Quantification of hepatitis B e antigen between Elecsys HBeAg and Architect HBeAg assays among patients infected with hepatitis B virus

Comparative evaluation of four commercial analyzers for the serological screening of hepatitis A, B, C and HIV

BACKGROUND

Independent evaluations that deploy clinical patient samples are important in assessing the performance of commercial tests used for serological screening of viral hepatitis and HIV in clinical laboratories.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the analytical performance of Abbott Architect i2000SR, Abbott Alinity i, DiaSorin Liaison XL, and Siemens Atellica for the following analytes: anti-HAV IgG/anti-HAV total, anti-HAV IgM, HBsAg, anti-HBc IgM, Anti-HBc, HBeAg, anti-HBe, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, and HIV Ag/Ab. In addition, anti-HBc IgM, HBeAg, and anti-HBe were evaluated for Abbott Architect, Abbott Alinity and DiaSorin Liaison.

STUDY DESIGN

Pseudonymized clinical serum specimens (N = 98-200 for each analyte) were selected for the analysis according to their reactivity on the Abbott Architect. The results were compared against Abbott Architect and against consensus.

RESULTS

A generally high agreement was observed between the tests. Abbott Alinity had the lowest anti-HAV IgG/total specificity (75.9% against Abbott Architect and 83.0% against consensus). The comparatively low sensitivity of Siemens Atellica (78.2%), Abbott Alinity (87.5%) and DiaSorin Liaison (89.3%) for anti-HAV IgM against Abbott Architect may reflect a higher false-positive rate of Abbott Architect. Particular variation was observed in the sensitivity values of anti-HBc, HBsAg and HIV Ag/Ab between the test methods. DiaSorin Liaison anti-HBs gave consistently higher values as compared to the other tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The serodiagnostic methods for HIV and viral hepatitis of Abbott Architect, Abbott Alinity, DiaSorin Liaison, and Siemens Atellica performed well in comparison with each other. The observed differences between the tests will provide useful information for clinical laboratories in planning their workflows for screening and confirmation.

Challenges and opportunities for hepatitis B cure in the setting of HIV--hepatitis B virus co-infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine issues specific to HIV--HBV co-infection that are relevant to the search for and achieving hepatitis B cure in this the setting RECENT FINDINGS: In HIV--HBV co-infection, high rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss early after initiation of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy (ART) have previously been reported. Between 2012 and 2016, HBsAg loss from 2.8 to 23% was reported in numerous studies, including those already on suppressive HBV-active ART. Data published in 2018-2019 show that these rates have remained fairly stable (3.0-13.9%). However, it appears that higher HBsAg loss on starting HBV-active ART in co-infection falls within a few years to levels similar to that observed in long-term treated HBV mono-infection. Immune reconstitution and CD4+ T-cell recovery are likely to play a role in high HBsAg loss rates seen in early treated co-infection, although the mechanisms driving this are yet to be fully elucidated.

SUMMARY

High rates of HBsAg loss early after HBV-active ART initiation is unique to HIV--HBV co-infection, making it the ideal setting to investigate underlying mechanisms of HBV loss and develop new HBV cure strategies. This phenomenon could be used to enhance HBsAg loss with new therapeutic approaches currently being investigated; however, this is obstructed by excluding co-infection from such studies.

Impact of Introducing Hepatitis B Birth Dose Vaccines into the Infant Immunization Program in Burkina Faso: Study Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial (NéoVac Study)

To achieve global hepatitis elimination by 2030, it is critical to prevent the mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Since 2009, the WHO has recommended administering hepatitis B vaccine to all neonates within 24 h of birth to prevent MTCT. However, many countries in sub-Saharan Africa only provide hepatitis B immunization at the age of 6, 10, and 14 weeks or 8, 12, and 16 weeks using a combined vaccine. To accelerate the introduction of the hepatitis B birth dose vaccine (HepB-BD) into sub-Saharan Africa, it is critical to establish to what extent the addition of HepB-BD can further reduce HBV transmission in areas where three-dose infant vaccination has been implemented. We therefore designed a study to evaluate the impact, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of incorporating the HepB-BD into the routine immunization program in a real-life field condition in Burkina Faso, where the hepatitis B vaccination is currently scheduled at 8-12-16 weeks. Through a multidisciplinary approach combining epidemiology, anthropology, and health economics, the Neonatal Vaccination against Hepatitis B in Africa (NéoVac) study conducts a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in rural areas of the Hauts-Bassins Region. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04029454). A health center is designated as a cluster, and the introduction of HepB-BD will be rolled out sequentially in 24 centers. Following an initial period in which no health center administers HepB-BD, one center will be randomly allocated to incorporate HepB-BD. Then, at a regular interval, another center will be randomized to cross from the control to the intervention period, until all 24 centers integrate HepB-BD. Pregnant women attending antenatal care will be systematically invited to participate. Infants born during the control period will follow the conventional immunization schedule (8-12-16 weeks), while those born in the interventional period will receive HepB-BD in addition to the routine vaccines (0-8-12-16 weeks). The primary outcome, the proportion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity in infants aged at 9 months, will be compared between children born before and after HepB-BD introduction. The study will generate data that may assist governments and stakeholders in sub-Saharan Africa to make evidence-based decisions about whether to add HepB-BD into the national immunization programs.

Kinetics of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen and Anti-Hepatitis B Core Antibody and Their Association With Serological Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis B Coinfection

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to describe the kinetics of quantified hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) and quantified anti-hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) during tenofovir (TDF) treatment and assess their ability to predict hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus.

METHODS

Serum qHBcrAg, qAnti-HBc, and hepatitis B virus DNA were obtained at TDF initiation and every 6-12 months. The on-treatment kinetics of qHBcrAg (ΔqHBcrAg) and qAnti-HBc (ΔqAnti-HBc) were estimated using mixed-effect linear regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) assessing the association between markers and HBeAg seroclearance were calculated using proportional hazards regression, and the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of marker levels in predicting HBeAg seroclearance were assessed using time-dependent receiving operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

During a median of 4.6 years, the cumulative incidences of hepatitis B surface antigen and HBeAg seroclearance were 3.2% (n = 5 of 158) and 27.4% (n = 26 of 95), respectively. ΔqHBcrAg was biphasic in HBeAg-positive patients (-0.051 and -0.011 log10 U/mL/mo during ≤18 and >18 months, respectively) and monophasic in HBeAg-negative patients. ΔqAnti-HBc was monophasic regardless of HBeAg status. In HBeAg-positive patients, baseline qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc levels were associated with HBeAg seroclearance (adjusted HR, 0.48/log10 U/mL [95% confidence interval, .33-.70] and unadjusted HR, 1.49/log10 Paul Ehrlich Institute units/mL [1.08-2.07], respectively). Cutoffs with the highest accuracy in predicting HBeAg seroclearance at 36 months were qHBcrAg <6.5 log10 U/mL at month 24 (Se, 1; Sp, 0.58) and baseline qAnti-HBc ≥4.1 log10 Paul Ehrlich Institute units/mL (Se, 0.42; Sp, 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In coinfected patients undergoing TDF, qHBcrAg/qAnti-HBc could be of use in monitoring HBeAg seroclearance.

Evaluation of reliability and performance of hepatitis B virus-e-antigen assays in tertiary care setting

Hepatitis B virus-e-antigen (HBeAg) is a viral marker to assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. We have evaluated the reliability of three commonly available HBeAg immunoassays using World Health Organization-International Standard and clinical samples. In addition the performance of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) was assessed by kinetic binding and reagent exchange experiments. Analytical and diagnostic sensitivity were significantly different among HBeAg assays (P < 0.01). The affinity of capture/detector antibodies varied significantly between EIAs (P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that significant difference in the affinity of capture/detector antibodies to HBeAg may impact the overall performance and the reliability of currently available HBeAg assays in HBV diagnosis and management.

Precore G1896A mutation is associated with reduced rates of HBsAg seroclearance in treated HIV hepatitis B virus co-infected patients from Western Africa

The nucleotide substitution G1896A on the precore (pc) region has been implicated in virological and serological responses during treatment in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients. Whether this mutation affects the therapeutic course of HIV-HBV co-infected patients, especially from Western Africa, is unknown. In this prospective cohort study, 86 antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve HIV-HBV co-infected patients from Côte d'Ivoire, initiating ARV-treatment containing lamivudine (n = 53) or tenofovir (n = 33), had available baseline pc sequences. Association of the pcG1896A mutation with time to undetectable HBV-DNA, hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance (in HBeAg-positive patients), and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. At ARV-initiation, median HBV-DNA was 6.04 log₁₀ copies/mL (IQR = 3.70-7.93) with 97.7% harbouring HBV genotype E. Baseline pcG1896A mutation was identified in 51 (59.3%) patients, who were more commonly HBeAg-negative (P < .001) and had basal core promotor A1762T/G1764A mutations (P < .001). Patients were followed for a median 36 months (IQR = 24-36). Cumulative proportion of undetectable HBV-DNA was significantly higher in patients with baseline mutation (pcG1896A = 86.6% vs no pcG1896A = 66.9%, P = .04), but not after adjusting for baseline HBV-DNA levels and anti-HBV agent (P = .2). No difference in cumulative proportion of HBeAg seroclearance was observed between mutation groups (pcG1896A = 57.1% vs no pcG1896A = 54.3%, P = .7). Significantly higher cumulative proportion of HBsAg seroclearance was observed in patients without this mutation (pcG1896A = 0% vs no pcG1896A = 36.9%, P < .001), even after adjusting for baseline HBsAg quantification and anti-HBV agent (P < .001). In conclusion, lacking the pcG1896A mutation before ARV initiation appeared to increase HBsAg seroclearance rates during treatment. The therapeutic implications of this mutation need further exploration in this setting.

Viral Biomarkers in Chronic HBeAg Negative HBV Infection

Viral biomarkers are important tools for monitoring chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg) negative infection, both in its natural course as well as during and after treatment. The biomarkers consist of antibodies against viral epitopes, viral proteins, and molecular surrogate markers of the quantity and transcriptional activity of the stable episomal HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) which is located in the nuclei of the infected hepatocytes. HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or else viral load measurement in plasma or serum is a marker of HBV replication of major clinical importance. HBV DNA is used for staging and treatment monitoring as described in international scientific guidelines. Quantification of HBV antigens, mainly hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as well as Hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg), play an important yet secondary role, especially in cases of low or undetectable HBV DNA and has been evaluated for the classification of the inactive carrier state, as a predictor of subsequent HBsAg clearance, treatment outcome, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The measurement of the replicative intermediate HBV RNA in serum is currently evaluated and may also prove to be a significant biomarker particularly in patients treated with nucleot(s)ide analogs. This review focuses on the viral biomarkers mentioned above and their role in HBV, HBeAg negative, infection.

Poor Sensitivity of Commercial Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Hepatitis B e Antigen in Senegal, West Africa

Limited access to nucleic acid tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is a significant barrier to the effective management of chronic HBV infection in resource-poor countries. Alternatively, HBV e antigen (HBeAg) may accurately indicate high viral replication. We assessed the diagnostic performance of three commercially available rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for HBeAg (SD Bioline, Insight and OneStep) against a quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA, Architect). Using stored sera from adults with chronic HBV infection, we tested RDTs in three groups in Senegal (48 HBeAg-positive, 196 HBeAg-negative, and 117 cases with high HBV DNA (≥ 10⁶ IU/mL)) and one group in France (17 HBeAg-positive East Asians). In Senegal, the sensitivity and specificity for HBeAg detection were 29.8% and 100% for SD Bioline, 31.1% and 100% for Insight, and 42.5% and 98.4% for OneStep, respectively. The lower limits of detection of these RDTs were very high (> 2.5 log10 Paul Ehrlich Institut units/mL). Their low sensitivity was also confirmed in HBeAg-positive Asian samples (35.3-52.9%). The prevalence of HBeAg in highly viremic (≥ 10⁶ IU/mL) Senegalese patients was low: 58.1% using CLIA and 24.5-37.5% using RDTs. Hepatitis B e antigen prevalence was similarly low in a subgroup of 28 Senegalese women of childbearing age with a high viral load (≥ 10⁶ IU/mL). Approximately, half of highly viremic adults do not carry HBeAg in Africa, and HBeAg RDTs had remarkably poor analytical and diagnostic sensitivity. This implies that HBeAg-based antenatal screening, particularly if using the currently available HBeAg RDTs, may overlook most pregnant women at high risk of mother-to-child transmission in Africa.

Intensification with pegylated interferon during treatment with tenofovir in HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients

In hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) positive patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) mono-infection, intensification of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment with pegylated interferon (PegIFN) could help induce higher HBeAg seroclearance rates. Our aim was to determine the long-term effect of adding PegIFN to tenofovir (TDF)-containing antiretroviral therapy on seroclearance in HBeAg-positive patients co-infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV. In this prospective matched cohort study, 46 patients with 1-year PegIFN intensification during TDF-containing antiretroviral therapy (TDF+PegIFN) were matched 1:1 to controls undergoing TDF without PegIFN (TDF) using a time-dependent propensity score based on age, CD4+ count and liver cirrhosis status. Kinetics of HBeAg quantification (qHBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen quantification (qHBsAg) were estimated using mixed-effect linear regression and time to HBeAg seroclearance or HBsAg seroclearance was modelled using proportional hazards regression. At baseline, previous TDF exposure was a median 39.8 months (IQR=21.4-59.4) and median qHBeAg and qHBsAg levels were 6.9 PEIU/mL and 3.72 log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively (P>.5 between groups). Median follow-up was 33.4 months (IQR=19.0-36.3). During intensification, faster average declines of qHBeAg (-0.066 vs -0.027 PEIU/mL/month, P=.001) and qHBsAg (-0.049 vs -0.026 log₁₀ IU/mL/month, P=.09) were observed in patients undergoing TDF+PegIFN vs TDF, respectively. After intensification, qHBeAg and qHBsAg decline was no different between groups (P=.7 and P=.9, respectively). Overall, no differences were observed in HBeAg seroclearance (TDF+PegIFN=13.2 vs TDF=12.6/100 person·years, P=.5) or HBsAg seroclearance rates (TDF+PegIFN=1.8 vs TDF=1.3/100 person·years, P=.7). In conclusion, PegIFN intensification in HBeAg-positive co-infected patients did not lead to increased rates of HBeAg or HBsAg clearance, despite faster declines of antigen levels while on PegIFN.

Decay of ccc-DNA marks persistence of intrahepatic viral DNA synthesis under tenofovir in HIV-HBV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In the presence of highly-potent antivirals, persistence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is most well-characterized by covalently-closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and total intrahepatic DNA (IH-DNA). We sought to determine how antiviral therapy could affect their levels during human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HBV co-infection.

METHODS

Sixty co-infected patients from a well-defined cohort with ⩾1 liver biopsy were studied. HBV cccDNA and total IH-DNA were extracted from biopsies and quantified by real-time PCR. Factors associated with intrahepatic viral load were determined using mixed-effect linear regression and half-life viral kinetics during reconstructed follow-up using non-linear exponential decay models.

RESULTS

At biopsy, 35 (58.3%) patients were hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 33 (55.0%) had detectable plasma HBV-DNA (median=4.58log10IU/ml, IQR=2.95-7.43). Overall, median cccDNA was -0.95log10copies/cell (IQR=-1.70, -0.17) and total IH-DNA was 0.27log10copies/cell (IQR=-0.39, 2.00). In multivariable analysis, significantly lower levels of cccDNA and total IH-DNA were observed in patients with HBeAg-negative serology, nadir CD4(+) cell counts >250/mm(3), and longer cumulative TDF-duration, but not lamivudine- or adefovir-duration. In post-hoc analysis using reconstructed TDF-duration (median 29.6months, IQR=15.0-36.1, n=31), average half-life of cccDNA was estimated at 9.2months (HBeAg-positive=8.6, HBeAg-negative=26.2) and total IH DNA at 5.8months (HBeAg-positive=1.3, HBeAg-negative=13.6). Intrahepatic viral loads remained detectable for all patients, even with prolonged TDF-exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

In co-infection, TDF-use is associated with lower levels of HBV replication intermediates and cccDNA. Slow decay of intrahepatic viral loads underscores that TDF is unable to completely block intracellular viral DNA synthesis, which possibly accounts for continuous replenishment of the cccDNA pool.

LAY SUMMARY

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a persistent infection, while the only real way of knowing the extent of this persistence is through measuring levels of virus in the liver. In this study, we examine levels of HBV in the liver among patients with both HBV and human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, infection. It would appear that the currently available medication, namely "tenofovir", works well to decrease virus levels in the liver, but it remains at low levels despite long periods of treatment.

Cost-Effective In-House Neutralization Assay for the Confirmation of HBeAg

BACKGROUND & AIM

Hepatitis B virus-e-antigen (HBeAg) is an affordable viral marker to assess viral replication kinetics and response to antiviral therapy. In the absence of confirmatory assays, discrepant or false-positive HBeAg results are resolved by screening for other HBV markers. We standardized an in-house HBeAg neutralization assay (HBeAg-NT) to confirm HBeAg in clinical samples.

METHODS

The performance and reliability of this assay were evaluated by first WHO International Standard for HBeAg (first WHO-IS HBeAg) from Paul Ehrlich Institute and clinical samples (n = 150) from chronic HBV carriers. Of these, 71 HBeAg-positive sera were used for HBeAg-NT.

RESULTS

Concentrations spanning 0.25-10 U of first WHO-IS HBeAg and clinical samples (S/Co ranges from 1.00 to 10.00) were neutralized completely in the HBeAg-NT.

CONCLUSIONS

HBeAg-NT is a simple, cost-effective, and reliable direct approach to confirm HBeAg in clinical samples which precludes the need for screening additional HBV markers in low resource settings.

Hepatitis B surface antigen quantification as a predictor of seroclearance during treatment in HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfected patients from Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In Sub-Saharan Africa, seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg), including their quantifiable markers, have rarely been evaluated during long-term antiviral treatment among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study from two randomized-control trials in Côte d'Ivoire, 161 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-HBV coinfected patients starting lamivudine (n = 76) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (n = 85) containing antiretroviral therapy were included. HBV DNA was quantified using an in-house assay (detection limit = 12 copies/mL) and HBsAg quantification (qHBsAg) using the Elecsys assay.

RESULTS

Overall, 33 (20.5%) patients were HBeAg positive, 121 (75.2%) had detectable HBV DNA, and 92/93 (98.9%) harbored HBV genotype E. Median treatment duration was 35.5 months (interquartile range: 24.3-36.4). Among HBeAg-positive patients, cumulative proportion with HBeAg seroclearance was 46.3% (n = 14). Overall, cumulative proportion of HBsAg seroclearance was 6.6% (n = 10). Lower baseline qHBsAg levels and strong 12-month declines in qHBsAg were significantly associated with HBsAg seroclearance for both HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive patients. When taken at certain levels, these determinants provided moderate sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) in predicting HBsAg seroclearance at month 36 (≤ 1000 IU/mL at baseline, Se = 0.80, Sp = 0.80; ≥ 1.0 log10  IU/mL drop at month 12, Se = 0.57, Sp = 1.00). Instead, qHBsAg levels ≤ 100 or ≤ 10 IU/mL at month 12 were optimal (both Se = 0.90 and Sp = 1.00). Detectable HBV-DNA provided fairly high Se and Sp when evaluated at baseline (Se = 1.00, Sp = 0.80), but not at month 12 (Se = 0.80, Sp = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg seroclearance rates are not common in patients from Sub-Saharan Africa treated with anti-HBV containing antiretroviral therapy. qHBsAg levels at 12 months of treatment may accurately predict HBsAg seroclearance.

Use of hepatitis B surface and "e" antigen quantification during extensive treatment with tenofovir in patients co-infected with HIV-HBV

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV, hepatitis B 'e' antigen (qHBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen quantification (qHBsAg) may be used to predict short-term HBeAg and HBsAg loss, respectively. To determine if these quantifiable markers also provide accurate prediction of antigen loss during long-term, extensive tenofovir (TDF) treatment and to further establish qHBsAg profiles associated with HBsAg seroconversion.

METHODS

Prospective study of 111 co-infected, antiretroviral-experienced patients undergoing a TDF-containing regimen for >12 months. HBV-DNA viral load, qHBeAg [Paul Ehrlich Institute Units (PEIU)/ml] and qHBsAg were quantified at baseline and every 6-12 months. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of qHBeAg criteria were calculated using a time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curve, and qHBsAg profiles were developed using a group-based trajectory model.

RESULTS

After a median 74.2 months (IQR: 33.1-94.7) of TDF treatment, four patients had HBsAg seroconversion. Among the 78 (70.3%) HBeAg-positive patients, cumulative proportion with HBeAg loss was 42.0% (n = 23) at month 96. Baseline qHBeAg ≤100 PEIU/ml was the only significant factor for HBeAg loss (adjusted-HR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.02-5.46) in multivariable analysis. In terms of predicting HBeAg-loss until month 96, qHBeAg ≤10 PEIU/ml was more accurate when evaluated at month 24 (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.80) than month 12 (Se = 0.48, Sp = 0.90). All four patients with HBsAg seroconversion had profiles with large decreases in qHBsAg (>2 log10 IU/ml), not necessarily occurring during the first 12 months, which was infrequent in patients without seroconversion (8.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantifying hepatitis 'e' antigen during the first 2 years of TDF treatment is a practical tool in predicting long-term HBeAg loss. Non time-specific declines in qHBsAg may be a useful indicator of HBsAg seroconversion.

Coexistence of circulating HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies in chronic hepatitis B carriers is not a simple analytical artifact and does not influence HBsAg quantification

BACKGROUND

Presence at the same time of HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies (HBsAg/Ab) is an entity sometimes encountered in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) carriers.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to characterize such serological profiles and to assess the reliability of serological marker quantification by three commercially available assays in this setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Among 2578 CHB identified patients, 129 (5%) had an HBsAg/Ab profile as determined by Abbott Architect. After exclusion of co-infections (HIV, HCV, HDV), HBV reactivation or HBIg treatment, 101 samples from 62 patients were tested for HBsAg and anti-HBs quantification using Architect, DiaSorin Liaison-XL and Roche Modular-Cobas. Influence of genotype and HBsAg variants was studied in 31 samples with HBV replication.

RESULTS

HBsAg detection was confirmed with the 3 techniques for 98% (n = 99) of the samples while the HBsAg/Ab profile was concordant between all techniques for 65% of them. The overall correlation between the 3 HBsAg quantification techniques was good (R(2): 0.94-0.97). The median HBsAg concentration was comparable for the 99 samples whatever the used technique but a bias of -0.11 and 0.02 log IU/mL were noticed for DiaSorin and Roche compared to Abbott, respectively. Anti-HBs quantifications were poorly correlated between techniques with major discrepancies observed. Genotype and substitutions within the "a" determinant showed an impact on HBsAg quantification.

CONCLUSIONS

The double HBsAg/Ab profile is not an analytical artifact and is confirmed on all commercially available techniques. While such profile does not influence HBsAg quantification, differences of HBsAg quantification were noticed according to HBV genotype or HBsAg variant.

Persistent viremia in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis B coinfected patients undergoing long-term tenofovir: virological and clinical implications

Tenofovir (TDF) is considered the ideal treatment for patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, certain coinfected patients exhibit incomplete viral suppression, with persistent, and sometimes transient, bouts of HBV replication. The reasons for this, including clinical effect, are unclear. A total of 111 HIV-HBV-infected patients undergoing TDF-containing antiretroviral therapy were prospectively followed. Serum HBV-DNA viral load, hepatitis surface (HBsAg) and e antigen (HBeAg) status were obtained at baseline and every 6-12 months. Amino acid (aa) changes on the polymerase gene were assessed using direct sequencing after nested polymerase chain reaction in patients with persistent viremia (PV). After a median of 74.7 months (interquartile range: 33.4-94.7), virological response (VR; <60 IU/mL) occurred in 96 of 111 (86.5%) patients. Of these, 86 of 96 (89.6%) remained completely undetectable during follow-up (stabilized VR). The remaining 10 of 96 (10.4%) patients had a transient blip of detectable HBV-DNA (transient PV), during which time 9 of 9 (100%) with available samples had detectable plasma TDF. Low-level PV (LL-PV; 61-2,000 IU/mL) was observed in 11 of 111 (9.9%) patients, the majority of which had detectable plasma TDF (8 of 9; 88.9%). High-level PV (>2,000 IU/mL) was rare (4 of 111; 3.6%) and was associated with nonadherence. At TDF initiation, patients with stabilized VR had significantly higher nadir CD4(+) count, compared to those with transient PV (P = 0.006) or LL-PV (P = 0.04). No consistent aa changes, other than those associated with lamivudine resistance, were observed in patients with persistent viremia. Importantly, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion, and HBsAg loss only occurred in patients with stabilized VR. Two patients with stabilized VR developed hepatocellular carcinoma and 2 with LL PV died, 1 of a liver-related cause.

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal HBV control during TDF treatment has a negative effect on serological outcomes, but not necessarily clinical events. Immunoregulation may provide more insight into this phenomenon.