Outcomes of trabecular microbypass surgery: Comparison of resident trainees and attending surgeons

Angle-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in normal tension glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively examines the efficacy of angle-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

A literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library from inception until 20 December 2022. Pilot, cohort, observational studies and randomised controlled trials including at least 5 subjects undergoing angle-based MIGS (trabecular-bypass devices, excisional trabeculotomy, goniotomy and ab-interno canaloplasty) for NTG, with or without cataract surgery, were included. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome using the meta routine in R version 2022.12.0+353 was performed to determine mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and anti-glaucoma medication (AGM) reduction post-operatively.

RESULTS

Of the 846 studies initially identified, 15 studies with a pooled total of 367 eyes which underwent combined phacoemulsification and angle-based MIGS were included for final meta-analysis. Outcomes of the iStent were reported in 5 studies, iStent inject in 7 studies, Hydrus Microstent in 1 study, Kahook Dual Blade in 3 studies, and Trabectome in 2 studies. There was significant reduction in both IOP and AGM post-operatively at 6 months (2.44 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.83-3.06; 1.21 AGM, 95%CI: 0.99-1.44), 12 months (2.28 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.71-2.84; 1.18 AGM, 95%CI: 0.90-1.47), 24 months (2.10 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.51-2.68; 1.26 AGM, 95%CI: 0.85-1.68) and 36 months (2.43 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.71-3.15, 0.87 AGM, 95%CI: 0.21-1.53) (all p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis on combined phacoemulsification-iStent inject surgery demonstrated a reduction in both IOP (2.31 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.07-3.56, p < 0.001) and AGM (1.07 AGM, 95%CI: 0.86-1.29, p < 0.001) at 12 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Angle-based MIGS combined with phacoemulsification effectively reduces IOP and AGM in NTG eyes for up to 36 months after surgery.

Comparative evaluation of iStent versus iStent inject W combined with phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the 12-month post-operative outcomes of iStent and iStent inject W (inject W), and the factors associated with their success in open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective comparative case series evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent iStent (comprising 1 stent) or inject W (comprising 2 stents) implantation with cataract surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma between January 2019 and March 2022. The 12-month post-operative efficacy outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medications, and survival analysis of the probability of success. "Failure" was defined as any of the following conditions compared to baseline: 1) IOP elevation, 2) increased glaucoma medication, or 3) IOP decline not exceeding 20% when glaucoma medication scores were comparable, and 4) need for additional glaucoma surgery. The safety outcomes included intra- and post-operative adverse events and changes in the best-corrected visual acuity and visual field.

RESULTS

The study comprised 55 eyes in the iStent and 105 in the inject W groups. At 12 months, treatment success was achieved in 66.0% of iStent and 78.4% of inject W eyes. The mean IOP was lower, and the percent reduction from baseline was equal in iStent-treated eyes (8.0% reduction, 14.8 mmHg to 13.7 mmHg, P<0.01) and inject W-treated eyes (11.9% reduction, 15.0 mmHg to 13.8 mmHg, P<0.01) (between-group comparison, P = 0.23). The mean medication burden decreased significantly from 2.5 to 1.1 for iStent (55.0% reduction, P<0.01) and 2.9 to 1.7 for iStent inject (46.8% reduction, P<0.01), with no significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.17). Both devices exhibited excellent safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices significantly reduced IOP and glaucoma medication 12 months post-operatively. The outcome measures did not differ significantly between the two groups, and lower baseline IOP was predictive of surgical failure.

Prospective Study of Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Performed by Trainees

Purpose

To evaluate outcomes of new adopters of the OMNI® Surgical System (Sight Sciences, Inc.) by prospectively evaluating intermediate-term outcomes of patients operated by trainees.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective study of surgeries performed by trainees on patients with open angle glaucoma undergoing simultaneous cataract surgery and ab interno canaloplasty and trabeculotomy using the OMNI Surgical System. Pre-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications were recorded. Only patients with a minimum of 6-month follow up were included. Baseline IOP was used to separate subjects into two groups: Group 1 (IOP ≥18 mmHg) and Group 2 (IOP <18 mmHg). Mean decrease in IOP and medications was calculated and compared with paired t-tests for the overall sample as well as the subgroups. Success was defined as those with a ≥20% reduction from pre-operative IOP or with an IOP ≤18 mmHg and ≥6 mmHg and on the same or fewer number of medications while not requiring additional surgery. Adverse events were also recorded.

Results

Forty-two eyes of 31 patients were included. Mean pre-operative IOP was 17.2 ± 4.8 mmHg and mean number of medications was 2.4 ± 1.2. The primary endpoint was reached in 83.3% of patients at 12 months. IOP was reduced by 22.3% to 13.4 ± 2.4 (p<0.001). Mean number of medications decreased to 1.7 ± 1.6 (p<0.001). Group 1 mean IOP decreased 35.4% from 22.2 ± 4.6 mmHg to 14.3 ± 2.8 mmHg (p<0.001). Group 2 mean number of medications decreased from 2.3 ± 1.1 to 1.6 ± 1.5 (p<0.001).

Conclusion

When operated on by the novice MIGS surgeon, the OMNI device provides effective IOP and glaucoma medication reduction with minimal adverse events. Efficacy and safety of the device in the hands of trainees was comparable to experienced glaucoma surgeons suggesting its ease of adoption.

Microfluidics in the eye: a review of glaucoma implants from an engineering perspective

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy in the eye, which is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and currently affects over 70 million individuals. Clinically, intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction is the only proven treatment to halt the progression of glaucoma. Microfluidic devices such as glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices are routinely used by ophthalmologists to manage elevated IOP, by creating an artificial pathway for the over-accumulated aqueous humor (AH) in a glaucomatous eye, when the natural pathways are severely blocked. Herein, a detailed modelling and analysis of both the natural microfluidic pathways of the AH in the eye and artificial microfluidic pathways formed additionally by the various glaucoma implants are conducted to provide an insight into the causes of the IOP abnormality and the improvement schemes of current implant designs. The mechanisms of representative glaucoma implants have been critically reviewed from the perspective of microfluidics, and we have categorized the current implants into four groups according to the targeted drainage sites of the AH, namely Schlemm's canal, suprachoroidal space, subconjunctival space, and ocular surface. In addition, we propose to divide the development and evolution of glaucoma implant designs into three technological waves, which include microtube (1st), microvalve (2nd) and microsystem (3rd). With the emerging trends of minimal invasiveness and artificial intelligence in the development of medical implants, we envision that a comprehensive glaucoma treatment microsystem is on the horizon, which is featured with active and wireless control of IOP, real-time continuous monitoring of IOP and aqueous rate, etc. The current review could potentially cast light on the unmatched needs, challenges, and future directions of the microfluidic structural and functional designs of glaucoma implants, which would enable an enhanced safety profile, reduced complications, increased efficacy of lowering IOP and reduced IOP fluctuations, closed-loop and on-demand control of IOP, etc.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges

The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.

Safety and Efficacy of Resident-Performed Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy

PRCIS

GATT can be performed efficaciously and safely by PGY-3 and PGY-4 residents, with clinical outcomes and complication rates that mirror those of attending-performed GATT cohorts from the literature.

PURPOSE

Report outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) performed by PGY-3 and PGY-4 residents.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing resident-performed GATT. Eyes with previous traditional glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy or aqueous shunt) or neovascular glaucoma were excluded from this analysis. The primary aim was to assess whether resident-performed GATTs demonstrated success rates comparable with the GATT literature. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP)<21 mmHg, and an IOP reduction of 20% from baseline, and no subsequent IOP-lowering surgery. The secondary and tertiary aims were to describe complication rates and operating times for resident-performed GATTs, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 50 eyes from 40 patients with various types of glaucoma were included. Eyes either underwent resident-performed GATT-alone (N=9) or GATT+cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CEIOL) (N=41). The surgical success rate at 6 months was 71% for GATT-alone and 42% for GATT+CEIOL. Three eyes required subsequent IOP-lowering surgery. The hyphema rate was 16% at postoperative week 1 and 6% at postoperative month 1. The IOP spike (>30 mmHg) rate was 18%. Mean surgical time for both GATT-alone and GATT+CEIOL was longer for PGY-4s than for PGY-3s, attributable to less attending assistance during PGY-4 cases and more resident-performed cataracts in PGY-4 GATT+CEIOL cases (85%) compared with PGY-3 cases (35%).

CONCLUSIONS

GATT can be performed efficaciously and safely by PGY-3 and PGY-4 residents, with clinical outcomes and complication rates that mirror those of attending-performed GATT cohorts from the literature.

Effect of Resident Involvement in Ophthalmic Surgery on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of resident- vs attending-led surgeries on patient outcomes in ophthalmic surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Two independent authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2022. Categorical data from studies were pooled to report odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. Continuous data were analyzed to yield standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs. Propensity-matched studies were analyzed separately. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis. Seventeen of the 20 outcomes had no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. Notably, many critical cataract surgery-related outcomes showed no significant differences, including posterior capsular tear, lens fragment retainment, and retinal detachment. Among propensity-scored studies, the resident-led surgeries had longer operative duration (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.29, 1.33; 3 studies [260 patients], I² = 74%) and had an increased risk of an unplanned return to the operating room (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.31, 5.06; 4 studies [342 patients], I² = 0%). Among 2 non-propensity-scored, resident-led surgeries had increased incidence of choroidal detachment or choroidal effusion (OR 2.28, 95% 1.02, 5.09; 2 studies [401 patients], I² = 19%). No significant difference was found for ocular hypotony. Significant heterogeneity existed among propensity-scored studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident-led surgeries appear overall safe, effective, and comparable to attending-led surgeries with respect to commonly encountered perioperative complications. Specific differences in outcomes exhibit significant heterogeneity and small sample sizes, and may be of unclear or equivocal clinical significance.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Where Is the Evidence?

PURPOSE

The last decade has witnessed an unprecedented growth in glaucoma treatment options through the introduction of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS). The aim of the present review is to provide an understanding of the currently available MIGS and to examine what data are currently available to guide treatment choice.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized and non-randomized control trials.

METHODS

Out of 2567 articles identified, a total of 77 articles were retained for analysis, including 28 comparative studies and 12 randomized control trials. Overall, 7570 eyes were included. When data permitted, the weighted mean difference in intraocular pressure reduction was calculated for comparison purposes.

RESULTS

Weighted mean intraocular pressure reductions from all analyzed studies were: 15.3% (iStent), 29.1% (iStent inject), 36.2% (ab interno canaloplasty), 34.4% (Hydrus), 36.5% (gonioscopically-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy), 24.0% (trabectome), 25.1% (Kahook dual blade), 30.2% (Cypass), 38.8% (XEN), and 50.0% (Preserflo).

CONCLUSIONS

One of the advantages of the heterogenous range of available MIGS options is the chance to tailor therapy in an individualized manner. However, high-quality data are required to make this choice more than an educated guess. Overall, this review confirms the efficiency of assessed MIGS compared with standalone phacoemulsification, but it highlights that only few studies compare different MIGS techniques and even fewer assess MIGS against criterion standard treatments. Current evidence, while non-negligible, is mostly limited to heterogenous nonrandomized studies and uncontrolled retrospective comparisons, with few quality randomized control trials. We suggest that future research should be comparative and include relevant comparators, standardized to report key outcome features, long-term to assess sustainability and late complications, and ideally randomized.