many decades. Their difficult mission is to prolong drug residence time and guarantee an appropriate ocular permeation. Several ocular obstacles oppose effective drug delivery such as precorneal, corneal, and blood-corneal barriers. Routes for ocular delivery include topical, intravitreal, intraocular, juxtascleral, subconjunctival, intracameral, and retrobulbar. More than 95% of marketed products exists in liquid state. However, other products could be in semi-solid (ointments and gels), solid state (powder, insert and lens), or mixed (in situ gel). Nowadays, attractiveness to nanotechnology-based carries is resulted from their capabilities to entrap both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs, enhance ocular permeability, sustain residence time, improve drug stability, and augment bioavailability. Different in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo characterization approaches help to predict the outcomes of the constructed nanocarriers. This review aims to clarify anatomy of the eye, various ocular diseases, and obstacles to ocular delivery. Moreover, it studies the advantages and drawbacks of different ocular routes of administration and dosage forms. This review also discusses different nanostructured platforms and their characterization approaches. Strategies to enhance ocular bioavailability are also explained. Finally, recent advances in ocular delivery are described.

Pupil Status with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification: An Intraindividual Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare the pupil changes in low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with conventional phacoemulsification (CP) intraindividually.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective review of registered surgical data from patients that undergone uncomplicated cataract surgery in a single centre, with randomly assigned femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) to one eye and conventional phacoemulsification (CP) to the other, was performed. The recorded pupil images were evaluated at pre and post laser treatment (after suction release) and at several surgical timepoints for both techniques (FLACS and CP). Pupil areas were calculated and compared in the same eye undergone FLACS (pre vs post laser treatment), between eyes (CP vs FLACS) in the same patient and between groups. Subgroups were built regarding age and ocular comorbidity.

Results

This study involved a total of 164 eyes of 82 patients (55 female, 27 male). No statistical differences regarding the total duration of surgery (p=0.805) between FLACS and CP. Pupil measurements between pre and post laser treatment in the FLACS group showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.107). The mean change in pupil area from the beginning until the end of surgery (total variation) was 6.59±2.08 mm² in the FLACS group and 6.67±2.13 mm² in the CP group, associated to less narrowing of pupil area with FLACS, although not statistically significant (p=0.080). Comorbidity group analysis revealed less, but not significant, pupil narrowing with the FLACS technique (p=0.071). No statistically significant differences between FLACS and CP concerning age subgroups were registered.

Conclusion

This study shows no significant pupil changes, namely myosis, after low-energy FLACS pre-treatment. Comparison between techniques showed less pupil variation in FLACS as compared to CP, more markedly in eyes with comorbidities (particularly with shallow anterior chamber), although non-statistically significant.

Pain control and reduction of opioid use associated with intracameral phenylephrine1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% administered during cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare pain and the need for the opioid fentanyl use associated with the administration of phenylephrine 1.0%-ketorolac 0.3% (P/K) with those of epinephrine administration during cataract surgery.

SETTING

Ambulatory surgery center.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, self-controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients undergoing bilateral, topical anesthetic cataract surgery were randomized to receive either intracameral P/K or epinephrine in their balanced salt solution for the first eye and the other for the second eye, 2 weeks later. Fentanyl was used to manage intraoperative pain. The primary end point was the need for fentanyl administration intraoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain measurements; surgery duration; effective phacoemulsification time; pupil size; and complications.

RESULTS

112 eyes of 56 patients were enrolled. Significantly fewer eyes in the P/K group (7 [12.5%]) than in the epinephrine group (19 [33.9%]; P = .013) required intraoperative fentanyl administration. Mean pain scores were lower in the P/K group than those in the control group at all timepoints. For patients with no pain to mild pain (pain scores ≤ 3), 85.7% (n = 48) of the P/K group and 58.9% (n = 33) of the epinephrine group met this benchmark ( P = .003) intraoperatively. The combined outcome, the number of patients not receiving intravenous fentanyl and experiencing no pain to mild pain, was significantly higher in the study (82.1%, n = 46) than in the control group (58.9%, n = 33; P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

P/K administration significantly reduced pain and the need for fentanyl use. Using P/K is a practical way for cataract surgeons to provide better patient care and reduce the need for intraoperative opioids.

[Historical development of energetic cataract surgery]

This article reviews scientific literature analyzing the history of ultrasound and laser phaco surgery of combined or isolated designs: erbium YAG laser, 1.064 μm Nd:YAG laser for dissection of the lens capsule and nucleus, exclusively-laser technique of lens destruction with 1.44 µm Nd:YAG laser without manual, vacuum or ultrasonic action, femtosecond laser assistance with automated transcorneal delivery of radiation into the eye cavity.

Recent advances in ophthalmic preparations: Ocular barriers, dosage forms and routes of administration

The human eye is a complex organ with unique anatomy and physiology that restricts the delivery of drugs to target ocular tissues/sites. Recent advances in the field of pharmacy, biotechnology and material science have led to development of novel ophthalmic dosage forms which can provide sustained drug delivery, reduce dosing frequency and improve the ocular bioavailability of drugs. This review highlights the different anatomical and physiological factors which affect ocular bioavailability of drugs and explores advancements from 2016 to 2020 in various ophthalmic preparations. Different routes of drug administration such as topical, intravitreal, intraocular, juxtascleral, subconjunctival, intracameral and retrobulbar are discussed with their advances and limitations.

Safety and efficacy data supporting U.S. FDA approval of intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% for pediatric cataract surgery: clinical safety and pupil and pain management

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of phenylephrine and ketorolac (PE/K) 1.0%/0.3% compared with phenylephrine (PE) 1.0% in children aged 0 to 3 years undergoing cataract surgery. The effect of PE/K to PE on intraoperative pupil diameter and postoperative pain were also compared.

SETTING

Multicenter study in the United States.

DESIGN

Randomized double-masked phase 3 clinical trial.

METHODS

This study was powered to assess safety only. Depending on randomization, 4 mL of PE/K 1.0%/0.3% or PE 1.0% was injected into the surgical irrigation solution. Safety endpoints were assessed up to 90 days postoperatively. From surgical videos, a masked central reader measured the change in pupil diameter from immediately prior to incision to wound closure. Postoperative pain was measured using Alder Hey Triage Pain Score at 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, and 24 hours following wound closure and recorded by parent/caregiver.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients received masked intervention. There were no notable changes in vital signs or ophthalmological complications in either group. Mean change in pupil diameter was similar between PE/K 1.0%/0.3% and PE 1.0% (mean difference in area under the curve -0.071; P = .599). Postoperative ocular pain scores and overall mean scores were lower in PE/K group at all individual time points, and differences in overall mean scores were statistically significant at 6 and 24 hours (P = .029 and 0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PE/K 1.0%/0.3% was safe for use in children and maintained mydriasis during cataract surgery. Postoperative pain levels were lower in the PE/K 1.0%/0.3% group.

Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery after 10 years of clinical application

INTRODUCTION

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has been considered a technological advance in modern cataract surgery. After years of experience, it has been observed that clinical outcomes had more complications than expected at the beginning. The aim of this study is to compare the benefits and disadvantages of the FLACS technique with conventional cataract surgery.

METHOD

The PubMed and Web of Science platforms were used to search for scientific literature.

RESULTS

The FLACS has currently improved the surgical technique in terms of the shorter ultrasound time used and the lower loss of endothelial cells. Likewise, the centration of capsulotomy and the correction of astigmatism with arcuate incisions have also been improved. As disadvantages, are the high cost of the laser, the intraoperative capsular complications, the induction of intraoperative myosis, and the learning curve of the technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLACS technique is considered beneficial for specific cases, such as patients with scheduled premium surgery, or with low endothelial cell count. However, it is believed that given the technological cost it is not a cost effective technique for most standard cases in our daily clinical practice.

The benefits and drawbacks of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was believed to revolutionize cataract surgery. However, the judgment of clinical benefit was found to be far more complex than initially might have been thought. The aim of this review was to analyze the benefits and drawbacks of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with traditional phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

METHODS

PubMed and the Web of Science were used to search the medical literature. The following keywords were searched in various combinations: femtosecond laser, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, phacoemulsification cataract surgery, FLACS.

RESULTS

The benefits of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery include lower cumulated phacoemulsification time and endothelial cell loss, perfect centration of the capsulotomy, and opportunity to perform precise femtosecond-assisted arcuate keratotomy incisions. The major disadvantages of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery are high cost of the laser and the disposables for surgery, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery-specific intraoperative capsular complications, as well as the risk of intraoperative miosis and the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery seems to be beneficial in some groups of patients, that is, with low baseline endothelial cell count, or those planning to receive multifocal intraocular lens. Nevertheless, having considered that the advantages of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery might not be clear in every routine case, it cannot be considered as cost-effective.

Effect Of Intracameral Phenylephrine And Ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% On Intraoperative Pain And Opioid Use During Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To compare the effect of Omidria (phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3%) vs epinephrine on pain reduction and opioid usage during cataract surgery.

Patients and methods

Sixty patients at a single center underwent femtosecond laser (FLACS) or conventional phacoemulsification under topical lidocaine gel anesthesia and intracameral preservative-free lidocaine 1%. Eligible participants were prospectively assigned to receive either intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% or intracameral epinephrine. All patients received standardized pre- and post-operative topical therapy. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl was administered for ocular discomfort in patients who complained of intraoperative pain. Outcome measures included both pain (measured by mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain)) and the use of IV fentanyl during surgery. A composite endpoint identified “responders” as being patients who: (1) did not require fentanyl and (2) experienced no to minimal pain (VAS score ≤ 3).

Results

Forty-one patients were in the phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% (study) group and 19 were in the epinephrine (control) group. Mean VAS pain scores were significantly (48.9%) lower in the study group than the control group (2.3 vs 4.5; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with VAS scores ≤ 3 was significantly greater in the study group (85.0%) than the control group (31.6%) (P < 0.0001). A smaller proportion of patients required intraoperative fentanyl in the study group compared to the control group (9.8% vs 42.1%; P = 0.006). For the composite endpoint, patients receiving phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% were 94% less likely to require fentanyl or to have moderate-to-severe pain (pain VAS ≥ 4; OR, 0.06; 95% CI 0.02–0.24) than patients receiving epinephrine.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the routine use of intracameral phenylephrine and ketorolac 1.0%/0.3% during cataract surgery can significantly reduce patient pain as well as the need for opioids.

Changes in Pupil Area during Low-energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To study the potential changes in pupil area within low-energy femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

Methods

A retrospective assessment of the pupil size was performed in the eyes undergoing FLACS using the Ziemer LDV Z8. We measured the pupil diameters as part of the images taken preoperatively and at the completion of laser pretreatment (after releasing the suction). We calculated the pupil area in 40 eyes of 40 patients (14 right and 26 left eyes). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age of the patients was 74 ± 7.4 years (range: 51-87). Paired t-test was used for statistical analyses. Subgroups were built with reference to age and preoperative pupil area (smaller than or equal to the median versus larger than the median).

Results

The mean ± SD axial length, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance and lens thickness were 24.01 ± 1.47, 3.23 ± 0.4, 11.97 ± 0.49, and 4.59 ± 0.41 mm, respectively. The mean ± SD pupil area was 39.33 ± 7.1 mm 2 preoperatively and 39.3 ± 6.75 mm 2 after laser pretreatment. The mean ± SD change in pupil area was -0.03 ± 2.12 mm 2 . There were no statistically significant changes between preoperative and post-laser pupil areas (P = 0.93, 95% CI: -0.71 to 0.65). Comparisons within subgroups also did not detect pupil area reduction.

Conclusion

This study did not detect statistically significant changes in pupil area after laser pretreatment using low-energy FLACS. This observation is in contrast to previous studies using other laser platforms.