1
|
Massey PR, Schmults CD, Li SJ, Arron ST, Asgari MM, Bavinck JNB, Billingsley E, Blalock TW, Blasdale K, Carroll BT, Carucci JA, Chong AH, Christensen SR, Chung CL, DeSimone JA, Ducroux E, Escutia-Muñoz B, Ferrándiz-Pulido C, Fox MC, Genders RE, Geusau A, Gjersvik P, Hanlon AM, Harken EBO, Hofbauer GF, Hopkins RS, Leitenberger JJ, Loss MJ, Del Marmol V, Mascaró JM, Myers SA, Nguyen BT, Oliveira WRP, Otley CC, Proby CM, Rácz E, Ruiz-Salas V, Samie FH, Seçkin D, Shah SN, Shin TM, Shumack SP, Soon SL, Stasko T, Zavattaro E, Zeitouni NC, Zwald FO, Harwood CA, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Prevention of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Consensus Statement. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:1219-1226. [PMID: 34468690 PMCID: PMC9937447 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There is a paucity of evidence to guide physicians regarding prevention strategies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). OBJECTIVE To examine the development and results of a Delphi process initiated to identify consensus-based medical management recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. EVIDENCE REVIEW Dermatologists with more than 5 years' experience treating SOTRs were invited to participate. A novel actinic damage and skin cancer index (AD-SCI), consisting of 6 ordinal stages corresponding to an increasing burden of actinic damage and CSCC, was used to guide survey design. Three sequential web-based surveys were administered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Pursuant to Delphi principles, respondents thoroughly reviewed all peer responses between rounds. Supplemental questions were also asked to better understand panelists' rationale for their responses. FINDINGS The Delphi panel comprised 48 dermatologists. Respondents represented 13 countries, with 27 (56%) from the US. Twenty-nine respondents (60%) were Mohs surgeons. Consensus was reached with 80% or higher concordance among respondents when presented with a statement, question, or management strategy pertaining to prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. A near-consensus category of 70% to less than 80% concordance was also defined. The AD-SCI stage-based recommendations were established if consensus or near-consensus was achieved. The panel was able to make recommendations for 5 of 6 AD-SCI stages. Key recommendations include the following: cryotherapy for scattered actinic keratosis (AK); field therapy for AK when grouped in 1 anatomical area, unless AKs are thick in which case field therapy and cryotherapy were recommended; combination lesion directed and field therapy with fluorouracil for field cancerized skin; and initiation of acitretin therapy and discussion of immunosuppression reduction or modification for patients who develop multiple skin cancers at a high rate (10 CSCCs per year) or develop high-risk CSCC (defined by a tumor with approximately ≥20% risk of nodal metastasis). No consensus recommendation was achieved for SOTRs with a first low risk CSCC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physicians may consider implementation of panel recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs while awaiting high-level-of-evidence data. Additional clinical trials are needed in areas where consensus was not reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R. Massey
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chrysalyne D. Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara J. Li
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah T. Arron
- Sarah Arron MD, A Professional Corporation, San Mateo, California
| | - Maryam M. Asgari
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Travis W. Blalock
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katie Blasdale
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Bryan T. Carroll
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio,Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John A. Carucci
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York
| | - Alvin H. Chong
- Skin Health Institute, Victoria, Australia,Department of Medicine (Dermatology), St Vincent’s Hospital Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sean R. Christensen
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christina Lee Chung
- Montgomery Dermatology, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania,Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Emilie Ducroux
- Dermatology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | | | - Carla Ferrándiz-Pulido
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matthew C. Fox
- Division of Dermatology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| | - Roel E. Genders
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Geusau
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Petter Gjersvik
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Allison M. Hanlon
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - R. Samuel Hopkins
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | | | - Manisha J. Loss
- Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - José M. Mascaró
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sarah A. Myers
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bichchau T. Nguyen
- Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Dermatology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Walmar R. P. Oliveira
- Department of Dermatology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Clark C. Otley
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Charlotte M. Proby
- Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Emőke Rácz
- Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Veronica Ruiz-Salas
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Faramarz H. Samie
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Deniz Seçkin
- Department of Dermatology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Syed N. Shah
- Department of Dermatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Thuzar M. Shin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Seaver L. Soon
- Scripps Green Hospital, Private Practice (The Skin Clinic MD), San Diego, California
| | - Thomas Stasko
- Department of Dermatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Elisa Zavattaro
- Dermatology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Nathalie C. Zeitouni
- Medical Dermatology Specialists, Phoenix, Arizona,Division of Dermatology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix
| | - Fiona O’Reilly Zwald
- Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia,O’Reilly Comprehensive Dermatology Inc, Atlanta, Georgia,Mount Vernon Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Catherine A. Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts, United Kingdom,The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voiculescu VM, Lisievici CV, Lupu M, Vajaitu C, Draghici CC, Popa AV, Solomon I, Sebe TI, Constantin MM, Caruntu C. Mediators of Inflammation in Topical Therapy of Skin Cancers. Mediators Inflamm 2019; 2019:8369690. [PMID: 30766448 PMCID: PMC6350587 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8369690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Taking into consideration that the immune system plays a very important role in the development of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, which have a high prevalence in immunosuppressed patients and after prolonged ultraviolet radiation, the interest in developing novel therapies, in particular targeting the inflammation in cancer, has increased in the past years. The latest data suggest that therapies such as imiquimod (IMQ), ingenol mebutate (IM), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), retinoids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used with success in the topical treatment of some cancers. Herein, we review the topical treatment targeting the inflammation in skin cancer and the mechanisms involved in these processes. Currently, various associations have shown a superior success rate than monotherapy, such as systemic acitretin and topical IMQ, topical 5-FU with tretinoin cream, or IMQ with checkpoint inhibitor cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4. Novel therapies targeting Toll-like receptor-7 (TLR-7) with higher selectivity than IMQ are also of great interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad Mihai Voiculescu
- Department of Dermatology, “ELIAS” University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Mihai Lupu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania, Bucharest, Romania
- Dermatology Clinic, MedAs Medical Center, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristina Vajaitu
- Department of Dermatology, “ELIAS” University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Iulia Solomon
- Department of Dermatology, “ELIAS” University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Teona Ioana Sebe
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania, Bucharest, Romania
- The Clinic of Plastic Surgery Reconstructive Microsurgery, Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
| | - Maria Magdalena Constantin
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania, Bucharest, Romania
- 2nd Department of Dermatology, “Colentina” Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Constantin Caruntu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Dermatology, Prof. “N Paulescu” National Institute of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|