Clinical audit of posterior three-unit fixed-movable resin-bonded fixed partial dentures – A retrospective, preliminary clinical investigation

Posterior two-unit cantilevered zirconia resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A 3-year prospective single-arm clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the longevity of cantilevered zirconia-based resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) in replacing missing posterior teeth, as well as the quality of life and patient satisfaction experienced by those receiving zirconia RBFPDs.

METHODS

A prospective single-arm uncontrolled clinical trial was conducted to replace one or more missing premolars or molars with a span of 5 to 8 mm using cantilevered zirconia RBFPDs. Thirty-six participants with 40 prostheses were recruited and underwent a 3-year clinical evaluation. The retainer designs included a minimum thickness of 0.8mm, a minimum of 200° circumferential wraparound with an occlusal bar, and a connector dimension of 3 × 3 mm. Patient-reported outcomes, including patient satisfaction and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), were assessed.

RESULTS

The average age of participants was 45.8 years, and 72.5% were women. The success rate of the posterior zirconia RBFPDs was 76.2%, with an estimated mean survival duration of 46.1 months. The survival rate was 88.1%, with an estimated mean success duration of 49.4 months. Participants were highly satisfied with the treatment, achieving an average satisfaction score of 80.8 ± 11.9. Participants' total OHIP scores decreased from 52.3 to 39.6 after 3 years, indicating a significant improvement in oral health-related quality of life (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

After 3 years, a moderately high survival rate and favourable patient-reported outcomes of posterior cantilevered zirconia RBFPDs were achieved. Therefore, it can be recommended as a conservative treatment option to replace missing posterior teeth, provided that retainer design considerations are taken into account.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Cantilevered zirconia RBFPDs for posterior teeth can serve as a conservative treatment option that is both aesthetically pleasing and biocompatible. It offers a more cost-effective alternative compared to dental implants, which are often prohibitively expensive for the majority of patients. This approach has the potential to greatly improve patient-reported outcomes.

Long-term clinical outcome of three-unit fixed-fixed posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term clinical outcome of posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs) with a modified design made from zirconia ceramic.

METHODS

In 30 patients thirty 3-unit IRFDPs were placed to replace 7 premolars (4 in the maxilla, 3 in the mandible), and 23 first molars (15 in the maxilla, 8 in the mandible). Preparations were accomplished in agreement with the general principles for ceramic inlay restorations and modified with a short retainer-wing bevel preparation within the enamel at the buccal and oral sides. The frameworks were milled from 3Y-TZP ceramic, and the pontics were veneered with feldspathic ceramic. All IRFDPs were bonded with a phosphate monomer containing luting resin after air-abrasion of the intaglio surfaces. The patients were recalled 6-12 months after placement, and then annually. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the survival and complication rates of the IRFDPs.

RESULTS

The mean observation time was 10.6 ± 1.5 years. The 10-year cumulative survival rate was 89% with 4 failures, two of them were due to deep secondary caries with loss of retention, one due to repeated debonding with enamel fractures, and one due to generalized progressive periodontitis. The most common complication was chipping of the veneering ceramic (20.1%). Eighteen IRFDPs were free of any type of complication up to 15.4 years, which corresponds to a 10-year cumulative success rate of 70.4%.

CONCLUSION

The long-term clinical performance of modified IRFDPs made of veneered zirconia ceramics was favorable after 10 years, therefore, they represent a treatment alternative to replace posterior single missing teeth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Zirconia-based IRFDPs fabricated in the modified design may represent a substance-preserving alternative to conventional posterior FDPs to replace posterior single missing teeth, particularly in cases where implants cannot be placed, and when the adjacent teeth already have small restorations or defects.

Retention durability of one-retainer versus two-retainer posterior RBFDPs after chewing simulation

The clinical use of one-retainer RBFDPs in the anterior region has shown higher survival rates compared to conventional two-retainer RBFDPs. The motivation for this study was to assess the validity of this observation when extended to the posterior region. The aim was thus to evaluate different preparation and framework designs for replacing premolars, particularly one-retainer versus two-retainer designs, on the retention of monolithic zirconia posterior RBFDPs. Extracted caries-free human premolars and third molars were embedded in auto-curing resin to create models with an edentulous space of premolar width. Abutment teeth were prepared according to these six designs (n = 8 each): one or two upper retainers with narrow rests, one or two upper retainers with wide rests, and one or two-retainers with wide rests. RBFDPs were milled from monolithic zirconia (KATANA Zirconia HT), and were adhesively bonded using Panavia V5 with corresponding primers. After thermodynamic loading, the quasi-static tensile force required for failure was determined. Failure modes were evaluated using a microscope. Survival rates after thermodynamic loading were 75% for one group (one upper-molar retainer with narrow rest), 100% for the other groups. The debonding forces ranged from 310 ± 224 N (group one upper-molar retainer with narrow rest) to 927 ± 292 N (group two upper retainers with narrow rests). Two-retainer designs failed at significantly higher tensile forces than designs with one retainer (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences between upper and lower designs, or rest widths. Although RBFDPs with two retainers withstood higher debonding forces, RBFDPs with one retainer and wide rest still have a high potential for clinical treatment because of the high forces required for their debonding.

Retention of posterior resin bonded fixed dental prostheses with different designs after chewing simulation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different preparation and framework designs on the retention of posterior resin bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) made from monolithic zirconia ceramic. Forty-eight caries-free upper premolars and forty-eight upper third molars were used in this study. The teeth were randomly divided into six main groups (n = 8 each) according to the preparation design of two-retainer RBFDPs: narrow or wide rest, combined with 0, 1 or 2 retainer wings. All RBFDPs were milled from monolithic zirconia (KATANA Zirconia ML). They were bonded using Panavia V5 with its corresponding primer, and underwent thermodynamic loading (98 N, 1,200,000 cycles). Retention was evaluated for the surviving RBFDPs in a universal testing machine by means of a debonding test. Failure modes were evaluated using a light microscope. Data was statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Shapiro-Wilk followed by Mann-Whitney with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. The survival rates after the chewing simulation were 75% (group narrow rest/no retainer wing), 62.5% (group wide rest/no retainer wing) and 100% (the other groups). The mean retention ranged from 31 N to 766 N. Designs with two retainer wings showed significantly higher bond strength than the other designs (p ≤ 0.05). The rest width did not show a significant effect on the retention. Posterior RBFDPs with a modified design (occlusal rest and two retainer wings) exhibited promising durability and retention. Designs with two additional retainer wings should be preferred over designs with one or no retainer wing, irrespectively of the rest width.

A randomised controlled trial of two-unit cantilevered or three-unit fixed-movable resin-bonded fixed partial dentures replacing missing molars

OBJECTIVE

To examine the short-term clinical performance and patient-reported outcomes of two-unit cantilevered (CL2) and three-unit fixed-movable (FM3) RBFPDs for replacement of single molar-sized spans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects with an 8-10 mm molar-sized edentulous span(s) and 12 pairs of occluding units were randomly assigned to receive either CL2 or FM3 RBFPD (ratio 1:1). The survival (retention of original prosthesis) and success (survival, complication-free) of RBFPDs at one-year were analysed. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by prosthesis satisfactory questionnaire and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49). Data in mean, proportion and longevity were analysed by t-test/Mann-Whitney U test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test, chi-square and log-rank tests respectively at significance level α = 0.05.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02239718.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight RBFPDs (42 CL2 and 56 FM3) were delivered in eighty-three patients. Majority (n = 89) of the prostheses were provided by operators who have less than 2 years of clinical experience. Sixty-six patients with seventy-eight RBFPDs (35 CL2 and 43 FM3) were reviewed at one-year. One CL2 and one FM3 RBFPDs debonded, resulting in a success rate at 97.1 % and 97.7 % respectively (P > 0.05). Both RBFPDs were rebonded and the survival rate were 100 % for both designs. No significant difference in satisfactions and summary OHIP-49 scores were observed (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CL2 RBFPDs can be used for replacing molar-sized edentulous spans with minimal observable complications up to one-year. Longer-term data is being collected.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This clinical trial demonstrates CL2 RBFPDs have comparable clinical and patient-reported outcomes as the FM3 design. This challenges the current dogma in prosthodontics and expands the clinical use of CL2 design which is more conservative, simpler and easier for patients to maintain.

Ten-year clinical evaluation of posterior fixed-movable resin-bonded fixed partial dentures

OBJECTIVES

Two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) offer long-term retention for anterior and premolar-sized spans. At this center, molar and longer spans have been restored with fixed-movable (FM) RBFPDs to overcome the lower retention rates of fixed-fixed RBFPDs. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term longevity and the patient-reported outcomes of posterior FM-RBFPDs.

METHODS

Posterior FM-RBFPDs that had been inserted at least five years were reviewed. Survival was "retention of the original prosthesis in mouth" and success was "survival of prosthesis and absence of complications requiring treatment intervention". Prosthesis location, number of units, insertion year, tooth/teeth replaced and operator experience were collected. Patients' acceptance to FM-RBFPDs were assessed using prosthesis satisfaction questionnaire and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49). Results were analyzed using log-rank and cox-regression tests at significance level α = 0.05.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-one prostheses were examined. The mean observation time was 126.4 ± 32.2 months. Thirty-six (35.6%) and 63 (62.4%) FM-RBFPDs were rated as success and survival respectively. Prostheses inserted after year 2001 (n = 69) experienced 42.0% (n = 29) success and 75.4% (n = 52) survival, and its survival rate was significantly better than those inserted in or before 2001 (p = 0.01). Five- and ten-year cumulative survival probability of FM-RBFPDs inserted after year 2001 were 82.3% and 74.1% respectively. The most frequent complications were debonding among 34 (33.7%) prostheses. Patients' acceptance were high.

CONCLUSIONS

More recently inserted prostheses showed improved longevity and patients' acceptance to posterior FM-RBFPDs were high.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Fix-Movable RBFPDs are a viable tooth replacement option in the posterior region.