Role of Xpert MTB/RIF in Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of sputum-scarce, suspected Pulmonary TB patients

Determination of the diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis

PURPOSE

The early and efficient diagnosis of patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for PTB diagnosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples and compared it with other techniques such as acid-fast bacilli smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and CapitalBio Mycobacterium reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (MTB RT-PCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 195 patients with suspected PTB who were admitted to our hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these assays were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of nanopore sequencing were 90.70%, 84.85%, 92.13%, 82.35%, and 0.88; those of acid-fast bacilli smear were 12.40%, 98.48%, 94.12%, 36.52%, and 0.55; those of culture were 36.43%, 100%, 100%, 44.59%, and 0.68; those of Xpert MTB/RIF were 41.09%, 100%, 100%, 46.48%, and 0.71; and those of CapitalBio MTB RT-PCR were 34.88%, 98.48%, 97.83%, 43.62%, and 0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nanopore sequencing assay using BALF samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy for sputum-scarce PTB. Moreover, it can improve the clinical diagnosis of PTB.

Correlation of Cyclic Threshold Values Generated by GeneXpert Ultra MTB/RIF and Fluorescence Microscopy to Predict Mycobacterial Burden in Suspected Cases of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli visualization is important to assess the infectivity rate in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), but it has limited sensitivity; hence, it is important to find an alternative strategy. The aim of our study was to compare the fluorescence microscopy grading by Auramine O phenol staining technique of respiratory samples with the cyclic threshold (Ct) values of GeneXpert Ultra (Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin [MTB/RIF]) and assess the diagnostic efficacy of GeneXpert Ultra (MTB/RIF) compared to microscopy in suspected cases of PTB.

METHODS

The study was conducted in the Mycobacteriology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, in Kasturba Hospital, Manipal. The study was a prospective, single-centered, cross-sectional study. Four hundred and fifty-two respiratory samples were included in the study. An optimal Ct cutoff value for ruling smear-positivity and smear-negativity and the mean Ct cutoff value were calculated. Clinical and radiological data from the requisition forms were assessed. IBM SPSS statistics software version 22 was used. The correlation between GeneXpert Ultra (MTB/RIF) Ct values and smear status was calculated by polychoric correlation. The extended McNemar's test was used to find the association between the variables.

RESULTS

GeneXpert Ultra (MTB/RIF) yielded a higher positivity rate of 22.2% compared to smear microscopy 17.2%. Ct value and smear grading yielded a positive correlation (P = 0.8681; P < 0.05). GeneXpert Ultra (MTB/RIF) yielded nontuberculous mycobacteria in five undetected cases and speciated as Mycobacterium abscessus complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the GeneXpert Ultra (MTB/RIF) Ct value levels as a predictor of smear positivity.

GeneXpert analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples: promising diagnostic modality in patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

Purpose

The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples with GeneXpert test in diagnosis of TB in smear-negative patients.

Method

One-hundred sixty-nine cases were included in this study, as they had a radiological finding suggested to have pulmonary tuberculosis, while the sputum direct smear examination for acid-fast bacilli was negative. All cases prepared to do fiber-optic bronchoscope with bronchoalveolar lavage collection after their consent and post bronchoscope sputum collection for further molecular and microbiological examination.

Results

The combined diagnostic yield of all bronchoscopy procedures was 15.97% (27 cases of 169) and the final diagnosis of TB cases was established in 16 cases of 169 (9.4%) using BAL culture and in 20 cases of 169 (11.83%) by GeneXpert methods. Post bronchoscope direct sputum examination, culture, and GeneXpert evaluation gave diagnostic yield about 1.1%, 5.5%, and 7.1%, respectively. The specificity of GeneXpert examination of BAL and post bronchoscope sputum was 95.42% and 97.38%, respectively.

Conclusion

Early detection of pulmonary tuberculosis using fiber-optic bronchoscope BAL examination and post bronchoscope sputum with GeneXpert method promotes the accurate decision to start antituberculous therapy in patients with smear negative.

Review and Updates on the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Diagnosis of tuberculosis, and especially the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, still faces challenges in clinical practice. There are several reasons for this. Methods based on the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) are insufficiently sensitive, methods based on the detection of Mtb-specific immune responses cannot always differentiate active disease from latent infection, and some of the serological markers of infection with Mtb are insufficiently specific to differentiate tuberculosis from other inflammatory diseases. New tools based on technologies such as flow cytometry, mass spectrometry, high-throughput sequencing, and artificial intelligence have the potential to solve this dilemma. The aim of this review was to provide an updated overview of current efforts to optimize classical diagnostic methods, as well as new molecular and other methodologies, for accurate diagnosis of patients with Mtb infection.

Additional Usefulness of Bronchoscopy in Patients with Initial Microbiologically Negative Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analysis of a Korean Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Bronchoscopy is widely used for microbiological diagnosis of patients with minimal sputum production. However, the usefulness of bronchoscopy in patient groups who benefit from subsequent microbiological confirmation has not been established.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed Korean tuberculosis (TB) cohort data from September 2018 to October 2019 to evaluate the usefulness of bronchoscopy in patients with microbiologically negative pulmonary TB (based on initial sputum polymerase chain reaction and culture results). The primary outcome was the proportion of microbiological diagnoses made after bronchoscopy. Secondary outcomes were the predictors of microbiological confirmation and the percentage of additional resistance detection after bronchoscopy.

Results

A total of 5194 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary TB, 937 of whom were microbiologically negative for pulmonary TB based on the initial sputum findings. Of these, 319 patients underwent bronchoscopy, and further microbiological confirmation was achieved in 157 (49.1%) patients. The predictors of microbiological confirmation after bronchoscopy were age >65 years, female sex, and low body mass index (BMI). The rate of additional resistance detection was 10.5% (multidrug resistant/rifampin-resistant 3.8%; isoniazid-resistant 5.7%).

Conclusion

Bronchoscopy can be used for the detection of resistant pathogens. Bronchoscopy should be considered for microbiologically negative pulmonary TB in women aged >65 years and with low BMI for subsequent microbiological confirmation.

Diagnostic value of bronchoscopy in sputum-negative pulmonary tuberculosis patients and its correlation with clinicoradiological features

CONTEXT:

Tuberculosis (TB) remains endemic in Saudi Arabia. Little local data have been reported on bronchoscopic evaluation of sputum-negative pulmonary TB patients, which poses a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

AIMS:

To determine the diagnostic value of bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and its correlation with clinical and radiological features in sputum-negative, culture-confirmed pulmonary TB patients.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with definite or probable pulmonary TB with overall negative (smear and/or polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) or scanty sputum that had undergone bronchoscopy with BAL over a period of 5 years. Patients’ symptoms, radiological features, lung lobe lavaged, BAL acid-fast bacilli (AFB) stain, Mycobacterium TB (MTB)-PCR, and mycobacterial cultures were analyzed. Mycobacterial cultures (either sputum or BAL) were used as a reference standard.

RESULTS:

Out of 154 patients, 49 (32%) were overall sputum negative and underwent a diagnostic bronchoscopy. Dry cough and fever were the most common symptoms. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus was the most frequent comorbidity identified in 15 (31%) patients. Fifty-nine percent of the patients had diffuse lung infiltrates, with consolidation being the most common abnormality (41%), followed by cavitation (39%). Right upper lobe was the most frequent lung lobe lavaged (31%), while transbronchial lung biopsies (TBLB) were obtained in 21 (43%). BAL mycobacterial culture and MTB PCR were positive in 35 (71%) and 23 (47%) patients, respectively. Combined BAL MTB PCR and TBLB provided rapid diagnosis in 28 (57%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

An overall diagnostic yield of 90% was achieved with combined use of BAL MTB PCR, culture, and histopathology. Upper lobe lavage and presence of cavities on chest imaging had a higher diagnostic yield.

Efficacy of the Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin assay for diagnosing sputum-smear negative or sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate he diagnostic performance of the Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/Rifampin (MTB/RIF) assay in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data from 671 sputum-smear negative or sputum-scarce adult patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) who had an Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed on BALF. The diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, smear microscopy (SM) and MTB culture was evaluated using MTB culture or final clinical diagnosis as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Compared with MTB culture, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.8% and 72.7% for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and 11.0% and 99.2% for SM, respectively. Compared with final diagnosis, diagnostic performance was 58.9% and 83.9% for the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, 5.0% and 98.3% for SM, and 43.3% and 100% for culture, for sensitivity and specificity respectively. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay had low specificity and high sensitivity. When very low results were re-evaluated and considered MTB-negative, the specificity increased significantly. The sensitivity remained higher than SM and was similar to that of culture.

CONCLUSIONS

The Xpert MTB/RIF assay adds microbiologic evidence to clinical decisions; however, close attention should be paid to very low semi-quantitative positive results.

Value of Xpert MTB/RIF Using Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains unclear. Therefore, a systematic review/meta-analysis was conducted. Studies published before 31 December 2019 were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the keywords "pulmonary tuberculosis," "Xpert MTB/RIF," and "BAL." Two independent evaluators extracted the data and assessed the bias risk of the included studies. A random-effects model was used to calculate the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR, respectively), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC), as well as the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nineteen trials involving 3,019 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the culture method, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and the AUC with 95% CIs of Xpert MTB/RIF were 0.87 (0.84 to 0.90), 0.92 (0.91 to 0.93), 10.21 (5.78 to 18.02), 0.16 (0.12 to 0.22), 78.95 (38.59 to 161.53), and 0.9467 (0.9462 to 0.9472), respectively. Relative to the composite reference standard, the observed values were 0.69 (0.65 to 0.72), 0.98 (0.98 to 0.99), 37.50 (18.59 to 75.62), 0.30 (0.21 to 0.43), 171.98 (80.82 to 365.96), and 0.9691 (0.9683 to 0.9699), respectively. All subgroups, except children, showed high sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the use of Xpert MTB/RIF in the context of BAL samples has a high diagnostic performance for PTB (except for children) and may serve as an alternative rapid diagnostic tool.

Combined tests with Xpert MTB/RIF assay with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increasing the diagnostic performance of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Eastern China

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health threat. Misdiagnosis and delayed therapy of sputum smear-negative TB can affect the treatment outcomes and promote pathogen transmission. The application of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) has been recommended but needs clinical evidence. We carried out a prospective study in the Nanjing Public Health Medical Center from September 2018 to August 2019. Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients were enrolled in the study if they had negative results of sputum smear. We compared the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in sputum and BALF using sputum culture as the reference. In addition to this, we applied parallel tests using sputum culture, sputum-based Xpert MTB/RIF assay and BALF-based Xpert MTB/RIF assay to jointly detect smear-negative PTB using clinical diagnosis as the reference. With mycobacterial culture as the reference standard, Xpert MTB/RIF of BALF showed a higher sensitivity (14/16, 87.5%), but a relatively lower specificity (57/92, 62.0%). Xpert MTB/RIF of sputum showed relatively lower sensitivity (6/10, 60.0%) and higher specificity (63/88, 71.6%). Compared with sputum culture, Xpert MTB /RIF assay reduced the median detection time of MTB from 30 to 0 days, which significantly shortened the diagnosis time of the smear-negative TB patients. Among the combined detections, the positive detection proportion was improved with significant differences comparing with sputum culture only, from 11.1% (10/90) to 46.7% (42/90) (P < 0.05). Our study showed Xpert MTB/RIF in BALF had a better performance in detecting MTB of smear-negative patients.

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection test and the first-generation Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). In this retrospective study of smear-negative PTB, we reviewed patient medical records to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test (positive result for either of the Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection tests) to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy against a composite reference standard. In total, 1553 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 57.1%, 92.9%, 81.1%, 95.9%, and 0.75; 53.4%, 97.7%, 98.6%, 41.5%, and 0.76; and 66.2%, 90.8%, 95.5%, 47.7%, and 0.79, respectively. For the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens, these values for Xpert MTB/RIF, CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test, and the parallel test were 68.8%, 97.7%, 99.2%, 43.9%, and 0.83; 61.7%, 97.7%, 99.1%, 38.9%, and 0.80; and 77.0%, 95.5%, 98.6%, 50.9%, and 0.86, respectively. CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test had moderate accuracy for smear-negative PTB, similar to Xpert MTB/RIF. The parallel test improved the sensitivity. BALF significantly improved the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of the test. The maximum diagnostic accuracy for smear-negative PTB was obtained with the parallel test and BALF specimens. BALF was the most effective specimen for diagnosing smear-negative PTB.

Which sample type is better for Xpert MTB/RIF to diagnose adult and pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis?

Objective: This review aimed to identify proper respiratory-related sample types for adult and pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), respectively, by comparing performance of Xpert MTB/RIF when using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), induced sputum (IS), expectorated sputum (ES), nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs), and gastric aspiration (GA) as sample.

Methods: Articles were searched in Web of Science, PubMed, and Ovid from inception up to 29 June 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated, each with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment and heterogeneity evaluation across included studies were performed.

Results: A total of 50 articles were included. The respective sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI: 0.84–0.89), 91% (95% CI: 0.90–0.92) and 95% (95% CI: 0.93–0.97) in the adult BAL group; 90% (95% CI: 0.88–0.91), 98% (95% CI: 0.97–0.98) and 97% (95% CI: 0.95–0.99) in the adult ES group; 86% (95% CI: 0.84–0.89) and 97% (95% CI: 0.96–0.98) in the adult IS group. Xpert MTB/RIF showed the sensitivity and specificity of 14% (95% CI: 0.10–0.19) and 99% (95% CI: 0.97–1.00) in the pediatric ES group; 80% (95% CI: 0.72–0.87) and 94% (95% CI: 0.92–0.95) in the pediatric GA group; 67% (95% CI: 0.62–0.72) and 99% (95% CI: 0.98–0.99) in the pediatric IS group; and 54% (95% CI: 0.43–0.64) and 99% (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) in the pediatric NPA group. The heterogeneity across included studies was deemed acceptable.

Conclusion: Considering diagnostic accuracy, cost and sampling process, ES was a better choice than other sample types for diagnosing adult PTB, especially HIV-associated PTB. GA might be more suitable than other sample types for diagnosing pediatric PTB. The actual choice of sample types should also consider the needs of specific situations.