Consecutive infections and clearances of different hepatitis C virus genotypes in an injecting drug user

T-Cell Immunity against the Hepatitis C Virus: A Persistent Research Priority in an Era of Highly Effective Therapy

Approximately 70% of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections become chronic, indicating that the virus is exceptionally well adapted to persist in humans with otherwise normal immune function. Robust, lifelong replication of this small RNA virus does not require a generalized failure of immunity. HCV effectively subverts innate and adaptive host defenses while leaving immunity against other viruses intact. Here, the role of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses in control of HCV infection and their failure to prevent virus persistence in most individuals are reviewed. Two issues of practical importance remain priorities in an era of highly effective antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C. First, the characteristics of successful T-cell responses that promote resolution of HCV infection are considered, as they will underpin development of vaccines that prevent HCV persistence. Second, defects in T-cell immunity that facilitate HCV persistence and whether they are reversed after antiviral cure to provide protection from reinfection are also addressed.

Next-generation sequencing analysis of new genotypes appearing during antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C reveals that these are selected from pre-existing minor strains

Coinfection with more than one hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype is common, but its dynamics, particularly during antiviral treatment, remain largely unknown. We employed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyse sequential serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples in seven patients with transient presence or permanent genotype change during antiviral treatment with interferon and ribavirin. Specimens were collected right before the therapy initiation and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 20, 24, 36, 44 and 48 weeks during treatment and 6 months after treatment ceased. A mixture of two different genotypes was detected in the pretreatment samples from five patients and the minor genotype constituted 0.02 to 38 %. A transient or permanent change of the predominant genotype was observed in six patients. In three cases genotype 3 was replaced as the predominant genotype by genotype 4, in two cases genotype 3 was replaced by genotype 1, and in one subject genotype 1 was replaced by genotype 4. The PBMC- and serum-derived sequences were frequently discordant with respect to genotype and/or genotype proportions. In conclusion, pre-existing minor HCV genotypes can be selected rapidly during antiviral treatment and become transiently or permanently predominant. In coinfections involving genotype 3, genotype 3 was eliminated first from both the serum and PBMC compartments. The PBMC- and serum-derived HCV sequences were frequently discordant with respect to genotype and/or genotype proportions, suggesting that they constitute separate compartments with their own dynamics.

The impact of injecting networks on hepatitis C transmission and treatment in people who inject drugs

With the development of new highly efficacious direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the concept of treatment as prevention is gaining credence. To date, the majority of mathematical models assume perfect mixing, with injectors having equal contact with all other injectors. This article explores how using a networks-based approach to treat people who inject drugs (PWID) with DAAs affects HCV prevalence. Using observational data, we parameterized an exponential random graph model containing 524 nodes. We simulated transmission of HCV through this network using a discrete time, stochastic transmission model. The effect of five treatment strategies on the prevalence of HCV was investigated; two of these strategies were (1) treat randomly selected nodes and (2) "treat your friends," where an individual is chosen at random for treatment and all their infected neighbors are treated. As treatment coverage increases, HCV prevalence at 10 years reduces for both the high- and low-efficacy treatment. Within each set of parameters, the treat your friends strategy performed better than the random strategy being most marked for higher-efficacy treatment. For example, over 10 years of treating 25 per 1,000 PWID, the prevalence drops from 50% to 40% for the random strategy and to 33% for the treat your friends strategy (6.5% difference; 95% confidence interval: 5.1-8.1).

CONCLUSION

Treat your friends is a feasible means of utilizing network strategies to improve treatment efficiency. In an era of highly efficacious and highly tolerable treatment, such an approach will benefit not just the individual, but also the community more broadly by reducing the prevalence of HCV among PWID.

Understanding the trends in HIV and hepatitis C prevalence amongst injecting drug users in different settings--implications for intervention impact

BACKGROUND

A recent systematic review observed that HIV prevalence amongst injectors is negligible (<1%) below a threshold HCV prevalence of 30%, but thereafter increases with HCV prevalence. We explore whether a model can reproduce these trends, what determines different epidemiological profiles and how this affects intervention impact.

METHODS

An HIV/HCV transmission model was developed. Univariate sensitivity analyses determined whether the model projected a HCV prevalence threshold below which HIV is negligible, and how different behavioural and epidemiological factors affect the threshold. Multivariate uncertainty analyses considered whether the model could reproduce the observed breadth of HIV/HCV epidemics, how specific behavioural patterns produce different epidemic profiles, and how this affects an intervention's impact (reduces injecting risk by 30%).

RESULTS

The model projected a HCV prevalence threshold, which varied depending on the heterogeneity in risk, mixing, and injecting duration in a setting. Multivariate uncertainty analyses showed the model could produce the same range of observed HIV/HCV epidemics. Variability in injecting transmission risk, degree of heterogeneity and injecting duration mainly determined different epidemic profiles. The intervention resulted in 50%/28% reduction in HIV incidence/prevalence and 37%/10% reduction in HCV incidence/prevalence over five years. For either infection, greater impact occurred in settings with lower prevalence of that infection and higher prevalence of the other infection.

DISCUSSION

There are threshold levels of HCV prevalence below which HIV risk is negligible but these thresholds are likely to vary by setting. A setting's HIV and HCV prevalence may give insights into IDU risk behaviour and intervention impact.

Examination of the risk of reinfection with hepatitis C among injecting drug users who have been tested in Glasgow

BACKGROUND

Unsafe injecting practices put injecting drug users (IDUs) at repeat exposure to infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). It has not yet been determined if spontaneously clearing one's primary infection influences the risk of reinfection; our aim was to estimate the relative risk of reinfection in IDUs who have cleared the virus.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using a large database of HCV test results covering Greater Glasgow Health Board during 1993-2007 to calculate rates of infection and reinfection in current/former IDUs. The relative risk of (re)infection in previously infected compared with never-infected IDUs was estimated using Poisson regression, adjusting for age at study entry, sex, and calendar period of test.

RESULTS

Although the rate of reinfection in IDUs who were HCV antibody-positive, RNA-negative at baseline was lower (7/100 person-years, 95% CI: 5-9) than the rate of acute infection in IDUs who were HCV antibody-negative at baseline (10/100 person-years, 95% CI: 9-12), the risk of reinfection was not significantly different than the risk of initial infection (adjusted rate ratio=0.78, 95% CI: 0.57-1.08).

CONCLUSION

We found only weak evidence for a reduced risk of HCV reinfection in IDUs who had cleared their previous infection. Further research among those who have cleared infection through antiviral therapy is needed to help inform decisions regarding treatment of IDUs.

Adaptive immunity to the hepatitis C virus

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global public health problem affecting approximately 2% of the human population. The majority of HCV infections (more than 70%) result in life-long persistence of the virus that substantially increases the risk of serious liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The remainder (less than 30%) resolves spontaneously, often resulting in long-lived protection from persistence upon reexposure to the virus. To persist, the virus must replicate and this requires effective evasion of adaptive immune responses. In this review, the role of humoral and cellular immunity in preventing HCV persistence, and the mechanisms used by the virus to subvert protective host responses, are considered.

Risk of Hepatitis C virus re-infection following spontaneous viral clearance in injecting drug users: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In order to develop new ways to prevent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission amongst injecting drug users (IDUs), it is necessary to fully understand the dynamics of this disease. We reviewed the evidence on three key areas of HCV transmission in this population: the rate of acute HCV infection amongst IDUs who have spontaneously resolved a previous infection, the rate of chronic HCV infection amongst IDUs who have spontaneously resolved a previous infection, and the ability of IDUs to be re-infected with either the same or a different HCV genotype.

METHODS

A literature search of PUBMED (January 1950 to January 2009), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2009) and PsycINFO (January 1967 to January 2009) for English language, primary research papers was undertaken to identify longitudinal studies examining HCV re-infection following spontaneous viral clearance amongst IDUs.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified three studies that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Regarding the risk of acute HCV infection amongst IDUs, the findings from the three studies were conflicting and thus provided no compelling evidence in support of an increased or decreased risk of acute infection amongst IDUs who have spontaneously resolved compared to those previously uninfected. Limited evidence was found from two studies to support a reduced risk of subsequent chronic HCV infection in those who have previously spontaneously resolved an infection. Further, two studies found IDUs who spontaneously resolved an infection can be re-infected (with comparable proportions) with either the same or a different HCV genotype.

CONCLUSION

The limited, and sometimes contradictory, evidence published in the worldwide literature highlights the need for more longitudinal studies of IDUs to fully understand the dynamics of the disease in this population.

Frequent multiple hepatitis C virus infections among injection drug users in a prison setting

Recent data indicate that multiple hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections (mixed infection, superinfection, and reinfection) are common among injection drug users (IDUs). In this study, we identified and characterized multiple HCV infection episodes among HCV-seronegative IDU prison inmates (n = 488) enrolled in the Hepatitis C Incidence and Transmission Study cohort. Incident HCV infection with detectable HCV RNA was identified in 87 subjects, 48 of whom completed additional follow-up to screen for reinfection or superinfection. All HCV RNA-detectable samples were tested for multiple infection through a series of specifically designed nested reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR) with sequencing and HCV RNA level measurement. Sequencing revealed that 22 of 87 (25.3%) subjects were infected by two or more viruses. Nine (10.3%) subjects were designated as prevalent cases of incident mixed infection, because two distinct HCV strains were detected at the first viremic time point. Fifteen further cases of multiple HCV infection (superinfection or reinfection) were identified, two of which also showed baseline incident mixed infections. The incidence of new HCV infection (superinfection and reinfection) during follow-up was 40/100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 33-44/100 person-years). Spontaneous clearance of viruses from one subtype and persistence of the other subtype after mixed infection was observed in eight subjects. In these subjects, the virus with higher HCV RNA levels superseded the other.

CONCLUSION

This study comprehensively analyzed frequent multiple HCV infections in a high-risk cohort and provides further insight into infection dynamics and immunity after exposure to variant viral strains. The data presented suggest that HCV RNA levels play an important role in viral competition.

Optimal targeting of Hepatitis C virus treatment among injecting drug users to those not enrolled in methadone maintenance programs

BACKGROUND

This work used mathematical modelling to explore effective policy for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in Australia in the context of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT).

METHOD

We consider two models to depict HCV in the population of injecting drug users (IDU) within Australia. The first model considers the IDU population as a whole. The second model includes separate components for those that are or are not enrolled in MMT. The impact of different levels of HCV treatment and its allocation dependent on MMT status were then determined in terms of the steady state levels of each of these models.

RESULTS

Although increasing levels of HCV treatment decrease chronic infection prevalence, initially numbers of acutely infected can rise. This is caused by the high rate of reinfection. We find that no matter the extent of HCV treatment, HCV prevalence cannot be eliminated without limiting risk behaviour. Assuming equal adherence to HCV therapy between MMT and non-MMT, over 84% of HCV treatment should be allocated to those not in MMT. Only if adherence to HCV therapy in non-MMT patients falls below 44% of that in MMT then treatment should be preferentially directed to those in MMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to generally held beliefs regarding HCV treatment the majority of therapy should be allocated to those that are still actively injecting. This is due to rates of reinfection and to the high turnover of individuals in MMT. Higher adherence to HCV therapy in MMT would need to be achieved before this changed.

Hepatitis C virus recombinants are rare even among intravenous drug users

Systematic studies of the circulation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinants in different parts of the world have been initiated only recently, and no detailed information on this subject is available. The aim of the current investigation was to determine the frequency of HCV recombinants in intravenous drug users (IVDU) from two European countries. HCV RNA from serum samples was tested by RT-PCR with primers derived from the core and NS5B regions with subsequent sequencing and genotype assignment. The 118 samples from Germany (100%) and 45 out of 47 (96%) sera from Russia demonstrated concordant genotyping results. In the two genotype discrepant sera from Russia 2k/1b recombinants were identified. In order to test the hypothesis that the individuals from the IVDU group might be multiply exposed to various genotypes, 145 out of 165 genotyped serum samples, which were found to be positive for anti-NS4 antibodies, were serotyped with the Murex HCV serotyping kit that is based on detection of antibodies to type-specific peptides derived from the NS4 proteins of different HCV genotypes. Discrepancy in genotype and serotype attributions was observed in 11% cases. Retesting of 99 type 1a or 3a samples with a set of type- and subtype-specific primers revealed the presence of a mixed infection only in one case (1a/3a). Thus, the cases of the mixed infection with different HCV genotypes as well as the recombinant forms of HCV are very rare even in such a highly exposed group as IVDU.

Degree of cross-genotype reactivity of hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+ T cells directed against NS3

The inherent sequence diversity of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) with the existence of multiple genotypes that differ up to 20% at the amino acid level represents one of the major obstacles for immune control. Accordingly, immune control of a heterologous virus challenge, particularly across genotypes, is difficult to achieve; however, the overall role of genotype-specific sequence differences has not yet been defined at the epitope level. The aim of this study was to determine the role of genotype-specific sequence differences for the CD8+ T cell response against HCV. We analyzed a cohort of anti-HCV-positive injection drug users infected with HCV genotype 1 (n = 17) or genotype 3 (n = 22) or undetectable HCV-RNA (n = 14) with overlapping peptides covering consensus sequences of NS3 from both genotypes. Importantly, the majority of HCV-specific CD8 T cells were specific for one genotype only indicating that sequence differences between genotypes are relevant at the epitope level. Interestingly, T cells active against both genotypes were significantly more frequent in HCV-RNA-negative subjects. Of note, we identified five subjects with undetectable viremia and coexistence of two T cell populations-one for each genotype-suggesting immune control of two different genotypes.

CONCLUSION

We systematically analyzed the degree of cross-genotype reactivity of HCV-specific T cells and have shown that CD8 responses targeting different HCV genotypes can be primed in the same individual and that such responses potentially characterize a subgroup among injection drug users being protected from chronic HCV infection.