Fully automated quantitation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in human plasma by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system

Viral Diagnosis of Hepatitis B and Delta: What We Know and What Is Still Required? Specific Focus on Low- and Middle-Income Countries

To achieve the World Health Organization's (WHO) goals of eradicating viral hepatitis globally by 2030, the regional prevalence and epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) coinfection must be known in order to implement preventiveon and treatment strategies. HBV/HDV coinfection is considered the most severe form of vira l hepatitis due to it's rapid progression towards cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related death. The role of simplified diagnosticsis tools for screening and monitoring HBV/HDV-coinfected patients is crucial. Many sophisticated tools for diagnoses have been developed for detection of HBV alone as well as HBV/HDV coinfection. However, these advanced techniques are not widely available in low-income countries and there is no standardization for HDV detection assays, which are used for monitoring the response to antiviral therapy. More accessible and affordable alternative methods, such as rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), are being developed and validated for equipment-free and specific detection of HBV and HDV. This review will provide some insight into both existing and diagnosis tools under development, their applicability in developing countries and how they could increase screening, patient monitoring and treatment eligibility.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of entecavir and switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in chronic hepatitis B: Long-term effects from a prospective study

AIM

Both entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) are widely used to treat chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Japan. However, it remains unclear whether the efficacy of TAF in decreasing the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level, and its safety, are superior to those of ETV. This study aimed to report the long-term effects and safety of 96-week ETV and TAF treatment in patients with CHB.

METHODS

A prospective comparative observational study was undertaken on the following two groups: patients with CHB who received continuous ETV (n = 32) and patients with CHB who were switched from ETV to TAF upon request (n = 48). The HBsAg, urinary β2-microglobulin (β2MG)/creatinine (Cr), urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG)/Cr, and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and bone mineral density (lumbar spine and femur) at 96 weeks were compared.

RESULTS

The two groups did not significantly differ with respect to mean age, male / female patient ratio, or rate of hepatitis B e antigen-positive status. The mean changes in serum HBsAg level and eGFR at 96 weeks were not significantly different between the two groups. The β2MG/Cr and NAG/Cr levels at 96 weeks were similar between the two groups. Additionally, the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and femur as well as the serum ALT did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with patients who received continuous ETV, those who were introduced to TAF after ETV showed similar effects in terms of the decrease in HBsAg level and safety.

Switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs continuing treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B who maintain long-term virological response to entecavir therapy: A randomized trial

No controlled trial in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on long-term entecavir (ETV) treatment, comparing switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with continuing the therapy, has been reported. Twenty-seven nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with chronic HBV who underwent ETV therapy for ≥5 years and maintained virological response were included and randomized into two groups: one group continued ETV, and the other switched to TDF, in a 1:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was changed from baseline in serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level at week 48. The baseline characteristics were not different between nineteen patients in the TDF group and eight patients in the ETV group. Mean decreases in HBsAg level at week 48 were 0.023 and 0.042 log₁₀  IU/mL in the TDF and ETV groups, respectively (P = 0.94). The mean drops in hepatitis B core-related antigens were also not different between the TDF and ETV groups at week 48 (P = 0.80). HBV DNA was sustainedly <2.1 log ₁₀  copies/mL in all patients throughout the study period. In contrast, the mean aminotransferase levels were significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group at weeks 12, 24, and 36, although being within the reference range. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in the TDF group than in the ETV group at weeks 24 (P = 0.016) and 48 (P = 0.003). In conclusion, we could not find the effect on reducing HBsAg level by switching to TDF in chronic hepatitis B patients with maintained virological response to ETV for ≥5 years.

Hemodialysis-Associated Infections

Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of infections, which are common adverse events among this patient population. We review factors contributing to infections among hemodialysis patients and epidemiology of common infections and outbreaks, including bloodstream infections, vascular access infections, and infections caused by bloodborne pathogens. Recommendations for prevention are discussed with emphasis on essential infection control practices for hemodialysis settings.

Sequential therapy involving an early switch from entecavir to pegylated interferon-α in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

The optimal combination of two currently available agents with different mechanisms of action, a nucleos(t)ide analog and pegylated interferon-α (PegIFNα), must be determined to improve treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

In this study, 24 patients with CHB (14 hepatitis B envelope antigen [HBeAg]-positive patients and 10 HBeAg-negative patients) received entecavir for 36-52 weeks, followed by entecavir plus Peg-IFNα2a for 4 weeks, and finally by PegIFNα-2a alone for 44 weeks.

RESULTS

A sustained biochemical, virologic, and serologic response was obtained in 7/24 (29%) patients at 48 weeks post-treatment (2/14 [14%] in HBeAg-positive vs 5/10 [50%] in HBeAg-negative patients, P = 0.085). At baseline, patients with a sustained response had a significantly lower γ-glutamyl transferase level (P = 0.0023), a lower aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (P = 0.049), and a lower α-fetoprotein level (P = 0.042) than those without a sustained response. The decline in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels during the first 24 weeks of PegIFNα-2a treatment in patients with a sustained response was greater than that in patients without (P = 0.017). Additionally, HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in two patients (8.3%): one HBeAg-positive and one HBeAg-negative patient.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of sequential therapy involving an early switch from entecavir to PegIFNα-2a were unsatisfactory in Japanese patients with CHB. In addition to viral factors, host metabolic characteristics and liver fibrosis/tumor markers can be used for prediction of a sustained response to therapy, but accurate prediction of the therapeutic response is difficult.

Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant assay vs. the COBAS TaqMan HBV test using the high pure system for the quantitation of HBV DNA in plasma and serum samples

Background:

Proper management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection requires monitoring of plasma or serum HBV DNA levels using a highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification test. Because commercially available assays differ in performance, we compared herein the performance of the Hologic Aptima HBV Quant assay (Aptima) to that of the Roche Cobas TaqMan HBV test for use with the high pure system (HPS/CTM).

Methods:

Assay performance was assessed using HBV reference panels as well as plasma and serum samples from chronically HBV-infected patients. Method correlation, analytical sensitivity, precision/reproducibility, linearity, bias and influence of genotype were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using linear regression, Deming correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results:

Agreement between the assays for the two reference panels was good, with a difference in assay values vs. target <0.5 log. Qualitative assay results for 159 clinical samples showed good concordance (88.1%; κ=0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.651–0.845). For the 106 samples quantitated by both assays, viral load results were highly correlated (R=0.92) and differed on average by 0.09 log, with 95.3% of the samples being within the 95% limit of agreement of the assays. Linearity for viral loads 1–7 log was excellent for both assays (R2>0.98). The two assays had similar bias and precision across the different genotypes tested at low viral loads (25–1000 IU/mL).

Conclusions:

Aptima has a performance comparable with that of HPS/CTM, making it suitable for use for HBV infection monitoring. Aptima runs on a fully automated platform (the Panther system) and therefore offers a significantly improved workflow compared with HPS/CTM.

Ultrasensitive detection of serum hepatitis B virus by coupling ultrafiltration DNA extraction with real-time PCR

Background

A simple and reliable DNA extraction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is critical in developing an ultrasensitive detection method for HBV infection. Current commercially available serum Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA extraction methods are time-consuming, expensive and/or require specialized equipment, which hinders wide adoption of clinical laboratories. This study offers a report on an ultrasensitive HBV DNA detection method by coupling serum HBV DNA extraction by ultrafiltration (UF) with real-time PCR (qPCR) detection.

Methods

Serum proteins were precipitated by phenol to release HBV DNA in the supernatant which was then transferred to the UF devices. The resultant DNA concentrate was eluted and released into qPCR pre-mixture. The UF-qPCR assay performance, including recovery rate, linearity, detection sensitivity, precision and diagnostic accuracy that compared to the CAP-CTM V2.0 assay by analyzing batched low viral load clinical samples was evaluated.

Results

The recovery rate of the UF-based HBV DNA extraction method was above 80%. The assay linearity was demonstrated with a slope of 0.95 and R² values of 0.99. Limit-of-detection (LOD) of the UF-qPCR assay was determined to be 12.1IU/ml. The coefficient of variation (CV) of HBV quantitation for high, low and limit titer samples was 2.28%, 5.77% and 25.59%, respectively. Accuracy of the UF-qPCR assay was confirmed with the reference panel, and there was a strong correlation between these two methods (R² = 0.55, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The UF-qPCR assay is reliable, highly sensitive, affordable and time-saving, and the method can be used for ultrasensitive detection of serum HBV.

Natural Killer Group 2A Expressed on Both Peripheral CD3-CD56+NK Cells and CD3+CD8+T Cells Plays a Pivotal Negative Regulatory Role in the Progression of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

To explore the role of surface receptors natural killer group 2A (NKG2A) and natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) on CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells and CD3^-CD56⁺NK cells in the progression of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), we measured the expression of NKG2A and NKG2D on the surface of these 2 types of circulating cells by flow cytometry in 3 groups. One group consists of 36 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), another one consists of 22 patients with HBV-related ACLF, and the last one has 12 normal controls (NC). The experimental result indicated that there was no significant difference in the proportion of CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells in total lymphocytes between the 3 groups. However, the percentage of CD3^-CD56⁺NK cells in ACLF group was evidently higher than that in the CHB group (P < 0.05). In addition, the expression of NKG2D on CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells in the ACLF group was significantly lower than that in the CHB group (P < 0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences in its percentages on CD3^-CD56⁺NK cells between the 3 groups. The expression of NKG2A on CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells in the ACLF group was significantly higher than that in the NC group (P < 0.05), and on NK cells was significantly higher than that in the CHB group (P < 0.05) and NC group (P < 0.01). The increase in ratios of NKG2A to NKG2D on CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells and CD3^-CD56⁺NK cells in the ACLF group was significantly more than that in the CHB group and NC group. The results indicate that the imbalance between NKG2A and NKG2D may contribute to the progression of HBV-related ACLF mediated by CD3^-CD56⁺NK cells and CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells. Compared with NKG2D, NKG2A expressed on both peripheral CD3^-CD56⁺NK cells and CD3⁺CD8⁺T cells plays a more pivotal negative regulatory role in the progression of HBV-related ACLF.

Profile of HBV polymerase gene mutations during entecavir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in 54 naïve patients and 27 lamivudine (LMV) and/or adefovir (ADV) experienced patients.

METHODS

Eighty-one chronic hepatitis B patients with a viral load above 4 log 10 copies/ml and high levels of serum alanine aminotransferase were treated with ETV 0.5mg daily. The viruses of patients were sequenced before ETV therapy and after every three months of ETV therapy.

RESULTS

Eight LAM-experienced and ADV-experienced patients emerged mutations in the ETV treatment. In one of these experienced patients, the ETV-resistant mutations were detected during ETV treatment, with the virological and the biochemical breakthrough. Two LAM-experienced and ADV-naïve patients were detected mutation during 1-2 years ETV therapy. All three LAM-naïve and ADV-experienced patients were detected mutations in the ETV treatment. Five in fifty for LAM-naïve and ADV-naïve patients showed mutations in the ETV monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ETV has a high genetic barrier to resistance and the efficacy in LAM-experienced and/or ADV-experienced patients were much lower than in naïve patients.

Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update

Worldwide, some 240 million people have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), with the highest rates of infection in Africa and Asia. Our understanding of the natural history of HBV infection and the potential for therapy of the resultant disease is continuously improving. New data have become available since the previous APASL guidelines for management of HBV infection were published in 2012. The objective of this manuscript is to update the recommendations for the optimal management of chronic HBV infection. The 2015 guidelines were developed by a panel of Asian experts chosen by the APASL. The clinical practice guidelines are based on evidence from existing publications or, if evidence was unavailable, on the experts' personal experience and opinion after deliberations. Manuscripts and abstracts of important meetings published through January 2015 have been evaluated. This guideline covers the full spectrum of care of patients infected with hepatitis B, including new terminology, natural history, screening, vaccination, counseling, diagnosis, assessment of the stage of liver disease, the indications, timing, choice and duration of single or combination of antiviral drugs, screening for HCC, management in special situations like childhood, pregnancy, coinfections, renal impairment and pre- and post-liver transplant, and policy guidelines. However, areas of uncertainty still exist, and clinicians, patients, and public health authorities must therefore continue to make choices on the basis of the evolving evidence. The final clinical practice guidelines and recommendations are presented here, along with the relevant background information.

Detection of hepatitis B virus infection: A systematic review

AIM: To review published methods for detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

METHODS: A thorough search on Medline database was conducted to find original articles describing different methods or techniques of detection of HBV, which are published in English in last 10 years. Articles outlining methods of detection of mutants or drug resistance were excluded. Full texts and abstracts (if full text not available) were reviewed thoroughly. Manual search of references of retrieved articles were also done. We extracted data on different samples and techniques of detection of HBV, their sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and applicability.

RESULTS: A total of 72 studies were reviewed. HBV was detected from dried blood/plasma spots, hepatocytes, ovarian tissue, cerumen, saliva, parotid tissue, renal tissue, oocytes and embryos, cholangiocarcinoma tissue, etc. Sensitivity of dried blood spot for detecting HBV was > 90% in all the studies. In case of seronegative patients, HBV DNA or serological markers have been detected from hepatocytes or renal tissue in many instances. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) are most commonly used serological tests for detection. CLIA systems are also used for quantitation. Molecular techniques are used qualitatively as well as for quantitative detection. Among the molecular techniques version 2.0 of the CobasAmpliprep/CobasTaqMan assay and Abbott’s real time polymerase chain reaction kit were found to be most sensitive with a lower detection limit of only 6.25 IU/mL and 1.48 IU/mL respectively.

CONCLUSION: Serological and molecular assays are predominant and reliable methods for HBV detection. Automated systems are highly sensitive and quantify HBV DNA and serological markers for monitoring.

Hepatitis B viral load predicts survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sorafenib is now considered as a standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titers on prognosis in HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2012, 78 HBV-related HCC patients who received sorafenib treatment at Severance Hospital were included in our analysis. The effect of pretreatment HBV-DNA levels on clinical outcomes for use in predicting prognosis after treatment with sorafenib was examined by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 5.2 months (95% confidence interval: 4.0-6.4) and 3.5 months (95% confidence interval: 2.3-4.7), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed high levels of HBV-DNA (> 2000 IU/mL) to be an independent risk factor for worse overall survival (P=0.005; hazard ratio, 2.85) and disease progression among patients who did not receive concomitant prophylactic antiviral therapy during sorafenib treatment (P=0.008; hazard ratio, 87.4). Moreover, viral reactivation occurred more frequently in patients who did not receive concomitant prophylactic antiviral therapy than in those who did (4/38 vs 0/40; P=0.025).

CONCLUSION

Higher HBV-DNA levels prior to sorafenib treatment were associated with poorer prognosis and increased viral reactivation thereafter. These results suggest the potential usefulness of prophylactic antiviral therapy when treating HBV-related HCC patients with sorafenib.

Monitoring of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA and Risk of HBV Reactivation in B-Cell Lymphoma: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

There is no standard management of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in HBV-resolved patients without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), but with antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen and/or antibodies against HBsAg (anti-HBs).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the occurrence of HBV reactivation by serial monthly monitoring of HBV DNA and to establish preemptive therapy guided by this monitoring in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) treated with rituximab plus corticosteroid-containing chemotherapy (R-steroid-chemo). The primary endpoint was the incidence of HBV reactivation defined as quantifiable HBV DNA levels of ≥ 11 IU/mL.

RESULTS

With a median HBV DNA follow-up of 562 days, HBV reactivation was observed in 21 of the 269 analyzed patients. The incidence of HBV reactivation at 1.5 years was 8.3% (95% confidence interval, 5.5-12.4). No hepatitis due to HBV reactivation was observed in patients who received antiviral treatment when HBV DNA levels were between 11 and 432 IU/mL. An anti-HBs titer of <10 mIU/mL and detectable HBV DNA remaining below the level of quantification at baseline were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation (hazard ratio, 20.6 and 56.2, respectively; P < .001). Even in 6 patients with a rapid increase of HBV due to mutations, the monthly HBV DNA monitoring was effective at preventing HBV-related hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Monthly monitoring of HBV DNA is useful for preventing HBV reactivation-related hepatitis among B-NHL patients with resolved HBV infection following R-steroid-chemo (UMIN000001299).

Long-Term Outcome of Sequential Therapy with Lamivudine Followed by Interferon-β in Nucleoside-Naive, Hepatitis B e-Antigen-Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Genotype C Infection

It is unclear whether the combination of a nucleos(t)ide analog and interferon (IFN) is superior to monotherapy for treating chronic hepatitis B. In this study, we report the long-term outcomes of sequential therapy using lamivudine followed by IFN-β. This study included 24 hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype C infection who were treated with lamivudine alone for 16-32 weeks, then with both IFN-β and lamivudine for 4 weeks, and finally with IFN-β alone for 20 weeks. All patients were followed up for 7.1±2.8 years post-treatment. The rate of response, defined as transaminase normalization, HBeAg loss, and HBV DNA <10(4) copies/mL, was 5/24 (21%) at 24 weeks post-treatment. The patients with short-term responses were younger than those with no response (P=0.039). More short-term responders had undetectable HBV DNA at the start of IFN-β compared with the nonresponders (P=0.0059). Subsequently, 4 of the 5 short-term responders remained free of the need for further drug treatment for 4.2±3.5 years post-treatment; more short-term responders remained drug free than did nonresponders (P=0.035). In conclusion, the rate of response to sequential therapy was limited in HBeAg-positive patients with chronic HBV genotype C infection at 24 weeks post-treatment. In the majority of the short-term responders, however, the response was sustainable in the long term.

Comparison of the Abbott RealTime HBV assay with the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV assay for HBV DNA detection and quantification

BACKGROUND

Measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels is essential in the clinical management of patients with chronic HBV infection. Performance and accuracy of quantitation for HBV DNA are therefore critical in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare and evaluate the performance characteristics of two HBV DNA quantitative assays: Abbott RealTime HBV (RealTime assay) and Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV assays 2.0 (TaqMan assay).

STUDY DESIGN

Serum samples from 220 HBV-infected patients were collected. Performance characteristics of the HBV DNA quantitative assays, including sensitivity, linearity, and reproducibility were measured. The assays were compared based on the viral status, including HBeAg, genotype, core promoter and pre-core region mutations.

RESULTS

The RealTime assay had a sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% and 100%, respectively. The intra-assay coefficients of variation of serum samples ranged from 0.00% to 11.25% for the RealTime assay and 1.22% to 8.22% for TaqMan assay. Paired quantitative results showed excellent correlation by linear regression analysis (R(2)=0.961), good level of agreement with a mean difference of 0.31log10IU/mL, and limits of agreement of -0.62 to 1.24log10IU/mL, irrespective of HBeAg, genotype, core promoter and pre-core region mutation-specific differences. In this study, a difference of ≥1log10IU/mL between the two assays was observed in 8.6% of the samples. Genotype B and average HBV DNA levels of <3log10IU/mL were significant associated factors of this discordance.

CONCLUSIONS

The Abbott assay delivered high performance for HBV DNA quantification and correlated extremely well with the TaqMan assay, irrespective of viral status.

Entecavir and interferon-α sequential therapy in Japanese patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of sequential therapy with lamivudine followed by interferon have been unsatisfactory in Japanese patients with hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B. However, the efficacy of sequential therapy with entecavir and interferon remains unclear.

METHODS

Twenty-four HBeAg-positive patients (23 men and 1 woman; mean age 39 ± 7 years) received entecavir 0.5 mg alone for 36-52 weeks, followed by entecavir plus interferon-α for 4 weeks, and lastly by interferon-α alone for 20 weeks. Twenty-three patients had genotype C infection, and one had genotype A infection.

RESULTS

No entecavir-resistant mutant variants emerged in any patient. Hepatitis flare occurred in three patients during interferon-α treatment after the withdrawal of entecavir, but none had hepatic decompensation. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels did not change during or after therapy. Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen levels were significantly decreased at the start (P < 0.0001) and at the end of interferon-α treatment (P < 0.0001), but returned to baseline levels after treatment. Twenty-four weeks after the completion of the sequential therapy, a sustained biochemical, virological, and serological response was achieved in 5 (21 %) patients. The proportion of patients in whom HBeAg was lost during entecavir treatment was significantly higher among those with a sustained response than among those with no response (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of response to sequential therapy with entecavir and interferon-α in Japanese patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B was not higher than the rate in previous studies of lamivudine followed by interferon.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: high hepatitis B viral load and mortality in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level and the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by means of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. From January 2005 to March 2007, 183 patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent TACE but never received antiviral therapy were consecutively enrolled in our cohort. All patients were tested for pre-TACE serum level of HBV DNA, and overall survival was measured from date of enrollment until death from any cause. Radiologic progression was evaluated by using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors by means of independent radiologic assessment.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 19 months (95% confidence interval: 13.7, 24.3) and median time to progression was 4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.03, 4.97). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high pre-TACE serum level of HBV DNA (> 2000 IU/L) was an independent risk factor for reduced overall survival (P = .021; hazard ratio [HR], 1.725), high cancer progression-related mortality (P = .014; HR, 1.936), and hepatic failure-related mortality associated with cancer progression (P = .005, HR, 3.908). Pre-TACE level of HBV DNA did not significantly affect hepatic failure-related mortality that was not caused by cancer progression.

CONCLUSION

A high pre-TACE serum level of HBV DNA was associated with poor overall survival and rapid progression of hepatocellular carcinoma after TACE, and the cause of mortality was not hepatitis exacerbation but cancer progression.

Clinical and virological characteristics post HBsAg seroclearance in hepatitis B virus carriers with hepatic steatosis versus those without

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested hepatic steatosis contributes to seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Although HBsAg seroclearance generally confers favorable outcome, hepatic steatosis may account for progressive liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to compare clinical and virological characteristics post HBsAg seroclearance between subjects with hepatic steatosis and those without.

METHODS

One-hundred and fifty-five HBsAg carriers with HBsAg seroclearance were enrolled. Subjects with moderate-severe hepatic steatosis as diagnosed by ultrasonography were designated as having hepatic steatosis.

RESULTS

There were 69 subjects with hepatic steatosis and 86 without. Subjects with hepatic steatosis had significantly higher body mass index (BMI; 27.8 ± 3.5 vs. 23.0 ± 3.1, P < 0.001), were more likely to be male (78.3 vs. 63.9%, P = 0.05), and were significantly younger at HBsAg seroclearance (48.7 ± 8.9 years vs. 53.4 ± 8.9 years, P = 0.001), than those without. The frequency of anti-HBsAg seroconversion (56.5 vs. 59.3%, P = 0.72) and HBV viremia (20.3 vs. 15.1%, P = 0.40) was not significantly different between subjects with and without hepatic steatosis, but the incidence of abnormal AST and ALT was significantly higher in the former (23.2 vs. 0%, P < 0.0001; and 30.4 vs. 0%, P < 0.0001, respectively), and progression to liver cirrhosis tended to be more likely in the former than in the latter (10.1 vs. 3.5%, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

In HBsAg carriers with increased body mass index, hepatic steatosis can accelerate HBsAg seroclearance by approximately 5 years. However, the beneficial effects of HBsAg seroclearance should be balanced against the harmful effects of hepatic steatosis.

Antiviral efficacy of combination therapy with entecavir and adefovir for entecavir/lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus with or without adefovir resistance

There is little clinical information on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) that is resistant to multiple drugs including entecavir (ETV). The present retrospective cohort study assessed the antiviral efficacy of ETV/adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy for ETV-resistant HBV with prior lamivudine (LAM) resistance, and either with or without previous ADV resistance. The cumulative probability of achieving a virological response (undetectable serum HBV DNA) was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Breslow method. Seventeen patients with ETV-resistant HBV who were treated with ETV/ADV combination therapy for at least 6 months at a tertiary care center, were included; seven had dual resistance to ETV and LAM [ADV-r(-) group] and 10 had triple resistance to ETV, LAM, and ADV [ADV-r(+) group]. The median follow-up period was 9 months (range, 6-23). A virological response was noted in seven patients after a median of 3 months (range, 3-12) of treatment; five in the ADV-r(-) group and two in the ADV-r(+) group. The cumulative probability of a virological response was significantly higher in the ADV-r(-) group than in the ADV-r(+) group (6 months cumulative probability, 57.1% vs. 11.1%). In conclusion, ETV/ADV combination therapy led to virological responses in five of seven patients with resistance to ETV and LAM, but a significantly poorer response in patients with prior ADV resistance than in those without prior ADV resistance. Therefore, ETV/ADV combination therapy could be a useful therapeutic option for ETV- and LAM-resistant HBV without prior ADV resistance.

Comparison of three Roche hepatitis B virus viral load assay formats

Two FDA-approved (in vitro diagnostic [IVD]) hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load assays, the manual Cobas TaqMan HBV Test for use with the High Pure System (HP) and the automated Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV Test v2.0 (CAP/CTM), were compared to a modified (not FDA-approved) version of the HP assay by automating the DNA extraction using the Total Nucleic Acid Isolation (TNAI) kit on the Cobas AmpliPrep. On average, CAP/CTM measurements were 0.08 log IU/ml higher than HP results (n = 206), and TNAI results were 0.17 log IU/ml higher than HP results (n = 166). The limit of detection (LOD), as determined by probit analysis using dilutions of the 2nd HBV international standard, was 10.2 IU/ml for CAP/CTM. The data sets for HP and TNAI were insufficient for probit analysis; however, there was 100% detection at ≥ 5 or ≥ 10 IU/ml for TNAI and HP, respectively. Linearity was demonstrated between 60 and 2,000,000 IU/ml, with slopes between 0.95 and 0.99 and R(2) values of >0.99 for all assays. Total precision (log percent coefficient of variance [CV]) was between 0.8% and 2.1% at 4.3 log IU/ml and between 1.4% and 4.9% at 2.3 log IU/ml. Correlation of samples, reproducibility, linearity, and LOD were acceptable and similar in all assays. The CAP/CTM assay and, to a lesser extent, the TNAI assay reduced hands-on time due to automation. There were no instances of contamination detected in negative samples during the course of the study, despite testing several samples up to 9.6 log IU/ml. The incidence of false-positive negative controls in HP and CAP/CTM clinical testing was <0.5% over 6 to 7 months of testing.

Simple scoring system predicting genotypic resistance during rescue therapy for Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

GOAL

In this study, we aimed to devise a simple scoring system predicting the risk of genotypic resistance (GR) to current rescue therapies for patients with lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND

LAM and adefovir (ADV) combination therapy should be recommended for an initial rescue therapy against LAM-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, there still are many LAM-resistant patients being treated with entecavir (ETV) or ADV monotherapy.

STUDY

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients treated for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B with ETV or ADV monotherapy, or LAM/ADV combination therapy. The cumulative probabilities of GR and virological responses and breakthrough according to clinical variables were analyzed by survival analyses and derived an index for future GR.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were included (median treatment duration=117.9 wk). Using risk factors indentified on multivariable analyses, a simple index for future GR (Antiviral Resistance Prediction Index, ARPI) was developed with 3 clinical variables: the rescue therapy regimens (+0, ADV; +1, ETV; +2, LAM/ADV), HBV DNA reduction at 12 weeks (+0, <3 log10 copies/mL; +1, >3 log10 copies/mL), and the initial HBV DNA level (+0, >10 copies/mL; +1, <10 copies/mL). No patient with ARPI ≥2 exhibited GR, whereas 47% of the patients with an ARPI <2 developed GR by week 144 (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the ARPI is a simple and early index that can be used to determine the risk for subsequent GR during rescue therapy for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatitis B viremia after spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in hepatitis B carriers

In 118 previous hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers, low-level hepatitis B (HBV) viremia persisted at a rate of 15%-20% for >10 years after HBsAg seroclearance. The frequency of HBV viremia was significantly (P = .002) lower in patients with anti-HBsAg seroconversion (6 of 69 [8.7%]) than in those without seroconversion (15 of 49 [30.6%]).

Multilaboratory evaluation of real-time PCR tests for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification

The performance characteristics of four different assays for hepatitis B virus (HBV) quantification were assessed: the Abbott RealTime HBV IUO, the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV test, the Roche Cobas TaqMan HBV test with HighPure system, and the Qiagen artus HBV TM ASR. Limit of detection (LOD), linear range, reproducibility, and agreement were determined using a serially diluted plasma sample from a single chronically infected subject. Each assay was tested by at least three laboratories. The LOD of the RealTime and two TaqMan assays was approximately 1.0 log(10) IU/ml; for artus HBV (which used the lowest volume of extracted DNA), it was approximately 1.5 log(10) IU/ml. The linear range spanned 1.0 to at least 7.0 log(10) IU/ml for all assays. Median values were consistently lowest for artus HBV and highest for Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV. Assays incorporating automated nucleic acid extraction were the most reproducible; however, the overall variability was minor since the standard deviations for the means of all tested concentrations were ≤0.32 log(10) IU/ml for all assays. False-positive results were observed with all assays; the highest rates occurred with tests using manual nucleic acid extraction. The performance characteristics of these assays suggest that they are useful for management and therapeutic monitoring of chronic HBV infection.

The prevalence of "anti-HBc alone" and HBV DNA detection among anti-HBc alone in Korea

The "anti-HBc alone" is a frequent serological finding in clinical laboratories, making it difficult to determine whether the HBV infection has resolved. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of anti-HBc alone and HBV DNA detection (occult HBV infection) among anti-HBc alone, and to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of anti-HBc alone. A total of 17,677 sera referred from the Health Promotion Center (HPC group, 4,014 sera) as well as all the hospital clinical departments (Patient group, 13,663 sera) were tested for HBs Ag, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs. HBV DNA test using real-time PCR was performed on 230 anti-HBc alone. The prevalence of anti-HBc alone was 8.9%, significantly higher in the Patient group than in the HPC group. The prevalence of anti-HBc was higher in men than women and was increased with age. Very low levels of HBV DNA were found in only 4 (1.7%) out of 230 subjects with anti-HBc alone. They were patients with conditions unrelated to chronic liver disease. Considering the high prevalence of anti-HBc alone, the frequency of occult HBV infection among anti-HBc alone was unexpectedly low. In addition, HBV viral load was low in these patients. Further studies are required to determine the clinical significance and infectivity of anti-HBc alone, in conjunction with very low levels of HBV DNA and to standardize the detection methodology for both anti-HBc alone and HBV DNA.

Detection and quantitation of HBV DNA in miniaturized samples: multi centre study to evaluate the performance of the COBAS ® AmpliPrep/COBAS ® TaqMan ® hepatitis B virus (HBV) test v2.0 by the use of plasma or serum specimens

Laboratory analysis of blood specimens is an increasingly important tool for rapid diagnosis and control of therapy. So, miniaturization of test systems is needed, but reduced specimens might impair test quality. For rapid detection and quantitation of HBV DNA, the COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HBV test has proved a robust instrument in routine diagnostic services. The test system has been modified recently for application of reduced samples of blood plasma and for blood serum, too. The performance of this modified COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HBV v2.0 (HBV v2.0 (this test is currently not available in the USA)) test was evaluated by comparison with the former COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HBV v1.0 (HBV v1.0) test. In this study a platform correlation of both assay versions was done including 275 HBV DNA positive EDTA plasma samples. Comparable results were obtained (R(2)=0.97, mean difference -0.03 log(10)IU/ml). The verification of equivalency of the sample matrix (plasma vs. serum samples tested in HBV v2.0 in the same run) showed comparable results for all 278 samples with a R(2)=0.99 and a mean difference of 0.06 log(10)IU/ml. In conclusion, the new test version HBV v2.0 is highly specific and reproducible and quantifies accurately HBV DNA in EDTA plasma and serum samples from patients with chronic HBV infection.

Escape hepatitis B virus mutations in recipients of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen-positive liver grafts receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulins

A variety of prophylactic strategies are used to prevent the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive donors. The mechanisms underlying the failure of HBV immunoglobulin monoprophylaxis have been poorly evaluated. Seventy-seven anti-HBc-positive grafts were used in 21 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive recipients and 56 HBsAg-negative recipients. HBsAg-positive recipients received prophylaxis comprising hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) and antiviral agents, 45 HBsAg-negative recipients received a modified HBIG regimen, and 11 HBsAg-negative recipients received no prophylaxis. Both donors and recipients were screened for HBsAg, antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and anti-HBc in their sera and for HBV DNA in both their sera and liver. S gene mutations were investigated after HBV reinfection. HBV infection occurred in 15 HBsAg-negative recipients (19.4%) at a median interval of 16 months (range = 6-67 months) post-transplant and in none of the HBsAg-positive recipients. HBV infections were observed in 31.6% of HBV-naive recipients and 7.7% of HBV-immune recipients receiving HBIG prophylaxis versus 100% of HBV-naive recipients (P = 0.0068) and 33% of HBV-immune recipients (P = 0.08) with no such prophylaxis. S gene mutations were identified in 9 recipients. In conclusion, priority should be given to using anti-HBc positive grafts for HBsAg-positive or HBV-immune recipients. Our study has confirmed the high risk of HBV transmission to naive recipients. HBIG monoprophylaxis was associated with a significant risk of de novo HBV infection and HBV escape mutations. In these patients, we therefore recommend prophylaxis with lamivudine or new nucleos(t)ides analogues. The potential benefits of HBIG prophylaxis combined with antiviral drugs require further evaluations. Long-term prophylaxis is needed because of the long interval of de novo HBV infection post-transplant in some patients.

Quantification of plasma DNA as a prognostic indicator in canine lymphoid neoplasia

Dogs have a similar incidence of spontaneous cancers as people, and a noninvasive test to monitor disease status in dogs would be of great value. Humans with cancer often have increased levels of cell-free circulating DNA in their plasma, which has shown promise for diagnosis, prognosis and detection of residual disease. We hypothesized that dogs with cancer have increased circulating DNA compared with healthy dogs or dogs with non-neoplastic diseases. Plasma DNA was measured in 40 healthy dogs, 20 dogs with non-neoplastic diseases and 80 dogs with cancer. The reference interval for plasma DNA in healthy dogs was 1-15 ng mL(-1). Dogs with lymphoma and lymphoid leukaemia had significantly higher concentrations (range: 0-91 ng mL(-1), P < 0.0001). Antigen receptor rearrangement assays suggest that plasma DNA had the same clonality as the primary lymphoid tumours. Dogs with lymphoid neoplasia and plasma DNA >25 ng mL(-1) had shorter remission times than those with < 25 ng mL(-1) (P = 0.0116). In contrast to humans, where increased plasma DNA is seen in many diseases, dogs with nonlymphoid malignancies and non-neoplastic diseases had plasma DNA concentrations similar to healthy dogs. This study shows that a portion of dogs with lymphoid neoplasia have increased tumour-derived plasma DNA, which serves as a negative prognostic indicator.

Impact of hepatitis B virus genotypes and surface antigen variants on the performance of HBV real time PCR quantification

Quantitative PCR assays used to monitor hepatitis B virus (HBV) load differ in their ability to detect different HBV variants. This study evaluated the performance of the Abbott RT PCR assay for quantitating DNA from different HBV genotypes and from HBV variants bearing HBsAg gene mutations. The study was performed on a randomly-selected sample with a viral load >6logIU/mL for each genotype and on 25 HBsAg variants. Each sample was assayed using the Abbott RT assay and with the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan as a reference method. All HBV genotypes were detected with the Abbott RT assay with an equivalent dynamic range (1-8logIU/mL). For each genotype, the data suggest that the assay was linear over the entire dilution range (r(2): 0.985-0.995). For the 25 HBsAg variants, viral titres determined with the two assays correlated well (r(2): 0.929). The mean difference between the two methods was -0.295 (95% CI: -0.520 to -0.071). The difference was lower than 1log unit in all but two cases. In conclusion, the Abbott RT assay can detect and quantify DNA from different HBV variants with equivalent performance and is thus suitable for routine monitoring of patients with chronic HBV infections.

Sensitivity and specificity of Anti-HBc screening assays--which assay is best for blood donor screening?

Compared to HIV and hepatitis C virus, the residual infectious risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) posed by blood products is about 10 times higher. In addition to HBsAg testing, screening for anti-HBc was recommended by the German Advisory Committee Blood in March 2005. Prevalence of anti-HBc in German blood donors was investigated at five test sites located in different geographic regions. In total, 12,000 blood donors were screened for anti-HBc by PRISM HBcore, and a statistically representative number of these were tested with Abbott Murex anti-HBc total, bioMérieux Hepanostika anti-HBc uniform, Bio-Rad Monolisa anti-HBc PLUS and Dade Behring Enzygnost anti-HBc. Anti-HBc repeat reactive samples were tested for anti-HBs, anti-HBe and HBV DNA by individual donation NAT. The mean prevalence of anti-HBc was 1.75% in donors that had not been tested for anti-HBc in the past. The percentage of anti-HBs in anti-HBc repeat reactive donors was 93.7%. Samples that were additionally reactive for anti-HBe were anti-HBc reactive in all tested assays. The sample to cut-off (S/Co) values for anti-HBc were lower (competitive assays) in samples that were also positive for anti-HBe, when compared to samples that were only anti-HBc reactive. Most commercially available anti-HBc assays provide sufficient sensitivity for routine screening purposes, and lacking specificity is no longer a serious issue for most of them. Assay differences were recognized for samples that were anti-HBc only reactive. The overall loss of 1.75% of positive testing donors can be significantly reduced to 0.45% by implementation of re-entry procedures for donors with an anti-HBs titre of over 100 IU/l and negative by sensitive ID-NAT.

Efficient amplification with NASBA of hepatitis B virus, herpes simplex virus and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus DNA

A new mechanism is described for DNA amplification using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) including a restriction enzyme digestion and P1 primer binding directly upstream of the digestion. For hepatitis B virus (HBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA, which all show very poor amplification with normal NASBA, assay sensitivity was improved by a factor 100-1000 when restriction enzyme digestion was performed prior to amplification. For the quantitative HBV assay, in combination with the NucliSENS Extractor (bioMérieux, Boxtel, The Netherlands), a 95% target detection rate of 242 WHO IU/ml and 50% detection rate of 35 WHO IU/ml was achieved. The lowest detectable HBV concentration was 10 WHO IU/ml. HBV DNA could be quantified with an algorithm comparable to that used for RNA quantitation and by using a two step approach a dynamic range of 10(2)-10(9)WHO IU/ml (>6 log) was shown to be quantifiable. For the qualitative HSV assay, in combination with the NucliSENS miniMAG (bioMérieux, Boxtel, The Netherlands), the 95% detection rate was determined to be 84 and 138 copies/isolation for HSV 1 and HSV 2, respectively, which corresponds to approximately 10 copies per amplification for both targets. For MRSA, the limit of detection was <10 equivalent CFU per amplification.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with an increased risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is significantly reduced by prophylaxis with hyperimmune antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) globulins (HBIG) and antiviral drugs. The role of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HBV recurrence remains unclear. We investigated the association between HCC pre-OLT and HBV recurrence post-OLT.

METHODS

We studied 99 hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients who underwent OLT for cirrhosis. The median follow-up period was 43 months. All patients received HBIG, and 51 also received lamivudine and/or adefovir. Of these 99 patients, 31 had HCC before OLT. Total HBV DNA and covalently closed circular (ccc)-DNA were measured in tumor and nontumor tissues from the explanted livers of 16 of these 31 HCC patients and, also, in a context of tumor recurrence, in 3 patients who developed HBV/HCC recurrence.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (14.1%) developed HBV recurrence within a median period of 15 months post-OLT. HCC at OLT, a pre-OLT HBV DNA viral load > or = 100,000 copies/mL, and HBIG monoprophylaxis were independently associated with HBV recurrence post-OLT. Eleven out of the 31 patients with HCC at OLT presented with HBV recurrence and 3 out of the 68 patients without HCC had HBV recurrence (P < .0001). HBV recurrence was more frequent in patients who developed HCC recurrence (7/8 patients, 87.5%) than in those who did not (4/23 patients, 17.4%) (P < .0001). In the 16 explanted livers, cccDNA was detectable in HCC cells in 11 and in nontumor cells in 12. cccDNA was detected in a context of HCC recurrence in 2 of the 3 patients tested who developed HBV/HCC recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations of HCC pre-OLT, and HCC recurrence with HBV recurrence post-OLT, and the detection of HBV DNA and cccDNA in HCC suggest that HBV replication in tumor cells may contribute to HBV recurrence post-OLT.

[Molecular virology of the hepatitis B virus]

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) belongs to the hepadnavirus family. The genome of the virus, formed by a small DNA molecule with 3,200 base pairs, has 4 strongly overlapping protein coding regions: ORF preS/S, corresponding to the envelope proteins that constitute the HBV surface antigen (HBsAg); ORF preC/C, which encodes the viral capsid component (core antigen or HBcAg) and a non-structural protein that, after postranslation modification, is secreted and constitutes the "e" antigen (HBeAg); ORF P, which encodes the viral polymerase (polyprotein with DNA polymerase activity, reverse transcriptase and RNAase), and ORF X, which encodes a protein that acts as a multifunctional regulator for both the viral and cell cycles. HBV has a mutation rate of 1.4-3.2 x 105 substitutions/nucleotide/year. As a result of this variability, the virus circulates as a complex mixture of genetic variants, constituting a semi-species, that evolves throughout the infection depending on the evolutionary pressure of factors such as the immune response and antiviral treatments. Based on this variability, HBV has been classified into 8 genotypes (A-H) defined by a difference of more than 8% in the sequences of the complete viral genome. This variability is also responsible for HBV resistance to antiviral treatments with nucleotide and nucleoside analogs. Diagnosis of HBV infection includes determination of virological markers: viral antigens (HBsAg, HBeAg), specific antibodies (anti-HBc, anti-HBe, anti-HBs) and study of HBV-DNA for its detection and quantification and determination of genotypes and viral variants.

Performance of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan real-time PCR assay for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantification is used to establish the prognosis of chronic HBV-related liver disease, to identify those patients who need to be treated, and to monitor the virologic response and resistance to antiviral therapies. Real-time PCR-based assays are gradually replacing other technologies for routine quantification of HBV DNA in clinical practice. The goal of this study was to evaluate the intrinsic characteristics and clinical performance of the real-time PCR Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) platform for HBV DNA quantification. Specificity was satisfactory (95% confidence interval, 98.1 to 100%). Intra-assay coefficients of variation ranged from 0.22% to 2.68%, and interassay coefficients of variation ranged from 1.31% to 4.13%. Quantification was linear over the full dynamic range of quantification of the assay (1.7 to 8.0 log(10) IU/ml) and was not affected by dilution. The assay was accurate regardless of the HBV genotype. Samples containing HBV DNA levels above 4.5 log(10) IU/ml were slightly underestimated relative to another accurate assay based on branched-DNA technology, but this is unlikely to have noteworthy clinical implications. Thus, the CAP/CTM HBV DNA assay is sensitive, specific, and reproducible, and it accurately quantifies HBV DNA levels in patients chronically infected by HBV genotypes A to F. Samples with HBV DNA concentrations above the upper limit of quantification need to be diluted and then retested. Broad use of fully automated real-time PCR assays should improve the management of patients with chronic HBV infection.

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HBV DNA assay and comparison to the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan 48 assay in monitoring patients with chronic cases of hepatitis B

The new Abbott RealTime hepatitis B virus (HBV) assay was compared to the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan assay with 128 serum samples from patients with chronic hepatitis B. There was an excellent correlation (r = 0.961) between the two assays, with the Abbott RealTime test showing at least equivalent sensitivity and a slightly wider dynamic range than the Cobas TaqMan assay. By coupling high sensitivity with a large dynamic range, the Abbott RealTime HBV assay is useful in monitoring the response to antiviral therapy.

Virologic monitoring of hepatitis B virus therapy in clinical trials and practice: recommendations for a standardized approach

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is aimed at suppressing viral replication to the lowest possible level, and thereby to halt the progression of liver disease and prevent the onset of complications. Two categories of drugs are used in HBV therapy: the interferons, including standard interferon alfa or pegylated interferon alfa, and specific nucleoside or nucleotide HBV inhibitors that target the reverse-transcriptase function of HBV-DNA polymerase. The reported results of clinical trials have used varying definitions of efficacy, failure, and resistance based on different measures of virologic responses. This article discusses HBV virologic markers and tests, and their optimal use both for planning and reporting clinical trials and in clinical practice.

Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction with the COBAS Amplicor test for quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum samples

AIM: To compare the clinical performance of a real-time PCR assay with the COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Monitor test for quantitation of HBV DNA in serum samples.

METHODS: The reference sera of the Chinese National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products and the National Center for Clinical Laboratories of China, and 158 clinical serum samples were used in this study. The linearity, accuracy, reproducibility, assay time, and costs of the real-time PCR were evaluated and compared with those of the Cobas Amplicor test.

RESULTS: The intra-assay and inter-assay variations of the real-time PCR ranged from 0.3% to 3.8% and 1.4% to 8.1%, respectively. The HBV DNA levels measured by the real-time PCR correlated very well with those obtained with the COBAS Amplicor test (r = 0.948). The real-time PCR HBV DNA kit was much cheaper and had a wider dynamic range.

CONCLUSION: The real-time PCR assay is an excellent tool for monitoring of HBV DNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Characterization of a new sensitive PCR assay for quantification of viral DNA isolated from patients with hepatitis B virus infections

Sensitive and accurate quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is necessary for monitoring patients with chronic hepatitis receiving antiviral therapy in order to determine treatment response and to adapt therapy in case of inadequate virologic control. The development of quantitative PCR assays has been crucial in meeting these needs. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of a new real-time PCR assay (Abbott RealTime) for HBV DNA with that of three other commercial assays for the detection of HBV DNA. These were the Versant 3.0 branched-chain DNA assay, the Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor test, and the Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan hepatitis B virus assay (CAP-CTM). HBV DNA was measured in blood samples taken from two cohorts of patients with chronic hepatitis. HBV DNA levels measured with the Abbott RealTime assay were highly correlated with those measured with the other three tests over their respective dynamic ranges (r, 0.88 to 0.96). The sensitivity (detection limit, 10 IU/ml) and dynamic range of the Abbott RealTime assay (10(1) to 10(9) IU/ml) was superior to that of the Versant assay. The RealTime assay recognized both HBV strains belonging to genotypes A to G and those bearing polymerase gene mutations equivalently. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the utility of the Abbott RealTime assay for monitoring HBV DNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Its sensitivity and wide dynamic range should allow optimal monitoring of antiviral therapy and timely treatment adaptation.

Molecular testing in the diagnosis and management of chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an enveloped virus with a small (3.2-kb) partially double-stranded DNA genome that causes acute and chronic infections. The impact of these infections on public health worldwide is enormous, with an estimated prevalence of 2 billion acute infections and 360 million chronic infections globally. This review focuses on chronic hepatitis B and the molecular assays used in its diagnosis and management. Background information, including that about features of the hepatitis B virion, viral replication, and epidemiology of infection, that is important for understanding chronic hepatitis B and molecular diagnostic tests for HBV is provided. To facilitate an understanding of the utility of molecular testing for chronic hepatitis B, the four stages of chronic hepatitis B infection that are currently recognized, as well as an additional entity, occult hepatitis B, that can be diagnosed only by sensitive nucleic acid amplification methods, are reviewed in detail, including available therapeutic agents. The molecular diagnostic content focuses on tests for HBV DNA quantification, genotyping, and mutation detection (including precore/core promoter and antiviral resistance mutations). The discussion of these tests encompasses their current utility and performance characteristics, drawing from current clinical guidelines and other studies from the literature. In recognition of the continual evolution of this field, the final section describes emerging molecular markers with future diagnostic potential.

Comparison of Versant HBV DNA 3.0 and COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan assays for hepatitis B DNA quantitation: Possible clinical implications

We compared two commercial assays for HBV DNA quantitation, Versant HBV 3.0, System 340 (bDNA; Bayer Diagnostics) and COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan HBV Test (TaqMan; Roche Diagnostics). Analytical sensitivity, calculated on WHO International Standard, predicted 95% detection rate at 11.4 and 520.2IU/ml for TaqMan and bDNA, respectively. Specificity, established on 50 blood donor samples, was 100% and 84% for TaqMan and bDNA, respectively. When using clinical samples, HBV DNA was detected by TaqMan in 21/55 samples negative to bDNA. Mean values of HBV DNA obtained with bDNA were higher than those obtained with TaqMan (4.09log(10)+/-1.90 versus 3.39log(10)+/-2.41, p<0.001), and 24.4% of samples showed differences in viral load values >0.5log(10), without association with HBV genotype. There was a good correlation for HBV DNA concentrations measured by the two assays (r=0.94; p<0.001) within the overlapping range, and the distribution of results with respect to relevant clinical threshold recently confirmed (20,000 and 2000IU/ml) was similar. Approximately 50% of samples with low HBV DNA, appreciated by TaqMan but not by bDNA, were successfully sequenced in pol region, where drug resistance mutations are located.

Prevalence of low-level hepatitis B viremia in patients with HBV surface antigen-negative hepatocellular carcinoma with and without hepatitis C virus infection in Japan: analysis by COBAS TaqMan real-time PCR

OBJECTIVES

The effect of circulating low-level hepatitis B virus (HBV), defined as one of the states of 'occult HBV infection', on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients is controversial. In addition, the prevalence of occult HBV infection strongly depends on the sensitivity of the HBV detection method. We investigated the prevalence of low-level HBV in the serum of HBsAg-negative patients with HCC using a newly developed, sensitive method based on real-time polymerase chain reaction.

METHODS

Serum was examined for HBV DNA in 132 patients with HBsAg-negative HCC (95 with hepatitis C virus [HCV] infection and 37 without detectable hepatitis virus infection) with the COBAS TaqMan HBV test, of which the 95% hit rate is 35 copies/ml (6.7 IU/ml).

RESULTS

Low-level HBV DNA was detected in 2 of 95 (2.1%) patients with HCV-related HCC and 1 of 37 (2.7%) patients with non-viral HCC.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of the detection of circulating low-level HBV was low in both HBsAg-negative HCC patients with HCV infection and those without detectable hepatitis virus, even with the use of the most sensitive method for the detection of HBV. Circulating low-level HBV does not appear to play an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis in HBsAg-negative HCC.

Fully automated quantification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 RNA in human plasma by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 RNA is a key parameter for reliable diagnosis and treatment of HIV-1 infection. The determination of HIV-1 RNA reduces the pre-seroconversion period in the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection and supports clinical management of HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN

The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test combines automated extraction of total nucleic acids on the COBAS AmpliPrep Instrument with real-time PCR on the COBAS TaqMan Analyzer, thus greatly reducing hands-on time during sample preparation and amplification/detection. The test was evaluated for sensitivity, dynamic range, precision, subtype inclusivity, interfering substances, diagnostic and analytical specificity, as well as correlation with three other commercial tests for HIV-1 RNA quantification.

RESULTS

The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test demonstrated an assay sensitivity of 40 copies/mL, a greater than 5 log(10) measuring range of 40-1.0E+07 copies/mL (1.6-7.0 log(10)) and a reliable determination of HIV-1 group M and N subtypes in EDTA plasma. Quantification results were highly correlated with those obtained by the COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test v1.5, the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test v1.5 and the VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test excellently satisfies the requirements for reliable quantification of HIV-1 RNA in clinical specimens by a broad linear measuring range and a fully automated quantification procedure. It is highly appropriate for therapy monitoring and routine management of HIV-1 infection.

COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan hepatitis B virus (HBV) test: a novel automated real-time PCR assay for quantification of HBV DNA in plasma

Success in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B is supported by highly sensitive PCR-based assays for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. Nucleic acid extraction from biologic specimens is technically demanding, and reliable PCR results depend on it. The performances of the fully automatic system COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS TaqMan 48 (CAP-CTM; Roche, Branchburg, NJ) for HBV DNA extraction and real-time PCR quantification were assessed and compared to the endpoint PCR COBAS AMPLICOR HBV monitor (CAHBM; Roche). Analytical evaluation with a proficiency panel showed that CAP-CTM quantitated HBV DNA levels in one single run over a wide dynamic range (7 logs) with a close correlation between expected and observed values (r = 0.976, interassay variability below 5%). Clinical evaluation, as tested with samples from 92 HBsAg-positive patients, demonstrated excellent correlation with CAHBM (r = 0.966, mean difference in quantitation = 0.36 log(10) IU/ml). CAP-CTM detected 10% more viremic patients and longer periods of residual viremia in those on therapy. In lamivudine (LAM)-resistant patients, the reduction of HBV DNA after 12 months of Adefovir (ADF) was higher in the combination (LAM+ADF) schedule than in ADF monotherapy (5.1 logs versus 3.5 logs), suggesting a benefit in continuing LAM. CAP-CTM detected HBV DNA in liver biopsy samples from 15% of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBcAg-positive graft donors with no HBV DNA in plasma. The amount of intrahepatic HBV DNA was significantly lower in occult HBV infection than in overt disease. CAP-CTM can improve the management of HBV infection and the assessment of antiviral therapy and drug resistance, supporting further insights in the emerging area of occult HBV infection.

New developments in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Significant progress has been made during the last 2 years in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Treatment decisions differ significantly depending on whether patients are HBeAg+ or HBeAg-, treatment-naive or nucleoside/nucleotide-resistant, and in early or advanced stages of liver disease. Courses of finite duration, aiming to achieve sustained off-therapy responses, are practically restricted to HBeAg+ patients with compensated chronic liver disease, whereas long-term therapy aiming to achieve maintained on-therapy remission is mostly applicable to HBeAg- individuals either with early or advanced liver disease. A course of finite duration with pegylated (PEG)-IFN-alpha-2a offers the highest probability of sustained off-therapy response in HBeAg+ individuals, as well as in some HBeAg- individuals. Long-term therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, both in HBeAg+ and HBeAg- CHB, has most favourable effects on patient outcome, provided that virological and biochemical remission is maintained without development of viral resistance. The best results are achievable with potent analogues suppressing serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to non-detectability by most sensitive techniques. The best 2-year resistance profile has hitherto been reported with entecavir monotherapy, and the best long-term resistance profile was seen with adefovir of 5-year duration. Adefovir is effective in most lamivudine (LAM)-resistant patients, but should be administered as an add-on rather than as a substitute for LAM. Combination therapies have entered the treatment arena of CHB by the side doors of LAM-resistance and of end-stage liver disease, and the most recent results suggest that treatment with combinations of two strong nucleosides/nucleotides with different resistance profiles may turn out to be the optimal first-line/first choice option in CHB.