Survival time of post and cores: A 16 year retrospective follow-up study

How long must a post be? A retrospective survival analysis on a large cohort with long follow-ups

OBJECTIVES

Post and core (PC) is frequently used, but clinical evidence concerning how long a post must be is scarce. Recommendations in dental literature range from half of the root which should be incorporated, to post space preparations conducted as deep as possible increasing the risk for root perforation thus tooth loss. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective survival analysis is to evaluate the post length as well as the post-clinical crown ratio on a large patient cohort with long follow-ups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall 1026 PC in 731 patients could be included in this study (2004-2023). The files were analysed due to the parameters post length and post-clinical crown ratio on X-Ray. Furthermore, the influence of the type of covering prosthetic restoration, location, type of tooth, luting material, PC material, bone attachment and therapist was evaluated. The statistical analysis was assessed using Kaplan-Meier (univariate influences) and Cox regression (multifactorial influences).

RESULTS

Survival until extraction as well as decementation was significantly influenced by bone attachment and covering prosthetic restoration. Posts reaching the middle third of the root showed highly significant (p < 0.001) better survival probabilities than those reaching the coronal or apical third. Regarding the post-clinical crown ratio, no significant difference was found for post = crown/post > crown, whereas post

CONCLUSIONS

The post space preparation should not be extended over the middle third of the root, but has to be deep enough to ensure that the post is at least as long as the clinical crown.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Against the background of the large sample size and the long follow-ups, the results of this retrospective survival analysis are suitable to give general recommendations regarding how long a post has to be in order to ensure the best survival probability for PC treatment.

Collapse

Key Words

• Cox regression
• Kaplan-Meier analysis
• Post length
• Post-clinical crown ratio
• Survival time

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Retrospective Studies
• Follow-Up Studies
• Post and Core Technique
• Dental Restoration Failure
• Crowns
• Survival Analysis

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Sarah Marie Reich Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Kay-Arne Walther Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Bernd Wöstmann Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Peter Rehmann Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany
Jonas Adrian Helmut Vogler Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Collapse

Single crown vs. composite for glass fiber post-retained restorations: An 8-year randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the success and survival rates of metal-ceramic crowns and composite resin restorations applied in root filled teeth that received a glass fiber post.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled trial, with equivalent parallel groups was designed. Eighty-two teeth were randomly allocated to the metal-ceramic or composite resin groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with shared frailty for patients and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed using success and survival rates (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Seventy-five post-retained restorations (34 metal-ceramic crowns and 41 composite restorations) in 62 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 8.1 years [IQR 4.0-9.9]. Twenty-seven failures were observed. Twenty-two failures (81.5 %) were observed in the composite resin group, of which six (27.3 %) were not repairable. Five failures (18.5 %) were observed in the metal-ceramic crown group, of which three (66.6 %) were non-repairable. The cumulative success rate at 8 years was 85.0 % for crowns (AFR=1.31 %) and 43.2 % for composite resins (AFR=6.58 %), while the survival rate was 93.8 % for crowns (AFR=0.52 %) and 97.6 % for composite resins (AFR=0.20 %). Considering the success rates, adjusted multivariate Cox regression showed that composite resin had a Hazard Ratio of 5.07 (95 %CI, 1.99-12.89) greater than the metal-ceramic crown. No significant difference in the failure risk was observed when the survival rates were considered (HR=0.38, 95 %CI (0.10 - 1.44), p = 0.156). Co-variables did not affect the success and survival rates (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Metal-ceramic crowns showed a higher success rate than composite restorations. The survival rates were similar, but composite restorations presented a higher need for repairs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Post-retained composite restorations may need more reinterventions during the lifecycle, although more preservation of sound tooth structure is expected with a large restoration of resin post-and-core. These aspects have to be discussed with the patient for decision-making planning.

Quality of post and core placement by final year undergraduate dental students

The success of endodontic restoration of badly compromised teeth depends on the quality of post and core placement and the extra-coronal restoration. Ensuring that students place posts to acceptable quality standards is therefore essential. The aim of this study was to radiographically evaluate post placement by final year undergraduate dental students and to identify any predictors of performance. Two hundred retrospectively and randomly selected posts placed by sixth year students were evaluated radiographically. Data on student gender; number and quality of radiographs; periapical pathology; tooth location; root canal treatment quality; amount of remaining gutta percha; gap between gutta percha and post; post-to-root width; crown-to-root ratio; and types of core material and crowns were recorded. Four criteria were used to grade post placement quality: (i) amount of remaining gutta percha; (ii) gap between gutta percha and post; (iii) post width to root ratio; and (iv) crown-to-root ratio. Assessments were scored to produce final grades. Data are presented using descriptive statistics and the chi-squared test was used to investigate whether student gender or tooth location were associated with final grade. Post and core quality was acceptable in most cases (97.5% were graded as adequate), with no differences in quality between male and female students nor according to tooth location (anterior, premolar, and molar). Just over half of radiographs were adequate quality (53.5%), while just under half were assessed as less than adequate (46.5%) due to cone cutting, overlap, shortening or elongation, although this did not affect formal assessment of post quality. General outcomes of post and core placement by undergraduate students were good, with few errors that might affect the prognosis and long-term survival of treated teeth. Providing undergraduate dental students with clear guidelines on when and how to take radiographs throughout the procedure may improve the quality of post and core treatment and reduce the risk of multiple unnecessary radiographic exposures. From the clinical perspective, although dental students generally place high quality posts and cores, it remains important to monitor the quality and performance of post placement as this determines the survival of compromised teeth.

Survival of teeth treated with post and core - A retrospective study of more than 1000 cases with observation periods up to 18 years

OBJECTIVES

Even if survival of post and core (PC) itself was frequently investigated in recent literature, clinical data concerning the risk for extraction of teeth restored with PC is still scarce. Since most authors found the loss of retention of refitable post and cores as the most common cause of failure, it is impossible to draw a conclusion on tooth survival on the results of those studies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to improve the clinical evidence on the survival of teeth treated with post and cores on a large number of cases over a long observation period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

735 patients were treated with 1053 post and cores in the observation period (2004-2022) and could be included in the study. The patient files were analysed due to the parameters: Type of covering prosthetic restoration, location, type of tooth, luting material, post and core material, bone attachment and therapist. The survival probability was assessed using Kaplan-Meyer analysis. Cox regression was used to assess possible multifactorial influences.

RESULTS

The overall average survival time until necessary extraction of a tooth restored with a post and core was 11.74 years. A root fracture in primary crown retained removeable partial dentures (RPDs) during the first five years was the most common reason for extraction in this study. A significant influence on the survival time of teeth restored with post and cores was found for the type of covering restoration, bone attachment, age of the patient and post and core material.

CONCLUSIONS

Post and core restored teeth should be avoided as abutments for primary crown retained RPDs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

If it is inevitable to utilise post and core restored teeth for primary crown retained RPDs, post and core materials with matching mechanical properties to that of dentine should be preferred.

Fibre-reinforced Cad/CAM post and cores: The new "gold standard" for anterior teeth with extensive coronal destruction?-A fully digital chairside workflow

Objectives

Since one-third of persons suffer a dental trauma, treatment of anterior teeth using post and core (PC) is becoming important. In teeth with extensive destruction, cast PC (CPC) remain the "gold standard", even though they lead to aesthetic impairment and have a mismatching elastic modulus to that of dentin. Prefabricated fibre-reinforced posts have elastic modulus similar to that of dentin but the accuracy of fit and mechanical stability are worse. This study was aimed to evaluate the deviation and mechanical performance of fibre-reinforced CAD/CAM PC (FRPC) fabricated in a fully digital chairside workflow, compared to those of CPC.

Methods

On 30 teeth, a PC preparation was conducted, and a conventional and digital post impression were taken with an intraoral scanner. Fifteen teeth each were treated with CPC and FRPC, respectively. The deviation was evaluated by superimposing the datasets of the digitalised stone models and digital post impressions. Decementation and root fracture during chewing simulation were analysed by microscopy and X-ray. Statistical analysis was performed by pairwise comparison and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

The median deviation for the "coronal", "middle" and "apical" were 14.5, 18.0 and 113.7 μm, respectively. The pairwise comparison for "coronal"/"middle" showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for "coronal"/"apical" and "middle"/"apical" showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001). After chewing simulation, five decementations and two root fractures were detected for CPC. For FRPC, neither decementation nor root fracture were documented.

Significance

Within the limitations of this study, FRPC performed significantly better than CPC.

Survival time of post and cores after recementation: A 16-year retrospective study with special focus on loss of retention

OBJECTIVES

Numerous studies investigating the survival time of post and cores have found that loss of retention is the most common cause of failure Nevertheless, investigations focusing on decementation, survival after recementation, and the influencing parameters in a large number of patients with long follow-up periods are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this short communication article is the survival analysis of post and cores after recementation and repeated loss of retention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the observation period (2004-2020), 653 patients received 953 post and cores. From these, 112 post and cores which suffered loss of retention were selected. The patient files were analysed for the following parameters: Type of covering prosthetic restoration, location, type of tooth, luting material, post and core material, bone attachment and therapist. The survival time until loss of retention or repeated decementations after recementation was documented. Survival probability was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The average time until decementation was 13.33 years. The cumulative decementation rate was 11.8%, while in 42.0% of the cases, post and cores showed multiple losses of retention. A significant influence (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was recorded for the type of covering prosthetic restoration, type of tooth, luting material, post and core material and bone attachment. The multifactorial survival analysis (Cox regression) showed a significant influence of patient's age and the type of covering prosthetic restoration.

CONCLUSIONS

Once decementation occurs, recementation neither guarantees definitive fit nor necessarily predetermines repeated decementations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Post and cores should be avoided under primary crown-retained removable partial dentures (RPD). If this treatment is inevitable, a continuous follow-up is necessary to check the denture for proper fit to the tissues to prevent overloading on the post and core.