Architect i2000 SR has improved turnaround time for infectious disease serology testing over Vitros ECiQ.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2020;
97:115049. [PMID:
32340767 DOI:
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115049]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Vitros ECiQ and Architect i2000 SR are two automated instruments used to detect serology biomarkers of hepatitis A, B and C viruses, and HIV infections. We compared performance of the Architect to the Vitro EciQ after implementation at our institution.
METHODS
A retrospective review was performed to compare patient samples tested on the Vitros ECiQ or Architect for hepatitis and HIV serological assays. The positivity rate, frequency of equivocal results, turnaround times (TAT), and hands-on time (HOT) were analyzed.
RESULTS
There was no statistical difference in the positivity rate between the two instruments, with the exception of two assays. An increase in equivocal results was observed for the Architect (0.2% vs 0.5%). Notably, the TAT for the Architect i2000 was shorter for all except one assay (31.6 vs 33.7 hours) and demonstrated improved workflow.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, both instruments performed comparably. Architect had shorter TAT over Vitros.
Collapse